-
Antiviral Research Jan 2023The alphaviruses are a widely distributed group of positive-sense, single stranded, RNA viruses. These viruses are largely arthropod-borne and can be found on all... (Review)
Review
The alphaviruses are a widely distributed group of positive-sense, single stranded, RNA viruses. These viruses are largely arthropod-borne and can be found on all populated continents. These viruses cause significant human disease, and recently have begun to spread into new populations, such as the expansion of Chikungunya virus into southern Europe and the Caribbean, where it has established itself as endemic. The study of alphaviruses is an active and expanding field, due to their impacts on human health, their effects on agriculture, and the threat that some pose as potential agents of biological warfare and terrorism. In this systematic review we will summarize both historic knowledge in the field as well as recently published data that has potential to shift current theories in how alphaviruses are able to function. This review is comprehensive, covering all parts of the alphaviral life cycle as well as a brief overview of their pathology and the current state of research in regards to vaccines and therapeutics for alphaviral disease.
Topics: Humans; Antiviral Agents; Virus Replication; Chikungunya virus; Alphavirus Infections; Caribbean Region
PubMed: 36436722
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2022.105476 -
American Journal of Preventive Medicine Dec 2023The hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemic remains a public health problem worldwide. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to provide evidence of outcomes... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemic remains a public health problem worldwide. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to provide evidence of outcomes attained across the HCV care cascade in the era of direct-acting antivirals.
METHODS
Studies from North America, Europe, and Australia (January 2014 through March 2021) reporting on HCV care cascade outcomes (screening to cure) were included. When calculating the proportions of individuals completing each step, the numerator for Steps 1-8 was the number of individuals completing each step; the denominator was the number of individuals completing the previous step for Steps 1-3 and Step 3 for Steps 4-8. In 2022, random effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled proportions with 95% CIs.
RESULTS
Sixty-five studies comprising 7,402,185 individuals were identified. Among individuals with positive HCV ribonucleic acid test results, 62% (95% CI=55%, 70%) attended their first care appointment, 41% (95% CI=37%, 45%) initiated treatment, 38% (95% CI=29%, 48%) completed treatment, and 29% (95% CI=25%, 33%) achieved cure. HCV screening rates were 43% (95% CI=22%, 66%) in prisons or jails and 20% (95% CI=11%, 31%) in emergency departments. Linkage to care rates were 62% (95% CI=46%, 75%) for homeless individuals and 26% (95% CI=22%, 31%) for individuals diagnosed in emergency departments. Cure rates were 51% (95% CI=30%, 73%) in individuals with substance use disorder and 17% (95% CI=17%, 17%) in homeless individuals. Cure rates were lowest in the U.S.
DISCUSSION
Despite the availability of effective all-oral direct-acting antiviral therapies, persistent gaps remain across the HCV care cascade, especially among traditionally marginalized populations. Public health interventions targeting identified priority areas (e.g., emergency departments) may improve screening and healthcare retention of vulnerable populations with HCV infection (e.g., substance use disorder populations).
Topics: Humans; Hepacivirus; Antiviral Agents; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Hepatitis C; Substance-Related Disorders
PubMed: 37380088
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.06.016 -
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection... 2023Nearly 30%-40% of patients with chronic hepatitis B do not fall into any of the traditional natural history classification and thus are classified as indeterminate.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Nearly 30%-40% of patients with chronic hepatitis B do not fall into any of the traditional natural history classification and thus are classified as indeterminate. However, it is unclear whether patients in the indeterminate phase (IP) are at a higher risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) than those in the defined phases (DP) and would benefit from antiviral therapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of HCC incidence and HBsAg clearance among patients in the IP versus DP.
METHODS
We defined the clinical phases as per the AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. We searched PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science for relevant studies that reported HCC incidence or HBsAg clearance in IP versus DP patients published between January 2007 and March 2023. Annual HCC incidence and HBsAg clearance rates were pooled using a random/common-effects model.
RESULTS
We analyzed data from 14 studies, comprising 7798 IP patients (222 patients developed HCC and 239 achieved HBsAg clearance) and 10,725 DP patients. The pooled annual HCC incidence was 2.54 cases per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 1.14-4.39) and HBsAg clearance rate was 12.36 cases per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 10.70-14.13) for the IP patients. IP patients were associated with significantly higher HCC incidence risk (RR = 1.64, 95% CI, 1.34-2.00) and slightly lower annual HBsAg clearance rate (RR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.70-0.99) than the DP patients. In addition, HBeAg-negative IP patients (2.31%; 95% CI, 0.87-4.45) showed a significantly higher HCC incidence than those who were HBeAg positive (0.00%; 95% CI, 0.00-0.99) (< 0.001). The Asia-Pacific region IP patients (4.30%; 95% CI, 2.07-7.27) were also associated with a higher HCC incidence versus Europe (0.05%; 95% CI, 0.00-1.39) (< 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between different strategies (treated vs. untreated: 2.56%; 95% CI, 1.01-4.63 vs. 1.61%; 95% CI, 0.00-5.81, = 0.09), and heterogeneity was substantial across the studies ( 89%).
CONCLUSION
The systematic review and meta-analysis showed a high HCC incidence and low HBsAg clearance among patients in the IP, especially for HBeAg-negative patients and the Asian population. We emphasize that future multicenter prospective cohort studies or randomized trials are needed to verify if expanding antiviral therapy for patients in the IP is associated with reduced HCC risk or good treatment outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Liver Neoplasms; Hepatitis B e Antigens; Incidence; Prospective Studies; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B virus; Antiviral Agents; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37771696
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1226755 -
Archives of Virology Jun 2023Viral infections and diseases caused by viruses are worldwide problems. According to a WHO report, three to five million people are chronically infected with hepatitis B... (Review)
Review
Viral infections and diseases caused by viruses are worldwide problems. According to a WHO report, three to five million people are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) each year globally. Since some viruses mutate very quickly, developing antiviral drugs can be a daunting task. Moreover, currently used synthetic drugs are toxic and associated with side effects. Therefore, there is a need to search for alternative natural remedies that have low toxicity, a new mechanism of action, and no major side effects. Phyllanthus plants have traditionally been used to treat viral hepatitis and liver damage in many tropical and subtropical countries worldwide. In this review, we discuss the therapeutic potential of Phyllanthus spp. against HBV, HCV, HIV, herpes simplex virus, and SARS-CoV-2. The inferences from in vitro and in vivo studies and clinical trials validate the use of Phyllanthus in antiviral remedies.
Topics: Humans; Antiviral Agents; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Hepatitis C; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis B virus; Phyllanthus; HIV Infections
PubMed: 37310509
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-023-05802-w -
European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology,... Dec 2020AQFThe authors present the guidelines of the French Society of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery (SFORL) regarding the management of Bell's palsy in adults. After a...
AQFThe authors present the guidelines of the French Society of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery (SFORL) regarding the management of Bell's palsy in adults. After a literature review by a multidisciplinary workgroup, guidelines were drawn up based on retrieved articles and group-members' experience, then read over by an independent group to edit the final version. Guidelines were graded A, B, C or "expert opinion" according to decreasing level of evidence. Thorough ENT and neurological clinical examination is recommended in all patients presenting with peripheral facial palsy to confirm diagnosis of Bell's palsy. MRI with gadolinium enhancement should explore the entire course of the facial nerve, if possible within the first month. ENMG should be performed to assess prognosis for recovery. In confirmed Bell's palsy, corticosteroid therapy should be implemented as early as possible (ideally within 72h) at a dose of 1mg/kg/day for 7-10 days. Antiviral therapy should be associated to steroids in patients with severe and early-onset disease and in Ramsay-Hunt syndrome. Isolated antiviral therapy is not recommended. To date, there is no evidence that surgical facial nerve decompression provides benefit.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Antiviral Agents; Bell Palsy; Contrast Media; Decompression, Surgical; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Facial Nerve; Facial Paralysis; France; Gadolinium; Herpes Zoster Oticus; Humans; Hyperbaric Oxygenation; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Neurologic Examination; Otolaryngology; Physical Therapy Modalities; Prognosis; Recovery of Function; Societies, Medical
PubMed: 32636146
DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2020.06.004 -
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease Dec 2021To provide the latest evidence for the efficacy and safety of arbidol (umifenovir) in COVID-19 treatment. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To provide the latest evidence for the efficacy and safety of arbidol (umifenovir) in COVID-19 treatment.
METHODS
A literature systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and medRxiv up to May 2021. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were met the inclusion criteria. No significant difference was observed between arbidol and non-antiviral treatment groups neither for primary outcomes, including the negative rate of PCR (NR-PCR) on Day 7 (risk ratio [RR]: 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-1.14) and Day 14 (RR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.96-1.25), and PCR negative conversion time (PCR-NCT; mean difference [MD]: 0.74; 95% CI: -0.87 to 2.34), nor secondary outcomes (p > .05). However, arbidol was associated with higher adverse events (RR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.06-4.73). Compared with lopinavir/ritonavir, arbidol showed better efficacy for primary outcomes (p < .05). Adding arbidol to lopinavir/ritonavir also led to better efficacy in terms of NR-PCR on Day 7 and PCR-NCT (p < .05). There was no significant difference between arbidol and chloroquine in primary outcomes (p > .05). No remarkable therapeutic effect was observed between arbidol and other agents (p > .05).
CONCLUSION
The present meta-analysis showed no significant benefit of using arbidol compared with non-antiviral treatment or other therapeutic agents against COVID-19 disease. High-quality studies are needed to establish the efficacy and safety of arbidol for COVID-19.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Humans; Indoles; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 34347937
DOI: 10.1002/iid3.502 -
Dermatologic Therapy Jun 2022Recent systematic reviews of plantar warts continue to consider cryotherapy as one of the treatments of choice, but this method appears to have lower cure rates than... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Recent systematic reviews of plantar warts continue to consider cryotherapy as one of the treatments of choice, but this method appears to have lower cure rates than alternative treatments. A systematic review using meta-analyses of the efficacy of cryotherapy in plantar warts treatment was performed. Systematic electronic searches were conducted. The primary endpoint was complete clearance of plantar warts. Risk-of-bias assessment was based on Cochrane Handbook recommendations. Meta-analyses used Review Manager v5.4.1 software. Cryotherapy appears to have lower cure rates than other treatments (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.78) with substantial heterogeneity (I = 80%). A second subgroup analysis had low heterogeneity (I = 28.2%). Subgroup analysis showed that plantar wart cure rates were significantly lower with cryotherapy compared to the physical treatment group (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.49) with substantial heterogeneity (I = 79%), and antiviral, chemotherapy, and retinoid group (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.66) without heterogeneity (I = 0%). Intralesional versus spray-on cryotherapy appears to be more effective (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09-0.48). No difference in efficacy between two rounds of 10-s and four rounds of 5-s freeze-thaw cycles in cryotherapy was found. Evidence of the superiority of antivirals and chemotherapy over cryotherapy in the treatment of plantar warts was found. However, no evidence supports the superiority or inferiority of cryotherapy compared to other treatments.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Cryotherapy; Dermatologic Agents; Humans; Treatment Outcome; Warts
PubMed: 35365922
DOI: 10.1111/dth.15480 -
Journal of Drugs in Dermatology : JDD Oct 2023Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a significant public health concern, affecting more than 6 million Americans; and currently, there are no cure or effective treatment...
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a significant public health concern, affecting more than 6 million Americans; and currently, there are no cure or effective treatment options. The underlying etiology and pathogenesis are not fully understood, presenting a barrier to therapy. A substantial amount of data exists associating infection with Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and AD. This review of published studies highlights the epidemiological associations between HSV-1 and AD. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted on January 6, 2022, using PRISMA guidelines. Articles that presented epidemiological data correlating HSV-1 with AD were included. Bibliographies were screened for additional relevant articles as well. After review, 21 studies were included: 2 review articles and 19 population-based studies including case control, cohort, and cross-sectional studies. The quantitative data derived from the studies in this report substantiate a relationship between infection with HSV-1 and AD. Based on these results, it may be of reasonable benefit to more consistently treat latent or active HSV-1 infection with anti-viral medications to potentially reduce the risk of AD. Furthermore, a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial could elucidate the benefit of anti-viral therapy to prevent or limit AD.J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(10):1046-1052 doi:10.36849/JDD.6785.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Cross-Sectional Studies; Herpes Simplex; Herpesvirus 1, Human; Antiviral Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37801540
DOI: 10.36849/JDD.6785 -
The safety and efficacy of oral antiviral drug VV116 for treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review.Medicine Jul 2023Recent trials have highlighted the potential of oral antiviral VV116 in the treatment of patients with mild COVID-19. However, no comprehensive studies have assessed the...
BACKGROUND
Recent trials have highlighted the potential of oral antiviral VV116 in the treatment of patients with mild COVID-19. However, no comprehensive studies have assessed the safety and efficacy of VV116. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to assess the safety and efficacy of VV116.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar websites, with a cutoff date of March 23, to identify pertinent studies.
RESULTS
The results from the 3 included studies indicated that no serious adverse events were reported in the VV116 experimental groups, which exhibited a 2.57-day faster time to viral shedding than the control group and demonstrated non-inferiority to the nirmatrelvir-ritonavir control group in alleviating major symptoms.
DISCUSSION
Collectively, available studies suggest a reliable safety and efficacy profile for VV116. However, the limited number of trials was insufficient for meta-analysis, and the included population consisted of younger individuals with mild and moderate symptoms, not encompassing the elderly who are severely affected by COVID-19. We hope that more studies will be conducted in the future to ensure that VV116 has a more reliable safety and efficacy profile in the clinical setting, especially in severe or critical patients.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Antiviral Agents; COVID-19; Ritonavir
PubMed: 37417593
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034105 -
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Aug 2021Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral loads change rapidly following symptom onset, so to assess antivirals it is important to understand... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral loads change rapidly following symptom onset, so to assess antivirals it is important to understand the natural history and patient factors influencing this. We undertook an individual patient-level meta-analysis of SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamics in humans to describe viral dynamics and estimate the effects of antivirals used to date. This systematic review identified case reports, case series, and clinical trial data from publications between January 1, 2020, and May 31, 2020, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards (Cox-PH) regression model of time to viral clearance was fitted to respiratory and stool samples. A simplified four parameter nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) model was fitted to viral load trajectories in all sampling sites and covariate modeling of respiratory viral dynamics was performed to quantify time-dependent drug effects. Patient-level data from 645 individuals (age 1 month to 100 years) with 6,316 viral loads were extracted. Model-based simulations of viral load trajectories in samples from the upper and lower respiratory tract, stool, blood, urine, ocular secretions, and breast milk were generated. Cox-PH modeling showed longer time to viral clearance in older patients, men, and those with more severe disease. Remdesivir was associated with faster viral clearance (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 9.19, P < 0.001), as well as interferon, particularly when combined with ribavirin (AHR = 2.2, P = 0.015; AHR = 6.04, P = 0.006). Combination therapy should be further investigated. A viral dynamic dataset and NLME model for designing and analyzing antiviral trials has been established.
Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Adult; Alanine; Antiviral Agents; COVID-19; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Interferons; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; SARS-CoV-2; Viral Load; Virus Shedding; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 33641159
DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2223