-
BMC Neurology Dec 2021Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system that results in progressive and irreversible disability. Fatigue is one of the...
BACKGROUND
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system that results in progressive and irreversible disability. Fatigue is one of the most common MS-related symptoms and is characterized by a persistent lack of energy that impairs daily functioning. The burden of MS-related fatigue is complex and multidimensional, and to our knowledge, no systematic literature review has been conducted on this subject. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review on the epidemiology and burden of fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS).
METHODS
Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews to identify relevant studies of fatigue in pwMS. English-language records published from 2010 to January 2020 that met predefined eligibility criteria were included. We initially selected studies that reported quality of life (QoL) and economic outcomes according to categories of fatigue (e.g., fatigued vs non-fatigued). Studies assessing associations between economic outcomes and fatigue as a continuous measure were later included to supplement the available data.
RESULTS
The search identified 8147 unique records, 54 of which met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 39 reported epidemiological outcomes, 11 reported QoL, and 9 reported economic outcomes. The supplementary screen for economic studies with fatigue as a continuous measure included an additional 20 records. Fatigue prevalence in pwMS ranged from 36.5 to 78.0%. MS-related fatigue was consistently associated with significantly lower QoL. Results on the economic impact of fatigue were heterogeneous, but most studies reported a significant association between presence or severity of fatigue and employment status, capacity to work, and sick leave. There was a gap in evidence regarding the direct costs of MS-related fatigue and the burden experienced by caregivers of pwMS.
CONCLUSION
Fatigue is a prevalent symptom in pwMS and is associated with considerable QoL and economic burden. There are gaps in the evidence related to the direct costs of MS-related fatigue and the burden of fatigue on caregivers. Addressing fatigue over the clinical course of the disease may improve health and economic outcomes for patients with MS.
Topics: Fatigue; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Prevalence; Quality of Life
PubMed: 34856949
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-021-02396-1 -
Neurologia 2020Numerous cases have been reported of patients with symptoms of Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with COVID-19, but much information is still lacking on this...
INTRODUCTION
Numerous cases have been reported of patients with symptoms of Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with COVID-19, but much information is still lacking on this association and its implications. The objective of this review is to analyse the available evidence on this topic in the adult population.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic review was conducted of studies published on scientific databases: PubMed, Cochrane, Science Direct, Medline, and WHO COVID-19 database.
RESULTS
We identified 47 studies, which were analysed and completed using the Covidence platform; the final analysis included 24 articles, with a total of 30 patients.
CONCLUSIONS
We found a strong association between both conditions; furthermore, the studies analysed highlight differences in the presentation of the disease, with greater severity of symptoms in Guillain-Barre syndrome associated with COVID-19.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Betacoronavirus; COVID-19; Causality; Coronavirus Infections; Female; Guillain-Barre Syndrome; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 32896460
DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2020.07.004 -
Annals of Clinical and Translational... Mar 2023Across its clinical development program, ocrelizumab demonstrated efficacy in improving clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis, including annualized relapse rates and... (Review)
Review
Across its clinical development program, ocrelizumab demonstrated efficacy in improving clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis, including annualized relapse rates and confirmed disability progression. However, as with any new treatment, it was unclear how this efficacy would translate into real-world clinical practice. The objective of this study was to systematically collate the published real-world clinical effectiveness data for ocrelizumab in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis and primary progressive multiple sclerosis. A search strategy was developed in MEDLINE and Embase to identify articles reporting real-world evidence in people with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis or primary progressive multiple sclerosis receiving treatment with ocrelizumab. The search focused on English language articles only but was not limited by the country in which the study was conducted or the time frame of the study. Additional manual searches of relevant websites were also performed. Fifty-two studies were identified reporting relevant evidence. Real-world effectiveness data for ocrelizumab were consistently favorable, with reductions in relapse rate and disease progression rates similar to those reported in the OPERA I/OPERA II and ORATORIO clinical trials, including in studies with more diverse patient populations not well represented in the pivotal trials. Although direct comparisons are confounded by lack of randomization of treatments, outcomes reported suggest that ocrelizumab has a similar or greater efficacy than other therapy options. Initial real-world effectiveness data for ocrelizumab appear favorable and consistent with results reported in clinical trials, providing clinicians with an efficacious option to treat patients with multiple sclerosis.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Immunologic Factors; Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive; Recurrence
PubMed: 36728340
DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51732 -
Journal of Neurology Mar 2022Current standard treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) has been proved effective, but it is poorly effective in refractory... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Current standard treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) has been proved effective, but it is poorly effective in refractory patients and unclear for anti-IgG4 antibody-associated CIDP. Rituximab is a B cell-depleting monoclonal antibody. It has been applied as one of the management strategies in CIDP, but its efficacy is unknown.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the efficacy of rituximab treatment in CIDP patients.
METHODS
Through searches in MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, BIOSOS, Web of Science, and Cochrane library on March 31st, 2021, 15 studies were identified. Patients' characteristics, treatment regime and outcome measure were extracted.
RESULTS
Ninety-six patients in 15 studies were included. The pooled estimate of responsiveness was 75% (95% CI 72-78%). The standard mean difference (SMD) of Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score improvement was 1.7 (95% CI 1.0-2.3, p value < 0.0001) and the Medical Research Council (MRC) score for muscle power is 1.3 (95% CI - 2.6 to - 0.1, p value 0.04). All of the anti-IgG4 antibody-positive patients showed excellent responses to rituximab treatment.
CONCLUSION
Rituximab was effective in the treatment in CIDP patients, especially in anti-IgG4 antibody-positive patients. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the effectiveness and safety of rituximab in CIDP patients.
Topics: Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating; Rituximab
PubMed: 34120208
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10646-y -
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Apr 2021Individuals with Guillain-Barrè syndrome (GBS) showed significant longer-term psychological sequelae, due to persistent disability. In recent years, great advances have...
INTRODUCTION
Individuals with Guillain-Barrè syndrome (GBS) showed significant longer-term psychological sequelae, due to persistent disability. In recent years, great advances have been made in medical care for patients with GBS. However, the focus has been mainly on patient care in the acute phase and improving survival instead of long-term disability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of rehabilitation in people with GBS through a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
AREA COVERED
PRISMA guidelines were used to perform this systematic review. Six bibliographic databases were searched: PUBMED, WEB OF SCIENCE, PEDro, CINHAL, PSYCHINFO, and SCOPUS. Papers included in the systematic review should have a search design of a randomized controlled trial. The quality of the clinical trials included was evaluated according to Jadad score.
EXPERT OPINION
After eliminating duplicates, 472 records got screened, three RCTs were included in the systematic review. Overall, the analysis of the three randomized controlled trials showed that various types of rehabilitation interventions are correlated to an improvement in the patient's well-being. Finally, it is not possible to extrapolate definite conclusions on the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment in patients with GBS. Therefore, high-quality future studies are needed to confirm these hypotheses.
Topics: Guillain-Barre Syndrome; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 33567916
DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2021.1890034 -
Autoimmunity Reviews Mar 2022Corticosteroids are the first-line treatment for several common autoimmune neurological diseases. Other therapeutic approaches, including intravenous immunoglobulin... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Corticosteroids are the first-line treatment for several common autoimmune neurological diseases. Other therapeutic approaches, including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasmapheresis, have shown mixed results in patient improvement.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy of IVIg administration with that of corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and placebo in autoimmune neurological diseases like Guillain-Barré syndrome, myasthenia gravis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, optic neuritis, and multiple sclerosis.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed on the databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane. Controlled, randomized studies comparing the efficacy of IVIg with placebo, plasmapheresis, and/or glucocorticoid administration were selected. Only studies reporting the number of patients who improved after treatment were included, irrespective of language or publication year. In total, 23 reports were included in the meta-analysis study.
RESULTS
Our meta-analysis showed a beneficial effect of IVIg administration on patient improvement over placebo (OR = 2.79, CI [95%] = 1.40-5.55, P = 0.01). Meanwhile, IVIg administration showed virtually identical effects to plasmapheresis (OR = 0.83, CI [95%] = 0.45-1.55, P < 0.01). Finally, no significant differences were found in the efficacy of IVIg and glucocorticoid administration (OR = 0.98, Cl [95%] = 0.58-1.68, P = 0.13).
CONCLUSION
IVIg can be regarded as a viable therapeutic approach, either as a first- or second-line therapy, and as an adjuvant therapy for autoimmune neurological diseases.
Topics: Guillain-Barre Syndrome; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Myasthenia Gravis; Plasma Exchange; Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating
PubMed: 34920107
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.103019 -
Autoimmunity Reviews Jun 2021To compare the efficacy and compliance of up-to-date disease modifying therapies (DMTs) in patients with remitting-relapsing MS (RRMS). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy and compliance of up-to-date disease modifying therapies (DMTs) in patients with remitting-relapsing MS (RRMS).
METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for eligible studies. Annualized relapse rate, discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were assessed as primary outcomes. Sensitivity analysis and inconsistency detection were performed to evaluated whether exclusion of high-risk studies affected the validity. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk-of-Bias Tool 2. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to estimate the rankings among different DMTs.
RESULTS
21 studies were included for main report. Seven studies were evaluated as "high risk" and were therefore excluded. Exclusion of high-risk studies did not affect the validity of evidence. The risk of relapses for most DMTs except Betaseron 50 μg was significantly lower comparing to placebo. Incompliance in patients treated with DMTs was not significantly increased comparing to placebo. Dimethyl fumarate and ocrelizumab had superiority in improving MRI outcomes. Ocrelizumab and ofatumumab had the largest reduction of risk in disability progression at 3 months. Referring to SUCRA, ofatumumab, alemtuzumab and natalizumab showed the best efficacy and compliance.
CONCLUSION
The present study demonstrated the hierarchy of DMTs treating RRMS. Ofatumumab, alemtuzumab and natalizumab have superiority with respect to effectiveness and compliance. More studies are required to explore the long-term effect of DMTs. Our findings could provide helpful information and contribute to clinical treatment decision-making.
Topics: Humans; Immunologic Factors; Immunosuppressive Agents; Multiple Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Natalizumab; Network Meta-Analysis
PubMed: 33878488
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102826 -
Neurological Sciences : Official... Mar 2023Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). The most common clinical manifestations of MS... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). The most common clinical manifestations of MS are spasticity, pain, vesico-urethral disorders, cognitive impairments, chronic fatigue and sexual dysfunction. This review aims to explore the possible therapeutic options for managing sexual dysfunction in people with MS (PwMS).
METHOD
A thorough search of the PubMed Medline database was performed. Records were limited to clinical studies published between 01/01/2010 up to 01/01/2022. The results were screened by the authors in pairs.
RESULTS
The search identified 36 records. After screening, 9 records met the inclusion-exclusion criteria and were assessed. The pharmacological approaches investigated the effectiveness of sildenafil, tadalafil and onabotulinumtoxinA. Of the interventional studies the non-pharmacological investigated, the effectiveness of aquatic exercises, the application of pelvic floor exercises,the combination of pelvic floor exercises and mindfulness technique, the combination of pelvic floor exercises and electro muscular stimulation with electromyograph biofeedback, the application of yoga techniques and the efficacy of assistive devices like the clitoral vacuum suction device and the vibration device.
CONCLUSION
The management of sexual dysfunction in PwMS needs to be further investigated. A team of healthcare professionals should be involved in the management of SD in order to address not only the primary (MS-related) SD symptoms but the secondary and tertiary as well. The main limitations that were identified in the existing literature were related to MS disease features, sample characteristics and evaluation tools and batteries.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; Sildenafil Citrate; Pain; Exercise Therapy
PubMed: 36585597
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06572-0 -
Journal of Neurology Jun 2022A moderate to high level of physical activity, including regular exercise, represents an established behavioral and rehabilitative approach for persons with multiple... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
A moderate to high level of physical activity, including regular exercise, represents an established behavioral and rehabilitative approach for persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Although being increasingly proposed to limit disease activity and progression, high-quality evidence is lacking.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of the study is to provide valuable information for MS clinicians and researchers by systematically evaluating the current state of evidence (i) whether exercise interventions affect established clinical measures of disease activity and progression in pwMS (i.e., EDSS, relapse rate, lesion load, brain volume, MSFC) and (ii) how the physical activity and fitness level interact with these measures.
METHODS
Literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus. Evaluation of evidence quality was done based on standards published by The American Academy of Neurology.
RESULTS
It is likely that exercise improves the MSFC score, whereas the EDSS score, lesion load, and brain volume are likely to remain unchanged over the intervention period. It is possible that exercise decreases the relapse rate. Results from cross-sectional studies indicate beneficial effects of a high physical activity or fitness level on clinical measures which, however, is not corroborated by high evidence quality.
CONCLUSIONS
A (supportive) disease-modifying effect of exercise in pwMS cannot be concluded. The rather low evidence quality of existing RCTs underlines the need to conduct more well-designed studies assessing different measures of disease activity or progression as primary end points. A major limitation is the short intervention duration of existing studies which limits meaningful exercise-induced effects on most disability measures. Findings from cross-sectional studies are difficult to contextualize regarding clinical importance due to their solely associative character and low evidence quality.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42020188774.
Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Exercise; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Physical Fitness; Recurrence
PubMed: 35084560
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10935-6 -
JAMA Neurology Nov 2023Emerging evidence suggests that progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) is a substantial contributor to long-term disability accumulation in...
IMPORTANCE
Emerging evidence suggests that progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) is a substantial contributor to long-term disability accumulation in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). To date, there is no uniform agreed-upon definition of PIRA, limiting the comparability of published studies.
OBJECTIVE
To summarize the current evidence about PIRA based on a systematic review, to discuss the various terminologies used in the context of PIRA, and to propose a harmonized definition for PIRA for use in clinical practice and future trials.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
A literature search was conducted using the search terms multiple sclerosis, PIRA, progression independent of relapse activity, silent progression, and progression unrelated to relapses in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, published between January 1990 and December 2022.
FINDINGS
Of 119 identified single records, 48 eligible studies were analyzed. PIRA was reported to occur in roughly 5% of all patients with RRMS per annum, causing at least 50% of all disability accrual events in typical RRMS. The proportion of PIRA vs relapse-associated worsening increased with age, longer disease duration, and, despite lower absolute event numbers, potent suppression of relapses by highly effective disease-modifying therapy. However, different studies used various definitions of PIRA, rendering the comparability of studies difficult.
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE
PIRA is the most frequent manifestation of disability accumulation across the full spectrum of traditional MS phenotypes, including clinically isolated syndrome and early RRMS. The harmonized definition suggested here may improve the comparability of results in current and future cohorts and data sets.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Chronic Disease; Recurrence; PubMed; Disease Progression
PubMed: 37782515
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3331