-
Clinical Oral Investigations Aug 2021This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of commonly used methods for occlusal caries diagnostics, such as visual examination... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of commonly used methods for occlusal caries diagnostics, such as visual examination (VE), bitewing radiography (BW) and laser fluorescence (LF), in relation to their ability to detect (dentin) caries under clinical and laboratory conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify studies meeting the inclusion criteria using the PIRDS concept (N = 1090). A risk of bias (RoB) assessment tool was used for quality evaluation. Reports with low/moderate RoB, well-matching thresholds for index and reference tests and appropriate reporting were included in the meta-analysis (N = 37; 29 in vivo/8 in vitro). The pooled sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and areas under ROC curves (AUCs) were computed.
RESULTS
SP ranged from 0.50 (fibre-optic transillumination/caries detection level) to 0.97 (conventional BW/dentine detection level) in vitro. AUCs were typically higher for BW or LF than for VE. The highest AUC of 0.89 was observed for VE at the 1/3 dentin caries detection level; SE (0.70) was registered to be higher than SP (0.47) for VE at the caries detection level in vivo.
CONCLUSION
The number of included studies was found to be low. This underlines the need for high-quality caries diagnostic studies that further provide data in relation to multiple caries thresholds.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
VE, BW and LF provide acceptable measures for their diagnostic performance on occlusal surfaces, but the results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited data in many categories.
Topics: Dental Caries; Dental Caries Susceptibility; Fluorescence; Humans; Radiography, Bitewing; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Transillumination
PubMed: 34128130
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04024-1 -
The Journal of Evidence-based Dental... Dec 2020This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of ozone therapy for treating dental caries. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of ozone therapy for treating dental caries.
METHODS
We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in 8 databases, from inception to April 4, 2020 (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS, Bibliografia Brasileira de Odontologia, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO, and OpenGrey). Primary outcome measures were antimicrobial effect and adverse events. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to evaluate methodological quality of included RCTs and GRADE approach to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. We used the Review Manager software to conduct meta-analyses.
RESULTS
We included 12 RCTs comparing ozone therapy with no ozone, chlorhexidine digluconate, fissure sealants (alone and added to ozone), and fluoride. Considering primary outcomes, ozone therapy showed (a) lower reduction in the bacterial number than chlorhexidine digluconate in children (mean difference [MD]: -5.65 [-9.79 to -1.51]), but no difference was observed in adults (MD: -0.10 [-1.07 to 0.88]); (b) higher reduction in the bacterial number than sealant (MD: 12.60 [3.86-21.34]), but no difference was observed after final excavation (MD: -0.00 [-0.01 to 0.01]). Regarding safety of ozone therapy, results from individual studies presented no adverse events during or after treatment. Most of these results are imprecise and should be interpreted with caution because of clinical and methodological concerns, small sample size, and wide confidence interval, precluding to determine the real effect direction.
CONCLUSION
Based on a very low certainty of evidence, there is not enough support from published RCTs to recommend the use of ozone for the treatment of dental caries. Well-conducted studies should be encouraged, measuring mainly the antimicrobial effects of ozone therapy at long term and following the recommendations of the CONSORT statement for the reporting of RCTs.
Topics: Adult; Child; Dental Caries; Fluorides; Humans; Ozone; Pit and Fissure Sealants
PubMed: 33303100
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101472 -
International Journal of Dentistry 2021The aim of this study was to explore the literature in order to assess systematically the association between amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) and caries development and to... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to explore the literature in order to assess systematically the association between amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) and caries development and to evaluate the DMF index among AI patients. . PubMed was used to explore the database Medline. The key words used were "Amelogenesis Imperfecta" [Mesh], "Dental Caries" [Mesh], "Tooth Loss" [Mesh], "DMF Index" [Mesh], and "Dental Restoration, Permanent" [Mesh]. Moreover, an ad hoc search was performed in order to make the study as exhaustive as possible.
RESULTS
Fifty-five articles were retained. The total number of patients gathered was 499. A percentage of 68.8% of the articles dealt with cases with a relatively low dental caries process, 20.8% dealt with cases in which the dental caries process was relatively moderate, and 10.4% dealt with cases in which the dental caries process was severe. Teeth extraction due to dental caries was mentioned in 10 articles. Eleven articles, concerning 53 patients, mentioned dental fillings. Four patients did not have dental filling due to dental caries. DMF index was very low in 2 articles and low-to-high in 3 articles.
CONCLUSION
Low dental caries susceptibility with AI patients was noticed in this study. A possible factor could be the lack of proximal contacts and elimination of fissures through enamel loss. The lack of dental caries susceptibility was also explained by the microbacterial specificity of hypoplastic AI patients. Moreover, it was also noted that the prevalence of dental caries among AI patients depends on sociodemographic change.
PubMed: 34447436
DOI: 10.1155/2021/5577615 -
Applied Health Economics and Health... Jan 2023To critically examine the methods used for full economic evaluations of preventive interventions for dental caries and periodontitis.
OBJECTIVES
To critically examine the methods used for full economic evaluations of preventive interventions for dental caries and periodontitis.
METHODS
Published literature post-2000 was searched to April 2021. Based on a developed intervention classification framework for dental caries and periodontitis, only universal, selective or indicated interventions were included in this review. The Drummond 10-point checklist was used for quality appraisal.
RESULTS
Of 3,007 unique records screened for relevance, 73 studies were reviewed. Most model-based studies (61/73) used cost-effectiveness analysis (49%) or cost-benefit analysis (28%). Trial-based studies (16/73) commonly used cost-effectiveness analysis (59%). Four studies used both economic evaluation methods. Sixty-four papers (88%) were on dental caries, eight papers (11%) focused on periodontitis, and one paper (1%) included both oral diseases; 72% of model-based and 82% of trial-based studies were of good quality. The most frequently investigated dental caries preventive interventions were water fluoridation (universal intervention; cost-saving or cost-effective), fissure sealant and fluoride varnish (selective and indicated interventions; cost-effectiveness outcomes were inconsistent). Supportive periodontal therapy with oral health education (indicated intervention; cost-effective) was the most frequently evaluated preventive intervention for periodontitis. Thirty percent of studies with a time horizon > 1 year did not apply an appropriate discount rate and 26% did not comprehensively discuss other important considerations beyond the technical analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Generic health outcome measures should be incorporated for economic evaluations on preventive interventions for dental caries and periodontitis, and an increased focus to prevent periodontitis using economic evaluation methods is needed to inform resource allocation and policy decision-making.
Topics: Humans; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; Dental Caries; Periodontitis; Pit and Fissure Sealants; Fluoridation; Fluorides, Topical; Oral Hygiene; Health Education
PubMed: 36089630
DOI: 10.1007/s40258-022-00758-5 -
Iranian Journal of Public Health Feb 2022Highly necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive interventions to prioritize them at the community level. We aimed to systematically investigate the related... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Highly necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive interventions to prioritize them at the community level. We aimed to systematically investigate the related studies on the effects of fluoride varnish and fissure sealant on dental caries in 6-12 children.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases using Fluoride Varnish, Fissure Sealant, Caries, and Oral Health keywords. The timeframe selected to search for articles is from 2000 to Dec 2020. CMA software: 2 (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis) was used to perform the meta-analysis. The intervention groups in this study were fluoride varnish and fissure sealants, each of them compared to the control groups.
RESULTS
We included nine studies. In the intervention group 84,380 and control group 11,254 individuals were studied. Eight of the studies were Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) and Field RCT, and two was non-RCT. In the overall Fluoride Varnish efficacy study, 4 were fully effective, 1 was ineffective, and all 4 were completely effective for Fissure Sealant. There was a significant difference between decayed, missing, and filled permanent teeth (DMFT) and decayed, missing, and filled primary teeth (dmft) indices in both interventions and comparison groups. Moreover, the mean difference of DMFT for Fluoride Varnish and Fissure Sealant in the intervention and control groups were -0.55 and -0.29, respectively (=0.00).
CONCLUSION
Due to the efficacy of fissure sealant and fluoride varnish in preventing dental caries in children aged 6-12 yr, these interventions can be considered as health priorities of societies and health systems interventions in countries.
PubMed: 35866130
DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v51i2.8680 -
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of... Sep 2023The purpose of this study was to systematically review the impact of nanofillers on the physicomechanical properties of resin-based pit and fissure sealants (RBS). This... (Review)
Review
The purpose of this study was to systematically review the impact of nanofillers on the physicomechanical properties of resin-based pit and fissure sealants (RBS). This review included in vitro studies with full-length English-language articles reporting on the physicomechanical properties of nanofilled RBS until February 2023. PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and LILACS databases were accessed for literature searches. The review was formulated based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and used the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines and risk of bias Cochrane tool for quality assessment. The search resulted in 539 papers, of which 22 were eligible to be included in the review. Inorganic, polymeric, core-shell, and composite nanomaterials were used to reinforce the studied RBS. The inherent nature of the nanomaterial used, its morphology, concentration, and volume used were the primary parameters that determined the nanomaterial's success as a filler in RBS. These parameters also influenced their interaction with the resin matrix, which influenced the final physicomechanical properties of RBS. The use of nanofillers that were non-agglomerated and well dispersed in the resin matrix enhanced the physicomechanical properties of RBS.
Topics: Humans; Pit and Fissure Sealants; Nanostructures; Polymers; Reference Standards; Dental Caries
PubMed: 37499522
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106037 -
Journal of Dental Research, Dental... 2023This systematic review aimed to evaluate the available scientific evidence concerning the effects of topical fluoride treatment on the bond strength of pit and fissure... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the available scientific evidence concerning the effects of topical fluoride treatment on the bond strength of pit and fissure sealants. Prevention of dental caries is one of the crucial issues in pediatric dentistry. Pit and fissure sealant and fluoride therapies are two caries prevention procedures that may be performed in one session. However, fluoride therapy may affect the bond strength of pit and fissure sealants.
METHODS
An electronic search for in vitro studies published in English and Persian on topical fluoride therapy and the bond strength of pit and fissure sealants was performed via PubMed/ Medline, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus databases until May 2022. The articles were independently reviewed for quality by two reviewers. Textual data were analyzed manually, and the bond strength of sealants placed after fluoride application was compared with control groups.
RESULTS
A total of 8482 articles were initially identified and reviewed by two independent reviewers, and 13 were selected for full-text evaluation. Finally, six articles were included in the systematic review. A total of 250 teeth were studied, 148 of which were in the case group (fluoride group) and 102 in the control group. Tensile and shear bond strengths were compared between groups in the studies.
CONCLUSION
In the studies in which the tooth surfaces were washed after applying fluoride, there was no change in the fissure sealant bond strength. However, in studies in which fluoride was not washed, the bond strength decreased significantly, independent of the fluoride type.
PubMed: 37649817
DOI: 10.34172/joddd.2023.39160 -
Clinical Oral Investigations Apr 2024To identify the characteristics of the oral microbiota and the relationship of the dental caries and periodontal status in patients aged 0 to 18 years with non-syndromic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Characterization of the oral microbiota and the relationship of the oral microbiota with the dental and periodontal status in children and adolescents with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To identify the characteristics of the oral microbiota and the relationship of the dental caries and periodontal status in patients aged 0 to 18 years with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was carried out. Five databases were consulted, including publications in English, Spanish and Portuguese. The evaluations of the quality of the observational studies and the experimental studies were carried out with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and CONSORT guidelines, respectively. The risk of bias of the studies was determined using Rev Manager 5.4, and 5 publications were meta-analyzed.
RESULTS
The cariogenic microbiota of children and adolescents with cleft lip and palate was similar to that of children without clefts, although with higher counts of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp. The periodontopathogenic microbiota was related to the presence of Campylobacter spp, Fusobacterium spp, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Prevotella intermedia/nigrescens, Parvimonas micra and Porphyromonas gingivalis, considered microorganisms with high pathogenic capacity. Heterogeneity was shown in relation to the microbiota and the type of fissure, presenting numerous microorganisms associated with the pre- and post-surgical condition (cheilorrhaphy and palatorrhaphy) such as Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus beta hemolyticus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella oxytoca, Moraxella catarrhalis, Candida spp, Candida albicans, Candida krusei and Candida tropicalis. The meta-analysis revealed that patients with cleft lip and palate were 2.03 times more likely to have caries than the control group (p<0.005).
CONCLUSION
In the microbiota, there was a great diversity of microorganisms that can vary according to the type of fissure and surgical interventions predisposing patients to a greater probability of dental caries, it is important to take into account the technique used to describe the oral microbiota in order to be able to compare the different studies.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Studying the microbiota and the relationship of dental caries and periodontal status in children and adolescents with cleft lip and palate can facilitate the comprehensive care of patients with these conditions.
Topics: Child; Humans; Adolescent; Cleft Lip; Cleft Palate; Dental Caries; Microbiota
PubMed: 38587683
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05624-3 -
Journal of Dentistry Nov 2021This meta-analysis review aims to answer two questions: 1) What is the effectiveness of hydrophilic resin-based sealant (RBS) in preventing/arresting pits and fissures... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
This meta-analysis review aims to answer two questions: 1) What is the effectiveness of hydrophilic resin-based sealant (RBS) in preventing/arresting pits and fissures caries in permanent teeth, and 2) What is the retention rate of a hydrophilic RBS as compared to alternative treatments.
DATA
Randomized control trials investigating the efficacy of hydrophilic RBS compared to any other (placebo) treatment for permanent teeth. Outcomes were retention rate and caries prevention/arresting.
SOURCES
A systematic search for eligible studies was conducted on six electronic databases (Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane; Web of Science, PubMed) from inception to March 2021. The Cochrane guidelines were used to classify the risk of bias.
STUDY SELECTION/RESULTS
A systematic literature search resulted in 290 studies. Thirteen articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Six articles were identified as good or fair quality and were included in the quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis results indicated that there is no significant difference in retention (RR 1.01, 95% CI:0.96-1.07, P-value 0.66), (RR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.89-1.19, P-value 0.0009) at six and twelve months, respectively. Likewise, for caries prevention there is no significant difference (RR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.91-1.03, P-value 0.19), (RR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.91-1.03, P-value 0.30) at six and twelve months.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the hydrophilic RBS and alternative treatment options (such as conventional resin or glass ionomer) regarding retention or caries prevention at six- and twelve-month follow-up. Future studies are required to investigate longer-term outcomes.
Topics: Bias; Bibliometrics; Dental Caries; Dentition, Permanent; Humans; Pit and Fissure Sealants
PubMed: 34560227
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103816 -
BMC Oral Health Jan 2021Infiltration and sealing are micro-invasive treatments for arresting proximal non-cavitated caries lesions; however, their efficacies under different conditions remain... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Infiltration and sealing are micro-invasive treatments for arresting proximal non-cavitated caries lesions; however, their efficacies under different conditions remain unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the caries-arresting effectiveness of infiltration and sealing and to further analyse their efficacies across different dentition types and caries risk levels.
METHODS
Six electronic databases were searched for published literature, and references were manually searched. Split-mouth randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effectiveness between infiltration/sealing and non-invasive treatments in proximal lesions were included. The primary outcome was obtained from radiographical readings.
RESULTS
In total, 1033 citations were identified, and 17 RCTs (22 articles) were included. Infiltration and sealing reduced the odds of lesion progression (infiltration vs. non-invasive: OR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.15-0.30; sealing vs. placebo: OR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.18-0.42). For both the primary and permanent dentitions, infiltration and sealing were more effective than non-invasive treatments (primary dentition: OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.20-0.45; permanent dentition: OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.14-0.28). The overall effects of infiltration and sealing were significantly different from the control effects based on different caries risk levels (OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.14-0.28). Except for caries risk at moderate levels (moderate risk: OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.01-8.27), there were significant differences between micro-invasive and non-invasive treatments (low risk: OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.72; low to moderate risk: OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.81; moderate to high risk: OR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.10-0.29; and high risk: OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.28). Except for caries risk at moderate levels (moderate risk: OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.01-8.27), infiltration was superior (low risk: OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.72; low to moderate risk: OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.81; moderate to high risk: OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.10-0.39; and high risk: OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.05-0.37).
CONCLUSION
Infiltration and sealing were more efficacious than non-invasive treatments for halting non-cavitated proximal lesions.
Topics: Databases, Factual; Dental Caries; Dentition, Permanent; Humans; Pit and Fissure Sealants; Tooth, Deciduous
PubMed: 33413327
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01364-4