-
The Journal of International Medical... Nov 2023To provide an overview of reported cases of new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) following COVID-19 infection.
AIMS
To provide an overview of reported cases of new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) following COVID-19 infection.
METHODS
PubMed and Scopus library databases were screened for relevant case reports published between January 2020 and June 2022. Study design, geographic region or language were not restricted.
RESULTS
Twenty studies were identified and involved 37 patients (20 [54%] male, 17 [46%] female). Median age was 11.5 years (range 8 months-33 years) and 31 (84%) patients were aged ≤17 years. Most patients (33, 89%) presented with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). In total, 23 (62%) patients presented at the time of positive COVID-19 testing and 14 (38%) had symptoms consistent with COVID-19 infection or a previous positive test (1-56 days). Diabetes symptomatology was provided in 22 cases and (19, 86%) reported polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia, fatigue, or weight loss or a combination of the aforementioned in the preceding weeks (3 days-12 weeks). Of the 28 patients that had data on acute and long-term treatment, all recovered well and most were managed with basal bolus insulin regimens. Quality assessment showed that most reports were either 'good' or 'moderate quality'.
CONCLUSIONS
Although uncommon, new-onset T1D is a condition healthcare professionals may expect to see following a COVID-19 infection.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant; Male; COVID-19; COVID-19 Testing; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Polyuria; Case Reports as Topic
PubMed: 37940619
DOI: 10.1177/03000605231210403 -
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and... 2019During the progress and resolution of a diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) episode, potassium levels are significantly affected by the extent of acidosis. However, none of the...
BACKGROUND
During the progress and resolution of a diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) episode, potassium levels are significantly affected by the extent of acidosis. However, none of the current guidelines take into account acidosis during resuscitation of potassium level in DKA management, which may increase the risk of cardiovascular adverse events.
OBJECTIVE
To assess literature regarding the adjustment of potassium level using pH to calculate pH-adjusted corrected potassium level, and to observe the relationship of cardiovascular outcomes with reported potassium level and pH-adjusted corrected potassium in DKA.
METHODOLOGY
Seven databases were searched from inception to January 2018 for studies which had reported people with diabetes developing diabetic ketoacidosis, in relation to prevalence or incidence, fluid resuscitation or potassium supplementation treatment, treatment or cardiovascular outcomes, and experimentation with DKA management or insulin. Quality of studies was evaluated using Cochrane Risk of Bias and Newcastle Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS
Forty-seven studies were included in qualitative synthesis out of a total of 10,292 retrieved studies. Forty-one studies discussed the potassium level and blood pH at the time of admission, ten studies discussed cardiovascular outcomes, and only four studies concurrently discussed potassium level, pH, and cardiovascular outcomes. Only two studies were graded as good on the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. The reported potassium level was well within normal range (5.8 mmol/L), whereas pH rendered patients to be moderately acidotic (7.13). Surprisingly, none of the included studies mentioned pH-adjusted corrected potassium level and, hence, this was calculated later. Although mean corrected potassium was within the normal range (3.56 mmol/L), 13 studies had corrected potassium below 3.5 mmol/L and five had it below 3.0 mmol/L. Nevertheless, with the exception of one study, none discussed cardiovascular outcomes in the context of potassium or pH-adjusted potassium level.
CONCLUSION
The evidence surrounding cardiovascular outcomes during DKA episodes in light of a pH-adjusted corrected potassium level is scarce. A prospective observational, or preferably, an experimental study in this regard will ensure we can modify and enhance safety of existing DKA treatment protocols.
PubMed: 31496770
DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S208492 -
Journal de Mycologie Medicale Aug 2022Mucormycosis is a rare but life-threatening disease with high morbidity and mortality and is difficult to diagnose. Mucormycosis, is a severe but rare fungal infection... (Review)
Review
Mucormycosis is a rare but life-threatening disease with high morbidity and mortality and is difficult to diagnose. Mucormycosis, is a severe but rare fungal infection caused by a group of molds called mucormycetes. Diabetes, use of corticosteroids, metabolic/diabetic acidosis and Covid-19 mediated immunosuppression are reported in more than 70% of cases in mucormycosis patients. Coexisting mucormycosis, Covid-19 along with diabetes mellitus increase the likelihood of mortality. Despite its occurrence since the beginning of the pandemic, there are still unanswered concerns regarding the origin of this fungal infection and mortality rate and/or relation with diabetic patients. In this review, we describe the detailed view of causative pathogens responsible for mucormycosis, diabetes mellitus and Covid-19 association along with the morbidity cases during the latest Covid-19 crisis. In the case of mucormycosis diagnosis, imaging, histopathological confirmation, fungal culture and molecular identification methods should be considered. Once mucormycosis is diagnosed, a combined treating method consisting of antifungals administration like amphotericin B, surgical intervention is needed for the reversal of the underlying condition. Early detection of this potentially life-threatening infection and timely care is needed in lowering mortality rates.
Topics: Amphotericin B; COVID-19; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Humans; Mucormycosis
PubMed: 35219907
DOI: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2022.101257 -
Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome 2020To conduct a systematic literature review and analyze the demographic/biochemical parameters and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)...
BACKGROUND AND AIM
To conduct a systematic literature review and analyze the demographic/biochemical parameters and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and combined DKA/HHS (hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome).
METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched till August 3, 2020 to identify studies reporting COVID-19 patients with DKA and combined DKA/HHS. A total of 19 articles reporting 110 patients met the eligibility criteria.
RESULTS
Of the 110 patients, 91 (83%) patients had isolated DKA while 19 (17%) had DKA/HHS. The majority of the patients were male (63%) and belonged to black ethnicity (36%). The median age at presentation ranged from 45.5 to 59.0 years. Most of the patients (77%) had pre-existing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Only 10% of the patients had newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus. The median blood glucose at presentation ranged from 486.0 to 568.5 mg/dl, being higher in patients with DKA/HHS compared to isolated DKA. The volume of fluid replaced in the first 24 h was higher in patients with DKA/HHS in contrast to patients with DKA alone. The in-hospital mortality rate was 45%, with higher mortality in the DKA/HHS group than in the isolated DKA group (67% vs. 29%). pH was lower in patients who had died compared to those who were discharged.
CONCLUSION
DKA in COVID-19 patients portends a poor prognosis with a mortality rate approaching 50%. Differentiating isolated DKA from combined DKA/HHS is essential as the latter represents nearly one-fifth of the DKA cases and tends to have higher mortality than DKA alone.
Topics: Blood Glucose; COVID-19; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Humans; Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Nonketotic Coma; Insulin
PubMed: 32853901
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.08.015 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023As an antidiabetic agent, sotagliflozin was recently approved for heart failure (HF). However, its cardiovascular benefits in type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) patients...
Cardiovascular benefits and safety of sotagliflozin in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with heart failure or cardiovascular risk factors: a bayesian network meta-analysis.
As an antidiabetic agent, sotagliflozin was recently approved for heart failure (HF). However, its cardiovascular benefits in type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) patients with HF or cardiovascular (CV) risk factors have not been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the cardiovascular benefits and safety of sotagliflozin in T2DM patients with HF or CV risk factors using Bayesian network meta-analysis. Data were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library from their inception to 16 August 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing sotagliflozin with a placebo, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin in adult T2DM patients with HF or CV risks for at least 12 weeks were included in the study. Data analysis was conducted using R 4.2.3 and Stata 17.0. Cardiovascular efficacy outcomes included HF events (hospitalization or urgent visits for HF), MACE (deaths from CV causes, hospitalizations for HF, nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and strokes), cardiovascular death, the decrease in SBP, and weight loss. Safety outcomes are urinary tract infection, diarrhea, and diabetic ketoacidosis. Eleven studies with 30,952 patients were included. Compared to dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, 200 mg of sotagliflozin showed the best effect in reducing HF events [OR (95% CI), 0.79 (0.66, 0.94) and 0.90 (0.63, 1.27)]. Compared to dapagliflozin, 200 mg of sotagliflozin [OR (95% CI), 0.76 (0.66, 0.87)] was superior in preventing MACE. Compared to empagliflozin, 200 mg of sotagliflozin [OR (95% CI), 1.46 (1.04, 2.05)] was inferior in preventing CV death. Sotagliflozin showed a poorer SBP decreasing effect than empagliflozin and dapagliflozin [MD (95% CI), 1.30 (0.03, 2.56) and 2.25 (0.35, 4.14), respectively]. There was no significant difference between sotagliflozin and other interventions in weight loss. Sotagliflozin exhibited no increased risk for diabetic ketoacidosis or urinary tract infection among all interventions, however, it showed a mild risk for diarrhea than placebo [OR (95% CI), 1.47 (1.28, 1.69)]. Sotagliflozin displayed moderate CV benefits and acceptable safety. Sotagliflozin can be one of the recommended options for T2DM patients with HF or CV risk factors, which will be important for evidence-based use of sotagliflozin as well as decision-making of T2DM medication.
PubMed: 38044937
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1303694 -
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists as add-on therapy to insulin for type 1 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023To assess the efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) used as an adjunct to insulin therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes. A...
To assess the efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) used as an adjunct to insulin therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes. A search of electronic databases (Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from 1 January 1950 to 23 May 2021 was conducted to find randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c. Eight efficacy and six safety secondary endpoints were evaluated meta-analysis. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR), alongside 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated using the random effects model. Among 1,379 candidate studies, 11 trials comprising 2,856 participants satisfied the inclusion criteria. Overall, GLP-1 RA adjunctive therapy reduced HbA1c by -0.21% (95% CI, -0.33 to -0.10), weight by -4.04 kg (-4.8 to -3.27), systolic pressure by -2.57 mmHg (-4.11 to -1.03), and diastolic blood pressure by -1.02 mmHg (-1.99 to -0.06). In addition, there was a decrease in prandial insulin dose (WMD, -4.23 IU; 95% CI, -5.26 to -3.20), basal insulin dose (-2.40 IU; -3.93 to -0.87), and total insulin dose (-5.73 IU; -10.61 to -0.86). Moreover, GLP-1 RAs did not increase the incidence of severe hypoglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, or severe adverse events. However, GLP-1 RAs increased the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 2.33-3.77). Our meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials suggests moderate beneficial effects of GLP-1 RAs on the metabolic profile in patients with type 1 diabetes, without an increased risk of serious adverse events. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO; Identifier: CRD 42020199840.
PubMed: 38249345
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.975880 -
Journal of Anesthesia Jun 2023Although the recommended preoperative cessation period for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) changed in 2020 (from 24 h to 3-4 days preoperatively)... (Review)
Review
Although the recommended preoperative cessation period for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) changed in 2020 (from 24 h to 3-4 days preoperatively) to reduce the risk of SGLT2i-associated perioperative ketoacidosis (SAPKA), the validity of the new recommendation has not been verified. Using case reports, we assessed the new recommendation effectiveness and extrapolated precipitating factors for SAPKA. We searched electronic databases up to June 1, 2022 to assess SAPKA (blood pH < 7.3 and blood or urine ketone positivity within 30 days postoperatively in patients taking SGLT2i). We included 76 publications with 99 cases. The preoperative SGLT2i cessation duration was reported for 59 patients (59.6%). In all cases with available cessation periods, the SGLT2is were interrupted < 3 days preoperatively. No SAPKA cases with > 2-day preoperative cessation periods were found. Many case reports lack important information for estimating precipitating factors, including preoperative SGLT2i cessation period, body mass index, baseline hemoglobin A1c level, details of perioperative fluid management, and type of anesthesia. Our study suggested that preoperative SGLT2i cessation for at least 3 days could prevent SAPKA. Large prospective epidemiologic studies are needed to identify risk factors for SAPKA.
Topics: Humans; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ketosis; Glucose; Sodium
PubMed: 36849747
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-023-03174-8 -
JAMA Pediatrics Dec 2022Presenting with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at onset of type 1 diabetes (T1D) remains a risk. Following a 2011 systematic review, considerable additional articles have...
IMPORTANCE
Presenting with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at onset of type 1 diabetes (T1D) remains a risk. Following a 2011 systematic review, considerable additional articles have been published, and the review required updating.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate factors associated with DKA at the onset of T1D among pediatric patients.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
In this systematic review, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, and article reference lists were searched using the population, intervention, comparison, outcome search strategy for primary research studies on DKA and T1D onset among individuals younger than 18 years that were published from January 2011 to November 2021. These studies were combined with a 2011 systematic review on the same topic. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.
FINDINGS
A total of 2565 articles were identified; 149 were included, along with 46 from the previous review (total 195 articles). Thirty-eight factors were identified and examined for their association with DKA at T1D onset. Factors associated with increased risk of DKA were younger age at T1D onset (<2 years vs ≥2 years; odds ratio [OR], 3.51; 95% CI, 2.85-4.32; P < .001), belonging to an ethnic minority population (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.21-0.74; P = .004), and family history of T1D (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.57; P < .001), consistent with the 2011 systematic review. Some factors that were not associated with DKA in the 2011 systematic review were associated with DKA in the present review (eg, delayed diagnosis: OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.72-3.01; P < .001). Additional factors associated with risk of DKA among patients with new-onset T1D included participation in screening programs (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.59; P < .001) and presentation during the COVID-19 pandemic (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.76-3.06; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this study, age younger than 2 years at T1D onset, belonging to an ethnic minority population, delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis, and presenting during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with increased risk of DKA. Factors associated with decreased risk of DKA included greater knowledge of key signs or symptoms of DKA, such as a family history of T1D or participation in screening programs. Future work should focus on identifying and implementing strategies related to these factors to reduce risk of DKA among new patients with T1D.
Topics: Child; Humans; Child, Preschool; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Ethnicity; COVID-19; Pandemics; Minority Groups
PubMed: 36215053
DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3586 -
BMJ Open Oct 2022To assess the cardiovascular and renal efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients without diabetes. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Cardiovascular and renal efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the cardiovascular and renal efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients without diabetes.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library for publications up to 17 August 2022. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to pool effect measures across studies. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs are expressed for composite cardiovascular outcome of cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure, cardiovascular death, hospitalisation for heart failure, all-cause mortality and composite renal outcome of ≥50% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), end-stage kidney disease or renal death. Annual rate of change in eGFR is expressed as the mean difference with 95% CI.
RESULTS
We identified four trials with 8927 patients with heart failure or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Compared with placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors showed favourable effects on the composite cardiovascular outcome (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.87; moderate certainty), cardiovascular death (0.85, 0.74 to 0.99; moderate certainty), hospitalisation for heart failure (0.72, 0.62 to 0.82; moderate certainty), the composite renal outcome (0.64, 0.48 to 0.85; low certainty) and the annual rate of change in eGFR (mean difference: 0.99, 0.59 to 1.39 mL/min/1.73 m/year; moderate certainty), while there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (0.88, 0.77 to 1.01; very low certainty). Moderate certainty evidence indicated that SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of serious adverse events and acute renal failure. Low certainty evidence suggested that SGLT2 inhibitors increased the risk of urinary tract infection and genital infection, while there were no differences in discontinuation due to adverse events, amputation, fracture, hypoglycaemia, ketoacidosis or volume depletion.
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence of low to moderate certainty suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors provide cardiorenal benefits but have increased risk for urinary tract infection and genital infection in patients without diabetes and with heart failure or CKD.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42021239807.
Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucose; Heart Failure; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Sodium; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 36241355
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060655 -
World Journal of Clinical Cases Aug 2023Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) manifests as hyperglycemia, metabolic acidosis, and ketosis. However, euglycemic DKA (eu-DKA) conceals severe DKA with glucose levels below...
BACKGROUND
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) manifests as hyperglycemia, metabolic acidosis, and ketosis. However, euglycemic DKA (eu-DKA) conceals severe DKA with glucose levels below 200 mg/dL. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors can induce eu-DKA in diabetic patients. Notably, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) -infected individuals with diabetes using SGLT2 inhibitors face an augmented risk of eu-DKA due to the direct toxic impact of the virus on pancreatic islets. This study aims to comprehensively investigate the association between SGLT2 inhibitors and eu-DKA in COVID-19 patients through meticulous case report analysis. Additionally, we endeavor to examine the outcomes and treatment approaches for COVID-19-infected diabetics receiving SGLT2 inhibitors, providing indispensable insights for healthcare professionals managing this specific patient population.
AIM
To investigate the connection between SGLT2 inhibitors and euglycemic DKA in COVID-19 patients through a meticulous analysis of case reports.
METHODS
We conducted an exhaustive search across prominent electronic databases, including PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. This search encompassed the period from December 2019 to May 2022, incorporating published studies and pre-prints. The search terms employed encompassed "SGLT2 inhibitors", "euglycemic DKA", "COVID-19", and related variations. By incorporating these diverse sources, our objective was to ensure a thorough exploration of the existing literature on this subject, thereby augmenting the validity and robustness of our findings.
RESULTS
Our search yielded a total of seven case reports and one case series, collectively comprising a cohort of twelve patients. These reports detailed instances of eu-DKA in individuals with COVID-19. Crucially, all twelve patients were utilizing SGLT2 as their primary anti-diabetic medication. Upon admission, all oral medications were promptly discontinued, and the patients were initiated on intravenous insulin therapy to effectively manage the DKA. Encouragingly, eleven patients demonstrated a favorable outcome, while regrettably, one patient succumbed to the condition. Subsequently, SGLT2 were discontinued for all patients upon their discharge from the hospital. These findings provide valuable insights into the clinical management and outcomes of eu-DKA cases associated with COVID-19 and SGLT2, underscoring the critical importance of prompt intervention and vigilant medication adjustments.
CONCLUSION
Our study sheds light on the possibility of diabetic patients developing both drug-related and unrelated DKA, as well as encountering adverse outcomes in the context of COVID-19, despite maintaining satisfactory glycemic control. The relationship between glycemic control and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 remains ambiguous. Consequently, this systematic review proposes that COVID-19-infected diabetic patients using SGLT2 should contemplate alternative treatment protocols until their recovery from the disease.
PubMed: 37727728
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i24.5700