-
The Laryngoscope Jul 2024Sialorrhea, also known as drooling, hypersalivation, or ptyalism, has a significant impact on the medical and psychosocial well-being of children. Onabotulinum toxin A... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Sialorrhea, also known as drooling, hypersalivation, or ptyalism, has a significant impact on the medical and psychosocial well-being of children. Onabotulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is the most commonly used botulinum toxin worldwide for the treatment of sialorrhea in children.
OBJECTIVES
To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinical efficacy and potential adverse effects of BoNT-A as a treatment for drooling in children.
METHODS
Cochrane, Embase, and Medline databases were systematically searched (up to May 2023). Out of 535 identified publications, 20 were found eligible for inclusion. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the efficacy of BoNT-A treatment in children in reducing the frequency and severity of drooling.
RESULTS
Out of the 20 studies included, a meta-analysis was conducted on the complete dataset of eight studies involving 131 patients. BoNT-A was found to significantly decrease the severity of drooling in patients with sialorrhea (standardized mean difference [SMD], -2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.91 to -1.23; p < 0.0001) when compared with the conditions before injections using random-effects models. Six studies out of 20 reported dysphagia as an adverse effect after injection. Other side effects included thickness of saliva and pain at the site of injection.
CONCLUSION
BoNT-A is a clinically effective therapy that improves drooling severity in children with sialorrhea. Although there were some adverse side effects reported, they were transient and not severe. Future studies are needed to further evaluate the best techniques and to identify the ideal dosages required to achieve the optimal outcomes. Laryngoscope, 134:3012-3017, 2024.
Topics: Humans; Sialorrhea; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Child; Neuromuscular Agents; Treatment Outcome; Child, Preschool; Adolescent; Male; Female
PubMed: 38294288
DOI: 10.1002/lary.31277 -
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders Sep 2021Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders have been thoroughly investigated in hypokinetic disorders such as Parkinson's disease, but much less is known about GI disorders in...
BACKGROUND
Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders have been thoroughly investigated in hypokinetic disorders such as Parkinson's disease, but much less is known about GI disorders in hyperkinetic movement disorders and ataxia. The aim of this review is to draw attention to the GI disorders that are associated with these movement disorders.
METHODS
References for this systematic review were identified by searches of PubMed through May 2020. Only publications in English were reviewed.
RESULTS
Data from 249 articles were critically reviewed, compared, and integrated. The most frequently reported GI symptoms overall in hyperkinetic movement disorders and ataxia are dysphagia, sialorrhea, weight changes, esophago-gastritis, gastroparesis, constipation, diarrhea, and malabsorption. We report in detail on the frequency, characteristics, pathophysiology, and management of GI symptoms in essential tremor, restless legs syndrome, chorea, and spinocerebellar ataxias. The limited available data on GI disorders in dystonias, paroxysmal movement disorders, tardive dyskinesias, myoclonus, and non-SCA ataxias are also summarized.
CONCLUSION
The purpose of our systematic review is to draw attention that, although primarily motor disorders, hyperkinetic movement disorders and ataxia can involve the GI system. Raising awareness about the GI symptom burden in hyperkinetic movement disorders and ataxia could contribute to a new research interest in that field, as well as improved patient care.
Topics: Ataxia; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Gastrointestinal Tract; Humans; Hyperkinesis; Movement Disorders
PubMed: 34544654
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.09.005 -
Journal of Clinical Nursing Dec 2019To review published literature pertaining to the management of sialorrhoea while also highlighting the significance of the multidisciplinary approach.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
To review published literature pertaining to the management of sialorrhoea while also highlighting the significance of the multidisciplinary approach.
BACKGROUND
Sialorrhoea is a common and troublesome problem among certain neurological patients. It is distressing for patients and caregivers, and can be challenging for healthcare professionals. Various sialorrhoea management approaches have been documented. However, there is no clear consensus on best management practices. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically review and synthesise various approaches so as to provide an understanding of the efficacy of management approaches.
DESIGN
Systematic literature review using PRISMA checklist (see Appendix S1).
METHOD
Five databases (ScienceDirect, Wiley Online Library, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PubMed) were searched (years 2001-2018) following inclusion criteria. Out of 1,294 identified records, 29 studies met the inclusion criteria.
RESULTS
Various management approaches identified, ranging from noninvasive, such as speech therapy aiming to enhance swallowing behaviour, to invasive treatment including anticholinergic medication, botulinum toxin injection and surgical techniques. However, in the majority of cases, there is no scientific evidence-based management protocol leading to favourable results, and the evidence base for intervention effectiveness remains weak.
CONCLUSIONS
The multifactor nature of sialorrhoea and its associated complications presents challenges for the medical care team. None of the management strategies stand alone as the best modality; therefore, it is proposed that management strategies follow a multidisciplinary approach to meet the diverse needs of patients.
RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE
A comprehensive understanding of different sialorrhoea management approaches will enable healthcare professionals to identify the signs and symptoms regarding sialorrhoea, and to assist in effective management implementation. This will help to improve the management of sialorrhoea, hence, to improve quality of life of patients and provide formative scope to the development of an integrated care pathway.
Topics: Deglutition Disorders; Humans; Quality of Life; Sialorrhea
PubMed: 31318993
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15009 -
Clinical Oral Investigations May 2024To investigate the effectiveness of botulinum toxin in the salivary glands of patients with neurological impairment and drooling and its impact on the quality of life.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the effectiveness of botulinum toxin in the salivary glands of patients with neurological impairment and drooling and its impact on the quality of life.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD 42,023,435,242) and conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. An electronic search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and clinical trial databases until August 2023, no language restriction. Cohort studies and randomized clinical trials of patients diagnosed with drooling and neurological impairment who used botulinum toxin on the salivary gland were included, which evaluated subjective quality of life parameters. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and Risk of Bias 2 tools. The certainty of the evidence was analyzed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
RESULTS
Eight studies involving 317 patients were included. All studies, through subjective parameters, suggested the effectiveness of botulinum toxin in reducing drooling, resulting in an improvement in the quality of life. Three studies demonstrated improvements in swallowing and four in cases of respiratory diseases. Two clinical trials had a high risk of bias, whereas one had low risk. The five cohort studies that were evaluated had a high risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was considered low.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the patient/caregivers' perception of improvement in drooling, dysphagia, and respiratory symptoms, it can be inferred that botulinum toxin application reduces subjective drooling in neurologically compromised patients. Its impact contributes to the general well-being and quality of life.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Injection of botulinum toxin into the salivary glands can be considered an alternative technique to surgical or medicinal approaches in reducing drooling. It is effective, less invasive and without significant side effects. It promotes a positive impact on the well-being and quality of life of neurological patients.
Topics: Humans; Botulinum Toxins; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Nervous System Diseases; Neuromuscular Agents; Quality of Life; Sialorrhea
PubMed: 38758415
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05718-y -
The British Journal of Oral &... Jun 2022Different therapeutic methods for chronic drooling in paediatric patients with neurological problems have been described in the scientific literature. However, there is... (Review)
Review
Different therapeutic methods for chronic drooling in paediatric patients with neurological problems have been described in the scientific literature. However, there is no consensus on the ideal strategy of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare botulinum toxin injection therapy and surgical modalities to control drooling in paediatric patients with neurological disorders. A systematic literature search was conducted on nine electronic databases for publications until April 2020. Six articles were included with a total sample of 209 patients, 67.4% (n = 141) of whom had cerebral palsy. All studies used injections of botulinum toxin type A with application to the submandibular and/or parotid salivary glands. The surgical treatments were duct ligation in the parotid and/or submandibular salivary glands, duct relocation in the submandibular salivary glands, and glandular excision of the submandibular and sublingual salivary glands. There were complications in only 16.1% (n = 27) of the sample (11 cases due to botulinum toxin application and 16 due to surgery). Drooling control was assessed by objective and subjective measures. Although surgical procedures presented a higher risk of adverse effects than botulinum toxin type A in all the studies and measurements performed, they presented larger and longer-lasting positive effects on drooling. We suggest bilateral submandibular duct relocation with bilateral sublingual gland excision or isolated bilateral submandibular duct ligation, which were the surgical techniques with the largest samples in this review. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to compare samples with botulinum toxin type A and surgical treatment.
Topics: Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Cerebral Palsy; Child; Humans; Nervous System Diseases; Salivary Ducts; Sialorrhea; Submandibular Gland; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35227530
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.10.010 -
BMC Oral Health Feb 2024Human saliva as a bodily fluid-similar to blood-is utilized for diagnostic purposes. Unlike blood sampling, collecting saliva is non-invasive, inexpensive, and readily...
BACKGROUND
Human saliva as a bodily fluid-similar to blood-is utilized for diagnostic purposes. Unlike blood sampling, collecting saliva is non-invasive, inexpensive, and readily accessible. There are no previously published systematic reviews regarding different collection, transportation, preparation, and storage methods for human saliva.
DESIGN
This study has been prepared and organized according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. This systematic review has been registered at PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD42023415384). The study question according to the PICO format was as followed: Comparison of the performance (C) of different saliva sampling, handling, transportation, and storage techniques and methods (I) assessed for analyzing stimulated or unstimulated human saliva (P and O). An electronic search was executed in Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed.
RESULTS
Twenty-three descriptive human clinical studies published between 1995 and 2022 were included. Eight categories of salivary features and biomarkers were investigated (i.e., salivary flow rate, total saliva quantity, total protein, cortisol, testosterone, DNA quality and quantity, pH and buffering pH). Twenty-two saliva sampling methods/devices were utilized. Passive drooling, Salivette®, and spitting were the most utilized methods. Sampling times with optimum capabilities for cortisol, iodine, and oral cancer metabolites are suggested to be 7:30 AM to 9:00 AM, 10:30 AM to 11:00 AM, and 14:00 PM to 20:00 PM, respectively. There were 6 storage methods. Centrifuging samples and storing them at -70 °C to -80 °C was the most utilized storage method. For DNA quantity and quality, analyzing samples immediately after collection without centrifuging or storage, outperformed centrifuging samples and storing them at -70 °C to -80 °C. Non-coated Salivette® was the most successful method/device for analyzing salivary flow rate.
CONCLUSION
It is highly suggested that scientists take aid from the reported categorized outcomes, and design their study questions based on the current voids for each method/device.
Topics: Humans; Hydrocortisone; Saliva; Biomarkers; Specimen Handling; DNA
PubMed: 38308289
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-03902-w -
Behavioural Brain Research Mar 2021Antipsychotics are a cornerstone of pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia. Improved understanding of the dose-response relationship of antipsychotics in terms of...
BACKGROUND
Antipsychotics are a cornerstone of pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia. Improved understanding of the dose-response relationship of antipsychotics in terms of efficacy, adverse effects, and mortality can help to optimize the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia.
METHODS
This narrative literature review summarizes current evidence on the relationship of antipsychotic dose with efficacy, adverse effects, and mortality in patients with schizophrenia.
RESULTS
The efficacy of antipsychotics generally appeared to be highly dose-dependent in the acute phase of schizophrenia, with each antipsychotic having a specific dose-response curve. The presence or absence of dose-dependency and its extent varied according to the type of adverse effect. Parkinsonism, hyperprolactinemia, weight gain, and neurocognitive impairment appeared to be dose-related. The following adverse effects might be at least somewhat dose-dependent: akathisia, tardive dyskinesia, osteoporosis, sexual dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, stroke, thromboembolism, QT interval prolongation, anticholinergic adverse effects, somnolence, pneumonia, hip fracture, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome. In contrast, the relationships of antipsychotic dose with dyslipidemia, hypotension, seizure, sialorrhea, and neutropenia and agranulocytosis remained unclear due to mixed findings and/or limited data. Although a higher lifetime cumulative antipsychotic dose might contribute to higher mortality, it is still difficult to conclude whether mortality increases in a dose-dependent manner.
CONCLUSION
These findings could help clinicians to optimize antipsychotic treatment in patients with schizophrenia by balancing risks and benefits in clinical practice. However, further investigations with larger sample sizes and more robust study designs that focus on each antipsychotic agent are needed.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33417992
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113098 -
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders Oct 2021Drooling is a clinically relevant non-motor symptom of people with Parkinson's disease (PwP). Several drooling rating scales are available. Nevertheless, the compelling...
BACKGROUND
Drooling is a clinically relevant non-motor symptom of people with Parkinson's disease (PwP). Several drooling rating scales are available. Nevertheless, the compelling scientific evidence supporting their validity is limited. This study aims to evaluate clinical rating scales for drooling, assessing their characteristics, clinimetric properties, and clinical utility classification.
METHODS
A systematic review was undertaken. Two reviewers performed independent literature searches using the CENTRAL®, CINAHL®, Embase®, MEDLINE®, SciElo®, and SPEECH BITE® databases. We used consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) and the International Parkinson's disease and the Movement Disorders (MDS) criteria to evaluate the included rating scales.
RESULTS
The following six rating scales were identified: Drooling Impact Scale (DIS), Sialorrhea Scoring Scale (SSS), Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS), Drooling Rating Scale (DRS), Sialorrhea Clinical Scale for Parkinson Disease (SCS-PD), and the Radboud Oral Motor inventory for Parkinson's disease - Saliva (ROMP-saliva). The scales had heterogeneous characteristics: (i) not all were created/adapted for PwP; (ii) different dimensions associated with drooling are assessed; (iii) cross-cultural adaptations are limited to some languages. The clinimetric properties showed: (i) target population size limitations; (ii) incomplete reliability analysis; (iii) lack of robust validity; (iv) sensitivity to change not fully explored. Following the MDS criteria, only one tool was classified as "recommended", the ROMP-saliva.
CONCLUSIONS
This review provides information for an adequate selection of a drooling rating scale for clinical and/or research purposes. To date, ROMP-saliva is the only scale with substantial evidence of its clinimetric properties adequacy and data in PwP.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Parkinson Disease; Reproducibility of Results; Severity of Illness Index; Sialorrhea; Surveys and Questionnaires; Symptom Assessment
PubMed: 34583888
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.09.012 -
Children (Basel, Switzerland) Nov 2021We aimed to review and analyse the effectiveness and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections for drooling in children with cerebral palsy.
BACKGROUND
We aimed to review and analyse the effectiveness and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections for drooling in children with cerebral palsy.
DATA SOURCES
We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library) databases from inception to January 2020.
METHODS
We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies which (1) involved children with cerebral palsy, (2) used BoNT-A for control of drooling, and (3) provided quantitative evaluations of drooling before and after intervention with BoNT-A.
RESULTS
Twenty-one trials met the inclusion criteria. Most studies showed that BoNT-A injections are safe and efficacious as a treatment for drooling in children with cerebral palsy. Four trials had sufficient data to pool the results for the meta-analysis. Both the drooling quotient ( = 0.002) and drooling Ffrequency and severity scale ( = 0.004) supported this conclusion.
CONCLUSION
BoNT-A injections are a safe, reversible, effective treatment for drooling control in children with cerebral palsy that can offer effectiveness for more than 3 months with few side effects. The dosage of BoNT-A should not exceed 4 units/kg. Further studies are required to determine the optimal dosage and target glands.
PubMed: 34943284
DOI: 10.3390/children8121089 -
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia... Mar 2021Drooling is a major morbidity in several neurological diseases. Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections have been used to manage this condition. However,...
BACKGROUND
Drooling is a major morbidity in several neurological diseases. Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections have been used to manage this condition. However, by decreasing salivary flow, BoNT injections may result in an increased risk of caries and other oral adverse effects. In this study, we aimed to assess whether, in patients with drooling, intraglandular BoNT injections are associated with increased dental caries development, modifications on salivary composition (oral pH, buffering capacity and osmolality) and cariogenic bacterial load.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We performed a systematic review, searching PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus for all experimental and observational studies reporting on adverse effects of intraglandular BoNT injections in patients with drooling. Primary study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were independently performed by two researchers. No studies were excluded based on their language, publication status or date of publication. Studies' quality was based on revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. Meta-analysis was not performed.
RESULTS
We retrieved 1025 studies, of which 5 were included. Two studies were two randomized controlled trials and three quasi-experimental studies. None of the included studies found BoNT injections to be associated with dental caries development or with significant reductions in oral pH. One of the included primary studies even observed an increase in salivary buffer capacity. One study found an increase in Lactobacilli counts. As for the risk of bias, two studies were classified as having a critical risk, two as high risk and one as having some concerns.
CONCLUSIONS
Currently, there is no evidence that, in patients with drooling, BoNT injections associate with increased risk of dental caries or disturbances in oral pH or salivary buffering capacity. However, the included primary studies had important limitations and differences in their methodologies.
Topics: Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Cerebral Palsy; Dental Caries; Humans; Neuromuscular Agents; Oral Health; Sialorrhea
PubMed: 33340083
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.24101