-
BMC Psychology Jan 2022In the general population, 10.6% of people favor their left hand over the right for motor tasks. Previous research suggests higher prevalence of atypical (left-, mixed-,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
In the general population, 10.6% of people favor their left hand over the right for motor tasks. Previous research suggests higher prevalence of atypical (left-, mixed-, or non-right-) handedness in (i) twins compared to singletons, and in (ii) monozygotic compared to dizygotic twins. Moreover, (iii) studies have shown a higher rate of handedness concordance in monozygotic compared to dizygotic twins, in line with genetic factors playing a role for handedness.
METHODS
By means of a systematic review, we identified 59 studies from previous literature and performed three sets of random effects meta-analyses on (i) twin-to-singleton Odds Ratios (21 studies, n = 189,422 individuals) and (ii) monozygotic-to-dizygotic twin Odds Ratios (48 studies, n = 63,295 individuals), both times for prevalence of left-, mixed-, and non-right-handedness. For monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs we compared (iii) handedness concordance Odds Ratios (44 studies, n = 36,217 twin pairs). We also tested for potential effects of moderating variables, such as sex, age, the method used to assess handedness, and the twins' zygosity.
RESULTS
We found (i) evidence for higher prevalence of left- (Odds Ratio = 1.40, 95% Confidence Interval = [1.26, 1.57]) and non-right- (Odds Ratio = 1.36, 95% Confidence Interval = [1.22, 1.52]), but not mixed-handedness (Odds Ratio = 1.08, 95% Confidence Interval = [0.52, 2.27]) among twins compared to singletons. We further showed a decrease in Odds Ratios in more recent studies (post-1975: Odds Ratio = 1.30, 95% Confidence Interval = [1.17, 1.45]) compared to earlier studies (pre-1975: Odds Ratio = 1.90, 95% Confidence Interval = [1.59-2.27]). While there was (ii) no difference between monozygotic and dizygotic twins regarding prevalence of left- (Odds Ratio = 0.98, 95% Confidence Interval = [0.89, 1.07]), mixed- (Odds Ratio = 0.96, 95% Confidence Interval = [0.46, 1.99]), or non-right-handedness (Odds Ratio = 1.01, 95% Confidence Interval = [0.91, 1.12]), we found that (iii) handedness concordance was elevated among monozygotic compared to dizygotic twin pairs (Odds Ratio = 1.11, 95% Confidence Interval = [1.06, 1.18]). By means of moderator analyses, we did not find evidence for effects of potentially confounding variables.
CONCLUSION
We provide the largest and most comprehensive meta-analysis on handedness in twins. Although a raw, unadjusted analysis found a higher prevalence of left- and non-right-, but not mixed-handedness among twins compared to singletons, left-handedness was substantially more prevalent in earlier than in more recent studies. The single large, recent study which included birth weight, Apgar score and gestational age as covariates found no twin-singleton difference in handedness rate, but these covariates could not be included in the present meta-analysis. Together, the secular shift and the influence of covariates probably make it unsafe to conclude that twinning has a genuine relationship to handedness.
Topics: Birth Weight; Functional Laterality; Humans; Prevalence; Twins, Dizygotic; Twins, Monozygotic
PubMed: 35033205
DOI: 10.1186/s40359-021-00695-3 -
EFORT Open Reviews May 2022Idiopathic scoliosis is the most common spinal deformity and affects 1-3% of children and adolescents. Idiopathic scoliosis may run in families and the purpose of this... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Idiopathic scoliosis is the most common spinal deformity and affects 1-3% of children and adolescents. Idiopathic scoliosis may run in families and the purpose of this systematic review was to describe the degree of heritability.
METHODS
We searched Medline, Web of Science and EMBASE for family and twin studies reporting heritability estimates for idiopathic scoliosis, or studies from which heritability estimates could be calculated. Reference lists were screened for additional papers. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022307329).
RESULTS
The literature search identified 1134 reports. After full-text screening, nine eligible reports were included for data extraction. Seven were twin studies containing between 5 and 526 pairs, and two were family studies with 1149 and 2732 individuals, respectively. Quality was 'good' in four studies and 'fair' in five studies. In general, studies with radiograph-confirmed diagnosis reported higher heritability estimates than studies with self-reported diagnosis. Population-based twin studies reported lower heritability estimates than clinic-based twin studies. Family-based studies reported higher heritability estimates than twin studies. Pairwise concordance for scoliosis ranged from 0.11 to 1.00 in monozygotic twins and from 0 to 1.0 in dizygotic twins. A meta-analysis of three studies resulted in a narrow sense heritability estimate of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.29-0.86).
CONCLUSION
Twin and family studies indicate a hereditary component in idiopathic scoliosis, but study heterogeneity is large, and the degree of the heritability is uncertain. Nevertheless, known genetic variants associated with idiopathic scoliosis can still only explain a minor part of heritability.
PubMed: 35638601
DOI: 10.1530/EOR-22-0026 -
Journal of Perinatology : Official... Feb 2023Through a systematic review and meta-analyses, we aimed to analyze the impact of chorionicity on neurodevelopment outcomes. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Through a systematic review and meta-analyses, we aimed to analyze the impact of chorionicity on neurodevelopment outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN
We conducted a comprehensive search strategy through Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and reference lists of the retrieved studies until August 2022. Studies that examined the association between chorionicity and children's neurodevelopment outcomes were included.
RESULTS
Twelve studies were included. Monochorionic (MC) twins increased the odds of neurodevelopment impairment, cerebral palsy compared to dichorionic (DC) twins. The differences in neurodevelopmental impairment and cerebral palsy between the two groups disappeared after excluding infants with twin-twin transfusion (TTTS). After fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) for MC twins, there were no differences too.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared to DC twins, MC twins were associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopment impairment. MC twins complicated by TTTS were at high risk of neurologic disability, and FLS was an acceptable treatment modality for them.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant; Female; Child; Humans; Pregnancy, Twin; Cerebral Palsy; Fetofetal Transfusion; Twins, Dizygotic; Twins, Monozygotic; Pregnancy Outcome
PubMed: 36333420
DOI: 10.1038/s41372-022-01534-y -
Translational Psychiatry Jun 2023The first systematic review and meta-analysis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) genetic epidemiology was published approximately 20 years ago. Considering the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The first systematic review and meta-analysis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) genetic epidemiology was published approximately 20 years ago. Considering the relevance of all the studies published since 2001, the current study aimed to update the state-of-art knowledge on the field. All published data concerning the genetic epidemiology of OCD from the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BVS, and OpenGrey databases were searched by two independent researchers until September 30, 2021. To be included, the articles had to fulfill the following criteria: OCD diagnosis provided by standardized and validated instruments; or medical records; inclusion of a control group for comparison and case-control, cohort or twin study designs. The analysis units were the first-degree relatives (FDRs) of OCD or control probands and the co-twins in twin pairs. The outcomes of interest were the familial recurrence rates of OCD and the correlations of OCS in monozygotic compared with dizygotic twins. Nineteen family, twenty-nine twin, and six population-based studies were included. The main findings were that OCD is a prevalent and highly familial disorder, especially among the relatives of children and adolescent probands, that OCD has a phenotypic heritability of around 50%; and that the higher OCS correlations between MZ twins were mainly due to additive genetic or to non-shared environmental components.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Humans; Molecular Epidemiology; Twins, Dizygotic; Databases, Factual; Research Design
PubMed: 37380645
DOI: 10.1038/s41398-023-02433-2 -
Sleep Medicine Reviews Aug 2021Twin studies have consistently found that genetic factors explain a substantial proportion of the variance for insomnia. However, studies vary widely in their... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Twin studies have consistently found that genetic factors explain a substantial proportion of the variance for insomnia. However, studies vary widely in their heritability estimates. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to: 1) Estimate the mean heritability of insomnia; 2) Assess heterogeneity among twin studies of insomnia; and 3) Search and analyse characteristics of the studies (moderator variables) that may explain heterogeneity among estimates. For this purpose, separate meta-analyses were carried out for MZ and DZ correlations and for heritability estimates by assuming random-effects models. Thirteen independent samples were included in this meta-analysis. The heterogeneity index for heritability estimates was significant in both best fitting models (I = 98.77, P < .0001) and full models (I = 97.80, P < .0001). MZ correlations were higher (0.37; 95%CI: 0.31,.43) than DZ correlations (0.15; 95%CI: 0.12,.18). A mean heritability of 0.39 (95%CI: 0.32,.44) was found for insomnia. These results highlight the role of genetic factors in explaining differences among the population on insomnia and Emphasize heterogeneity among studies. Further research is needed to identify variables that could explain this heterogeneity.
Topics: Humans; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Twins, Dizygotic; Twins, Monozygotic
PubMed: 33556853
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101437 -
JAMA Network Open Aug 2022Although infancy is the most rapid period of postnatal growth and development, factors associated with variation in infant traits are not well understood. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Although infancy is the most rapid period of postnatal growth and development, factors associated with variation in infant traits are not well understood.
OBJECTIVE
To synthesize the large twin study literature partitioning phenotypic variance in psychological traits and developmental milestones in infancy into estimates of heritability and shared and nonshared environment.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, PsycINFO, and references of included publications were searched up to February 11, 2021.
STUDY SELECTION
Peer-reviewed publications using the classical twin design to study psychological traits and developmental milestones from birth to 2 years old were included.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data were extracted in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and categorized using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Children and Youth Version. Data were pooled in 3-level random effects models, incorporating within-cohort variance in outcome measurement and between-cohort variance. Data were analyzed from March 2021 through September 2021.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcomes were monozygotic and dizygotic twin correlations. These were used to calculate genetic and shared and nonshared environment estimates.
RESULTS
Among 139 publications that were systematically retrieved, data were available on 79 044 twin pairs (31 053 monozygotic and 47 991 dizygotic pairs), 52 independent samples, and 21 countries. Meta-analyses were conducted on psychological traits and developmental milestones from 106 publications organized into 10 categories of functioning, disability, and health. Moderate to high genetic estimates for 8 categories were found, the highest of which was psychomotor functions (pooled h2, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.25-0.79; P < .001). Several categories of traits had substantial shared environment estimates, the highest being mental functions of language (pooled c2, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.24-0.86; P = .001). All examined categories of traits had moderate or high nonshared environment estimates, the highest of which were emotional functions (pooled e2, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.33-0.50; P < .001) and family relationships (pooled e2, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.30-0.55; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
These findings may be an important source of information to guide future gene discovery research, public perspectives on nature and nurture, and clinical insights into the degree to which family history and environments may estimate major domains of infant functioning, disability, and health in psychological traits and developmental milestones.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Cohort Studies; Forecasting; Humans; Infant; Phenotype; Twins, Dizygotic
PubMed: 35994288
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27887 -
BJOG : An International Journal of... Apr 2021The perinatal mortality and morbidity among twins vary by chorionicity. Although it is considered that monochorionicity is associated with an increased risk of preterm...
BACKGROUND
The perinatal mortality and morbidity among twins vary by chorionicity. Although it is considered that monochorionicity is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth in twin pregnancies, no systematic review exists evaluating this association.
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review was undertaken to assess the association between preterm birth and chorionicity in twin pregnancies.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the electronic databases from January 1990 to July 2019 without language restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All studies on twin pregnancies where chorionicity and preterm birth were evaluated were included.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Findings are reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The estimates are pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.
MAIN RESULTS
From 13 156 citations, we included 39 studies (29 864 pregnancies). Monochorionicity was significantly associated with increased risk of preterm birth at ≤28, ≤32, ≤34 and <37 weeks in women asymptomatic and symptomatic for preterm labour (odds ratio [OR] 2.14, 95% CI 1.52-3.02, I = 46%, OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27-1.89 I = 68%, OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.27-1.69, I = 60%, OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.43-1.93, I = 65%, respectively). Among those asymptomatic for preterm labour, significantly increased odds of preterm birth were seen for monochorionicity at gestations ≤34 weeks (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.42-2.40, I = 25%) and <37 weeks (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.22-2.53, I = 61%). Sensitivity analysis showed significantly increased odds of spontaneous preterm birth at ≤34 and <37 weeks for monochorionicity (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55, I = 0% and OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.13-1.78, I = 0%).
CONCLUSIONS
Monochorionicity is significantly associated with preterm birth at all gestations.
TWEETABLE ABSTRACT
In twin pregnancies, monochorionicity is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth at all gestations.
Topics: Adult; Chorion; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, Twin; Premature Birth; Risk Factors; Twins, Dizygotic; Twins, Monozygotic
PubMed: 32888235
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16479 -
Journal of Dentistry Aug 2023This review aimed to assess the agreement of dental caries experience between monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This review aimed to assess the agreement of dental caries experience between monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins.
DATA RESOURCES
This systematic review was performed by reviewers in the databases Embase, MEDLINE-PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and manual searches and gray literature Google Scholar® and Opengray. Observational studies that evaluated dental caries in twins were included. The risk of bias was analyzed using the Joanna Briggs checklist. Meta-analyses were performed to assess the pooled Odds Ratio to estimate the agreement values of dental caries experience and DMF index between pairs of twins (p < 0.05). To assess the certainty of evidence, the GRADE scale was used.
STUDY SELECTION
2533 studies were identified, of which 19 were included in the qualitative analysis, six in the quantitative synthesis, with two meta-analyses being carried out. Association between genetics and the development of the disease was observed in most studies. In the risk of bias analysis, 47.4% had moderate risk. Higher agreement of dental caries experience was observed in MZ twins than DZ in both dentitions (OR: 5.94; 95% CI: 2.00-17.57). However, there was no difference between the MZ and DZ twin groups in the analysis comparing DMF index agreement (OR: 2.86; 95%CI: 0.25-32.79). The certainty of evidence was considered low and very low for all studies included in meta-analyses.
CONCLUSION
With very low certainty of the evidence, the genetic factor seems to influence the agreement of the caries experience.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Understanding the genetic influence on the disease has the potential to contribute to the development of studies that may use biotechnologies for prevention and treatment as well as guide future research involving gene therapies aiming to prevent the occurrence of dental caries.
Topics: Humans; Dental Caries; Bias; DMF Index; Odds Ratio
PubMed: 37339689
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104586 -
Archives of Oral Biology Aug 2023To determine the association between genetic factors and molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) and/or hypomineralised second primary molars by means of a systematic... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To determine the association between genetic factors and molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) and/or hypomineralised second primary molars by means of a systematic review.
DESIGN
A search was performed in Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases; manual search and search in gray literature were also performed. Selection of articles was performed independently by two researchers. A third examiner was involved in cases of disagreement. Data extraction was performed using an Excel® spreadsheet and independent analysis was performed for each outcome.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were included. There was an association between MIH and genetic variants related to amelogenesis, immune response, xenobiotic detoxification and other genes. Moreover, interactions between amelogenesis and immune response genes, and SNPs in the aquaporin gene and vitamin D receptors were associated with MIH. Greater agreement of MIH was found in pairs of monozygotic twins than dizygotic twins. The heritability of MIH was 20 %. Hypomineralised second primary molars was associated with SNPs in the hypoxia-related HIF-1 gene and methylation in genes related to amelogenesis.
CONCLUSION
With very low or low certainty of evidence, an association was observed between MIH and SNPs in genes associated with amelogenesis, immune response, xenobiotic detox and ion transport. Interactions between genes related to amelogenesis and immune response as well as aquaporin genes were associated to MIH. With very low certainty of evidence, hypomineralised second primary molars was associated to a hypoxia-related gene and to methylation in genes related to amelogenesis. Moreover, higher agreement of MIH in pairs of monozygotic twins than dizygotic twins was observed.
Topics: Humans; Dental Enamel Hypoplasia; Molar Hypomineralization; Xenobiotics; Amelogenesis; Molar; Prevalence
PubMed: 37210809
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.105716 -
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine Apr 2024Chiari malformations (CMs) are a group of congenital or acquired disorders characterized by hindbrain overcrowding into an underdeveloped posterior cranial fossa. CM is... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Chiari malformations (CMs) are a group of congenital or acquired disorders characterized by hindbrain overcrowding into an underdeveloped posterior cranial fossa. CM is considered largely sporadic-however, there exists growing evidence of transmissible genetic underpinnings. The purpose of this systematic review of all familial studies of CM was to investigate the existence of an inherited component and provide recommendations to manage and monitor at-risk family members.
METHODS
This paper includes the following: 1) a unique case report of dizygotic twins who presented at the Toronto Western Hospital Spinal Cord Clinic with symptomatic CM type 1 (CM-1) and syringomyelia; and 2) a systematic review of familial CM. The EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched on June 27, 2023, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only articles in the English language concerning the diagnosis of CM in > 1 human family member presented as a case study, case series, or literature review were included.
RESULTS
Among the 29 articles included in the final analysis, a total of 34 families with CM were analyzed. An average of 3 cases of CM were found per family among all generations. Eighty-one cases (88%) reported CM-1, whereas the other 11 (12%) cases reported either CM-0, CM-1.5, or tonsillar ectopia. A syrinx was present in 37 (54%) cases, with 14 (38%) of these patients also reporting a skeletal abnormality, the most common comorbidity. Most family members diagnosed with CM were siblings (18; 35%), followed by monozygotic twins/triplets (12; 23%).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients most often presented with headaches, sensory disturbances, or generalized symptoms. Overall, there exists mounting evidence for a hereditary component of CM. It is unlikely to be explained by a classic mendelian inheritance pattern, but is rather a polygenic architecture influenced by variable penetrance, cosegregation, and entirely nongenetic factors. For first-degree relatives of those affected by CM, the authors' findings may influence clinicians to conduct closer clinical and radiographic monitoring, promote patient education, and consider earlier genetic testing.
PubMed: 38608294
DOI: 10.3171/2024.1.SPINE231277