-
Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2020Intraoral scanner (IOS) is a medical device used for capturing direct optical impressions and composed of a handheld camera (hardware), a computer and software. Digital... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Intraoral scanner (IOS) is a medical device used for capturing direct optical impressions and composed of a handheld camera (hardware), a computer and software. Digital impressions by intraoral scanning have become an increasingly popular alternative to conventional impressions. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the studies regarding the various available technologies for IOS and evaluate the most accurate IOS system for cases with multiple implants and identify the factors that can influence its accuracy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A comprehensive electronic search was done in online databases, 'Pubmed', 'Google Scholar' and 'Cochrane' based on pre-determined eligibility criteria. In-vitro studies, In-vivo studies and Randomized controlled trials assessing the accuracy of intra-oral scanner technology were selected after thorough screening. The search strategy covered all studies published until February 2019 and yielded a total of 11 articles out of which 8 studies were determined to fulfil the inclusion criteria and were selected for this review. Data extraction from the included studies was conducted by the primary author and reviewed by the second author.
RESULTS
The information collected included sample size and population, study design, intervention, scanning methods, comparisons and outcome measures. 5 out of 8 included studies compared the distance deviation of the acquired scans from the true values while the remaining 3 studies gave trueness and precision values as the outcome variables. A forest plot on scanner precision displayed slightly higher precision levels in the TRIOS scanner compared to the other intraoral scanners.
CONCLUSION
Despite the limitations this study, it can be concluded that active wavefront sampling is more accurate than the other intraoral scanning technology employed by commercial scanners.
PubMed: 32655218
DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_379_19 -
Journal of Prosthodontic Research Oct 2021Purpose To clarify the rate of posterior residual ridge resorption (PRRR) in different denture treatments and the factors that can affect PRRR.Study selection A...
Purpose To clarify the rate of posterior residual ridge resorption (PRRR) in different denture treatments and the factors that can affect PRRR.Study selection A bibliographical electronic search was conducted on MeSH, Web of Science, and Ovid databases. Hand searching was also conducted. Longitudinal studies recording the average rate of PRRR in the mandible were included. The effect size was calculated based on the mean rate of PRRR with standard deviation and group size. The random-effects analysis was used to perform meta-analyses across qualified studies.Results A total of 2245 eligible studies were collected from the MeSH, Web of Science, and Ovid databases and hand searching. In the end, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria and were extracted. The average rate of PRRR in different mandibular denture treatments was assessed in this systematic review. The mean combined effect size was -1.05 ± 0.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.18-1.08) between four-implant overdentures and two-implant overdentures. The combined effect size was -0.01 ± 0.22 (95% CI: -0.93-0.82) between complete dentures and two-implant overdentures. Body mass index, number of dentures used, denture wearing habit, impression technique, artificial tooth material, and peri-implant bone resorption showed no significant effect on the rate of PRRR. Gender, denture material, and relining frequency showed a significant effect on the rate of PRRR.Conclusions This review summarized different average rates of PRRR in mandibular denture treatments. Meta-analyses have reported that four-implant overdenture treatments can lower the rate of PRRR compared to two-implant overdenture treatments. However, there was no significant difference in the treatment effect between the complete denture and two-implant overdenture treatments.
Topics: Bone Resorption; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Denture, Complete; Denture, Overlay; Humans; Mandible
PubMed: 33281173
DOI: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00075 -
Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2020The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the accuracy of the three-dimensional images among different scanners, scanning techniques, and substrates. .... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the accuracy of the three-dimensional images among different scanners, scanning techniques, and substrates. . Electronic databases (PubMed and Elsevier) were searched until March 2020. The systematic search was performed to identify the most precise method of obtaining a 3D image of the dentition.
RESULTS
Thirteen articles out of 221, considering the accuracy of 3D images, were selected. The main factors that are considered to have an influence on the precision are substrate type in the oral cavity, experience of the scanner's operator, direct vs. indirect scanning, and the reproducibility of the procedure.
CONCLUSION
Substrate type does have an impact on the overall accuracy of intraoral scans where dentin has the most and enamel the least accurately recorded dental structure. Experience of the operator has an influence on the accuracy, where more experienced operators and smaller scan sizes are made for more accurate scans. A conventional impression technique in a full-arch image provided the lowest deviation. The reproducibility of direct scanning was comparable to indirect scanning although a slight difference was noticeable (0.02 mm).
Topics: Computer-Aided Design; Dental Impression Technique; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Models, Dental; Mouth; Reproducibility of Results; Research Design
PubMed: 33414902
DOI: 10.1155/2020/8854204 -
Journal of Prosthodontics : Official... Jul 2021To systematically review clinical and laboratory studies that investigated the accuracy of intraoral scanners in recording denture bearing areas. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To systematically review clinical and laboratory studies that investigated the accuracy of intraoral scanners in recording denture bearing areas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Electronic and manual searches were conducted to identify all the available clinical and laboratory studies reporting the accuracy of digital impressions for recording denture related soft tissues. After the application of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final list of articles was reviewed to meet the objective of this study.
RESULTS
The inclusion criteria were met by 18 studies out of which 8 were clinical and the rest were laboratory investigations. The eligible studies assessed the accuracy of intraoral scanners in recording both the denture supporting structures and the peripheral mobile tissues. The accuracy results were different among the various intraoral scanners. Likewise, the effect of several influencing factors, such as artificial markers, scanner head size, scanning strategy, and the operator's experience, were evaluated.
CONCLUSION
While the accuracy of intraoral scanners was comparable to the conventional techniques in recording bony structures with attached mucosa, they were not capable of accurately registering the mobile tissues. In addition, factors such as presence of a marker, larger scanner head size and specific scanning techniques appeared to improve the accuracy of the digital impression.
Topics: Computer-Aided Design; Dental Impression Technique; Dentures; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Models, Dental
PubMed: 33554361
DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13345 -
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Jan 2021Unsatisfactory adaptation of restorations with subgingival margins can cause problems such as accumulation of biofilm, secondary caries, and inflammation of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Unsatisfactory adaptation of restorations with subgingival margins can cause problems such as accumulation of biofilm, secondary caries, and inflammation of the periodontal tissue. Therefore, special attention should be given to gingival displacement and impression procedures to optimize marginal fit.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare gingival displacement with conventional cords and cordless techniques and determine the reliability of the measurement methodologies.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and identified studies through September 2018. The studies were submitted to the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment. The gingival displacement was evaluated by using the Review Manager Software.
RESULTS
Nine studies were selected, and the most common risks of bias were random sequence generation, blinding of outcome assessment, and absence of sample size calculation. Most of the studies reported obtaining a width greater than 0.2 mm.
CONCLUSIONS
The cord technique resulted in increased displacement when compared with the cordless technique. The evaluation of sulcular width with digital microscope images obtained from sectioned gypsum casts is an adequate and versatile experimental methodology for measuring displacement.
Topics: Gingiva; Gingival Retraction Techniques; Humans; Reproducibility of Results
PubMed: 32008797
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.009 -
Heliyon May 2024The objective of the systematic review is to find an answer to a question: "What is the influence of the building direction of titanium implants produced by additive... (Review)
Review
The objective of the systematic review is to find an answer to a question: "What is the influence of the building direction of titanium implants produced by additive manufacturing on their physical and mechanical properties?" This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA 2020) and was registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF) (osf.io/rdc84). Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Embase, and Google Scholar databases on February 17th, 2024. Articles were chosen in 2 steps by 2 blinded reviewers based on previously selected inclusion criteria: In vitro studies that evaluated the influence of the impression direction of titanium implants produced by additive manufacturing on their physical and mechanical properties were selected. Articles were excluded that (1) did not use additive technology to obtain the implants, 2) used surfaces other than titanium, 3) did not evaluate the direction of impression, 4) Studies with only in vivo analyses, clinical studies, systematic reviews, book chapters, short communications, conference abstracts, case reports, and personal opinions.). In the initial search, 581 results were found. Of this total, 108 were excluded for duplication and, after applying the eligibility criteria, 16 articles were included in the present review. The risk of bias was analyzed using the RoBDEMAT. The risk of bias was analyzed using the RoBDEMAT. In addition, the coefficient of interagreement of the reviewers (Cohen's Kappa) and the certainty of evidence by GRADE were analyzed. In general, different impression angles showed variations in the physical and mechanical characteristics of the groups evaluated, including roughness, tensile strength, hardness, and modulus of elasticity. While some impression orientations resulted in greater strength or hardness, others showed greater elasticity or lower surface roughness. These findings suggest that print orientation plays a significant role in determining material properties. It can be concluded that printing directions influence the physical and mechanical properties of titanium implants and the studies included showed that the 0°, 45°, and 90° directions are the most evaluated as they present lower probabilities of structural anisotropies and provide better results in their roughness, hardness, tensile and compressive strength.
PubMed: 38774089
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30108 -
The International Journal of... 2022To evaluate the accuracy of virtual static articulation and to determine factors that affect its accuracy.
PURPOSE
To evaluate the accuracy of virtual static articulation and to determine factors that affect its accuracy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An electronic search up to December 21, 2020 was carried out in the PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases, and further searching was performed in the references of the evaluated articles. Studies were included if they were published in a peer-reviewed journal in English, were a clinical or laboratory study assessing only static virtual articulation accuracy without making computer-aided manufacturing restorations, used intraoral scanner (IOS) or extraoral scanner (EOS) systems, and evaluated tooth or implant cases.
RESULTS
After applying the inclusion criteria, a total of 28 studies were analyzed. Nine were clinical, and 19 were laboratory. Most of the studies indicated that virtual static articulation had a comparable accuracy to conventional methods in the presence of completely dentate arches, stable occlusal contacts, a single prepared tooth, or arches involving a single missing posterior tooth. The factors that appeared to influence the accuracy were the articulation technique, number, dimension, and location of virtual interocclusal records (VIRs), the length of articulated scans, and the position and size of edentulous areas.
CONCLUSION
Though conclusions were derived mainly from laboratory studies, static VIR had an acceptable accuracy in the presence of certain situations.
Topics: Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Computer-Aided Design; Mouth, Edentulous; Dental Impression Technique
PubMed: 35349610
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.7407 -
International Journal of Implant... May 2024The purpose of this systematic review was to explore and identify the factors that influence the accuracy of intraoral scanning in implant dentistry, with a specific... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The purpose of this systematic review was to explore and identify the factors that influence the accuracy of intraoral scanning in implant dentistry, with a specific focus on scan bodies (ISBs).
METHODS
Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this study conducted a thorough electronic search across MedLine, PubMed, and Scopus to identify relevant studies. Articles were screened based on titles, abstracts, and full texts for relevance. The Robins I tool assessed the risk of bias in various study types. Data extraction occurred based on predetermined parameters for studying specimens and assessing outcomes.
RESULTS
16 studies met the specified criteria and were consequently included in the systematic review. Due to variations in variables and methods across the selected studies, statistical comparison of results was not feasible. Therefore, a descriptive review approach was chosen, acknowledging the substantial heterogeneity in the reviewed literature.
CONCLUSIONS
The precision of virtual scan results is contingent upon diverse characteristics of ISBs and implants. These factors encompass their placement within the dental arch, structural design, shape, material composition, color, and the manufacturing system, all of which contribute to scan accuracy. Additionally, considerations such as the intraoral scanner (IOS) type, scanning technique, use of scan aids, inter-implant distance, scan span, and the number of implants warrant evaluation. In the context of capturing implant positions, intraoral scanning with ISBs demonstrates comparable accuracy to traditional impression methods, particularly in single and short-span scenarios. However, the existing data lacks sufficient information on in vivo applications to formulate clinical recommendations.
Topics: Humans; Dental Implants; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Computer-Aided Design; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Prosthesis Design
PubMed: 38691258
DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00543-0 -
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Aug 2020Scanning of completely edentulous arches remains a challenge because of the large surface to scan and the lack of anatomic indexes. Whether the presence of impression...
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Scanning of completely edentulous arches remains a challenge because of the large surface to scan and the lack of anatomic indexes. Whether the presence of impression transfer copings with digital scanning provides enough markers for acceptable precision and clinical use has not been determined.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the accuracy of digital scanning for complete-arch implant-supported restorations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted to analyze articles published between 2008 and 2019. Among the 208 retrieved articles, 20 were selected for review.
RESULTS
Five articles reported the use of digital scanning in clinical situations and satisfying short-term results. Fifteen in vitro studies were also included for complementary information, including measurement accuracy. Most of the intraoral scanners used in vitro provided acceptable accuracy below a threshold of 150 μm. When directly compared, the digital technique was at least equivalent to conventional impression techniques.
CONCLUSIONS
In vitro, intraoral scanners have shown acceptable accuracy. The main parameters identified for their influence on precision were interimplant distance, body scan design, scanning pattern, and operator experience. Clinical evidence is limited by the lack of a definitive method of assessing the fit of the framework.
Topics: Computer-Aided Design; Dental Implants; Dental Impression Technique; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Models, Dental
PubMed: 31757443
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.014 -
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Jun 2023The best method of optimizing the accuracy of complete arch intraoral digital scans is still unclear. For instance, the location of the scan bodies can be significantly... (Review)
Review
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The best method of optimizing the accuracy of complete arch intraoral digital scans is still unclear. For instance, the location of the scan bodies can be significantly distorted with respect to their actual positions, which would lead to a nonpassive fit of the definitive prosthesis.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze available techniques for improving the accuracy of digital scans in implant-supported complete arch fixed prostheses.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Three databases (Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar) were searched, and the results obtained were supplemented by a hand search. Specific descriptors identified techniques whose objective were to increase the accuracy of digital scans in implant-supported complete arch fixed prostheses. Titles and abstracts were screened by 2 independent reviewers, and unclear results were discussed with a third independent reviewer. A qualitative analysis based on procedural parameters was used. The interexaminer agreements of both were assessed by the Cohen kappa statistic, and the Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the risk of bias across the studies.
RESULTS
A total of 17 techniques matching the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Higher accuracy but also differences regarding the need for supplementary devices, number of intraoral scans, and time consumption of clinical and software program steps were observed compared with the conventional digital scanning protocol. The use of a splinting device was common to most of the studies. The outcome variables for the evaluation of the effectiveness of these protocols were heterogeneous.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of additional techniques during intraoral scanning can improve accuracy in implant-supported complete arch fixed prostheses. However, higher complexity for those procedures should be expected.
Topics: Dental Implants; Dental Impression Technique; Computer-Aided Design; Models, Dental; Prosthesis Implantation; Imaging, Three-Dimensional
PubMed: 34756427
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.08.018