-
Frontiers in Neurology 2023This study aimed to evaluate the retina and microvascular alterations with optical coherence tomography (OCT) or optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in...
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate the retina and microvascular alterations with optical coherence tomography (OCT) or optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in patients with migraine with aura (MA) and migraine without aura (MO).
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to find relevant literature on patients with MA or MO using OCT/OCTA devices. The eligible data were analyzed by Stata Software (version 15.0).
RESULTS
There were 16 studies identified, involving 379 eyes with MA, 583 eyes with MO, and 658 eyes of healthy controls. The thickness of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) of patients with MA decreased significantly in most regions. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and perimeter in MA patients significantly enlarged, while the perfusion density (PD) in the macular deep capillary plexus (mDCP) significantly decreased in the whole image and its subregions except for the fovea, with the PD in radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) decreasing inside the disk. Patients with MO demonstrated a significantly decreased thickness of pRNFL in most regions, and the FAZ parameters were significantly enlarged. No statistical significance was observed in the retina and microvascular features of patients with MA and MO.
CONCLUSION
The eyes affected by MA and MO demonstrated significantly reduced thickness of pRNFL and enlarged FAZ. Patients with MA showed retinal microvascular impairments, including a decreased PD in mDCP. The OCT and OCTA could detect membrane morphology and circulation status in migraine and might provide the basis for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with migraine.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42023397653.
PubMed: 37840933
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1241778 -
European Spine Journal : Official... Dec 2023Spondylodiscitis refers to infection of the intervertebral disk and neighboring structures. Outcomes based on instrumentation type are not well reported in the... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Spondylodiscitis refers to infection of the intervertebral disk and neighboring structures. Outcomes based on instrumentation type are not well reported in the literature, but are important in establishing guidelines for surgical management of spondylodiscitis. This study aims to clarify the effect of instrumentation material selection on clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with spondylodiscitis.
METHODS
Studies that evaluated the use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK), titanium, allograft, and/or autologous bone grafts for spondylodiscitis were identified in the literature. Radiographic and clinical data were analyzed using a meta-analysis of proportions, with estimated risk and confidence intervals reported for our primary study outcomes.
RESULTS
Thirty-two retrospective studies totaling 1088 patients undergoing surgical management of spondylodiscitis with PEEK, TTN, allograft, and autologous bone graft instrumentation were included. There were no differences in fusion rates (p-interaction = 0.55) with rates of fusion of 93.4% with TTN, 98.6% with allograft, 84.2% with autologous bone graft, and 93.9% with PEEK. There were no differences in screw loosening (p-interaction = 0.52) with rates of 0.33% with TTN, 0% with allograft, 1.3% with autologous bone graft, and 8.2% with PEEK. There were no differences in reoperation (p-interaction = 0.59) with rates of 2.64% with TTN, 0% with allograft, 1.69% with autologous bone graft, and 3.3% with PEEK.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis demonstrates that the choice of instrumentation type in the surgical management of spondylodiscitis resulted in no significant differences in rate of radiographic fusion, screw loosening, or reoperation. Future comparative studies to optimize guidelines for the management of spondylodiscitis are needed.
PubMed: 38148366
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08065-w -
Neurosurgery Jan 2024Cervical/lumbar total disk replacements (TDRs) are often performed for degenerative conditions but rarely in athletes. Therefore, we sought to conduct a systematic...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Cervical/lumbar total disk replacements (TDRs) are often performed for degenerative conditions but rarely in athletes. Therefore, we sought to conduct a systematic review of athletes undergoing TDRs of both the scientific literature and lay press, with an emphasis on contact sport athletes.
METHODS
In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, PubMed/Embase/Cochrane/Scopus/Web of Science databases were queried for all primary literature reporting TDRs in athletes, including both cervical/lumbar disk replacements (CDRs/LDRs). Sports were dichotomized into contact vs limited/noncontact. Because of the public nature of injuries in elite athletes, the lay press was also queried.
RESULTS
A total of 488 scientific studies were screened, of which 10 met inclusion criteria. Cervical: seven studies reported CDRs in 53 athletes, of which 7 were professional, 22 semiprofessional, and 24 recreational. Of the seven professional athletes, there was one contact sport athlete (kickboxer). All 7/7 professional and 21/22 semiprofessional athletes successfully returned-to-play at 8-52 weeks without complication. Lumbar: Three studies discussed LDRs in 51 athletes, of which 17 were professional, 6 semiprofessional, and 28 recreational. Of the 17 professional athletes, eight played contact sports (2 boxing, 2 alpine skiing, 2 soccer, judo, rugby). All 17 professional and 6 semiprofessional athletes successfully returned to play at 9-21 weeks. Lay Press: five professional contact sport athletes underwent CDRs, and all returned to play: 3 hockey, 1 mixed-martial arts, and 1 Australian-rules football.
CONCLUSION
The scientific literature and lay press revealed 14 professional contact sport athletes who underwent TDR-6 CDRs and 8 LDRs-all with successful return to play. From the little data that exist, it seems that TDR may be safe in elite athletes; however, the small number of patients highlights the major paucity of data on the safety of TDR in elite contact sport athletes.
Topics: Humans; Return to Sport; Australia; Athletes; Soccer
PubMed: 37607091
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002637 -
Frontiers in Surgery 2022To compare the effectiveness and safety of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) for... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To compare the effectiveness and safety of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) for degenerative lumbar disease.
METHODS
We searched relevant studies in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases comprehensively from inception to March 2022. The data were extracted from included studies, including operation indications, radiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes. Random or fixed-effects models were used in all meta-analyses according to the between-study heterogeneity.
RESULTS
In total, 30 studies, including 2,125 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. Our study found similar disk height, length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS), and Oswestry disability index(ODI) between the two groups. However, the OLIF showed an advantage in restoring lumbar lordotic angle compared with MI-TLIF, with the pooled mean change of 17.73° and 2.61°, respectively. Additionally, the operative time and blood loss in the OLIF group appeared to be less compared with the MI-TLIF group. Regarding complications, the rates of the two groups were similar (OLIF 14.0% vs. MI-TLIF 10.0%), but the major complications that occurred in these two procedures differed significantly.
CONCLUSION
The results of disk height, length of hospital stay, VAS, and ODI between the OLIF and MI-TLIF groups were similar. And the OLIF was superior in restoring lumbar lordotic angle, operative time, and blood loss. However, the OLIF group's complication rate was higher, although not significantly, than that in the MI-TLIF group.
PubMed: 36311941
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1014314 -
Asian Spine Journal Dec 2023Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion (L-ALIF), which employs laparoscopic cameras to facilitate a less invasive approach, originally gained traction during the...
Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion (L-ALIF), which employs laparoscopic cameras to facilitate a less invasive approach, originally gained traction during the 1990s but has subsequently fallen out of favor. As the envelope for endoscopic approaches continues to be pushed, a recurrence of interest in laparoscopic and/or endoscopic anterior approaches seems possible. Therefore, evaluating the current evidence base in regard to this approach is of much clinical relevance. To this end, a systematic literature search was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using the following keywords: "(laparoscopic OR endoscopic) AND (anterior AND lumbar)." Out of the 441 articles retrieved, 22 were selected for quantitative analysis. The primary outcome of interest was the radiographic fusion rate. The secondary outcome was the incidence of perioperative complications. Meta-analysis was performed using RStudio's "metafor" package. Of the 1,079 included patients (mean age, 41.8±2.9 years), 481 were males (44.6%). The most common indication for L-ALIF surgery was degenerative disk disease (reported by 18 studies, 81.8%). The mean follow-up duration was 18.8±11.2 months (range, 6-43 months). The pooled fusion rate was 78.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.9-90.4). Complications occurred in 19.2% (95% CI, 13.4-27.4) of L-ALIF cases. Additionally, 7.2% (95% CI, 4.6-11.4) of patients required conversion from L-ALIF to open surgery. Although L-ALIF does not appear to be supported by studies available in the literature, it is important to consider the context from which these results have been obtained. Even if these results are taken at face value, the failure of endoscopy to have a role in the ALIF approach does not mean that it should not be incorporated in posterior approaches.
PubMed: 38105638
DOI: 10.31616/asj.2023.0135 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Dec 2020The surgical treatment of thoracic myelopathy is still controversial and also a challenge for spine surgeons. Therefore, the objective of this study was to review the...
PURPOSE
The surgical treatment of thoracic myelopathy is still controversial and also a challenge for spine surgeons. Therefore, the objective of this study was to review the related literature on the surgical treatment of thoracic myelopathy and try to define treatment guidelines for spine surgeons on thoracic myelopathy.
METHODS
Relevant literatures were searched based on the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library between January 2008 and December 2018. Some data on the characteristics of patients were extracted, including number of patients, mean age, surgical procedures, blood loss, complications, and pre-/post-operation modified JOA score. Recovery rate was used to assess the effect of surgery outcome, and the safety was evaluated by blood loss and incidence of complications.
RESULTS
Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and were retrieved. A total of 2183 patients were included in our systematic review, with the average age of 55.2 years. There were 69.8% patients diagnosed as ossification of ligamentum flavum (OLF), 20.0% as ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), 9.3% as disk herniation (DH), and 0.9% as others including diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The volume of blood loss was more in the treatment of circumferential decompression (CD) than posterior decompression (PD), and the incidence of complications was higher in CD (P < 0.05). The volume of blood loss in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was lowest and the incidence of complications was 19.2%. Post-operation recovery rate was 0.49 in PD, 0.35 in CD, and 0.29 in MIS while the recovery rate was 0.54 in PD, 0.55 in CD, and 0.49 in MIS at the last follow-up. When focusing on the OLF specifically, incidence of complications in PD was much lower than CD, with less blood loss and higher recovery rate. Focusing on the OPLL specifically, incidence of complications in PD was much lower than CD, with less blood loss while there was no statistical difference in recovery rate between these two methods.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review showed that posterior decompression for thoracic myelopathy is safer and better than circumferential decompression according to the complication rate and surgical outcome. And we should also consider the location of compression before the operation.
Topics: Blood Loss, Surgical; Female; Humans; Male; Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament; Postoperative Complications; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Spinal Cord Diseases; Spinal Stenosis; Thoracic Vertebrae; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33302988
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-02081-y -
Ophthalmology. Retina Mar 2020Optic pit maculopathy (OPM) is an uncommon cause of vision loss with no standard surgical treatment. Surgical treatment involves pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), often... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Optic pit maculopathy (OPM) is an uncommon cause of vision loss with no standard surgical treatment. Surgical treatment involves pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), often combined with adjunctive procedures. Large studies comparing outcomes of these approaches are lacking because of low disease incidence. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of PPV without or with adjunctive procedures.
DESIGN
Meta-analysis and systematic literature review.
METHODS
We conducted a literature search to identify clinical studies and case series of surgically managed OPM. Inclusion criteria were: (1) more than 2 patients, (2) treatment with PPV, and (3) reporting of preoperative and postoperative visual acuity data. We excluded review articles and studies not available in English. Results were analyzed using a 1-way analysis of variance, Pearson's chi-square test, and simple linear regression. Publication bias was modeled using funnel plots.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Visual acuity changes, resolution rate, resolution time, and change in OCT thickness.
RESULTS
We identified 26 studies, encompassing 27 years and 342 patients. We identified 6 commonly reported techniques: PPV alone (92 patients), PPV plus juxtapapillary laser treatment (JPL; 146 patients), PPV plus internal limiting membrane peeling (ILMP; 50 patients), PPV plus both ILMP and JPL (16 patients), PPV plus inner retinal fenestration (18 patients), and PPV plus autologous platelet concentrate (22 patients). All groups demonstrated improved best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; average, 0.46 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.51 logMAR) compared with baseline, with no differences between groups (P = 0.11). The average OPM resolution rate was 70% among all groups (range, 56%-100%), and the average time to resolution was 8.4 months for all groups (95% CI, 7.2-9.6 months). Central macular thickness was reduced in all groups with no differences between groups (P = 0.15). Tamponade had no effect on outcomes. Linear regression analysis demonstrated significant correlations between preoperative BCVA and above outcome measures. Funnel plots demonstrated positive publication bias in PPV and PPV plus JPL groups.
CONCLUSIONS
We did not identify any significant differences in outcomes among 6 different surgical techniques. This study is limited by its inclusion of primarily retrospective studies and positive publication bias.
Topics: Eye Abnormalities; Humans; Optic Disk; Retinal Diseases; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Visual Acuity; Vitrectomy
PubMed: 31937471
DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.10.011 -
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound : JCU May 2022The aim of this study was to compare ultrasound (US) and intra uterine MRI (IUMRI) of the brain in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to compare ultrasound (US) and intra uterine MRI (IUMRI) of the brain in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities.
METHODS
The present systematic review is done based on guidelines for preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. All major articles comparing fetal US with IUMRI in fetuses with suspected brain abnormalities were qualified. Articles published before 2010 were excluded from the study. An I > 20% was considered as a sign of significant change. The statistical analysis was done using STATA -15 and Meta-Disk 1.4 applications.
RESULTS
Five articles were considered for meta-analysis. The sensitivity of US and IUMRI in diagnosing fetal abnormalities were 86% and 95%, respectively. The corresponding rates for specificity were 77% and 80%. IUMRI and US were concordant in 72.5% (95% CI: 68%-77%) of diagnoses. However, IUMRI added information in 21.7% of cases, while US added value was only 1.48.
CONCLUSION
Our results approved the good diagnostic performance of both US and IUMRI in confirming fetal brain normal development and emphasized that US is an appropriate screening technique in pregnancy. In cases of detected abnormalities in US, IUMRI is suggested as it was the most accurate imaging method and added information about the diagnosis in 22.2% of cases.
Topics: Brain; Brain Diseases; Female; Fetus; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Pregnancy; Prenatal Diagnosis; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 35266167
DOI: 10.1002/jcu.23158 -
Clinical Spine Surgery Dec 2023Systematic Review. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
STUDY DESIGNS
Systematic Review.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the impact of anesthesia type on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complications after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
A significant advantage of PELD involves the option to use alternative sedation to general anesthesia (GA). Two options include local anesthesia (LA) and epidural anesthesia (EA). While EA is more involved, it may yield improved pain control and surgical results compared with LA. However, few studies have directly examined outcomes for PELD after LA versus EA, and it remains unknown which technique results in superior outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases examining PELD performed with LA or EA from inception to August 16, 2021 were conducted. All studies reported greater than 6 months of follow-up in addition to PRO data. PROs, including visual analog scale (VAS)-leg/back, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were collected. Complications, recurrent disk herniation, durotomy, and reoperation rates, as well as surgical data, were recorded. All outcomes were compared between pooled studies examining LA or EA.
RESULTS
Fifty-six studies consisting of 4465 patients (366 EA, 4099 LA) were included. Overall complication rate, durotomy rate, length of stay, recurrent disk herniation, and reoperation rates were similar between groups. VAS back/leg and ODI scores were all significantly improved at the first and last follow-up appointments in the LA group. VAS leg and ODI scores were significantly improved at the first and last follow-up appointments in the EA group, but VAS back was not.
CONCLUSIONS
EA can be a safe and feasible alternative to LA, potentially minimizing patient discomfort during PELD. Conclusions are limited by a high level of study bias and heterogeneity. Further investigation is necessary to determine if PELD under EA may have greater short-term PRO benefits compared with LA.
Topics: Humans; Diskectomy, Percutaneous; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Anesthesia, Local; Lumbar Vertebrae; Endoscopy; Diskectomy; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37348062
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001476 -
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Jun 2023Exfoliative material has been shown to accumulate in ocular and systemic tissues. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Exfoliative material has been shown to accumulate in ocular and systemic tissues. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature evaluating optic nerve head vessel density (VD) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in patients with XFS and XFG.
METHODS
Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Studies comparing patients with XFS and/or XFG patients to healthy controls, using the optic nerve head-centred 4.5 × 4.5 mm square OCTA scan protocol were included. Pooled results are presented as standardised mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-regression analysis was performed between mean difference in circumpapillary VD between XFG and controls and mean pRNFL thickness in patients with XFG.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies with 1475 eyes were included in this review. Whole image VD and circumpapillary VD (cpVD) were significantly decreased in patients with XFS [-0.78(95% Cl: -1.08, -0.47); -0.55(95% Cl: -0.80, -0.30); respectively] and XFG [-1.85(95% CI: -2.33, -1.36); -1.84 (95% CI: -2.30, -1.39); respectively] compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, pRNFL thickness decreased in patients with XFS [-0.55(95% Cl: -0.72, -0.35)] and XFG [-1.78(95% Cl: -2.21, -1.36)] compared to healthy controls. Meta-regression showed that pRNFL thickness decreased with increasing mean cpVD difference in XFG patients compared to healthy controls.
CONCLUSIONS
OCTA provides non-invasive, objective and reproducible assessment of peripapillary VD and is important for the detection of vasculopathy in patients with XFS or XFG. This study provides strong evidence for decreased cpVD in the eyes of patients with XFS and XFG.
Topics: Humans; Exfoliation Syndrome; Optic Disk; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Glaucoma; Tomography, Optical Coherence
PubMed: 36933675
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103514