-
Annals of the Academy of Medicine,... Jan 2023Despite promising trials, catheter ablation is still regarded as an adjunct to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). This... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Despite promising trials, catheter ablation is still regarded as an adjunct to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of various ablation therapies and AADs.
METHOD
Randomised controlled trials or propensity score-matched studies comparing atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence among any combination of ablation modalities or AAD were retrieved. Kaplan-Meier curves and risk tables for this outcome were graphically reconstructed to extract patient-level data. Frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) using derived hazard ratios (HRs), as well as 2 restricted mean survival time (RMST) NMAs, were conducted. Treatment strategies were ranked using P-scores.
RESULTS
Across 24 studies comparing 6 ablation therapies (5,132 patients), Frequentist NMA-derived HRs of atrial fibrillation recurrence compared to AAD were 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.25-0.48) for cryoballoon ablation (CBA), 0.34 (95% CI=0.25-0.47) for radiofrequency ablation (RFA), 0.14 (95% CI=0.07-0.30) for combined CBA and RFA, 0.20 (95% CI=0.10-0.41) for hot-balloon ablation, 0.43 (95% CI=0.15-1.26) for laser-balloon ablation (LBA), and 0.33 (95% CI=0.18-0.62) for pulmonary vein ablation catheter. RMST-based NMAs similarly showed significant benefit of all ablation therapies over AAD. The combination of CBA + RFA showed promising long-term superiority over CBA and RFA, while LBA showed favourable short-term efficacy.
CONCLUSION
The advantage of ablation therapies over AAD in preventing atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence suggests that ablation should be considered as the first-line treatment for PAF in patients fit for the procedure. The promising nature of several specific therapies warrants further trials to elicit their long-term efficacy and perform a cost-benefit analysis.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Heart Atria; Network Meta-Analysis; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36730803
DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022326 -
CJC Open May 2022: The rhythm-monitoring strategy after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) impacts the detection of atrial arrhythmia recurrence and is not well... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
: The rhythm-monitoring strategy after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) impacts the detection of atrial arrhythmia recurrence and is not well characterized. We performed a systematic review and meta-regression analysis to determine whether the duration and mode of rhythm monitoring after CA affects detection of atrial arrhythmia recurrence.
METHODS
Databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials of adult patients undergoing first CA for AF from 2007 to 2021. Duration and strategy of rhythm monitoring were extracted. Meta-regression was used to identify any association between duration of monitoring and detection of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. The primary measure of outcome was single-procedure recurrence of atrial arrhythmia.
RESULTS
The search strategy yielded 57 trial arms from 56 randomized controlled trials comprising 5322 patients: 36 arms of patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF), and 21 arms of patients with persistent AF (PeAF) or both PAF/PeAF. Intermittent monitoring was associated with detection of significantly less atrial arrhythmia recurrence than continuous monitoring in PAF arms (31.2% vs 46.9%, = 0.001), but not in PeAF/PAF-PeAF combined arms (43.3% vs 63.6%, = 0.12). No significant relationship was seen between the duration of intermittent rhythm monitoring and atrial arrhythmia recurrence detection in either the PAF ( = 0.93) or PeAF/PAF-PeAF combined arms ( = 0.20).
CONCLUSIONS
Continuous rhythm monitoring detected higher atrial arrhythmia recurrence rates, compared to intermittent rhythm monitoring, in patients with PAF. The duration of intermittent monitoring did not show a statistically significant relationship to the yield of arrhythmia detection, in near identical cohorts of trial subjects undergoing similar interventions, with clinical and research implications.
PubMed: 35607484
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.02.001 -
JAMA Cardiology Jun 2024Catheter ablation is associated with reduced heart failure (HF) hospitalization and death in select patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Catheter ablation is associated with reduced heart failure (HF) hospitalization and death in select patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the benefit in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate whether catheter ablation for AF is associated with reduced HF-related outcomes according to HF phenotype.
DATA SOURCE
A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central was conducted among studies published from inception to September 2023.
STUDY SELECTION
Parallel-group randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing catheter ablation with conventional rate or rhythm control therapies in patients with HF, New York Heart Association functional class II or greater, and a history of paroxysmal or persistent AF were included. Pairs of independent reviewers screened 7531 titles and abstracts, of which 12 RCTs and 4 substudies met selection criteria.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data were abstracted in duplicate according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects Mantel-Haenszel models. Interaction P values were used to test for subgroup differences.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was HF events, defined as HF hospitalization, clinically significant worsening of HF, or unscheduled visits to a clinician for treatment intensification. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.
RESULTS
A total of 12 RCTs with 2465 participants (mean [SD] age, 65.3 [9.7] years; 658 females [26.7%]) were included; there were 1552 participants with HFrEF and 913 participants with HFpEF. Compared with conventional rate or rhythm control, catheter ablation was associated with reduced risk of HF events in HFrEF (risk ratio [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.48-0.72), while there was no benefit in patients with HFpEF (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.65-1.32) (P for interaction = .03). Catheter ablation was associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular death compared with conventional therapies in HFrEF (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34-0.70) but a differential association was not detected in HFpEF (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.46-1.79) (P for interaction = .12). Similarly, no difference in the association of catheter ablation with all-cause mortality was found between HFrEF (RR vs conventional therapies, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.86) and HFpEF (RR vs conventional therapies, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.39-2.30) groups (P for interaction = .39).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This study found that catheter ablation for AF was associated with reduced risk of HF events in patients with HFrEF but had limited or no benefit in HFpEF. Results from ongoing trials may further elucidate the role of catheter ablation for AF in HFpEF.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Heart Failure; Stroke Volume
PubMed: 38656292
DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0675 -
Europace : European Pacing,... Mar 2023To describe the role of left atrial (LA) epicardial conduction and targets of ablation in biatrial tachycardias (BiATs).
AIMS
To describe the role of left atrial (LA) epicardial conduction and targets of ablation in biatrial tachycardias (BiATs).
METHODS AND RESULTS
Consecutive patients with BiAT diagnosed by high-density mapping and appropriate entrainment were enrolled. A systematic review of case reports or series was then performed. Biatrial tachycardia was identified in 20 patients aged 63.5 ± 11.1 years. Among them, eight had LA epicardial conduction, including four via the ligament of Marshall, two via myocardial fibres between the great cardiac vein (GCV) and LA, one via septopulmonary bundle, and one via myocardial fibres between the posterior wall and coronary sinus. Ablation was targeted at the anatomical isthmus in 14, including 5 undergoing vein of Marshall ethanol infusion and 2 undergoing ablation in the GCV. Another six underwent ablation at interatrial connections, including one with septopulmonary bundle at the fossa ovalis and five at the atrial insertions of Bachmann's bundle. After a mean follow-up of 8.7 ± 3.8 months, five patients had recurrence of atrial fibrillation/flutter. Systematic review enrolled 87 patients in previous and the present reports, showing a higher risk of impairment in atrial physiology in those targeting interatrial connections (30.4 vs. 5.0%, P < 0.001) but no significant difference in short- and long-term effectiveness.
CONCLUSION
Left atrial epicardial conduction is common in BiATs and affects the ablation strategy. Atrial physiology is a major concern in selecting the target of intervention.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Conduction System; Treatment Outcome; Tachycardia; Heart Atria; Catheter Ablation
PubMed: 36563053
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac231 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Oct 2021This study analyzes and compares the efficacy of using catheter ablation (CA) and traditional drug treatments for atrial fibrillation (AF). Through a systematic review... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This study analyzes and compares the efficacy of using catheter ablation (CA) and traditional drug treatments for atrial fibrillation (AF). Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, it seeks to provide a theoretical basis for using clinical CA for patients with AF.
METHODS
We searched through articles detailing randomly controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the surgical effect of CA on the treatment of AF. These articles were published before January 31, 2000 in various English databases, including PubMed, Embase, Medline, Ovid, Springer, and Web of Sciences. The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention 5.0.2 was adopted for the bias risk assessment, and Review Manager 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis of the articles.
RESULTS
A total of 2,098 patients drawn from 13 articles were included in the study. For patients in the experimental group (Exp. group), the meta-analysis showed an increase in the effects of clinical treatment [mean deviation (MD) =3.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.15-4.85; Z=12.36; P<0.00001], an improvement in daily life function (MD =1.45; 95% CI, 1.03-1.87; Z=6.82; P<0.00001), a decrease in body weakness (MD =-2.84; 95% CI, -3.24 to -2.45; Z=14.16; P <0.00001), and an increase in quality of life score (MD =14.15; 95% CI, 7.24-21.05; Z=4.01; P<0.0001). The Exp. group also experienced a reduction in postoperative pain level (MD =-2.5; 95% CI, -3.11 to -1.89; Z=8.04; P<0.00001), reoccurrence of symptomatic AF (OR =0.27; 95% CI, 0.11-0.67; Z=2.82; P=0.005), rehospitalization (MD =0.15; 95% CI, 0.07-0.31; Z=5.11; P<0.00001), other arrhythmia (MD =0.33; 95% CI, 0.18-0.6; Z=3.62; P=0.0003), and pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) (MD =0.32; 95% CI, 0.14-0.72; Z=2.74; P=0.006). However, in contrast to patients in the control group (Ctrl group), the 'bleeding' mentioned above showed no statistical difference.
DISCUSSION
CA has a good postoperative clinical effect on AF patients, reducing incidences of pain, adverse reactions, and rehospitalization. For this reason, CA is a suitable treatment for AF patients who do not effectively respond to drug therapy.
Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Humans; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34763501
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-2313 -
Current Problems in Cardiology Mar 2023Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an effective therapy for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an effective therapy for AF. We conducted a meta-analysis to update the current clinical evidence on the efficacy of CA for AF in patients with HCM. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Clinicaltrials.gov for interventional and observational studies assessing single and multiple procedure success rate of CA in HCM patients. Our meta-analysis included 25 studies involving 1817 patients. Success rate following single procedure was 40.4% (95% CI 33.1 to 48.0%) at latest follow-up. The pooled success rate following multiple procedures was 51.4% (95% CI 42.9% to 60.0%) at latest follow-up. In the subgroup analysis for AF subtype, TCA was more successful for paroxysmal AF compared to non-paroxysmal AF. For the subset of studies reporting drug-free success rate, single and multiple procedures had a success rate of 33.4% (95% CI 19.3 to 49.1%) and 51.8% (95% CI 41.3 to 62.2%) at latest follow-up, respectively. CA is a suitable option for AF in patients with HCM. Success rate is greater in paroxysmal AF, after multiple procedures and with antiarrhythmic drugs.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Treatment Outcome; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Catheter Ablation
PubMed: 36455792
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101524 -
Cureus Aug 2023It is expected that the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia among people aged 65 to 85, would be mostly classified using the... (Review)
Review
It is expected that the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia among people aged 65 to 85, would be mostly classified using the CHAS2DS2-VASc approach for anticoagulation therapy. A high number of people in the entire world will be living with AF by 2030. Long-term follow-up data are sparse, although radiofrequency catheter ablation (CA) for symptomatic AF patients has the potential to be a curative therapy. Although women are referred later and less often than men, the outcomes following ablation are comparable across both genders. Health-related quality of life suffers from AF, and patients often find themselves less active as a result of their condition. AF may have a wide variety of symptoms and signs from the clinic's point of view. Women are more likely to exhibit symptoms than men; one reason for this is that women have an average QT interval that is 10-20 milliseconds longer than men, which is more likely to exacerbate tachycardia symptoms. In search of medical databases for relevant medical literature, we looked at PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Ten publications were gathered after the papers were located, assessed, and qualifying criteria applied were used to select them. The finished articles were done to give an overview of the effectiveness of ablation therapy for AF. Some studies showed that there was no statistical significance between invasive and pharmacological treatments. Other research found no difference in the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia between pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) CA alone and PVI + enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided fibrosis ablation in individuals with persistent AF. The oldest individuals in studies comparing CA to medical treatment for AF demonstrated no improvement in prognosis after CA. Also, complications from therapy and CA's efficacy in preventing future atrial arrhythmias were similarly low across all age groups. Based on the above, we concluded that more studies are required to establish the most effective approach to treating AF to apply it in daily practice and gain more knowledge about it.
PubMed: 37641724
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43992 -
Current Problems in Cardiology Mar 2021Pregnancy is associated with major structural and hemodynamic changes in the cardiovascular system that predispose women to an increased risk of atrial fibrillation.... (Review)
Review
Pregnancy is associated with major structural and hemodynamic changes in the cardiovascular system that predispose women to an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. While these changes generally resolve after parturition, the impact of subsequent pregnancies on the risk of atrial fibrillation is unknown. We searched through PubMed for studies that have investigated the impact of multiparity on the risk of atrial fibrillation. The following Medical Subject Headings terms were used: ([repeated pregnancies] OR parity) AND ([Atrial fibrillation] OR AF). Studies with complete data were included in the current study. Out of 135 studies identified through the prespecified criteria, we selected 2 studies with relevant data. Increasing number of pregnancies was associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation in a dose-response relationship. Our systematic review suggests that multiparity is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. More studies are warranted to elucidate the association between repeated pregnancies and atrial fibrillation.
Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Gravidity; Humans; Pregnancy
PubMed: 33004225
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100697 -
Journal of Arrhythmia Dec 2022Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a proven alternative to pharmacologic rhythm control in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction...
BACKGROUND
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a proven alternative to pharmacologic rhythm control in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Whether outcomes differ in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is of interest.
METHODS
Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Primary efficacy outcomes of interest include atrial arrythmia recurrence and repeat ablation. Harm outcomes of interest include all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalizations, cardiovascular hospitalizations, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and cardiac tamponade.
RESULTS
We included 7 observational studies comprising 2554 patients with HFpEF who underwent catheter ablation for AF. When comparing patients with HFpEF versus without HF, there was no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio [RR] 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-2.13), stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.03-6.54), or cardiac tamponade (RR 1.20; 95% CI 0.12-12.20). When comparing patients with HFpEF versus HFrEF, there was no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence (RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.92-1.37), repeat ablation (RR 1.19; 95% CI 0.74-1.93), all-cause mortality (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.67-1.13), all-cause hospitalizations (RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.94-1.30), cardiovascular hospitalizations (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.69-1.01), stroke or TIA (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.29-2.25), or cardiac tamponade (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.19-5.16).
CONCLUSIONS
Non-randomized studies suggest that catheter ablation for AF in patients with HFpEF is associated with similar arrythmia-free survival and safety profile when compared to patients with HFrEF or without heart failure.
PubMed: 36524044
DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12794 -
The American Journal of Cardiology Dec 2023Although surgical ablation has been shown to produce excellent outcomes at follow-up for patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent mitral valve replacement/repair... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Although surgical ablation has been shown to produce excellent outcomes at follow-up for patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent mitral valve replacement/repair (MVR), this procedure is not commonly performed. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of concomitant surgical ablation during MVR. Three databases were systematically reviewed for randomized clinical trials published by August 2022. The primary outcome was sinus rhythm (SR) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included SR at discharge and 6 months, all-cause mortality, permanent pacemaker implantation, and stroke and thromboembolic events. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, calculating odds ratios (ORs) for each outcome. Thirteen studies were included, involving 1,089 patients comparing patients who underwent either isolated MVR ("MVR-only") or concomitant surgical ablation during MVR ("MVR+Ablation"). The odds of SR were significantly higher in the MVR+Ablation group at discharge (OR 9.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.87 to 19.02, I = 55%), at 6-month follow-up (OR 7.21, 95% CI 4.30 to 12.11, I = 34%), and at 1-year follow-up (OR 8.41, 95% CI 5.14 to 13.77, I = 48%). All-cause mortality was not different in the groups, as were stroke and thromboembolic events, whereas the odds of permanent pacemaker implantation were slightly higher in the MVR+Ablation group (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.17, I = 0%). Concomitant surgical ablation during MVR showed excellent outcomes at short-term follow-up, despite a slightly higher rate of permanent pacemaker implantation. Further studies with longer follow-ups are needed to assess if the SR is maintained over the years.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Mitral Valve; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Catheter Ablation; Stroke; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
PubMed: 37848175
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.088