-
The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery Feb 2022The aim of this paper was to evaluate the current role of atherectomy techniques (ATH) in treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) at below the knee (BTK) arteries.
INTRODUCTION
The aim of this paper was to evaluate the current role of atherectomy techniques (ATH) in treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) at below the knee (BTK) arteries.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
The PubMed and Embase were searched (last search on 11 September 2021) for studies reporting on the early and mid-term outcomes of ATH in BTK vessels. Analysis included the data from six studies, with a total of 1062 PAD patients treated with various ATH techniques. We compared them the ATH outcomes with the contemporaneous outcomes of plain balloon angioplasty alone or with bailout stenting. Early safety and efficacy were accessed with perioperative and 30-day technical success (TS) rate, which included the primary patency of the treated BTK arterial segment. Evaluation of clinical performance was based on target limb revascularization (TLR) and on major limb adverse events (MALEs) rates.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
The current body of literature mainly includes retrospective observational studies, and the level of derived evidence is low. The mean perioperative and 30-day TS rate was 87.3%. The mean reported TLR and MALEs rates at 12 months were 6.6% and 4.7% respectively. The relevant rates in studies reporting at 24 months were 24.3% and 31.7% while in studies reporting at 36 months the rates were 37.0% and 23.0% respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Based in low-quality evidence, it seems that ATH in BTK vessels has a high safety, high efficacy profile and durable outcomes at 12 months. In the mid-term, the clinical success of ATH is compromised by increased TLR and MALEs rates. Comparison of ATH with other endovascular techniques in BTK treatment of PAD shows a slight lead of ATH at 1-year and equivalent clinical performance in the mid-term. Overall, ATH has a significant and potentially predominant role in treatment of BTK vessels.
Topics: Arteries; Atherectomy; Humans; Leg; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Patency
PubMed: 34792313
DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.21.12113-5 -
The American Journal of Cardiology Oct 2023Calcified coronary plaque (CCP) represents a challenging scenario for interventional cardiologists. Stent underexpansion (SU), often associated with CCP, can predispose... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Calcified coronary plaque (CCP) represents a challenging scenario for interventional cardiologists. Stent underexpansion (SU), often associated with CCP, can predispose to stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis. To date, SU with heavily CCP can be addressed using very high-/high-pressure noncompliant balloons, off-label rotational atherectomy/orbital atherectomy, excimer laser atherectomy, and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL). In this meta-analysis, we investigated the success rate of IVL for the treatment of SU because of CCP. Studies and case-based experiences reporting on the use of IVL strategy for treatment of SU were included. The primary end point was IVL strategy success, defined as the adequate expansion of the underexpanded stent. A metanalysis was performed for the main focuses to calculate the proportions of procedural success rates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Random-effects models weighted by inverse variance were used because of clinical heterogeneity. This meta-analysis included 13 studies with 354 patients. The mean age was 71.3 years (95% CI 64.9 to 73.1), and 77% (95% CI 71.2% to 82.4%) were male. The mean follow-up time was 2.6 months (95% CI 1 to 15.3). Strategy success was seen in 88.7% (95% CI 82.3 to 95.1) of patients. The mean minimal stent area was reported in 6 studies, the pre-IVL value was 3.4 mm (95% CI 3 to 3.8), and the post-IVL value was 6.9 mm (95% CI 6.5 to 7.4). The mean diameter stenosis (percentage) was reported in 7 studies, the pre-IVL value was 69.4% (95% CI 60.7 to 78.2), and the post-IVL value was 14.6% (95% CI 11.1 to 18). The rate of intraprocedural complications was 1.6% (95% CI 0.3 to 2.9). In conclusion, the "stent-through" IVL plaque modification technique is a safe tool to treat SU caused by CCP, with a high success rate and a very low incidence of complications.
Topics: Humans; Male; Aged; Female; Lithotripsy; Stents; Endovascular Procedures; Atherectomy; Atherectomy, Coronary; Constriction, Pathologic
PubMed: 37611414
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.144 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Feb 2022Atherectomy has become increasingly used as an endovascular treatment of lower extremity atherosclerotic disease in the United States. However, concerns and...
OBJECTIVE
Atherectomy has become increasingly used as an endovascular treatment of lower extremity atherosclerotic disease in the United States. However, concerns and controversies about its indications and outcomes exist. The goal of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the outcomes and complications related to atherectomy to treat femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease.
METHODS
A systematic review in accordance with the recommendations from the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) statement was performed. Four major scientific repositories (MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Thompson Web of Sciences) were queried from their inception to April 5, 2020. We reviewed and entered the data in a dedicated dataset. The outcomes included the patency rates, clinical and hemodynamic improvement, and morbidity and mortality associated with atherectomy interventions.
RESULTS
Twenty-four studies encompassing 1900 patients met the inclusion criteria for the present study. Of the 1900 patients, 74.3% had presented with Rutherford class 1 to 3 and 25.7% presented with Rutherford class 4 to 6; 1445 patients had undergone atherectomy, and 455 patients had been treated without atherectomy. The atherectomy group had undergone directional atherectomy (n = 851), rotational atherectomy (n = 851), laser atherectomy (n = 201), and orbital atherectomy (n = 78). Most of these patients had also received adjunct treatments, which varied across the studies and included a combination of stenting, balloon angioplasty, or drug-coated balloon angioplasty. Technical success was achieved in 92.3% of the cases. Distal embolization, vessel perforation, and dissection occurred in 3.4%, 1.9%, and 4% of the cases, respectively. The initial patency was 95.4%. At the 12-month median follow-up, the primary patency was 72.6%. The ankle brachial index had improved from a preoperative mean of 0.6 to a postoperative mean of 0.84. The incidence of major amputation and mortality during the follow-up period was 2.2% and 3.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The results from our review of the reported data suggest that femoropopliteal atherectomy can be completed safely, modestly improving the ankle brachial index and maintaining the 1-year patency in nearly three of four patients. However, these findings were based on heterogeneous studies that skewed the generalizable conclusions about atherectomy's efficacy. Atherectomy places a high cost burden on the healthcare system and is used in the United States at a higher rate than in other countries. Our review of the literature did not demonstrate clear atherectomy superiority to alternatives that would warrant the pervasive and increasing use of this costly technology. Future work should focus on developing high-quality randomized controlled trials to determine the specific patient and lesion characteristics for which atherectomy can add value.
Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Atherectomy; Atherosclerosis; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Femoral Artery; Humans; Intermittent Claudication; Popliteal Artery; Stents; Vascular Patency
PubMed: 34303802
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.106 -
Annals of Vascular Surgery May 2023In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to compare drug-coated balloon (DCB) to drug-eluting stent (DES) angioplasty as a primary option in patients with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to compare drug-coated balloon (DCB) to drug-eluting stent (DES) angioplasty as a primary option in patients with femoropopliteal lesions in terms of primary patency and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cdTLR) and major adverse limb events (MALE).
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed and Embase databases. All studies written in English language and reporting data presenting a comparison between patients receiving primary percutaneous balloon angioplasty using the DCB versus primary percutaneous stenting with DES for native femoropopliteal lesions were included in this meta-analysis.
RESULTS
There were 984 patients with 1,078 femoropopliteal lesions, of which procedures with DCB and DES were performed in 514 and 564 lesions, respectively. Overall, majority patients were men with a mean age of 70.9 years, and there were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the cardiovascular comorbidities. With regards to the procedural strategy, there was significant heterogeneity in the DCB group. This included adjunctive procedures such as atherectomy besides the angioplasty of the target vessel, which was reported in 1 study as a part of 32.1% of the procedures in the DCB group. Provisional bare metal stents (pBMS) for residual stenosis and dissection were used in 4 studies with a percentage varying from 14.8 to 25.3%. Overall, at 1 year, all outcomes were similar for all the end points; however, where adjunctive procedures were performed (atherectomy + pBMS) in the DCB group, the outcomes were better (primary patency p.001, freedom cdTLR p.001, and freedom form MALE p.002). In studies where no adjunctive procedures were performed in the DCB group, the results favored the DES group for the primary patency (p.026) and freedom from cdTLR (p.044).
CONCLUSIONS
DES seems to be superior in terms of cdTLR and primary patency at 1 year when compared to the procedures performed solely with DCB. For DCB to achieve optimal results, further adjunctive procedures such as pBMS and atherectomy are needed. More studies are needed to confirm the superiority of the primary stenting with DES at the femoropopliteal segment.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Aged; Drug-Eluting Stents; Popliteal Artery; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Patency; Femoral Artery; Atherosclerosis; Angioplasty, Balloon; Coated Materials, Biocompatible
PubMed: 36746268
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.01.043 -
European Journal of Vascular and... Jul 2021The efficacy and cost effectiveness of atherectomy for femoropopliteal (FP) arterial diseases have not been determined yet. A systematic review and meta-analysis were... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Atherectomy Combined with Balloon Angioplasty versus Balloon Angioplasty Alone for de Novo Femoropopliteal Arterial Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
OBJECTIVE
The efficacy and cost effectiveness of atherectomy for femoropopliteal (FP) arterial diseases have not been determined yet. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the efficacy and safety between atherectomy combined with balloon angioplasty (BA) and BA alone for patients with de novo FP steno-occlusive lesions.
METHODS
The Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase were used to search for studies evaluating outcomes of atherectomy combined with BA compared with BA alone in FP arterial diseases from inception to July 2020. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess the level of evidence for each outcome. The fixed effects model was chosen to combine the data when I < 50%; otherwise, the random effects model was used. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to further analyse the results.
RESULTS
Four RCTs were included. The meta-analysis showed that atherectomy combined with BA was associated with improved technical success rate (risk ratio [RR] 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.38, p < .001; I = 0; high quality), reduced bailout stenting (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07-0.32, p < .001; I = 16%; high quality), and flow limiting dissection (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.47, p < .001; I = 0; high quality). No statistically significant difference was found in target lesion revascularisation (TLR), primary patency, mortality, major adverse event (MAE), or ankle brachial index (ABI) after one year follow up.
CONCLUSION
Compared with BA alone, atherectomy combined with BA may not improve primary patency, TLR, mortality rate, or ABI, but may reduce the need for bailout stenting and the incidence of flow limiting dissection and increase the technical success rate in FP arterial diseases. More studies are warranted to further confirm the conclusion.
Topics: Aortic Dissection; Angioplasty, Balloon; Ankle Brachial Index; Atherectomy; Combined Modality Therapy; Femoral Artery; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Patency
PubMed: 34112574
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.012 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022Severely calcified coronary lesions with reduced left ventricular (LV) function result in worse outcomes. Atherectomy is used in treating such lesions when technically...
Outcomes of atherectomy in treating severely calcified coronary lesions in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Severely calcified coronary lesions with reduced left ventricular (LV) function result in worse outcomes. Atherectomy is used in treating such lesions when technically feasible. However, there is limited data examining the safety and efficacy of atherectomy without hemodynamic support in treating severely calcified coronary lesions in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the clinical outcomes of atherectomy in patient with reduced LVEF.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL Register and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception through July 21, 2021) for studies evaluating the outcomes of atherectomy in patients with severe LV dysfunction. We used random-effect model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The endpoints were in-hospital and long term all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR).
RESULTS
A total of 7 studies consisting of 2,238 unique patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up duration was 22.4 months. The risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality using atherectomy in patients with severely reduced LVEF compared to the patients with moderate reduced or preserved LVEF was [2.4vs.0.5%; RR:5.28; 95%CI 1.65-16.84; = 0.005], the risk of long term all-cause mortality was [21 vs. 8.8%; RR of 2.84; 95% CI 1.16-6.95; = 0.02]. In-hospital TVR risk was 2.0 vs. 0.6% (RR: 4.15; 95% CI 4.15-15.67; = 0.04) and long-term TVR was [6.0 vs. 9.9%; RR of 0.75; 95% CI 0.39-1.42; = 0.37]. In-hospital MI was [7.1 vs. 5.4%; RR 1.63; 95% CI 0.91-2.93; = 0.10], long-term MI was [7.5 vs. 5.7; RR 1.74; 95%CI 0.95-3.18; = 0.07).
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis suggested that the patients with severely reduced LVEF when using atherectomy devices experienced higher risk of clinical outcomes in the terms of all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. As we know that the patients with severely reduced LVEF are inherently at increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes, this information should be considered hypothesis generating and utilized while discussing the risks and benefits of atherectomy in such high risk patients. Future studies should focus on the comparison of outcomes of different atherectomy devices in such patients. Adjusting for the inherent mortality risk posed by left ventricular dysfunction may be a strategy while designing a study.
PubMed: 36204563
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.946027 -
Vascular Dec 2021To compare the safety and efficiency of atherectomy plus drug-coated balloon with drug-coated balloon only for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To compare the safety and efficiency of atherectomy plus drug-coated balloon with drug-coated balloon only for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions.
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed and reported following the requirement of the PRISMA. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane library were queried from January 2000 to June 2020 to identify eligible literature. The modified Downs and Black checklist was used to assess the quality of included studies. Outcome measures included bail-out stenting, distal embolization, perforation, hematoma, primary patency at 12 months, target lesion revascularization at 12 months, leg amputation at 12 months, and mortality at 12 months. We used DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model to pool the dichotomous data on risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each study to obtain an overall estimate for major outcomes. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analyses were conducted.
RESULTS
Six studies (two randomized controlled trials and four retrospective cohort studies) with 470 patients were included. Atherectomy plus drug-coated balloon group was associated with lower rates of bail-out stenting (RR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.34-0.71, < 0.001). There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of distal embolization (RR: 2.06, 95%CI: 0.51-8.38, = 0.31), perforation (RR: 2.04, 95%CI: 0.43-9.71, = 0.37), hematoma (RR: 1.75, 95%CI: 0.43-7.09, = 0.43), primary patency at 12 months (1.09, 95%CI: 0.98-1.21, = 0.12), target lesion revascularization at 12 months (RR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.41-1.14, = 0.15), leg amputations at 12 months (RR: 0.54, 95%CI: 0.13-2.23, = 0.39), mortality at 12 months (RR: 2.18, 95%CI: 0.71-6.64, = 0.17). Sensitivity analysis had no effect on our findings.
CONCLUSIONS
The combination of atherectomy and drug-coated balloon was safe and effective in the treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions, with lower incidence of bail-out stenting compared with drug-coated balloon only.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amputation, Surgical; Angioplasty, Balloon; Atherectomy; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Equipment Design; Female; Femoral Artery; Humans; Limb Salvage; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Popliteal Artery; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Access Devices; Vascular Patency
PubMed: 33478353
DOI: 10.1177/1708538120985732 -
Coronary Artery Disease Dec 2022Rotational and orbital coronary atherectomy (CA) are commonly utilized to treat complex calcified coronary lesions. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate sex... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Rotational and orbital coronary atherectomy (CA) are commonly utilized to treat complex calcified coronary lesions. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate sex differences in procedural complications and clinical outcomes after CA.
METHODS
PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases were searched for all studies comparing sex differences in procedural and clinical outcomes following CA. The outcomes of interest were procedural complications (coronary dissection, stroke, major bleeding, coronary perforation, cardiac tamponade, and slow or no flow in target vessel) and the clinical outcomes (including early mortality, mid-term all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization). Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model.
RESULTS
Six observational studies with 3517 patients (2420 men and 1035 women) were included in this meta-analysis. While there was no significant difference in the early mortality (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.37-3.53; P = 0.83) between men and women, at a mean follow-up of 2.9 years, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in women (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.11-1.49; P = 0.0009). Women had an increased risk of procedure-related stroke (RR, 3.98; 95% CI, 1.06-14.90; P = 0.04), coronary dissection (RR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.23-3.58; P = 0.006), and bleeding (RR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.30-3.93; P = 0.004), whereas the rates of coronary perforation, cardiac tamponade, and the risk of slow or no flow in the revascularized artery were similar in both.
CONCLUSION
In our analysis, women undergoing CA are at increased risk of mid-term mortality and procedure-related complications including stroke, coronary dissection, and major bleeding.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Atherectomy, Coronary; Cardiac Tamponade; Sex Characteristics; Heart Injuries; Hemorrhage; Treatment Outcome; Stroke; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Coronary Artery Disease; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 36238981
DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001187 -
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Jan 2024Interventional cardiologists face challenges in managing chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions, with conflicting results when comparing rotational atherectomy (RA) to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Safety and feasibility of rotational atherectomy (RA) versus conventional stenting in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Interventional cardiologists face challenges in managing chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions, with conflicting results when comparing rotational atherectomy (RA) to conventional PCI. This meta-analysis aims to provide a critical evaluation of the safety and feasibility of RA in CTO lesions.
METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, and Cochrane central library until April 2023 were searched for relevant studies. MACE was our primary outcomes, other outcomes were all cause of death, cardiac death, MI, and TVR. Also, we reported angiographic outcomes as technical success, procedural success, and procedural complications in a random effect model. The pooled data was analyzed using odds ratio (OR) with its 95% CI using STATA 17 MP.
RESULTS
Seven studies comprising 5494 patients with a mean follow-up of 43.1 months were included in this meta-analysis. Our pooled analysis showed that RA was comparable to PCI to decrease the incidence of MACE (OR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.74 to 1.3], p = 0.9). Moreover, there was no significant difference between RA and conventional PCI in terms of other clinical or angiographic outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Our study showed that RA had comparable clinical and angiographic outcomes as conventional PCI in CTO lesions, which offer interventional cardiologists an expanded perspective when addressing calcified lesions.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION
CRD42023417362.
Topics: Humans; Atherectomy, Coronary; Chronic Disease; Coronary Occlusion; Feasibility Studies; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38166554
DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03673-2 -
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal :... Jun 2021Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is one of the paramount hurdles for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) since it impedes stent delivery and complete expansion.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Short term outcomes of rotational atherectomy versus orbital atherectomy in patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is one of the paramount hurdles for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) since it impedes stent delivery and complete expansion. This study intended to evaluate the short-term clinical and procedural outcomes comparing rotational atherectomy (RA) and orbital atherectomy (OA) in patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions undergoing PCI. : This systematic review and meta-analysis included all head-to-head published comparisons of coronary RA versus OA. Procedural endpoints and post-procedural clinical outcomes (30 days/in-hospital), were compared. RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis. : Seven retrospective observational investigations with a total of 4623 patients, including 3203 patients in the RA group and 1420 patients in the OA group, were incorporated. Compared with OA, the RA group was associated with a higher incidence of myocardial infarction at short-term follow-up (OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.07-2.29, = .02, = 0%). No difference was noted among other short-term post-procedural clinical outcomes including all-cause mortality, target vessel revascularization, or major adverse cardiac events. Among procedural complications, RA was associated with reduced coronary artery dissection and arterial perforation. Increased fluoroscopy time was observed in the RA cohort as compared with OA (MD: 4.78, 95% CI: 2.25-7.30, = .0002, = 80%). : RA was associated with fewer vascular complications, but at a cost of higher incidence of myocardial infarction and higher fluoroscopy time compared with OA, at short term follow-up. OA is a safe and effective alternative for the management of CAC.
Topics: Atherectomy; Atherectomy, Coronary; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33461347
DOI: 10.1080/14017431.2021.1875139