-
Otology & Neurotology : Official... Feb 2023Congenital cytomegalovirus infection is the leading nonhereditary cause of pediatric sensorineural hearing loss. This systematic review evaluated infection concordance...
OBJECTIVE
Congenital cytomegalovirus infection is the leading nonhereditary cause of pediatric sensorineural hearing loss. This systematic review evaluated infection concordance and comparative hearing abilities in twins/multiple births to model infection patterns.
DATABASES REVIEWED
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.
METHODS
Studies that reported hearing outcomes of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in at least one multiple birth were eligible. Concordant infections (both twins) and discordant infections (single twin) were included. Multiple reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment. Analyses involved relative risk of infection concordance by zygosity and chorionicity and odds of hearing loss by infection concordance. Hearing outcomes were compared between siblings.
RESULTS
Of 247 studies screened, 31 were included (74.2% high quality). The review captured 40 eligible multiple births. Among infected patients, 42.9% (95% confidence interval, 31.2-55.2%) demonstrated hearing loss. All uninfected twins had normal hearing. Most infections were concordant, and infected patients experienced 4.11 (1.18-14.36) times greater odds of hearing loss if their twin was also infected ( p = .02). Yet siblings' hearing outcomes diverged in over 40% of concordant cases. If either twin is infected, infection risk in the second twin is 3.25 (1.83-5.79) times greater in monozygotic than dizygotic twins and 2.50 (1.61-3.88) times greater in monochorionic than dichorionic twins (both p < .001). We describe a case from our practice.
CONCLUSION
Congenital cytomegalovirus infection patterns and hearing outcomes can vary widely even within a shared fetal and postnatal environment. Suspected infection in a twin indicates that both should receive testing and continued monitoring for late-onset sequelae.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Child; Pregnancy, Multiple; Twins, Dizygotic; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Hearing
PubMed: 36538753
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003776 -
Pediatric Surgery International Aug 2020Biliary atresia (BA) in twins is extremely rare reported in the literature, but twin studies are useful methods of examining the associated factors of a complex disease.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Biliary atresia (BA) in twins is extremely rare reported in the literature, but twin studies are useful methods of examining the associated factors of a complex disease. The objective of this study was to analyze the characteristics and patterns of biliary atresia in twins from reviewing available articles.
METHODS
PubMed and EMBASE databases were reviewed for related articles using the keywords ''biliary atresia'', ''twins'', ''monozygotic (MZ)'', and ''dizygotic (DZ)'', including relevant papers in the reference lists.
RESULTS
This analysis was extracted from 12 articles, with a total of 35 twin pairs included. BA was found in 36 out of 70 twin subjects (51.4%), of which had an even gender split. 97.1% twins were discordant, among 55.9% of which were monozygotic twin sets, indicating that BA may be related to genetic phenotype or penetrance. Isolated BA was the largest group with 27 (75%) affected twins. Only one pair of dizygotic twins (2.9%) demonstrate concordance for BA, and have one affected family member.
CONCLUSION
BA was found in nearly half of twin subjects with an even gender split. Isolated BA was the largest group, in which the number of monozygotic twins was similar with dizygotic twins, so the onset of the disease may not associate with the zygosity of twins. Most of twin sets had discordant disease presentation, especially monozygotic twins therein, emphasizing the role of epigenetic factor in the pathogenesis of BA. Future studies should take genetic testing among any twin sets in BA, especially the disease-associated mutations, thus be useful to investigate the etiology of disease.
Topics: Adult; Biliary Atresia; Diseases in Twins; Female; Humans; Male; Twins
PubMed: 32504124
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-020-04690-4 -
Cornea Dec 2022The objective of this study was to undertake a systematic review of the literature reporting on clinical registries in dry eye disease (DED).
PURPOSE
The objective of this study was to undertake a systematic review of the literature reporting on clinical registries in dry eye disease (DED).
METHODS
Electronic searches were conducted using systematic review methodology to provide an overview of clinical registries in ophthalmology and to identify clinical registries reporting on dry eye parameters. Two reviewers independently assessed titles and abstracts, then full-texts for eligibility.
RESULTS
A total of 129 clinical registries in ophthalmology were identified. The most common conditions captured were blindness or low vision, followed by glaucoma and corneal transplantation. Most of the registries originated in Europe (n = 56), followed by North America (n = 28). Of the registries identified, 12 were multinational, 59 were national, and 17 were regional. The second search identified 27 eligible articles, from which 8 clinical registries reporting on dry eye parameters were identified. One registry included patients with a diagnosis of dry eye. The remaining 7 registries included patients from a nationwide administrative ophthalmic database (n = 1), Sjögren syndrome (n = 4), glaucoma (n = 1), or were monozygotic and dizygotic twins (n = 1), who were evaluated for DED. Five of the registries were actively collecting data.
CONCLUSIONS
Most of the registries identified in this review evaluated aqueous deficient dry eye; however, the most common type of dry eye in the general population is evaporative. Few registries also collected recommended dry eye clinical assessment. A well-designed clinical registry for DED that engages international eye care clinicians has the potential to vastly contribute to addressing pivotal gaps in understanding this highly prevalent disease.
Topics: Humans; Dry Eye Syndromes; Registries; Ophthalmology; Databases, Factual; Glaucoma
PubMed: 36197325
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003139 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Jul 2022Monochorionic dizygotic twins are a rare condition, mostly related to assisted reproductive technology. This type of twinning is burdened by the same risk of pregnancy...
BACKGROUND
Monochorionic dizygotic twins are a rare condition, mostly related to assisted reproductive technology. This type of twinning is burdened by the same risk of pregnancy complications found in monochorionic monozygotic pregnancies.
CASE PRESENTATION
We report a case of spontaneous monochorionic dizygotic twins sharing situs inversus abdominalis and isolated levocardia, with only one twin affected by biliary atresia with splenic malformation syndrome. We also conducted a literature review of the 14 available documented monochorionic dizygotic twin gestations spontaneously conceived.
CONCLUSIONS
It is still unclear how this unusual type of twinning can occur in spontaneous conception. The evidence so far suggest the importance to timely diagnose the chorionicity, in order to adequately manage the typical complications associated with monochorionicity.
Topics: Chorion; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy, Twin; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; Twins, Dizygotic; Twins, Monozygotic
PubMed: 35836143
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04866-x -
Journal of Perinatal Medicine Sep 2020Objectives To compare the fetal and maternal outcomes in surviving singletons of vanishing twin, with singletons or twins, in pregnancies following assisted reproductive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Objectives To compare the fetal and maternal outcomes in surviving singletons of vanishing twin, with singletons or twins, in pregnancies following assisted reproductive technology (ART). Content We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases from the time of conception of the database until Dec 2019 to identify relevant published studies. Perinatal outcomes were synthesized with random effects meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3. Summary and Outlook Fifteen studies were included. Dichorionic twin pregnancies conceived by ART wherein the vanishing twin phenomenon occurred had a risk of fetal malformation similar to that of ART singleton pregnancies (OR=1.25; 95% CI 0.87-1.79) and a higher risk of fetal malformation compared with ART twin pregnancies (OR=1.82; 95% CI 1.23-2.70). Moreover, the remaining fetus in ART vanishing twin pregnancy was at a significantly higher risk of preterm birth (<37 weeks) compared to fetuses in ART singleton pregnancies (OR=2.41; 95% CI 1.46-3.99) and a markedly lower risk of preterm birth (<37 weeks) compared to the fetuses in ART twin pregnancies (OR=0.19; 95% CI 0.16-0.22). Meanwhile, the risk of delivery of infants who were small for gestational age (SGA) was significantly higher in ART vanishing twin pregnancies compared to that in ART singleton pregnancies (OR=2.70; 95% CI 1.39-5.24) and similar to that in ART twin pregnancies (OR=0.67; 95% CI 0.27-1.65). The risks of preterm birth and of the infant being SGA is higher for the remaining fetus in an ART vanishing twin pregnancy compared to those for the fetuses in ART singleton pregnancies; the risk of fetal malformation is also higher in such cases compared with ART twin pregnancies.
Topics: Congenital Abnormalities; Female; Fetal Death; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Small for Gestational Age; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, Twin; Premature Birth; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; Risk Assessment; Twins, Dizygotic
PubMed: 32697761
DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0088 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth May 2023This review aimed to identify guidelines with recommendations applicable to the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies within high-income...
OBJECTIVE
This review aimed to identify guidelines with recommendations applicable to the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies within high-income countries, appraise their methodological quality, and discuss the similarities and variability across guidelines.
METHOD
A systematic literature review of electronic databases was performed. Manual searches of guideline repositories and websites of professional organisations were performed to identify additional guidelines. The protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021248586, 25 June 2021). AGREE II and AGREE-REX tools were applied to assess the quality of eligible guidelines. A narrative and thematic synthesis described and compared the guidelines and their recommendations.
RESULTS
Twenty-four guidelines were included, from which 483 recommendations were identified across 4 international organisations and 12 countries. Guidelines addressed eight themes and recommendations were classified accordingly: chorionicity and dating (103 recommendations), fetal growth (105 recommendations), termination of pregnancy (12 recommendations), fetal death (13 recommendations), fetal anomalies (65 recommendations), antenatal care (65 recommendations), preterm labour (56 recommendations) and birth (54 recommendations). Guidelines showed significant variability in recommendations, with conflicting recommendations regarding non-invasive preterm testing, definitions surrounding selective fetal growth restriction, screening for preterm labour and the timing of birth. Guidelines lacked a focus on standard antenatal management of DCDA twins, management of discordant fetal anomaly and single fetal demise.
CONCLUSIONS
Specific guidance for dichorionic diamniotic twins is overall indistinct and access to guidance regarding the antenatal management of these pregnancies is currently difficult. Management of discordant fetal anomaly or single fetal demise needs greater consideration.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Pregnancy, Twin; Pregnancy Outcome; Fetal Death; Twins, Dizygotic; Obstetric Labor, Premature; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37179347
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05652-z -
Medicine Jun 2020Published findings on perinatal outcomes of multifetal pregnancy reduction (MPR) of dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twin pregnancy to singleton are controversial. We... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Published findings on perinatal outcomes of multifetal pregnancy reduction (MPR) of dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twin pregnancy to singleton are controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to appraise the effects of MPR of DCDA twin pregnancy versus expectant management on perinatal outcomes.
METHODS
Four electronic databases were searched from their inception to June 15, 2019, to identify publications that appraised MPR before 15 weeks of gestation. Studies reporting perinatal outcomes of both MPR of DCDA twin pregnancy to singleton and expectant management were considered. The relative risks (RRs) and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Six studies involving 7398 participants showed that MPR of DCDA twin pregnancy to singleton was associated with a lower risk of preterm birth (5 studies with 7297 participants; RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.22-0.40; P < .001) and higher birth weight (4 studies with 5763 participants; mean differences: 548.10 g, 95% CI: 424.04-672.15; P < .001) than expectant management; there was no difference in the occurrence of miscarriages (5 studies with 7355 participants; RR: 1.57, 95% CI: 0.90-2.75; P = .11). Sensitivity analysis showed that all the results were stable and reliable, with the omission of 2 studies with serious risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
Compared to expectant management, MPR of DCDA twin pregnancy to singleton prevents preterm birth and low birth weight, without increasing the risk of miscarriages. Regarding perinatal morbidity related to preterm birth, MPR can be reserved as a remediation measure to improve the perinatal outcomes of DCDA twin pregnancies.
Topics: Adult; Amnion; Chorion; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy Reduction, Multifetal; Pregnancy, Twin; Twinning, Dizygotic; Twins, Dizygotic; Watchful Waiting
PubMed: 32569212
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020730