-
Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta. Reviews... Dec 2019Breast cancer has, due to its high incidence, the highest mortality of cancer in women. The most common molecular type of breast cancer is the luminal subtype, which... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The association between type of endocrine therapy and development of estrogen receptor-1 mutation(s) in patients with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials.
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer has, due to its high incidence, the highest mortality of cancer in women. The most common molecular type of breast cancer is the luminal subtype, which expresses estrogen and progesterone receptors and is typically treated with surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), encoded by the estrogen receptor-1 (ESR1) gene, is expressed in approximately 70% of all breast cancers, and ET represents a major treatment modality in ERα-positive cancers. However, resistance to different ET evolves frequently, leading to disease progression or recurrence in ER+ breast cancer. Acquired mutations in the Ligand Binding Domain (LBD) of the ERα referred as ESR1 mutations; could be selected by ET itself leading to resistance over the course of ET therapy.
OBJECTIVE
The goal of this review is to estimate the effect of Aromatase Inhibitors (AIs), Tamoxifen (TAM) and Fulvestrant (FUL) on the development of ESR1 mutations in hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer.
METHODS
A systematic review of qualitative studies published between January 1st, 2007 and March 1st, 2019 was conducted using the PubMed and Thomas Reuters Web of Science databases. Search terms included ESR1 mutations, estrogen receptor, breast cancer, recurrent, metastatic disease, aromatase inhibitors, fulvestrant and tamoxifen. Only full-text studies in English concerning the development of ESR1 mutations and their outcomes on disease progression were included. Selection of studies was performed using predefined data fields, taking study quality indicators into consideration. Inclusion criteria of the study populations were: Ghoncheh et al. (2016) [1] female patients above 18 years; Nielsen et al. (2011) [2] Estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer in the advanced setting; Reinert et al. (2017) [3] previous exposure to endocrine therapy including SERDs (preferably Fulvestrant), SERMs (preferably Tamoxifen) or Aromatase Inhibitors.
RESULTS
The current review enrolled 16 articles, including 4 multicentre double blinded RCTs and 12 cohorts and comprising a total of 2632 patients. The overall incidence rate of the ESR1 mutation was 24% (95% CI: 18%-31%). We observed that D538G was the most frequent ESR1 mutation. Several studies showed that prior endocrine therapy (AIs, TAM, FUL) could result in an ESR1 mutation and therapy resistance leading to disease progression or recurrence. Different mechanisms had been implied to explain the underlying ET resistance. One of the key findings of this work is the significant difference in ESR1 mutation incidence between patients with and without AI therapy (OR: 9.34, 95% CI: 3.28-26.62, P ≤.001).
CONCLUSION
ESR1 mutations are not uncommon phenomenon in patients with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer. There is a significant higher incidence rate of ESR1 mutations in patients with previous AI-containing therapeutic regimens, compared to those who received non-AI containing regimes. These ESR1 mutations could lead to the development of complete endocrine resistance to AI, whereas only partial resistance is seen in case of TAM or FUL.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Estrogen Receptor alpha; Female; Fulvestrant; Humans; Mutation; Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tamoxifen
PubMed: 31647985
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.188315 -
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice :... Jun 2023To map the evidence available in the literature on the health-related quality of life of women with breast cancer using hormone therapy. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To map the evidence available in the literature on the health-related quality of life of women with breast cancer using hormone therapy.
DATA SOURCES
This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological recommendations and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines. Searches were performed in nine databases using descriptors, synonyms and keywords; grey literature was also included. The review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework under doi: http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/347FM. Inclusion criteria were established according to the Population, Concept, and Context strategy. The selection of studies was performed by two independent reviewers with the aid of RAYYAN software and disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. The main information from the included articles was grouped into textual categories and presented by means of a narrative synthesis.
DATA SUMMARY
A total of 5419 records were identified, of which 42 studies fully met the eligibility criteria. Most were multicenter studies (42.9%) and randomized controlled trials (62%). Most studies addressed anastrozole (39.5%), letrozole (34.2%), and tamoxifen (26.3%), which were studied alone or in combination. The most widely used health-related quality-of-life assessment tool was the EORTC-QLQ-C30. The concomitant use of hormone therapy and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors 4 and 6 showed improvement in health-related quality of life.
CONCLUSION
In recent years there has been an increase in studies focused on health-related quality of life, and the evidence pointed to relevant information on health-related quality of life and the use of endocrine therapy, tamoxifen in combination with aromatase inhibitors, as well as aromatase inhibitor alone and the use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6.
Topics: Female; Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Anastrozole; Tamoxifen; Aromatase Inhibitors; Hormones
PubMed: 37021486
DOI: 10.1177/10781552231168071 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine May 2022Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been considered first-line therapy for patients with hormone-dependent breast cancer due to their high efficacy and good tolerability.... (Review)
Review
Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been considered first-line therapy for patients with hormone-dependent breast cancer due to their high efficacy and good tolerability. However, AIs are not free of adverse events, and studies show that therapy with AIs is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and the development of insulin resistance and diabetes. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed and EMBASE up to 27 October 2020 for the prevalence of cardiovascular and/or metabolic adverse effects during treatment with AIs in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and illustrated using forest plot charts. We performed separate analyses depending on trial design. Twenty two studies met the inclusion criteria. AIs were associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events, especially when we compared study arms in which AIs were used (alone or in sequence with TAM) with the arms in which TAM was used alone (OR = 1.16; 95%CI 1.04-1.30) or when comparing patients taking AIs alone to patients taking TAM alone or in sequence with AIs (OR = 1.24; 95%CI 1.11-1.38). A pooled analysis of five trials comparing adjuvant AIs to TAM showed the odds for arterial hypertension being 1.31 times higher for patients taking AIs; however, this did not reach statistical significance (OR = 1.31; 95%CI 0.47-3.65). We have not shown an increased risk of dyslipidemia or weight gain with the use of AIs. Our results suggest that postmenopausal women with breast cancer treated with AIs have an increased risk of cardiovascular events in comparison with TAM, potentially due more to a cardioprotective effect of the latter than the cardiotoxicity of AIs. We were unable to prove a similar association for hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia or weight gain. Further high-quality RCTs and post-marketing safety observational studies are needed to definitively evaluate the impact of AIs on metabolic disorders in breast cancer patients.
PubMed: 35683517
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11113133 -
Obstetrics and Gynecology Jan 2024To estimate the effect of medical management on the size of ovarian endometriomas. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To estimate the effect of medical management on the size of ovarian endometriomas.
DATA SOURCE
Online databases were searched from inception to October 2022, including Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, PubMed, EBM Reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov , and Web of Science.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION
Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we included all English-language, full-text articles that reported on change in endometrioma size (either diameter or volume) after medical interventions. Studies evaluating surgical interventions or postoperative recurrence were excluded. All screening and data extraction were performed independently by two authors. Risk of bias assessment was performed with either the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials or a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS
After removal of duplicates, 9,332 studies were screened, with 33 full-text articles deemed eligible for inclusion. In the meta-analysis, dienogest showed significant reduction in cyst diameter (reduction 1.32 cm, 95% CI, 0.91-1.73, eight studies, n=418 cysts) and volume (mean difference of log-transformed volume 1.35, 95% CI, 0.87-1.83, seven studies, n=282 cysts). Similarly, significant reductions were seen with the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) (1.06 cm, 95% CI, 0.59-1.53, nine studies, n=455), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (1.17 cm, 95% CI, 0.42-1.92, four studies, n=128 cysts), norethindrone acetate (0.6 cm, 95% CI, 0.27-0.94, two studies, n=88 cysts), and danazol (1.95 cm, 95% CI, 1.18-2.73, two studies, n=34 cysts). Norethindrone acetate with aromatase inhibitor was also effective in reducing endometrioma volume (mean difference of log-transformed volume 1.47, 95% CI, 0.16-2.78, two studies, n=34 cysts).
CONCLUSION
Medical management with dienogest, OCPs, GnRH agonists, norethindrone acetate, norethindrone acetate with aromatase inhibitor, or danazol can reduce the size of ovarian endometriomas.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, CRD 42022363319.
Topics: Female; Humans; Endometriosis; Danazol; Norethindrone Acetate; Aromatase Inhibitors; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Cysts
PubMed: 37944155
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005444 -
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Oct 2023The objective of this systematic review was to establish an overview of aromatase inhibitor-related symptoms reported by postmenopausal women with nonmetastatic,... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The objective of this systematic review was to establish an overview of aromatase inhibitor-related symptoms reported by postmenopausal women with nonmetastatic, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
DATA SOURCES
Eight databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], Ovid EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched for trials published between January 2004 and November 2021. Inclusion criteria were studies exploring patient-reported aromatase inhibitor-related symptoms in postmenopausal women with nonmetastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool were used to rate the quality of the trials included. Of 325 full-text papers, 10 were included. Patient-reported symptoms were clustered by using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C30 questionnaire domains. Additional domains were used to cluster other symptoms mentioned: menopausal, sex-related, body alteration, and eye-related. The following clusters were the most frequently presented: sex-related (14 symptoms), pain (9 symptoms), insomnia (5 symptoms), and menopausal (5 symptoms).
CONCLUSION
The target group reported a variety of symptoms related to aromatase inhibitors. No tools are currently available to measure all the symptoms reported, indicating a need to revise the tools to acknowledge additional symptoms. Prospective studies are needed to investigate the prevalence of aromatase inhibitor-related symptoms in women with breast cancer.
IMPLICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE
Identification of patient-reported clinically relevant symptoms can enable targeted symptom assessment and management strategies for women with breast cancer undergoing aromatase inhibitor treatment.
Topics: Female; Humans; Aromatase Inhibitors; Receptors, Estrogen; Postmenopause; Quality of Life; Breast Neoplasms
PubMed: 37612223
DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151487 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Jan 2023Aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia (AIA) contributes to poor adherence of aromatase inhibitor therapies in patients with breast cancer. A systematic review using... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of treatments for aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in breast cancer patients: A systematic review with network meta-analysis.
Aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia (AIA) contributes to poor adherence of aromatase inhibitor therapies in patients with breast cancer. A systematic review using network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to examine the clinical effectiveness of multiple therapies and rank probabilities for the management of AIA. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing treatments for AIA in postmenopausal women with stage 0-III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer were searched from inception to October 2021. The main NMA involved 1516 participants from 17 RCTs. Acupuncture was the highest ranked intervention to improve pain intensity followed by sham acupuncture, multicomponent herbal medicine, exercise, duloxetine, vitamin D, omega-3 fatty acids, physical therapy, testosterone, and inactive controls. Single natural products were inferior to controls. The current review provides new insights into the management of AIA in breast cancer survivors for increased survival and can be utilized to make evidence-based decisions regarding treatment.
Topics: Female; Humans; Aromatase Inhibitors; Network Meta-Analysis; Arthralgia; Treatment Outcome; Breast Neoplasms
PubMed: 36535489
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103898 -
Andrology Feb 2024Selective oestrogen receptor modulators and aromatase inhibitors stimulate endogenous gonadotrophins and testosterone in men with hypogonadism. There are no systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Selective oestrogen receptor modulators and aromatase inhibitors stimulate endogenous gonadotrophins and testosterone in men with hypogonadism. There are no systematic reviews/meta-analyses assessing the effects of selective oestrogen receptor modulators/aromatase inhibitors on semen parameters in men with secondary hypogonadism.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effect of monotherapy or a combination of selective oestrogen receptor modulators/aromatase inhibitors on sperm parameters and/or fertility in men with secondary hypogonadism.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. Randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies of interventions reporting effects of selective oestrogen receptor modulators and/or aromatase inhibitors on semen parameters or fertility in men with low testosterone with low/normal gonadotrophins were selected. The risk of bias was assessed using ROB-2 and ROBINS-I tools. The results of randomised controlled trials were summarised using vote counting while summarising effect estimates where available. Non-randomised studies of intervention meta-analysis were conducted using the random-effect model. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.
RESULTS
Five non-randomised studies of interventions (n = 105) of selective oestrogen receptor modulators showed an increase in sperm concentration (pooled mean difference 6.64 million/mL; 95% confidence interval 1.54, 11.74, I = 0%) and three non-randomised studies of interventions (n = 83) of selective oestrogen receptor modulators showed an increase in total motile sperm count (pooled mean difference 10.52; 95% confidence interval 1.46-19.59, I = 0%), with very low certainty of evidence. The mean body mass index of participants was >30 kg/m . Four randomised controlled trials (n = 591) comparing selective oestrogen receptor modulators to placebo showed a heterogeneous effect on sperm concentration. Three included men with overweight or obesity. The results were of very low certainty of evidence. Limited pregnancy or live birth data were available. No studies comparing aromatase inhibitors with placebo or testosterone were found.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Current studies are of limited size and quality but suggest that selective oestrogen receptor modulators may improve semen parameters in those patients, particularly when associated with obesity.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Male; Aromatase Inhibitors; Semen; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Testosterone; Estrogens; Hypogonadism; Obesity
PubMed: 37306109
DOI: 10.1111/andr.13480 -
Heliyon Mar 2020The cytochrome P450 enzyme functions as the rate-limiting enzyme in changing androgens to estrogens. Inhibition of aromatase is one of the significant objectives of... (Review)
Review
The cytochrome P450 enzyme functions as the rate-limiting enzyme in changing androgens to estrogens. Inhibition of aromatase is one of the significant objectives of treatment of hormone-dependent diseases such as breast cancer, especially in post-menopausal women. Natural compounds like chrysin, as a flavor that has a high concentration in honey and propolis, are rich sources of them can be useful in inhibiting aromatase for chemoprevention following treatment or in women at risk of acquiring breast cancer. This study intended to summarize the existing evidence on the effect of chrysin on aromatase activity. We systematically searched Science Direct, PubMed and Google Scholar and hand searched the reference lists of identified relevant articles, up to 5 February, 2019. Articles with English abstracts that reported the effect of chrysin on aromatase inhibition and without publication date restriction were investigated. Twenty relevant articles were chosen from a total of 1721 articles. Only one study was performed on humans and two studies were assayed on rats, while other studies were evaluated in vitro. All the studies except one showed that chrysin had the potency of aromatase inhibition; however, only one study performed on endometrial stromal cells showed that chrysin and naringenin did not indicate aromatase inhibitory properties. Various assay methods and experimental conditions were the important aspects leading to different results between the studies. Chrysin has potency in inhibition of the aromatase enzyme and thus can be useful in preventing and treating the hormone-dependent breast cancer and as an adjuvant therapy for estrogen-dependent diseases.
PubMed: 32181408
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03557 -
Clinical Endocrinology Dec 2020Aromatase deficiency (AD) caused by cytochrome P450 family 19 subfamily A polypeptide 1 (CYP19A1) variants is characterized by a deficiency in androgen-to-oestrogen...
BACKGROUND
Aromatase deficiency (AD) caused by cytochrome P450 family 19 subfamily A polypeptide 1 (CYP19A1) variants is characterized by a deficiency in androgen-to-oestrogen conversion.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the clinical characteristics and accurate management of aromatase-deficient children.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We described three 46, XX aromatase-deficient children, searched PubMed with "(aromatase deficiency) AND (46, XX OR ovaries)" and manually searched citations in identified studies for the literature review.
RESULTS
Two girls and one boy (3.4-9.2 years) with the 46, XX karyotype presented ambiguous genitalia and maternal antenatal virilization, normal-low height, delayed bone age, normal glucose and lipid profiles, markedly elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels and poor oestradiol responses to human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation. Ultrasound revealed normal-sized uterus and ovaries with undetectable follicles. Histopathology revealed primordial follicles and few primary follicles in ovaries. One patient presented granulosa and follicular membrane cell proliferation and interstitial sclerosis. We identified four CYP19A1 variants; c.146_158del and c.344G >A were unreported. We reviewed available data from thirty 46, XX patients (0.2-32 years). Some patients were not diagnosed until puberty/adulthood; three were initially misdiagnosed with congenital adrenocortical hyperplasia. The main characteristics were maternal antenatal virilization (21/29), ambiguous genitalia (mainly Prader IV or III, 19/23), delayed bone age (16/17), low bone mass (5/8), markedly elevated FSH levels and ovarian cysts (13/30).
CONCLUSIONS
46, XX AD is easily neglected or misdiagnosed. Ambiguous genitalia, maternal antenatal virilization and markedly elevated FSH levels are important diagnostic indicators. We described two novel variants, new histopathological features of ovaries and an early management strategy.
Topics: 46, XX Disorders of Sex Development; Adult; Aromatase; Child; China; Female; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Gynecomastia; Humans; Infertility, Male; Male; Metabolism, Inborn Errors; Pregnancy
PubMed: 32623730
DOI: 10.1111/cen.14277 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022To identify the optimal initial 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC) patients. We conducted a...
Efficacy and Safety of Initial 5 Years of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
To identify the optimal initial 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC) patients. We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE to obtain relevant studies published between January 2000 and January 2022. Randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of initial 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy were included. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival and overall survival and the secondary outcome was severe adverse effects (SAEs). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was carried out to indirectly compare all regimens and the value of surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to obtain rankings. Eleven studies with 49,987 subjects were included. For DFS, exemestane (EXE) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.87-0.96], anastrozole (ANA) (0.94, 0.90-0.97), letrozole (LET) (0.93, 0.89-0.97), tamoxifen (TAM) followed by EXE (0.91, 0.87-0.96), and TAM followed by ANA (0.92, 0.87-0.98) were more favorable than TAM, with TAM followed by EXE ranking as the first of SUCRA. For OS, only TAM followed by ANA showed significant superiority than TAM (HR 0.91, 95%CI 0.86-0.97) and ranked as the first of SUCRA. For SAEs, EXE (HR 1.72, 95%CI 1.04-2.98), ANA (1.58, 1.03-2.43), and LET (1.63, 1.02-2.57) showed greater associations with bone fracture than TAM. However, no significant difference in the incidences of cardiac events, thromboembolic events, and cerebrovascular events was found among all comparisons. The sequential use of aromatase inhibitors, which has the best curative effects and relatively mild side effects, may be the optimal treatment mode for hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal EBC patients. In addition, the three kinds of aromatase inhibitors achieved roughly equal efficacy, but caused different types of SAEs. [website], identifier [registration number].
PubMed: 35721183
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.886954