-
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine Aug 2023Odontoid fractures can be managed surgically when indicated. The most common approaches are anterior dens screw (ADS) fixation and posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis (PA). Each... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Odontoid fractures can be managed surgically when indicated. The most common approaches are anterior dens screw (ADS) fixation and posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis (PA). Each approach has theoretical advantages, but the optimal surgical approach remains controversial. The goal in this study was to systematically review the literature and synthesize outcomes including fusion rates, technical failures, reoperation, and 30-day mortality associated with ADS versus PA for odontoid fractures.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed and the I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.
RESULTS
In total, 22 studies comprising 963 patients (ADS 527, PA 436) were included. The average age of the patients ranged from 28 to 81.2 years across the included studies. The majority of the odontoid fractures were type II based on the Anderson-D'Alonzo classification. The ADS group was associated with statistically significantly lower odds to achieve bony fusion at last follow-up compared to the PA group (ADS 84.1%; PA 92.3%; OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23-0.91; I2 42.6%). The ADS group was associated with statistically significantly higher odds of reoperation compared to the PA group (ADS 12.4%; PA 5.2%; OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.50-4.35; I2 0%). The rates of technical failure (ADS 2.3%; PA 1.1%; OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.52-2.37; I2 0%) and all-cause mortality (ADS 6%; PA 4.8%; OR 1.35; 95% CI 0.67-2.74; I2 0%) were similar between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis of patients > 60 years old, the ADS was associated with statistically significantly lower odds of fusion compared to the PA group (ADS 72.4%; PA 89.9%; OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.06-0.91; I2 58.7%).
CONCLUSIONS
ADS fixation is associated with statistically significantly lower odds of fusion at last follow-up and higher odds of reoperation compared to PA. No differences were identified in the rates of technical failure and all-cause mortality. Patients receiving ADS fixation at > 60 years old had significantly higher and lower odds of reoperation and fusion, respectively, compared to the PA group. PA is preferred to ADS fixation for odontoid fractures, with a stronger effect size for patients > 60 years old.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Spinal Fractures; Odontoid Process; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Arthrodesis; Fractures, Bone; Bone Screws; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37148232
DOI: 10.3171/2023.3.SPINE221001 -
World Neurosurgery Apr 2021Intraoperative vascular injuries in the cervical spine are rare, but carry significant morbidity and mortality when they do occur. There is a need to better characterize... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Intraoperative vascular injuries in the cervical spine are rare, but carry significant morbidity and mortality when they do occur. There is a need to better characterize the risk of vertebral artery injury (VAI) after posterior C1-C2 fusion. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of VAI in patients undergoing posterior C1-C2 cervical fusion.
METHODS
An electronic database search was performed to identify studies that reported rates of VAI following posterior cervical fusion at C1-C2 level. Patient-specific risk factors, surgical indication, surgical technique, and other data were collected for each study. Forest plots were created to outline the pooled ratios of VAI in the literature.
RESULTS
Eleven studies with 773 patients were identified. Mean age of patients was 48.47 years (range, 6-78 years), and most patients were female (61.7%, n = 399). Trauma was the most frequent indication for surgery (18.8%, n = 146), followed by inflammatory processes affecting the vertebrae (13.2%, n = 102). The rate of VAI per patient was 2% (95% confidence interval = 1%-4%) among 773 patients, while injury rate per screw was 1% (95% confidence interval = 0%-2%) among 2238 screws placed.
CONCLUSIONS
The rate of VAI after C1-C2 posterior cervical fusion was found to be 2% for each operated patient and 1% for each screw placed.
Topics: Atlanto-Axial Joint; Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Cerebral Angiography; Cervical Atlas; Humans; Intraoperative Complications; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Spinal Fusion; Vascular System Injuries; Vertebral Artery
PubMed: 33516865
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.165 -
World Neurosurgery Apr 2021Arachnoid cysts are benign cerebrospinal fluid collection within a duplication of arachnoid membrane and, when found in the retrocerebellar site, they may be associated...
Coexisting Retrocerebellar Arachnoid Cyst and Chiari Type 1 Malformation: 3 Pediatric Cases of Surgical Management Tailored to the Pathogenic Mechanism and Systematic Review of the Literature.
INTRODUCTION
Arachnoid cysts are benign cerebrospinal fluid collection within a duplication of arachnoid membrane and, when found in the retrocerebellar site, they may be associated with tonsils herniation. This rare situation of coexisting retrocerebellar arachnoid cyst (AC) and Chiari malformation type 1 (CM-1) have been previously reported in few cases (10 patients) with syringomyelia and hydrocephalus described to be the most relevant issues. The aim of this paper is to describe 3 pediatric cases of this condition with a systematic review of the literature, underlining the importance of surgical management tailored to the pathogenic mechanism.
METHODS
A restrospective analysis of patients treated for coexisting CM-1 and ACs at the authors' institution has been carried out.
RESULTS
A case of a 10-month-old baby with coexisting AC and CM-1 with tri-ventricular hydrocephalus treated with endoscopic third ventriculostomy, a case of a 1-year-old child with a huge retrocerebellar AC and CM-1 treated with a cysto-peritoneal shunt, and a case of a 15-year-old child with retrocerebellar AC causing symptomatic CM-1 treated with C0-C2 decompression, AC fenestration and duraplasty are described. A long-term follow-up is reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Surgical management of coexisting ACs and CM-1 should not aim at the complete resolution of the cyst or of tonsil herniation, especially when pediatric patients are treated. Rather, the purpose of the neurosurgeon should be to understand the underlying pathogenic mechanism, and then restoring both the cerebrospinal fluid flow in the posterior fossa and the dynamic equilibrium between ventricles, cyst, and subarachnoid space.
Topics: Adolescent; Arachnoid Cysts; Arnold-Chiari Malformation; Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts; Cranial Fossa, Posterior; Decompression, Surgical; Humans; Hydrocephalus; Infant; Male; Neuroendoscopy; Peritoneal Cavity; Ventriculostomy
PubMed: 33385608
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.094 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Apr 2024To analyze the risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) after correction surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
To analyze the risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) after correction surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
METHODS
PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and EMCC databases were searched for retrospective studies utilizing all AIS patients with PJK after corrective surgery to collect preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up imaging parameters, including thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), proximal junctional angle (PJA), the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), sacral slope (SS), rod contour angle (RCA) and upper instrumented vertebra (UIV).
RESULTS
Nineteen retrospective studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 550 patients in the intervention group and 3456 patients in the control group. Overall, sex (OR 1.40, 95% CI (1.08, 1.83), P = 0.01), larger preoperative TK (WMD 6.82, 95% CI (5.48, 8.16), P < 0.00001), larger follow-up TK (WMD 8.96, 95% CI (5.62, 12.30), P < 0.00001), larger postoperative LL (WMD 2.31, 95% CI (0.91, 3.71), P = 0.001), larger follow-up LL (WMD 2.51, 95% CI (1.19, 3.84), P = 0.0002), great change in LL (WMD - 2.72, 95% CI (- 4.69, - 0.76), P = 0.006), larger postoperative PJA (WMD 4.94, 95% CI (3.62, 6.26), P < 0.00001), larger follow-up PJA (WMD 13.39, 95% CI (11.09, 15.69), P < 0.00001), larger postoperative PI-LL (WMD - 9.57, 95% CI (- 17.42, - 1.71), P = 0.02), larger follow-up PI-LL (WMD - 12.62, 95% CI (- 17.62, - 7.62), P < 0.00001), larger preoperative SVA (WMD 0.73, 95% CI (0.26, 1.19), P = 0.002), larger preoperative SS (WMD - 3.43, 95% CI (- 4.71, - 2.14), P < 0.00001), RCA (WMD 1.66, 95% CI (0.48, 2.84), P = 0.006) were identified as risk factors for PJK in patients with AIS. For patients with Lenke 5 AIS, larger preoperative TK (WMD 7.85, 95% CI (5.69, 10.00), P < 0.00001), larger postoperative TK (WMD 9.66, 95% CI (1.06, 18.26), P = 0.03, larger follow-up TK (WMD 11.92, 95% CI (6.99, 16.86), P < 0.00001, larger preoperative PJA (WMD 0.72, 95% CI (0.03, 1.41), P = 0.04, larger postoperative PJA (WMD 5.54, 95% CI (3.57, 7.52), P < 0.00001), larger follow-up PJA (WMD 12.42, 95% CI 9.24, 15.60), P < 0.00001, larger follow-up SVA (WMD 0.07, 95% CI (- 0.46, 0.60), P = 0.04), larger preoperative PT (WMD - 3.04, 95% CI (- 5.27, - 0.81), P = 0.008, larger follow-up PT (WMD - 3.69, 95% CI (- 6.66, - 0.72), P = 0.02) were identified as risk factors for PJK.
CONCLUSION
Following corrective surgery, 19% of AIS patients experienced PJK, with Lenke 5 contributing to 25%. Prior and post-op measurements play significant roles in predicting PJK occurrence; thus, meticulous, personalized preoperative planning is crucial. This includes considering individualized treatments based on the Lenke classification as our future evaluation standard.
Topics: Humans; Adolescent; Scoliosis; Lordosis; Retrospective Studies; Kyphosis; Sacrum; Risk Factors; Spinal Fusion; Postoperative Complications; Thoracic Vertebrae
PubMed: 38566085
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04638-7 -
World Neurosurgery Sep 2020Odontoid fracture is a common injury especially in elderly people. Despite some recent studies arguing in favor of surgery, the best treatment is still being debated. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Odontoid fracture is a common injury especially in elderly people. Despite some recent studies arguing in favor of surgery, the best treatment is still being debated.
OBJECTIVE
We systematically review and analyze the comparative literature between surgical and conservative treatments of odontoid fractures.
METHODS
We systematically searched Medline and the Cochrane Library for studies reported from January 1990 to May 2019 in English. Comparative studies evaluating the results of surgical and conservative treatments for odontoid fractures were eligible for inclusion. Combined relative risks (RRs) for mortality at last follow-up, union or nonunion rates, and complications were calculated. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Influence of age and year of publication on treatment effect was explored using a meta-regression analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 1438 articles were identified, of which 30 articles with 2463 patients were eligible for inclusion. There was a trend toward lower mortality in the surgical group (RR, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.02). Nonunion rates (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.6) were lower in the surgical group. Union rates were higher in the surgical group (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.11-1.45). No significant influence of age or year of publication on treatment effect was found.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on this meta-analysis of nonrandomized comparative studies, surgical treatment seems not to be inferior to conservative treatments. The conclusions of this study remain limited by the low quality of the evidence available. Randomized controlled studies are required.
Topics: Conservative Treatment; Fracture Fixation; Humans; Odontoid Process; Spinal Fractures
PubMed: 32151771
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.169 -
World Neurosurgery Mar 2020Instability of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) following odontoidectomy is relatively common. Traditionally, separate stage posterior atlantoaxial ± occipitocervical...
Instability of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) following odontoidectomy is relatively common. Traditionally, separate stage posterior atlantoaxial ± occipitocervical fusion is used for treatment. A transmucosal approach using a clean-contaminated route is associated with hypothetical risks of infectious complications. There is a paucity of information in the literature assessing the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) using the transmucosal approach for hardware placement. The authors conducted a literature search through PubMed identifying patients with pathology requiring transmucosal (i.e., transnasal or transoral) CVJ fixation. Studies that described 1) cases requiring a transmucosal approach and 2) associated infectious complications were included. Rates of SSIs, device removal, unplanned reoperation, and hardware failures were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and odds ratios (ORs) were used to compare complications. Nine studies with a total of 431 patients were identified. There were 4 (0.93%) superficial SSIs and 4 (0.93%) deep SSIs. In total, 1.86% of patients experienced SSI. There were 18 (4.18%) cases of unplanned reoperation, 4 (0.93%) related to SSI. Five (1.16%) patients required removal of their anterior fixation device, 4 (0.93%) related to SSI. ORs comparing our results with Medvedev et al's retrospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study assessing the risk associated with posterior cervical fixation showed no statistical difference between postoperative infection rates (OR = 0.72, P = 0.36). An extensive review of the literature found no evidence to suggest placement of spinal hardware via transmucosal corridor is associated with an increased risk of SSI.
Topics: Atlanto-Axial Joint; Atlanto-Occipital Joint; Device Removal; Humans; Mouth Mucosa; Nasal Mucosa; Odontoid Process; Reoperation; Spinal Cord Compression; Spinal Fusion; Surgical Wound Infection
PubMed: 31811965
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.168 -
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine Jan 2024Odontoid fractures are the most common fracture of the cervical spine in adults older than 65 years of age. Fracture management remains controversial, given the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Odontoid fractures are the most common fracture of the cervical spine in adults older than 65 years of age. Fracture management remains controversial, given the inherently increased surgical risks in older patients. The objective of this study was to compare fusion rates and outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatments of type II odontoid fractures in the older population.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies reporting the management of type II odontoid fractures in patients older than 65 years from database inception to September 2022. A meta-analysis was performed to compare rates of fusion, stable and unstable nonunion, mortality, and complication.
RESULTS
Forty-six articles were included in the final review. There were 2822 patients included in the different studies (48.9% female, 51.1% male), with a mean ± SD age of 81.5 ± 3.6 years. Patients in the operative group were significantly younger than patients in the nonoperative group (81.5 ± 3.5 vs 83.4 ± 2.5 years, p < 0.001). The overall (operative and nonoperative patients) fusion rate was 52.9% (720/1361). The fusion rate was higher in patients who underwent surgery (74.3%) than in those who underwent nonoperative management (40.3%) (OR 4.27, 95% CI 3.36-5.44). The likelihood of stable or unstable nonunion was lower in patients who underwent surgery (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.28-0.49 vs OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22-0.47). Overall, 4.8% (46/964) of nonoperatively managed patients subsequently required surgery due to treatment failure. Patient mortality across all studies was 16.6% (452/2721), lower in the operative cohort (13.2%) than the nonoperative cohort (19.0%) (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.80). Complications were more likely in patients who underwent surgery (26.0% vs 18.5%) (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23-1.95). Length of stay was also higher with surgery (13.6 ± 3.8 vs 8.1 ± 1.9 days, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients older than 65 years of age with type II odontoid fractures had higher fusion rates when treated with surgery and higher stable nonunion rates when managed nonoperatively. Complications and length of stay were higher in the surgical cohort. Mortality rates were lower in patients managed with surgery, but this phenomenon could be related to surgical selection bias. Fewer than 5% of patients who underwent nonoperative treatment required revision surgery due to treatment failure, suggesting that stable nonunion is an acceptable treatment goal.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Spinal Fractures; Odontoid Process; Fractures, Bone; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37877937
DOI: 10.3171/2023.6.SPINE22920