-
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular... Jun 2022This study aimed to determine the therapeutic effectiveness of tuberculous aortic aneurysms (TBAAs) and the risk factors for mortality. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to determine the therapeutic effectiveness of tuberculous aortic aneurysms (TBAAs) and the risk factors for mortality.
METHODS
We reviewed all case reports of TBAAs treated with open surgery or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) from online database in 1996-2021. Only thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms were included.
RESULTS
Eighty cases of open surgery and 42 cases of EVAR were included. The 2-year mortality and perioperative mortality rates of open surgery were 11.3% and 10.0%, respectively. Emergent open surgery had a significantly higher mortality (25.0%) than non-emergent open surgery (6.7%). In the EVAR group, 2-year mortality, perioperative mortality, and TBAA-related mortality were 16.7%, 4.8%, and 10.0%, respectively. Patients with typical tuberculosis (TB) symptoms before EVAR had a significantly higher TBAA-related mortality (35.0%) than patients with no typical TB symptoms before EVAR (0%). In the open surgery group, the rate of TB recurrence (2.7% vs 2.4%) and aneurysm recurrence (8.1% vs 7.3%) were quite close between preoperative anti-TB-treated and postoperative anti-TB-treated cases. However, in the EVAR group, TB recurrence (8.7% vs 0%) and aneurysm recurrence (12.5% vs 6.25%) were more common in postoperative anti-TB-treated cases.
CONCLUSION
Open surgery was accompanied by higher perioperative mortality, whereas EVAR was followed with higher TBAA-related mortality. Emergent surgical choices of open surgery may be associated with high perioperative mortality. Typical TB symptoms before EVAR are a significant risk factor for mortality after EVAR. Early anti-TB treatment should be administered if EVAR is the surgical option.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis
PubMed: 35378674
DOI: 10.1007/s11748-022-01811-9 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Aug 2022Clostridium septicum bacteremia is often associated with occult malignancies (approximately 80%), especially of the right colon. Furthermore, inflammation of the aortic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Clostridium septicum bacteremia is often associated with occult malignancies (approximately 80%), especially of the right colon. Furthermore, inflammation of the aortic wall can rapidly lead to aneurysm induction through bacterial seeding into atheromatous lesions with consecutive life-threatening rupture. We summarize all published data on this rare and lethal disease to evaluate therapeutic approaches and give valid treatment recommendations because there are no guidelines.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was conducted screening EMBASE and MEDLINE databases following the PRISMA guidelines with search period from first description to August 25, 2021.
RESULTS
There were 72 cases of C septicum aortitis reported in 64 publications. Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) was performed in a minority of patients (n = 6) unfit for surgery but lacked long-term survivors. Antibiotic treatment was beneficial in a bridge to surgery concept, but up to now harbored a 6-month mortality rate of 100% (median overall survival, 0.5 months) when no additional aortic repair was performed. Open aortic repair was the only potential curative approach but was accompanied with a 90-day-mortality of 26.7% (4/15).
CONCLUSIONS
Open aortic repair combined with perioperative antibiotic treatment should be offered to all patients as the only potentially curative approach. If applicable, resection of a coexisting colonic tumor should be performed after successful aortic repair. Alternatively, long-term antibiotic treatment can be offered to patients unfit for surgery in a palliative setting. Endovascular aortic repair has been performed on a minority of patients with a high risk for stent graft infection and should remain a salvage strategy when therapeutic pressure demands acute intervention in patients unfit for surgery.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aorta; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortitis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Clostridium septicum; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Stents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35358668
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.02.029 -
Journal of Endovascular Therapy : An... Nov 2023Our objective was to investigate whether patients who receive anticoagulation therapy have different outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) from those who do... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Our objective was to investigate whether patients who receive anticoagulation therapy have different outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) from those who do not.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of studies that compared outcomes of EVAR in patients who were on therapeutic anticoagulation vs those who were not. We developed and reported the review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines with a registered protocol (CRD42022375894). The Ovid interface was used to search Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to November 2022. The quality of studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) (maximum score=9), and the evidence was appraised with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was the effect estimate in time-to-event meta-analyses, calculated using the inverse-variance statistical method and random-effects models.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies qualified for inclusion reporting a total of 35 739 individuals. Anticoagulated patients had a statistically significantly higher hazard of death (HR=1.93, 95% CI=1.03-3.63), endoleak (HR=2.13, 95% CI=1.55-2.93), reintervention (HR=1.79, 95% CI=1.27-2.52), and aneurysm sac expansion (HR=2.72, 95% CI=1.57-4.72) than patients not receiving anticoagulation therapy. The median score on the NOS was 7 (range=4-9). The certainty of evidence was very low for mortality and reintervention and low for endoleak and sac expansion.
CONCLUSIONS
Anticoagulation is a poor prognostic factor after standard EVAR and should be considered in decision-making, consent processes, and surveillance strategies.
CLINICAL IMPACT
The number of individuals who take anticoagulation treatment has been rapidly increasing over the recent years. We aimed to investigate the effect of such treatment on outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Anticoagulated patients were found to have increased mortality, endoleak, and reintervention rates after EVAR compared to their non-anticoagulated counterparts. Anticoagulation therapy has a prognostic role in EVAR and should be considered in decision making and EVAR surveillance. Anticoagulated patients need to be informed of the higher failure rates of EVAR, and intensified surveillance strategies may need to be implemented in this patient cohort.
PubMed: 38031419
DOI: 10.1177/15266028231214761 -
Journal of Endovascular Therapy : An... Aug 2022A systematic review of all patients that have been reported in the literature with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) concomitant with horseshoe kidney (HSK) treated...
PURPOSE
A systematic review of all patients that have been reported in the literature with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) concomitant with horseshoe kidney (HSK) treated electively by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is presented. A new grouping system for describing HSK vasculature is implemented.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched for published manuscripts using the Medical Subject Headings terms "abdominal aortic aneurysm," "AAA," "EVAR," "endovascular aneurysm repair," and "horseshoe kidney" in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and National Center for Biotechnology Information databases. Inclusion criteria include all published material of patients with AAA with HSK treated electively by an endovascular approach. We excluded patients who were treated by a hybrid or open repair or patients with ruptured AAA. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York) software.
RESULTS
A total of 50 patients from 30 studies were included for analysis. Males made up 88% (n=44) of the population. The median age for this cohort was 70 years (range: 47-86 years). Median aneurysmal diameter was 6.0 cm (range: 4.0-10.3 cm). The median operative time for endovascular repair was 84 minutes (range: 40-332 minutes). The most common graft used was Zenith, used in 40% (n=20) of the cases, followed by Endurant in 14% (n=7). The overall complication rate was 14% (n=7). The median follow-up was 19 months (range: 1-108 months). While comorbidities did not appear to impact outcomes significantly, median operative times for smokers were higher than those in nonsmokers, 84 versus 118 minutes, respectively (p=0.048). Univariate linear regression modeling of aneurysmal size with age, operative time, and length of stay revealed a significant coefficient association between aneurysmal size and operative times. After adjusting for comorbidities and aneurysmal size, prior history of chronic kidney disease significantly increased odds for renal infarction.
CONCLUSION
This review presents the most complete data set possible of patients with concomitant HSK and AAA treated by an endovascular approach. Furthermore, the A + B + C classification for grouping the HSK vasculature is implemented. This systematic review suggests EVAR to be an excellent option with low complication rates for the treatment of AAA in patients with HSK.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34836459
DOI: 10.1177/15266028211059447 -
VASA. Zeitschrift Fur Gefasskrankheiten Jul 2021Abdominal wall hernias (AWHs) share common epidemiological characteristics with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), typically presenting in male population and older... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Abdominal wall hernias (AWHs) share common epidemiological characteristics with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), typically presenting in male population and older ages. Prior reports have associated those two disease entities. Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis and examine whether AAA rates are higher among patients with AWH vs controls and whether the incidence of AWH was higher among patients with AAA vs patients without AAA. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guidelines. The Medline database was searched up to July 31, 2020. A random effects meta-analysis was performed. In total, 17 articles and 738,972 participants were included in the systematic review, while 107,578 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Among four studies investigating the incidence of AAA in patients with hernias, AAA was more common in patients with hernias, compared to patients without hernias. [OR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.24-5.16, I=81.6%]. Among thirteen studies that compared patients with known AAA vs no AAA, the incidence of hernias was higher in patients with AAA, compared with patients without AAA [OR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.66-3.09, I=84.6%]. Our study findings indicate that a strong association between AWH and AAA exists. AWHs could therefore be used as an additional selection criterion for screening patients for AAA, apart from age, gender, family history and smoking.
Topics: Aged; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Hernia, Abdominal; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors
PubMed: 33739140
DOI: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000947 -
International Angiology : a Journal of... Feb 2021Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a silent, progressive disease that can lead to death. It is easily diagnosed with noninvasive methods and its routine treatment has...
INTRODUCTION
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a silent, progressive disease that can lead to death. It is easily diagnosed with noninvasive methods and its routine treatment has excellent results. This creates an optimal situation for population screening programs. The aim of this paper was to assess results and methodological quality of cost-utility studies on screening versus no screening scenarios for AAA to assess future establishment of new AAA screening programs.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITON
A systematic review of efficiency (cost-effectiveness and cost-utility) studies was performed, finally selecting cost-utility studies on AAA screening versus no screening. Papers were selected that dealt with efficiency of screening for AAA according to PICOTS framework and the methodological quality assessed according to the economic evaluation analyses described by Drummond and Caro. Two independent reviewers were involved in the procedure.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Research retrieved 88 studies. From those, 26 showed cost-effectiveness and cost-utility results. Finally, 10 studies had cost-utility results and suited criteria (published in the last 10 years; time-horizon: 10 years or more) for exhaustive analysis. All publications, except one, showed adequate incremental cost-utility ratios according to different national perspectives. Methodological assessment showed some quality limitations, but the majority of items analyzed were favorably answered after applying the questionnaires.
CONCLUSIONS
Confirmation of the cost-utility results in this revision at a national/regional level should be the basis for the implantation of new national screening programs worldwide. The methodological evaluation applied in this revision is crucial for the corresponding future piggy-back trials to assess routine application of national AAA screening programs.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Mass Screening; Quality-Adjusted Life Years
PubMed: 33086780
DOI: 10.23736/S0392-9590.20.04547-2 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Mar 2023To provide an updated systematic literature review summarizing current evidence on aortic neck dilatation (AND) after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To provide an updated systematic literature review summarizing current evidence on aortic neck dilatation (AND) after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.
METHODS
An extensive electronic search in major electronic databases was conducted between January 2000 and December 2021. Eligible for inclusion were observational studies that followed up with patients (n ≥ 20) undergoing EVAR with self-expanding endografts, for 12 or more months, evaluated AND with computed tomography angiography and provided data on relevant outcomes. The primary end point was the incidence of AND after EVAR, and the secondary end points were the occurrence of type Ia endoleak, stent graft migration, secondary rupture, and reintervention.
RESULTS
We included 34 studies with a total sample of 12,038 patients (10,413 men; median age, 71 years). AND was defined clearly in 18 studies, but significant differences in AND definition were evidenced. The pooled incidence of AND based on quantitative analysis of 16 studies with a total of 9201 patients (7961 men; median age, 72 years) was calculated at 22.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.4-34.4) over a follow-up period ranging from 12 months to 14 years. The risk of a type Ia endoleak was significantly higher in AND patients compared with those without AND (odds ratio, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.10-7.93; P = .030). Similarly, endograft migration was more common in the AND group compared with the non-AND group (odds ratio, 5.95; 95% CI, 1.80-19.69; P = .004). The combined incidence of secondary rupture and reintervention did not differ significantly between the two groups, even though the combined effect was in favor of the non-AND group.
CONCLUSIONS
Proximal AND after EVAR is common and occurs in a large proportion of patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. AND can influence the long-term durability of proximal endograft fixation and is significantly related to adverse outcomes, often leading to reinterventions.
Topics: Male; Humans; Aged; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Endoleak; Treatment Outcome; Dilatation; Risk Factors; Endovascular Procedures; Retrospective Studies; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Blood Vessel Prosthesis
PubMed: 35948244
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.182 -
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery May 2022Open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and high length of stay (LOS). Enhanced recovery is now commonplace and...
Open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and high length of stay (LOS). Enhanced recovery is now commonplace and has been shown to decrease these in other non-vascular surgery settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the benefits of enhanced recovery (ERAS) in aortic surgery. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to undertake a systematic review via Ovid MEDLINE and Embase on 10.07.2021. The search terms were "aortic aneurysm" and "fast track" or "enhanced recovery". Data was obtained on major complications, 30-day mortality and LOS. 107 papers were identified and 10 papers included for meta-analysis. Complication rates were significantly reduced with ERAS compared to non-ERAS protocols (ERAS n = 709, non-ERAS n = 930) (odds ratio .38, .22 to .65: = .0005). LOS was also significantly reduced with an ERAS protocol (ERAS n = 708, non-ERAS n = 956) with a mean reduction of 3 .18 days (-5.01 to -1.35 days) ( = .0007: I = 97%). There was no significant difference however in 30-day mortality ( = .92). This meta-analysis demonstrates significant benefits to an enhanced recovery programme in open AAA surgery. There is a need for a multi-centre randomized controlled trial to assess this further.
PubMed: 35507465
DOI: 10.1177/15385744221098810 -
International Journal of Vascular... 2020. Aortic graft infection (AGI) is a rare complication following AAA repair and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management is variable, and there are no... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
. Aortic graft infection (AGI) is a rare complication following AAA repair and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management is variable, and there are no evidence-based guidelines. The aim of this study was to systematically review and analyse management options for AGI.
METHODS
Data was collected between July and August 2018. A full HDAS search was conducted on the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PUBMED. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5 software.
RESULTS
1,365 patient outcomes were assessed (10 cohort studies and 12 comparative studies). The most common treatment was in situ replacement of the graft (ISR) followed by extra-anatomical replacement (EAR). Various grafts were used for ISR, such as fresh/cryopreserved allograft, venous graft, and prosthetic grafts. No graft material was shown to be superior. Axillobifemoral graft was the commonest type of EAR used. In the majority of cohort studies, ISR was the main treatment for AGI. There was no significant difference in the overall mortality rate (ISR = 70/176 vs. EAR = 70/176 vs. EAR = 0.87). Graft occlusion rate was significantly lower in the ISR group vs. the EAR group ( = 70/176 vs. EAR = 70/176 vs. EAR = 0.87). Graft occlusion rate was significantly lower in the ISR group vs. the EAR group ( = 70/176 vs. EAR = 70/176 vs. EAR = 0.87). Graft occlusion rate was significantly lower in the ISR group vs. the EAR group (. In situ replacement is the preferred method of treatment as it had lower rates of occlusion. Further strong evidence is required, such as a multicentre trial to establish a management pathway for the condition.
PubMed: 32206352
DOI: 10.1155/2020/9574734 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery May 2023Secondary aortoduodenal fistulae (SADF) are uncommon but life-threatening conditions that occur as complications of aortic reconstructive surgery. Data on the mortality... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Secondary aortoduodenal fistulae (SADF) are uncommon but life-threatening conditions that occur as complications of aortic reconstructive surgery. Data on the mortality and morbidity of procedures associated with SADF remain scarce.
METHODS
Comprehensive literature search was conducted on the MedLine, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Knowledge databases for cases of SADF. Data regarding patient demographics, fistula anatomy and treatment interventions performed were extracted for further analysis.
RESULTS
The study pool consisted of 127 case reports, 28 case series and 1 retrospective study published between 1973 and 2021. A total of 189 patients were operated for SADF. Among the 189 patients, 141 patients (74.6%) had aortic graft excision, 26 (13.8%) aortic primary repair, and 22 (11.6%) EVAR. Although patients undergoing EVAR were older with higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, compared with patients who had graft excision and primary aortic repair these differences were not statistically significant (P = .12 and P = .22, respectively). Primary bowel repair was performed in 145 patients (76.7%), duodenectomy in 25 (13.2%), and no bowel repair in 19 (10.1%). Additional omentoplasty was performed in 65 patients (34.6%). Mortality was comparable with respect to the type of aortic and bowel repair, with no statistically significant differences recorded (P = .54 and P = .77, respectively). Omentoplasty significantly decreased the risk of death (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.8, P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS
Optimal operative management should address both the aortic and duodenal defects and be complemented with appropriate reconstructive procedures. Endovascular aortic approaches seem feasible in carefully select patients in whom duodenal repair may be omitted.
Topics: Humans; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Retrospective Studies; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Endovascular Procedures; Intestinal Fistula; Treatment Outcome; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors
PubMed: 36343874
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.055