-
Clinical Rheumatology Aug 2021Radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (also known as ankylosing spondylitis [AS]) is a chronic immune-mediated arthritis characterized by inflammation of the axial...
Radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (also known as ankylosing spondylitis [AS]) is a chronic immune-mediated arthritis characterized by inflammation of the axial skeleton, peripheral joints, and entheses. It is estimated that 1 in every 200 people are affected by AS, making it an important healthcare and socioeconomic issue. In this review, we aim to explore the current understanding of AS risk factors and provide a comprehensive update. Multiple search strings were used to identify articles of interest published in PubMed between January 1, 2013, and February 1, 2021. On the basis of the literature review and analysis, we present up-to-date information on the risk factors of developing AS and our viewpoints on disease onset and progression. Multiple genetic and nongenetic risk factors have been suggested in the onset of AS. HLA-B27 is known to have a strong association with the disease, but other genes have been implicated in disease development. Aside from genetics, other factors are thought to be involved; up to 70% of patients with AS have subclinical intestinal inflammation, suggesting that the origin of the disease may be in the gut. The exact mechanism by which AS onset begins is most likely complex and multifactorial. Key Points • It remains unclear how interactions between genes, microbes, mechanical stress, gender, and other environmental and lifestyle factors predispose patients to the development of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). • The exact mechanisms of AS are complex and multifactorial which will require much future research • Recognizing the risk factors, as well as understanding gene-environment interactions, may offer valuable insights into the etiology of AS and have important implications for diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Topics: HLA-B27 Antigen; Humans; Inflammation; Risk Factors; Spondylarthritis; Spondylitis, Ankylosing
PubMed: 33754220
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-021-05679-7 -
European Spine Journal : Official... Sep 2020To systematically evaluate any consensus for the etiology, definition, presentation and outcomes of developmental lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To systematically evaluate any consensus for the etiology, definition, presentation and outcomes of developmental lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS).
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was undertaken by 2 independent reviewers with PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science to identify all published knowledge on DLSS. Search terms included "developmental spinal stenosis" or "congenital spinal stenosis" and "lumbar". The inclusion criteria were English clinical studies with sample size larger than 8, articles examining the etiology, diagnostic criteria, surgical outcomes of DLSS, and its association with other spinal pathologies. Articles that did not specify a developmental component were excluded. The GRADE approach was used to assess their quality of evidence.
RESULTS
The initial database review found 404 articles. Twenty articles with moderate to very low quality met the inclusion criteria for analysis. The bony canal diameter was significantly shorter in patients with DLSS than normal subjects. In addition, the risk of re-operation on adjacent levels (21.7%) was high which could be explained by multi-level stenosis. However, there was a lack of consensus on the methodology of diagnosing DLSS and on its specific surgical techniques.
CONCLUSION
Multi-level stenosis and re-operation at adjacent levels are especially common with DLSS. Identification of these individuals provides better prognostication after surgery. However, current literature provides few consensus on its definition and the required surgical approach. Besides, there are limited reports of its etiology and association with other spinal pathologies. Due to these limitations, standardizing the definition of DLSS and investigating its etiology and expected clinical course are necessary.
Topics: Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae; Lumbosacral Region; Reoperation; Spinal Stenosis
PubMed: 32623513
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06524-2 -
The International Journal of...To synthesize evidence derived from systematic reviews (SRs) on different interventions for rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations.
PURPOSE
To synthesize evidence derived from systematic reviews (SRs) on different interventions for rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A protocol-oriented search was established to address the PICO question: What is the current evidence regarding rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla with different implant-supported prostheses in terms of implant and prosthesis survival? The primary outcomes were implant and prosthesis survival rates evaluated from SRs of clinical studies including adult patients with complete edentulism of the maxilla and comparing different implant-supported rehabilitation strategies. Methodologic quality of the SRs was assessed with the AMSTAR-2 tool.
RESULTS
The final selection process led to the inclusion of 36 SRs that were grouped as: (1) addressing maxillae with sufficient bone to place implants; (2) addressing maxillae with insufficient bone to place implants; and (3) comparing different types of prosthesis, number of implants, patient-reported outcomes, and economic evaluations. The literature describes four or more implants as suitable for full-arch fixed prostheses and implant-supported overdentures; in both cases, the overall survival rate is > 95%. Mini-implants present very high short-term failure rates (> 30%). Poor description of technical complications, adjustments, and maintenance and corresponding costs precluded a cost-effectiveness analysis.
CONCLUSION
No implant-supported rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla (fixed or removable) should be supported on fewer than four implants. A one-piece full-arch fixed dental prosthesis can be supported by a minimum of two anterior axial plus two posterior distally tilted implants or by six to eight axial implants symmetrically distributed through the posterior and anterior regions of the arch. Four to six implants is the advised number to support an overdenture. The use of mini-implants in the maxilla is inadvisable.
Topics: Adult; Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dental Restoration Failure; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Jaw, Edentulous; Maxilla; Mouth, Edentulous; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33571327
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.7162 -
Oral Diseases Oct 2023This study aimed to assess the frequency of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) compared with the healthy individuals. We... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study aimed to assess the frequency of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) compared with the healthy individuals. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases from their inception until 2022, without language restriction. A standardized dataset was used to extract data from the observational studies. Patients were required to have axial spondyloarthritis and clinical and/or radiographic evidence of temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model. A systematic review was registered under number CRD42020206283. We identified seven relevant studies, which provided data for 745 patients and 216 temporomandibular disorders events. The combined odds ratio (OR) showed that the risk of temporomandibular disorders in individuals with axial spondyloarthritis was higher than the control group (pooled OR = 5.26, 95% CI 2.50-11, 06; p < 0.02; I = 58%). Also, these individuals do not appear to refer possible temporomandibular joint symptoms to the rheumatologist or dentist. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that patients with axial spondyloarthritis have an increased frequency of temporomandibular disorders. TMDs seem to be secondary to postural alterations rather than direct involvement of the temporomandibular joints (TMJs).
Topics: Humans; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Temporomandibular Joint; Axial Spondyloarthritis; Odds Ratio
PubMed: 36578234
DOI: 10.1111/odi.14490 -
The Spine Journal : Official Journal of... Oct 2019Posterior cervical fusion (PCF) with decompression is a treatment option for patients with conditions such as spondylosis, spinal stenosis, and degenerative disc... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
Posterior cervical fusion (PCF) with decompression is a treatment option for patients with conditions such as spondylosis, spinal stenosis, and degenerative disc disorders that result in myelopathy or radiculopathy. The annual rate, number, and cost of PCF in the United States has increased. Far fewer studies have been published on PCF outcomes than on anterior cervical fusion (ACF) outcomes, most likely because far fewer PCFs than ACFs are performed.
PURPOSE
To evaluate the patient-reported and clinical outcomes of adult patients who underwent subaxial posterior cervical fusion with decompression.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
PATIENT SAMPLE
The total number of patients in the 31 articles reviewed and included in the meta-analysis was 1,238 (range 7-166).
OUTCOME MEASURES
Preoperative to postoperative change in patient-reported outcomes (visual analog scales for arm pain and neck pain, Neck Disability Index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] score, modified JOA score, and Nurick pain scale) and rates of fusion, revision, and complications or adverse events.
METHODS
This study was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and a preapproved protocol. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for articles published from January 2001 through July 2018. Statistical analyses for patient-reported outcomes were performed on the outcomes' raw mean differences, calculated as postoperative value minus preoperative value from each study. Pooled rates of successful fusion, revision surgery, and complications or adverse events, and their 95% confidence intervals, were also calculated. Two subgroup analyses were performed: one for studies in which only myelopathy or radiculopathy (or both) were stated as surgical indications and the other for studies in which only myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (or both) were stated as surgical indications. This study was funded by Providence Medical Technology, Inc. ($32,000).
RESULTS
Thirty-three articles were included in the systematic review, and 31 articles were included in the meta-analysis. For all surgical indications and for the 2 subgroup analyses, every cumulative change in patient-reported outcome improved. Many of the reported changes in patient-reported outcome also exceeded the minimal clinically important differences. Pooled outcome rates with all surgical indications were 98.25% for successful fusion, 1.09% for revision, and 9.02% for complications or adverse events. Commonly reported complications or adverse events were axial pain, C5 palsy, transient neurological worsening, and wound infection.
CONCLUSIONS
Posterior cervical fusion with decompression resulted in significant clinical improvement, as indicated by the changes in patient-reported outcomes. Additionally, high fusion rates and low rates of revision and of complications and adverse events were found.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Cervical Vertebrae; Decompression, Surgical; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Reoperation; Spinal Cord Diseases; Spinal Fusion
PubMed: 31075361
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.019 -
Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2021This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the clinical survival of axial and tilted implants in atrophic edentulous maxilla after three years of immediate... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the clinical survival of axial and tilted implants in atrophic edentulous maxilla after three years of immediate loading and also the corresponding marginal bone loss.
SETTING AND DESIGN
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The relevant studies were retrieved from MEDLINE(PubMed), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Direct, Google Scholar databases. The search was limited to studies published in the English language with no date restrictions. A further hand search was conducted on individual journals and reference lists of studies. The risk of bias in included studies was assessed by using the Evidence Project risk of bias tool.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED
Statistical meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. The assessment for the level of evidence was done using GRADEpro software.
RESULTS
Eleven studies were finalised. All were included in the meta-analysis for implant survival, while only seven studies were included in the meta-analysis of marginal bone loss. After three years, the meta-analysis results for implant survival showed no statistical difference between axial and tilted implants, with the forest plot neither favouring axial nor tilted implants (RR = 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.01); P-value = 0.59). After three years, the meta-analysis results for marginal bone showed no statistical difference between axial and tilted implants, with the forest plot neither favouring axial nor tilted implants (MD = -0.02; 95% CI; -0.09-0.06; P-value = 0.69).
CONCLUSION
In the immediately loaded rehabilitation of completely edentulous atrophic maxillae, tilting of implants did not induce any significant alteration in their survival and their corresponding marginal bone loss levels compared to conventionally placed axial implants even after three years of function.
Topics: Alveolar Bone Loss; Humans; Jaw, Edentulous; Maxilla; Mouth, Edentulous; Prostheses and Implants
PubMed: 34380808
DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_79_21 -
Neuroradiology Mar 2021The study design of this paper is systematic review. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the existing radiological grading systems that are used to assess cervical... (Review)
Review
The study design of this paper is systematic review. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the existing radiological grading systems that are used to assess cervical foraminal stenosis. The importance of imaging the cervical spine using CT or MRI in evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis is widely accepted; however, there is no consensus for standardized methodology to assess the compression of the cervical nerve roots. A systematic search of Ovid Medline databases, Embase 1947 to present, Cinahl, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ISRCTN and WHO international clinical trials was performed for reports of cervical foraminal stenosis published before 01 February 2020. In collaboration with the University of Leeds, a search strategy was developed. A total of 6952 articles were identified with 59 included. Most of the reports involved multiple imaging modalities with standard axial and sagittal imaging used most. The grading themes that came from this systematic review show that the most mature for cervical foraminal stenosis is described by (Kim et al. Korean J Radiol 16:1294, 2015) and (Park et al. Br J Radiol 86:20120515, 2013). Imaging of the cervical nerve root canals is mostly performed using MRI and is reported using subjective terminology. The Park, Kim and Modified Kim systems for classifying the degree of stenosis of the nerve root canal have been described. Clinical application of these scoring systems is limited by their reliance on nonstandard imaging (Park), limited validation against clinical symptoms and surgical outcome data. Oblique fine cut images derived from three dimensional MRI datasets may yield more consistency, better clinical correlation, enhanced surgical decision-making and outcomes.
Topics: Cervical Vertebrae; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Radiculopathy; Radiography; Spinal Nerve Roots; Spinal Stenosis
PubMed: 33392737
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02596-5 -
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience :... Sep 2022Burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) are rare injuries and typically occur because of high-energy axial compressive load. Their unique anatomy and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) are rare injuries and typically occur because of high-energy axial compressive load. Their unique anatomy and biomechanical characteristics distinguish them from other lumbar spine injuries. To the best of our knowledge, the treatment strategies for L5 burst fractures have not been thoroughly described. The aims of this case series and systematic review were to highlight the treatment strategies and outcomes of the L5 burst fractures.
METHODS
We performed a retrospective case series of 8 patients treated for burst L5 fractures in our institution between 2005 and 2020. Additionally, a systematic review via PubMed and Cochrane Library databases according to PRISMA guidelines was performed to review L5 burst fractures treatment strategies. Only Articles in English with full text available were included. The references of the selected studies were checked to find all possible related articles. Treatment strategies were conservative, posterior segmental instrumentation and fixation (PSIF), PSIF with anterior corpectomy (AC), and PSIF with posterior corpectomy (PC). Outcomes measures included neurological status, radiological regional alignment, and complications.
RESULTS
A total of 1449 publications were found, and 29 articles were finally selected for analysis. Of those, 15 were retrospective case reports, and 14 were retrospective case series. One hundred and sixty-nine patients were found in the review. The author's eight cases were added to the found in the literature for a methodological quality assessment. There were 52 (29%) patients managed non-operative, and 125 (71%) underwent surgery. One-hundred-two patients were neurologically intact, of whom 46 were managed non-operative. Canal compromise in intact patients ranged between 20 and 90%. Posterior segmental fixation and instrumentation with decompression was the preferred surgical strategy in patients with neurological deficits. Patients with combined anterior column restoration and anterior approach showed vertebral height and lordosis restoration. A 79% of the operative treated group reported neurological improvement. Patients with pre-operative neurological deficit managed non-operative reported the highest rate of complications (33.3%).
CONCLUSION
In the setting of L5 burst fractures, neurological injuries have a promising prognosis after surgery and are not correlated with the degree of canal stenosis. The compromise of the L5 vertebra affects the sagittal balance and its restoration can be achieved with an anterior corpectomy. Nonoperative management can be considered in cases of reasonable alignment, and no neurologic deficit.
Topics: Decompression, Surgical; Fractures, Compression; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fractures; Thoracic Vertebrae; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35907351
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.07.017 -
Clinical Rheumatology Sep 2023C-reactive protein (CRP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are widely used to monitor inflammation in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
C-reactive protein (CRP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are widely used to monitor inflammation in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but the relationship between CRP and MRI-detected inflammation is incompletely understood. The present study was undertaken to assess correlations between CRP and MRI-detected inflammation in axSpA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library) to identify relevant studies concerning CRP and MRI-detected inflammation in axSpA patients. The MRI-detected inflammation was evaluated by MRI-based disease activity score (DAS). The correlation between CRP and MRI-based DAS was integrated by random-effect models.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies reported a total of 1392 axSpA patients which were included in this meta-analysis. CRP was significantly associated with spinal MR DAS (r=0.226, 95%CI [0.149, 0.291], p<0.001, I=23%). We also found a moderate correlation between CRP change and spinal MR DAS change (r[ASspiMRI-a]=0.354, 95%CI [0.282, 0.422], p<0.001, I=48%; r[SPARCC]=0.544, 95%CI [0.345, 0.701], p<0.001, I=19%). CRP at baseline was negatively associated with improvement in spinal MR DAS (r= - 0.327, 95%CI [-0.397, -0.264], p<0.001, I=0%). However, no significant association was found between CRP and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) MR DAS.
CONCLUSIONS
In axSpA patients, CRP is associated with MRI-detected inflammation in the spine but not in SIJ. We speculate that CRP could be a reasonable index to reflect spinal inflammation. Therefore, we suggest it is not essential to repeat spinal MRI in a short term, while SIJ MRI may be necessary to provide additional information on inflammation. Key Points • CRP is associated with MRI-detected inflammation in the spine but not in sacroiliac joints. • CRP at baseline was negatively associated with improvement in spinal MR DAS. • It was not essential to repeat spinal MRI frequently, while SIJ MRI may be necessary to provide additional information on inflammation.
Topics: Humans; C-Reactive Protein; Spondylarthritis; Inflammation; Sacroiliac Joint; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Axial Spondyloarthritis
PubMed: 37336841
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-023-06658-w -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Dec 2020Axial spondyloarthropathy (axSpA) is an inflammatory arthritis which affects the sacroiliac joints and the spine. Many females affected are of childbearing age. Studies... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Axial spondyloarthropathy (axSpA) is an inflammatory arthritis which affects the sacroiliac joints and the spine. Many females affected are of childbearing age. Studies on effects of pregnancy on axSpA disease activity and medication use have been limited, with divergent conclusions.
OBJECTIVE
To review literature on axSpA in pregnancy to determine the effect of disease on pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS
A systematic review of case-control trials, observational studies, cross sectional studies and case series (n>5) on axSpA in pregnancy. EMBASE, Medline (OVID), CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care (MIDIRS online), and Web of Science were searched for keywords. Two reviewers reviewed articles to determine suitability for inclusion. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias. Data extraction was performed using a standardized template to streamline data to allow comparison and meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Search strategy returned 884 records, 130 full text articles were assessed for eligibility. Eighteen studies with a total of 3,166 axSpA participants were eligible for inclusion. There was an increased prevalence of pre-eclampsia (OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.92-1.82) and IUGR (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.26-5.17) and a statistically significant increase in cesarean sections (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.46-2.30) in axSpA females, with an especially high prevalence of elective cesarean sections (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.74, 2.93). There was a trend towards increased prevalence of fetal complications in axSpA pregnancies (LBW OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.98-2.21; SGA OR1.66, 95% CI 0.93-2.95; congenital abnormalities OR 1.34, 95% CI0.63-1.24; NICU admissions OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.96-2.51) which did not reach significance.
CONCLUSION
AxSpA females have an increased prevalence of cesarean sections compared to the general population. There is a trend towards increased prevalence of pre-eclampsia, IUGR and certain fetal complications. Ongoing development of national registries could help to better understand axSpA in pregnancy.
Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Sacroiliac Joint; Spondylarthritis; Spondylarthropathies
PubMed: 33065422
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.08.011