-
Psychological Medicine Jul 2022The dissociative subtype of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD-DS) was introduced in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The dissociative subtype of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD-DS) was introduced in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), and is characterised by symptoms of either depersonalisation or derealisation, in addition to a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to estimate the point prevalence of current PTSD-DS, and the extent to which method of assessment, demographic and trauma variables moderate this estimate, across different methods of prevalence estimation. Studies included were identified by searching MEDLINE (EBSCO), PsycInfo, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete and PTSDpubs, yielding 49 studies that met the inclusion criteria ( = 8214 participants). A random-effects meta-analysis estimated the prevalence of PTSD-DS as 38.1% (95% CI 31.5-45.0%) across all samples, 45.5% (95% CI 37.7-53.4%) across all diagnosis-based and clinical cut-off samples, 22.8% (95% CI 14.8-32.0%) across all latent class analysis (LCA) and latent profile analysis (LPA) samples and 48.1% (95% CI 35.0-61.3%) across samples which strictly used the DSM-5 PTSD criteria; all as a proportion of those already with a diagnosis of PTSD. All results were characterised by high levels of heterogeneity, limiting generalisability. Moderator analyses mostly failed to identify sources of heterogeneity. PTSD-DS was more prevalent in children compared to adults, and in diagnosis-based and clinical cut-off samples compared to LCA and LPA samples. Risk of bias was not significantly related to prevalence estimates. The implications of these results are discussed further.
Topics: Adult; Child; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dissociative Disorders; Humans; Prevalence; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
PubMed: 35734787
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291722001647 -
Journal of Psychiatric Research Sep 2020There is currently no general agreement on how to best conceptualize dissociative symptoms and whether they share similar neural underpinnings across dissociative... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
There is currently no general agreement on how to best conceptualize dissociative symptoms and whether they share similar neural underpinnings across dissociative disorders. Neuroimaging data could help elucidate these questions.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review is to summarize empirical evidence for neural aberrations observed in patients suffering from dissociative symptoms.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted including patient cohorts diagnosed with primary dissociative disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or borderline personality disorder.
RESULTS
Results from MRI studies reporting structural (gray matter and white matter) and functional (during resting-state and task-related activation) brain aberrations were extracted and integrated. In total, 33 articles were included of which 10 pertained to voxel-based morphology, 2 to diffusion tensor imaging, 10 to resting-state fMRI, and 11 to task-related fMRI. Overall findings indicated aberrations spread across diverse brain regions, especially in the temporal and frontal cortices. Patients with dissociative identity disorder and with dissociative PTSD showed more overlap in brain activation than each group showed with depersonalization/derealization disorder.
CONCLUSION
In conjunction, the results indicate that dissociative processing cannot be localized to a few distinctive brain regions but rather corresponds to differential neural signatures depending on the symptom constellation.
Topics: Brain; Diffusion Tensor Imaging; Dissociative Disorders; Gray Matter; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
PubMed: 32480060
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.05.006 -
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation : the... 2021: Research on dissociative symptomatology in the context of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has been gaining traction, with dissociation being studied as a set of...
: Research on dissociative symptomatology in the context of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has been gaining traction, with dissociation being studied as a set of complex symptoms following trauma exposure and as a specific subtype of PTSD. The aims of this review are to summarize the literature as it stands, examine the efficacy of existing interventions in treating dissociative symptomatology within the context of PTSD, and offer potential suggestions for future research. : A systematic approach was taken to locate empirical studies on PTSD that included dissociation as an outcome in the PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases. Recent experimental designs with adult subjects (18+ years) in the English language were included, yielding 103 potentially eligible studies. Thirty-three full-text articles were screened with 17 articles meeting criteria for inclusion in the systematic review. : Designs, populations, treatments, and inventories were extremely diverse. Most therapies did not target dissociation specifically, although the results of this review suggest that PTSD patients who experience dissociative symptoms could benefit from trauma-focused treatments, which often significantly reduced dissociative and trauma-related symptoms. : Future work should consider the evaluation of dissociation as a unique outcome to gain understanding about the nature of traumatic stress and to develop treatment options for its many presentations. The current literature displays limited generalizability to the treatment of individuals with high dissociation, which is a line of inquiry that should be explored. More RCTs are needed.
Topics: Adult; Dissociative Disorders; Humans; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
PubMed: 32401657
DOI: 10.1080/15299732.2020.1760410 -
The Australian and New Zealand Journal... Oct 2022Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is frequently complicated by the presence of dissociative symptoms. Pathological dissociation is linked with earlier and more... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is frequently complicated by the presence of dissociative symptoms. Pathological dissociation is linked with earlier and more severe trauma exposure, emotional dysregulation and worse treatment outcomes in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Dissociative Disorders, with implications for BPD.
OBJECTIVE
A systematic scoping review was conducted to assess the extent of current literature regarding the impact of dissociation on BPD and to identify knowledge gaps.
METHODS
Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus) were searched, and English peer-reviewed studies with adults with BPD were included, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) 2018 guidelines.
RESULTS
Most of the 70 included studies were observational (98%) with first authors from Germany (59%). Overall, dissociation was associated with increased BPD symptom severity, self-harm and reduced psychotherapy treatment response; findings regarding suicide risk were mixed. Dissociation was associated with working memory and cognitive deficits, decreased pain perception, altered body ownership, no substance abuse or the abuse of sedative substances, increased fantasy proneness, personality fragmentation, fearful attachment, dream anxiety, perceived stress and altered stress responses, increased cumulative body mass index, decreased water consumption, several neurological correlates and changes in gene expression.
CONCLUSION
BPD with significant dissociative symptoms may constitute a more severe and at-risk subgroup of BPD patients. However, there are significant research gaps and methodological issues in the area, including the possibility of unrecognized Dissociative Disorders in BPD study populations confounding results. Further studies are needed to better understand the impact of dissociation on BPD course and treatment, and to clarify the most appropriate assessment tools for clinical practice. In addition, interventional studies are needed to develop dissociation-specific BPD treatments to determine whether targeting dissociation in BPD can improve treatment outcomes.
Topics: Adult; Borderline Personality Disorder; Dissociative Disorders; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Psychotherapy; Self-Injurious Behavior
PubMed: 35152771
DOI: 10.1177/00048674221077029 -
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation : the... 2024The 11 revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) introduced Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) as a sibling disorder to PTSD.... (Review)
Review
The 11 revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) introduced Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) as a sibling disorder to PTSD. Dissociative symptoms have been implicated in the severity of ICD-11 CPTSD; however, no reviews have investigated how dissociation has been measured in studies investigating CPTSD, nor the relationship between CPTSD and dissociation. This systematic review aimed to identify measures used to assess dissociative symptoms in studies that have assessed CPTSD according to ICD-11 criteria and to synthesize the relationship between these constructs. PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched on March 31, 2021. Seventeen articles met inclusion criteria. CPTSD was most frequently measured by a version of the International Trauma Questionnaire. Twelve measures were used to assess for dissociative symptoms, the most common being the Dissociative Symptoms Scale and the Dissociative Experiences Scale. The relationship between CPTSD and dissociative symptoms was moderate-to-strong, but inconsistently reported. Further research is needed to determine the most appropriate measure(s) of dissociation in CPTSD.
Topics: Humans; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Surveys and Questionnaires; International Classification of Diseases; Dissociative Disorders
PubMed: 38112306
DOI: 10.1080/15299732.2023.2293785 -
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation : the... 2023Depersonalization-Derealization disorder (DDD) is a psychiatric condition characterized by persistent feelings of detachment from one's self and of unreality about the... (Review)
Review
Depersonalization-Derealization disorder (DDD) is a psychiatric condition characterized by persistent feelings of detachment from one's self and of unreality about the outside world. This review aims to examine the prevalence of DDD amongst different populations. A systematic review protocol was developed before literature searching. Original articles were drawn from three electronic databases and included only studies where prevalence rates of DDD were assessed by standardized diagnostic tools. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Twenty-three papers were identified and categorized into three groups of participants: general population, mixed in/outpatient samples, and patients with specific disorders. The prevalence rates ranged from 0% to 1.9% amongst the general population, 5-20% in outpatients and 17.5-41.9% in inpatients. In studies of patients with specific disorders, prevalence rates varied: 1.8-5.9% (substance abuse), 3.3-20.2% (anxiety), 3.7-20.4% (other dissociative disorders), 16.3% (schizophrenia), 17% (borderline personality disorder), ~50% (depression). The highest rates were found in people who experienced interpersonal abuse (25-53.8%). The prevalence rate of DDD is around 1% in the general population, consistent with previous findings. DDD is more prevalent amongst adolescents and young adults as well as in patients with mental disorders. There is also a possible relationship between interpersonal abuse and DDD, which merits further research.
Topics: Adolescent; Young Adult; Humans; Depersonalization; Prevalence; Dissociative Disorders; Substance-Related Disorders
PubMed: 35699456
DOI: 10.1080/15299732.2022.2079796 -
Psychiatry Research Nov 2019Dissociative Disorder (DD) is a large group of disorders that shares common psychopathology. Psychopharmacological agents have sparse evidence in the treatment of DD in...
BACKGROUND
Dissociative Disorder (DD) is a large group of disorders that shares common psychopathology. Psychopharmacological agents have sparse evidence in the treatment of DD in general. Multiple pharmacotherapy options have been used without conclusive evidence.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of data in English language from 1967 to 2019 the protocol of which was registered under PROSPERO (Study ID CRD42019127235). Using PRISMA guidelines, 5 RCTs reporting data on 214 participants providing data on response to pharmacotherapy in dissociative disorder were included.
RESULTS
The treatment response rate of pharmacotherapy group as measured in reduction in dissociative symptoms was 68.42% (n = 65/95), significantly higher than that of 39.49% (n = 47/119) in the control group. And, the pooled RR was 1.59 (95% CI, 0.76-3.30; P = 0.21). The overall effect estimates are favourable to pharmacotherapy group over placebo.
CONCLUSION
It would be apt to conclude that Paroxetine and Naloxone are the only pharmacological agents studied through RCTs and found to have modest evidence for controlling depersonalization symptoms and dissociative symptoms that are comorbid with PTSD and BPD. Results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution in view of high heterogeneity and scanty literature on RCTs on various subtypes of DD.
Topics: Dissociative Disorders; Female; Humans; Male; Naloxone; Paroxetine; Psychotropic Drugs; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31470213
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112529 -
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy Mar 2021Dissociation is a debilitating condition often present as comorbidity in patients with eating disorders, but to date only sparse findings are available on this topic.... (Review)
Review
Dissociation is a debilitating condition often present as comorbidity in patients with eating disorders, but to date only sparse findings are available on this topic. Additionally, very little data exist on the classification of dissociation, namely, psychoform and somatoform, in anorexia nervosa (AN). This review aimed to provide an updated view on the literature about dissociation in AN, with a focus on AN subtypes (i.e., restricter and binge-purging) as well as dissociation type (i.e., psychoform and somatoform), when available. We screened 304 studies, and after title and abstract selection and full-text reading, 29 of them were included in this review. Most of the studies investigated psychoform dissociation, whereas just four publications considered somatoform dissociation. Dissociation resulted to be present in AN more than in healthy controls and in individuals with other psychiatric disorders, and it was related mostly to the binge-purging subtype of AN. Moreover, dissociation was linked to traumatic events, self-harm and negative treatment outcomes, especially in patients affected by the binge-purging subtype of AN. However, results on these matters are scarce and partially discordant. The methodological assessment we performed revealed an overall fair quality of the included studies, although several flaws emerged as well. The present review reported on one hand the relevance of dissociation in AN, but on the other hand the need to stimulate the scientific debate on (a) a deeper investigation of somatoform dissociation in AN and (b) the relationship between dissociation and both clinical severity and treatment response/resistance in AN.
Topics: Anorexia Nervosa; Binge-Eating Disorder; Dissociative Disorders; Humans; Somatoform Disorders
PubMed: 32918777
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2517 -
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation : the... 2024Depersonalization-derealization disorder (DPD) is characterized by persistent or recurrent experiences of detachment from oneself and surroundings, as well as a sense of... (Review)
Review
Depersonalization-derealization disorder (DPD) is characterized by persistent or recurrent experiences of detachment from oneself and surroundings, as well as a sense of unreality. Considering the inadequacy of current research on treatment, we performed a systematic review of the available pharmacotherapies, neuromodulations, and psychotherapies for DPD. The systematic review protocol was based on PRISMA 2020 guidelines and pre-registered. The PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases were searched from inception to June 2021. All treatments for DPD and all study types, including controlled and observational studies as well as case reports, were assessed. Of the identified 17,540 studies, 41 studies (four randomized controlled trials, one non-randomized controlled trial, 10 case series, and 26 case reports) involving 300 participants met the eligibility criteria. We identified 30 methods that have been applied independently or in combination to treat DPD since 1955. The quality of these studies was considered. The relationship between individual differences, such as symptoms, comorbidities, history, and duration since onset, and treatment effects was explored. The results suggest that a series of treatments, such as pharmacotherapies, neuromodulation, and psychotherapies, could be considered in combination. However, the quality and quantity of studies were generally low considering the high prevalence of DPD. The review concludes with suggestions for future research and an urgent call for more high-quality research.
Topics: Humans; Comorbidity; Depersonalization; Psychotherapy
PubMed: 37431255
DOI: 10.1080/15299732.2023.2231920 -
Frontiers in Pain Research (Lausanne,... 2022Pain and depression frequently co-occur. Due to its antidepressant and analgesic properties, ketamine has been used for the management of treatment-resistant depression... (Review)
Review
Pain and depression frequently co-occur. Due to its antidepressant and analgesic properties, ketamine has been used for the management of treatment-resistant depression and pain. This systematic review examined the literature on the efficacy of sub-anesthetic doses of ketamine in individuals experiencing comorbid depression and chronic pain (CDCP), as well as comorbid depression and acute pain (CDAP). A secondary objective was to provide an assessment of dosage, route, and adverse effects of ketamine treatment for CDCP and CDAP. A literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase databases, coupled with a manual screening of the bibliography sections of included articles. In addition, registered ongoing and planned trials were searched on Clinicaltrials.gov. The end date of the search was April 9th, 2022. Included studies assessed changes in depression and pain in patients receiving at least one sub-anesthetic dose of ketamine. Assessment of quality was conducted using the GRADE checklist. Of the 7 CDCP clinical trials, 3 reported a reduction in depression and pain, 3 reported a reduction in depression or pain only, and 1 reported no improvement in either comorbidity. Among the 7 CDAP clinical trials, 4 studies found improvements in depression and pain while the remaining 3 reported improvements in only one parameter. Ten of the 12 case studies and 2 of the 3 observational studies assessing CDCP and CDAP found improvements in pain and depression scores post-treatment with effects of variable duration. The planned methodologies of the registered clinical trials are in line with those of the published research. Preliminary evidence supports the efficacy of ketamine in treating CDCP and CDAP. However, the current review identified a small number of heterogeneous studies with mixed results, preventing comprehensive conclusions. More longitudinal placebo-controlled studies are needed to identify the effects of ketamine for patients with CDCP and CDAP.
PubMed: 36353699
DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2022.1022767