-
Doxycycline and minocycline in Helicobacter pylori treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Helicobacter Oct 2021The decreasing Helicobacter pylori eradication rate and the increasing antibiotic resistance trend are of great concern. Therefore, new and effective therapies are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
The decreasing Helicobacter pylori eradication rate and the increasing antibiotic resistance trend are of great concern. Therefore, new and effective therapies are needed for H. pylori infection. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of semisynthetic tetracycline regimens in H. pylori treatment.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were searched. The outcome indicators were the eradication rate, risk ratio (RR, ie, the risk of the semisynthetic tetracycline regimen relative to the control), and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Controls were patients undergoing any other treatment without semisynthetic tetracycline.
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies with 5240 participants were included. The eradication rates of triple regimens with semisynthetic tetracyclines in most studies were less than 70% in both the intention-to-treat (ITT) and the per-protocol (PP) analyses. The pooled eradication rates of quadruple therapies with doxycycline and controls were 95% and 84% in the PP analyses, respectively. The pooled RR associated with efficacy in the quadruple therapy with doxycycline group compared with the control group was 1.12 (95% CI: 1.04-1.20) in the PP analysis. The pooled RR of side effects in the quadruple therapy with doxycycline group compared with the control group was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.65-1.55).
CONCLUSION
Seven-day and ten-day quadruple therapy with doxycycline might be an optional first-line therapy. The safety of regimens containing semisynthetic tetracyclines was relatively satisfactory. However, the triple regimen is not recommended.
Topics: Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Doxycycline; Drug Therapy, Combination; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Humans; Minocycline; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34318971
DOI: 10.1111/hel.12839 -
Phytomedicine : International Journal... Jan 2023The presence or absence of damage to the liver organ is crucial to a person's health. Nutritional disorders, alcohol consumption, and drug abuse are the main causes of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The presence or absence of damage to the liver organ is crucial to a person's health. Nutritional disorders, alcohol consumption, and drug abuse are the main causes of liver disease. Liver transplantation is the last irrevocable option for liver disease and has become a serious economic burden worldwide. Andrographolide (AP) is one of the main active ingredients of Herba Andrographitis. It has several biological activities and has been reported to have protective and therapeutic effects against liver diseases. Earlier literature has been written on AP's role in treating inflammation and other diseases, and there has not been a systematic review on liver diseases. This review is dedicated to sorting out the research results of AP against liver diseases. Pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and nanotechnology to improve bioavailability are discussed. Finally, an outlook and assessment of its future are provided.
METHODS
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. PubMed and web of Science databases were used to search all relevant literature on AP for liver disease up to 2022.
RESULTS
Studies have shown that AP plays an important role in different liver disease phenotypes, mainly through anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities. AP regulates HO-1 and inhibits hepatitis virus replication. It affects the NF-κB pathway, downregulates inflammatory factors such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, and reduces liver damage. In preventing liver fibrosis, AP inhibits angiogenesis and activation of hepatic stellate cells and reduces oxidative stress involved in the Nrf2 and TGF-β1/Smad pathways. In addition, AP impedes the development of liver cancer by promoting apoptosis and autonomous phagocytosis in a cell-dependent way. Interestingly, miRNAs are involved in the therapeutic process of liver cancer and hepatic fibrosis. The poor solubility of AP limits the development of dosage forms. Therefore, the advent of nanoformulations has improved bioavailability. Although the effect of AP is dose- and time-dependent, the magnitude of its toxicity is not negligible. Some clinical trials have shown that AP has mild side effects.
CONCLUSIONS
AP, as an effective natural product, has a good effect on the liver disease through multiple pathways and targets. However, the dose reaches a certain level, leading to its toxicity and side effects. For better clinical application of AP, high-quality clinical and toxic intervention mechanisms are needed to validate current studies. In addition, modulation of miRNA-mediated hepatocellular carcinoma and liver fibrosis and synergistic action with drugs may be the future focus of AP. In conclusion, AP can be regarded as an important candidate for treating different liver diseases in the future.
Topics: Humans; Liver; Liver Cirrhosis; Diterpenes; NF-kappa B; Liver Neoplasms
PubMed: 36610122
DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154537 -
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Aug 2023We conducted a systematic review to assess medical therapy for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
We conducted a systematic review to assess medical therapy for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.
METHODS
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of medical therapy in adults with or without pouchitis were searched to March 2022. Primary outcomes included clinical remission/response, maintenance of remission and prevention of pouchitis.
RESULTS
Twenty RCTs (N = 830) were included. Acute pouchitis: One study compared ciprofloxacin with metronidazole. At 2 weeks, 100% (7/7) of ciprofloxacin participants achieved remission, compared with 67% (6/9) of metronidazole participants (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.88-2.35, very low certainty evidence). One study compared budesonide enemas with oral metronidazole. Fifty percent (6/12) of budesonide participants achieved remission compared with 43% (6/14) of metronidazole participants (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.51-2.67, low certainty evidence). Chronic pouchitis: Two studies (n = 76) assessed De Simone Formulation. Eighty-five percent (34/40) of De Simone Formulation participants maintained remission at 9-12 months compared with 3% (1/36) placebo participants (RR: 18.50, 95% CI: 3.86-88.56, moderate certainty evidence). One study assessed vedolizumab. Thirty-one percent (16/51) of vedolizumab participants achieved clinical remission at 14 weeks compared with 10% (5/51) of placebo participants (RR: 3.20, 95% CI: 1.27-8.08, moderate certainty evidence).
PROPHYLAXIS
Two studies assessed De Simone Formulation. Ninety percent (18/20) of De Simone Formulation participants did not develop pouchitis compared with 60% (12/20) of placebo participants (RR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.02-2.21, moderate certainty evidence).
CONCLUSIONS
Apart from vedolizumab and the De Simone formulation, the effects of other medical interventions for pouchitis are uncertain.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Metronidazole; Remission Induction; Pouchitis; Ciprofloxacin; Budesonide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37246609
DOI: 10.1111/apt.17568 -
BMJ Open Jun 2023We studied the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 in healthcare workers (HCWs), using a meta-analysis of randomised... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
We studied the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 in healthcare workers (HCWs), using a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
DATA SOURCES
PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify randomised trials studying HCQ.
STUDY SELECTION
Ten RCTs were identified (n=5079 participants).
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used in this systematic review and meta-analysis between HCQ and placebo using a Bayesian random-effects model. A pre-hoc statistical analysis plan was written.
MAIN OUTCOMES
The primary efficacy outcome was PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and the primary safety outcome was incidence of adverse events. The secondary outcome included clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection.
RESULTS
Compared with placebo, HCWs randomised to HCQ had no significant difference in PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.92, 95% credible interval (CI): 0.58, 1.37) or clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.10), but significant difference in adverse events (OR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.73).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Our meta-analysis of 10 RCTs investigating the safety and efficacy of HCQ as pre-exposure prophylaxis in HCWs found that compared with placebo, HCQ does not significantly reduce the risk of confirmed or clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, while HCQ significantly increases adverse events.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42021285093.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Health Personnel; Hydroxychloroquine; SARS-CoV-2; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
PubMed: 37328184
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065305 -
Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) Dec 2021Protozoal infection is a lingering public health issue of great concern, despite efforts to produce drugs and vaccines against it. Recent breakthrough research has... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Protozoal infection is a lingering public health issue of great concern, despite efforts to produce drugs and vaccines against it. Recent breakthrough research has discovered alternative antiprotozoal agents encompassing the use of snake venoms and their components to cure these infections. This study collated the existing literature to examine the antiprotozoal effect of snake venoms and their fractions.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched from their inception until 13 October 2021. Articles were screened at the title, abstract and full-text phases. Some additional studies were obtained through the manual search process.
RESULTS
We identified 331 studies via the electronic database and manual searches, of which 55 reporting the antiprotozoal effect of snake venoms and their components were included in the review. Around 38% of studies examined the effect of whole crude venoms, and a similar percentage evaluated the effect of a proportion of enzymatic phospholipase A2 (PLA2). In particular, this review reports around 36 PLA2 activities and 29 snake crude venom activities. We also report the notable phenomenon of synergism with PLA2 isoforms of . Importantly, limited attention has been given so far to the antiprotozoal efficacies of metalloproteinase, serine protease and three-finger toxins, although these venom components have been identified as significant components of the dominant venom families.
CONCLUSION
This study highlights the impact of snake venoms and their fractions on controlling protozoal infections and suggests the need to examine further the effectiveness of other venom components, such as metalloproteinase, serine protease and three-finger toxins. Future research questions in this field must be redirected toward synergism in snake venom components, based on pharmacological usage and in the context of toxicology. Ascertaining the effects of snake venoms and their components on other protozoal species that have not yet been studied is imperative.
PubMed: 34959587
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10121632 -
The Journal of Laryngology and Otology May 2023The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the role of doxycycline in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the role of doxycycline in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis.
METHOD
This was a systematic review using Ovid Medline, Cinahl, Scopus and Cochrane and was limited to meta-analyses, systematic reviews and randomised, clinical trials. A combination of the following search terms was used: 'sinusitis', 'nasal polyps', 'doxycycline' and 'tetracycline'. Raw means and standard deviations were extracted from the included studies. The meta-analysis was performed using mean differences of pre- versus post-doxycycline treatment.
RESULTS
A total of 279 studies were screened, of which 5 studies met the criteria (all randomised, controlled trials published between 2010 and 2021). The interventions, endpoints and measured outcomes varied across all studies. Meta-analysis performed on pre- versus post-doxycycline treatment for Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22, nasal polyp scores and symptom scores did not yield statistically significant results.
CONCLUSION
This review identified a small number of high-quality studies on the use of doxycycline in chronic rhinosinusitis. There does not seem to be convincing evidence for the routine use of doxycycline in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Further research may try to identify certain phenotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis that may better respond to doxycycline.
Topics: Humans; Rhinitis; Quality of Life; Doxycycline; Nasal Polyps; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Sinusitis; Chronic Disease
PubMed: 35919933
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215122001803 -
Journal of General Internal Medicine Nov 2020There is no effective therapy for COVID-19. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) have been used for its treatment but their safety and efficacy remain uncertain. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
There is no effective therapy for COVID-19. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) have been used for its treatment but their safety and efficacy remain uncertain.
OBJECTIVE
We performed a systematic review to synthesize the available data on the efficacy and safety of CQ and HCQ for the treatment of COVID-19.
METHODS
Two reviewers searched for published and pre-published relevant articles between December 2019 and 8 June 2020. The data from the selected studies were abstracted and analyzed for efficacy and safety outcomes. Critical appraisal of the evidence was done by Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale. The quality of evidence was graded as per the GRADE approach.
RESULTS
We reviewed 12 observational and 3 randomized trials which included 10,659 patients of whom 5713 received CQ/HCQ and 4966 received only standard of care. The efficacy of CQ/HCQ for COVID-19 was inconsistent across the studies. Meta-analysis of included studies revealed no significant reduction in mortality with HCQ use [RR 0.98 95% CI 0.66-1.46], time to fever resolution (mean difference - 0.54 days (- 1.19-011)) or clinical deterioration/development of ARDS with HCQ [RR 0.90 95% CI 0.47-1.71]. There was a higher risk of ECG abnormalities/arrhythmia with HCQ/CQ [RR 1.46 95% CI 1.04 to 2.06]. The quality of evidence was graded as very low for these outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSION
The available evidence suggests that CQ or HCQ does not improve clinical outcomes in COVID-19. Well-designed randomized trials are required for assessing the efficacy and safety of HCQ and CQ for COVID-19.
Topics: Bias; Chloroquine; Humans; Hydroxychloroquine; Research Design; SARS-CoV-2; Treatment Outcome; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 32885373
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06146-w -
Infectious Diseases (London, England) Jul 2023Whipple's disease is an uncommon chronic systemic disease caused by . The most characteristic findings of late Whipple's disease include diarrhoea, abdominal pain,... (Review)
Review
Whipple's disease is an uncommon chronic systemic disease caused by . The most characteristic findings of late Whipple's disease include diarrhoea, abdominal pain, weight loss, and arthralgias, however, other clinical findings can occur, including lymphadenopathy, fever, neurologic manifestations, myocarditis and endocarditis. The aim of the present study was to systematically review all cases of Whipple's disease-associated infective endocarditis (IE) in the literature. A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library (all published studies up to 28 May 2022) for studies providing data on epidemiology, clinical characteristics as well as data on treatment and outcomes of Whipple's disease-associated IE was performed. A total of 72 studies, containing data for 127 patients, were included. A prosthetic valve was present in 8% of patients. The aortic valve was the most commonly involved intracardiac site followed by the mitral valve. Heart failure, embolic phenomena, and fever were the most common clinical presentations, however, fever occurred in less than 30% of patients. Sepsis was rarely noted. The diagnosis was most commonly performed through pathology through positive PCR or histology in cardiac valves in 88.2% of patients. Trimethoprim with sulfamethoxazole were the most commonly used antimicrobials followed by cephalosporins and tetracyclines. Surgery was performed in 84.3% of patients. Mortality was 9.4%. A multivariate logistic regression analysis model identified presentation with sepsis or development of a paravalvular abscess to be independently associated with increased mortality, while treatment with the combination of trimethoprim with sulfamethoxazole was independently associated with reduced mortality.
Topics: Humans; Whipple Disease; Endocarditis, Bacterial; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Trimethoprim; Sulfamethoxazole; Sepsis
PubMed: 37198913
DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2023.2214610 -
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Mar 2021: A century-long history in 8-aminoquinolines, the only anti-malaria drug class preventing malaria relapse, has resulted in the approval of tafenoquine by the U.S. Food... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
: A century-long history in 8-aminoquinolines, the only anti-malaria drug class preventing malaria relapse, has resulted in the approval of tafenoquine by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and to date registration in Brazil and Thailand. Tafenoquine is an alternative anti-relapse treatment for vivax malaria and malaria prophylaxis. It should not be given in pregnancy, during lactation of infants with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) unknown or deficient status, and in those with G6PD deficiency or psychiatric illness.: This systematic review assesses tafenoquine associated adverse events in English-language, human clinical trials. Meta-analysis of commonly reported adverse events was conducted and grouped by comparison arms.: Tafenoquine, either for radical cure or prophylaxis, is generally well tolerated in adults. There is no convincing evidence for neurologic, ophthalmic, and cardiac toxicities. Psychotic disorder which has been attributed to higher doses is a contraindication for the chemoprophylaxis indication and psychiatric illness is a warning for the radical cure indication. Pregnancy assessment and quantitative G6PD testing are required. The optimal radical curative regimen including the tafenoquine dose along with its safety for parts of Southeast Asia, South America, and Oceania needs further assessment.
Topics: Adult; Aminoquinolines; Animals; Antimalarials; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency; Humans; Malaria, Vivax; Mental Disorders
PubMed: 33306921
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1859476 -
The Journal of Dermatological Treatment Feb 2022For severe cases of lichen planopilaris (LPP), unresponsive to first line therapy, systemic or potent agents may be required for disease control. There have been several... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
For severe cases of lichen planopilaris (LPP), unresponsive to first line therapy, systemic or potent agents may be required for disease control. There have been several reports of the off-label use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients with LPP or have developed adverse effects to initial agents.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to recommended Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies with ≥5 cases reporting the outcomes of MMF in LPP were pooled and a meta-analysis of proportion was performed. Case reports were excluded from analysis.
RESULTS
A total of six studies were identified and included for meta-analysis, comprising 94 LPP patients. The pooled proportion of any good response (partial or complete) was 69.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 47.8-77). The pooled proportion of complete response was 20% (95% CI: 10.1-36.3). The pooled proportion of partial responses was 49.2% (95% CI: 30.5-63.7). Side effects occurred in 16.9% (95% CI: 17.6-33.2). of cases, which included elevated LFTs, edema, hyperlipidemia, anemia, herpes zoster infection, photosensitivity, and urinary tract infection.
CONCLUSION
The current evidence for MMF remains limited. However, it appears to be a potential treatment option for patients with severe or recalcitrant LPP who have failed hydroxychloroquine and other immunosuppressants.
Topics: Humans; Hydroxychloroquine; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lichen Planus; Mycophenolic Acid; Remission Induction
PubMed: 32281437
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1755416