-
European Urology Focus Sep 2023Office-based treatments are increasingly offered as an optional step to replace medical treatment or delay surgery for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Office-based treatments are increasingly offered as an optional step to replace medical treatment or delay surgery for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Nevertheless, little is known regarding the risks of retreatment.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically evaluate the current evidence regarding retreatment rates after water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), and temporarily implanted nitinol device (iTIND) procedures.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A literature search was conducted up to June 2022 using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. The primary outcomes were the rates of pharmacologic and surgical retreatment during follow-up.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
A total of 36 studies including 6380 patients met our inclusion criteria. Surgical and minimally invasive retreatment rates were generally well reported in the studies included and reached up to 5% after 3 yr of follow-up for iTIND, and up to 4% for WVTT and 13% for PUL after 5 yr of follow-up. The types and rates of pharmacologic retreatment are poorly reported in the literature, with the latter reaching up to 7% after 3 yr of follow-up for iTIND, and up to 11% after 5 yr of follow-up for WVTT and PUL. The main limitations of our review are the unclear to high risk of bias in most of the studies included and the lack of long-term (>5 yr) data on retreatment risks.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results highlight the low retreatment rates at mid-term follow-up after office-based treatments for LUTS, supporting the development of these strategies as an intermediate step between BPH medication and conventional surgery. Pending more robust data with longer follow-up, these results should be used to improve patient information and facilitate shared decision-making.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Our review highlights the low risk of mid-term retreatment after office-based treatments for benign enlargement of the prostate that is affecting urinary function. For well-selected patients, these results support the increasing use of office-based treatment as an intermediate option before conventional surgery.
Topics: Humans; Male; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Prostate; Retreatment; Urethra; Prostheses and Implants; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
PubMed: 36906484
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.03.004 -
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery... Oct 2020Endoprosthetic reconstructions have become increasingly common in the setting of significant bone loss. Indications include revision arthroplasty, trauma, and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Endoprosthetic reconstructions have become increasingly common in the setting of significant bone loss. Indications include revision arthroplasty, trauma, and reconstruction in the setting of primary malignancies or bony metastases. Although the use of endoprostheses has several advantages, they carry a high risk of infection. The purpose of this review is to determine the success rates of surgical management of infected endoprostheses.
METHODS
The authors searched databases for relevant studies and screened in duplicate. Data extracted included overall infection rate, timing of infection, follow-up, isolated pathogen and operative treatment strategy, and subsequent failure rate. The overall quality of the evidence with the Methodological Index for non-randomized studies criteria.
RESULTS
A total of 16 studies and 647 patients met the inclusion criteria. 400 patients had operative management and reported outcomes. Failure rates of patients undergoing debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) were 55.1%. Failure rates of patients who underwent one-stage revision were 45.5%. Failure rates of patients undergoing two-stage revision were 27.3%. Failure occurred at 31.4 months (range, 0-228) postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS
Rates of periprosthetic joint infection remain high in endoprosthetic reconstructions. Although DAIR procedures were found to have a low success rate, they remain a reasonable option in acute infections given the morbidity of staged revisions. There is a lack of comparative data in the current literature and the heterogeneity and low level of evidence does not allow for between group comparisons of results.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Debridement; Extremities; Humans; Prostheses and Implants; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32405759
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-020-02699-y -
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Aug 2022Hydroxyapatite (HA) is a well-known calcium phosphate ingredient comparable to human bone tissue. HA has exciting applications in many fields, especially biomedical... (Review)
Review
Hydroxyapatite (HA) is a well-known calcium phosphate ingredient comparable to human bone tissue. HA has exciting applications in many fields, especially biomedical applications, such as drug delivery, osteogenesis, and dental implants. Unfortunately, hydroxyapatite-based nanomaterials are synthesized by conventional methods using reagents that are not environmentally friendly and are expensive. Therefore, extensive efforts have been made to establish a simple, efficient, and green method to form nano-hydroxyapatite (NHA) biofunctional materials with significant biocompatibility, bioactivity, and mechanical strength. Several types of biowaste have proven to be a source of calcium in forming HA, including using chicken eggshells, fish bones, and beef bones. This systematic literature review discusses the possibility of replacing synthetic chemical reagents, synthetic pathways, and toxic capping agents with a green template to synthesize NHA. This review also shed insight on the simple green manufacture of NHA with controlled shape and size.
Topics: Animals; Bone and Bones; Cattle; Drug Delivery Systems; Durapatite; Humans; Nanostructures; Osteogenesis
PubMed: 36080349
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27175586 -
Minerva Cardiology and Angiology Oct 2023The concept of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) was born with the aim to reduce the rate of late and very late cardiac events related to drug-eluting stents. However,...
INTRODUCTION
The concept of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) was born with the aim to reduce the rate of late and very late cardiac events related to drug-eluting stents. However, first-generation BRS failed to prove their short-term safety and efficacy. Based on data derived from early investigations, new-generation BRS have been developed and tested in preliminary studies. The present review's focus was to summarize the mechanical characteristics of these new scaffolds and the clinical evidence of their safety and efficacy.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
This systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PUBMED, Google Scholar, and Biomed central databases were analyzed. Only papers published in English and in peer-reviewed journals were selected to summarize current evidence about new generation BRS, with CE mark approval. Overall, 23 studies were included.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Data obtained from selected studies assessing the safety and efficacy of new generation BRS are encouraging. This is thanks to the progressive development of scaffolds with a different backbone structure and struts thickness that guarantee higher radial strength, flexibility, and resistance to fracture. These characteristics led to low rates of major adverse cardiac events and device-oriented composite endpoint at follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
New-generation BRS have a good safety profile in stable patients with simple lesions, supported by a meticulous implantation technique. The first studies were performed on a small population with short-term follow-up, therefore new randomized clinical trials and registries are needed to expand the preliminary findings.
Topics: Humans; Coronary Artery Disease; Absorbable Implants; Treatment Outcome; Drug-Eluting Stents
PubMed: 33944536
DOI: 10.23736/S2724-5683.21.05658-1 -
Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders... 2023Osseo-integrated implants provide effective treatment results for edentulous patients. However, despite the high success and survival rates of dental implants, several...
BACKGROUND
Osseo-integrated implants provide effective treatment results for edentulous patients. However, despite the high success and survival rates of dental implants, several factors, such as poor oral hygiene and a history of periodontal disease, and systemic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, could influence the outcome of the treatment. In fact, poor glycemic control can affect the healing process. Diabetes mellitus is considered a relative contraindication for dental implant therapy due to the fact that the success rates of the implants seem to be lower in diabetic patients, even if there is no total agreement among the results reported in the literature. The analysis of peri-implant inflammation indices, bone loss around the implant and glycemic index can provide us with useful information on the relationship between glycaemia in diabetic patients and the course of peri-implantitis, as well as implant success in the short term.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this review is to establish how peri-implant inflammation parameters vary in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients.
METHODS
This review was conducted on the basis of PRISMA. The search was conducted by three independent reviewers searching for keywords in three databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web Of Sciences (WOS), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial.
RESULTS
A total of 1159 records were identified, and 11 articles were included in the qualitative analysis.
CONCLUSION
The analysis of the extracted data from the included studies suggests that some periimplant inflammation indices, such as bleeding on probing and bone loss around the implant, appear to be increased in diabetic patients with glycometabolic decompensation, compared with control not affected by diabetes mellitus.
Topics: Humans; Peri-Implantitis; Diabetes Mellitus; Inflammation; Hyperglycemia; Glycemic Index
PubMed: 36281861
DOI: 10.2174/1871530323666221021100427 -
Biomolecules Mar 2022Cochlear implantation initiates an inflammatory cascade in which both acute insertion trauma and chronic foreign body reaction lead to intracochlear fibrosis and loss of... (Review)
Review
Cochlear implantation initiates an inflammatory cascade in which both acute insertion trauma and chronic foreign body reaction lead to intracochlear fibrosis and loss of residual hearing. Several strategies have been proposed to attenuate the local reactive process after implantation, including intracochlear drug delivery. The present study gives an overview of what is being investigated in the field of inner ear therapeutics and cochlear implant surgery. The aim is to evaluate its potential benefit in clinical practice. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases identifying comparative prospective studies examining the effect of direct inner ear drug application on mechanical cochlear trauma. Both animal and human studies were considered and all studies were assessed for quality according to the validated risk of bias tools. Intracochlear administration of drugs is a feasible method to reduce the local inflammatory reaction following cochlear implantation. In animal studies, corticosteroid use had a significant effect on outcome measures including auditory brainstem response, impedance, and histological changes. This effect was, however, only durable with prolonged drug delivery. Significant differences in outcome were predominantly seen in studies where the cochlear damage was extensive. Six additional reports assessing non-steroidal agents were found. Overall, evidence of anti-inflammatory effects in humans is still scarce.
Topics: Animals; Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Ear, Inner; Hearing; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 35454118
DOI: 10.3390/biom12040529 -
Journal of Dentistry Oct 2021The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to state the efficacy of local administration of antibiotics in the treatment of peri-implantitis in terms of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to state the efficacy of local administration of antibiotics in the treatment of peri-implantitis in terms of peri-implant probing depth (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BoP) reduction.
DATA, SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION
Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted. Screening process was done using the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE by PubMed), Embase and the Cochrane Oral Health. Included articles were randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Weighted means were calculated. Heterogeneity was determined using Higgins (I2). Due to the encountered heterogeneity between the studies being combined, random-effects models were applied in order to analyze effect sizes. Twelve studies (365 patients and 463 implants) were included in the systematic review. After peri-implantitis treatment with local antibiotics, PPD was reduced 1.40 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.82-1.98). When local antibiotics were applied, a 0.30 mm higher reduction of PPD was obtained than in the control group (95% confidence interval: 0.07-0.53). BoP attained an odds ratio value of 1.82 (95% confidence interval: 1.09-3.04), indicating that the likehood of bleeding is almost two-fold when antibiotics are not locally administrated. Adverse effects were not found after applying local antibiotics.
CONCLUSIONS
The local antibiotic administration does reduce, without adverse effects, both peri-implant probing depths and bleeding on probing in patients affected by peri-implantitis, if compared to control groups without local antibiotic application.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Patients with dental implants frequently suffer from peri-implantitis. Clinical features of peri-implantitis lesions include the presence of bleeding on probing and increased peri-implant probing depths. Both BoP and PPD have become reduced after local administration of antibiotics.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Dental Implants; Humans; Peri-Implantitis
PubMed: 34455016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103790 -
Clinical Oral Implants Research Jul 2023Growing evidence is highlighting the inefficacy of clindamycin as an effective substitute to amoxicillin in patients self-reporting a penicillin allergy. The hypothesis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Self-reported allergy to penicillin and clindamycin administration may be risk factors for dental implant failure: A systematic review, meta-analysis and delabeling protocol.
OBJECTIVE
Growing evidence is highlighting the inefficacy of clindamycin as an effective substitute to amoxicillin in patients self-reporting a penicillin allergy. The hypothesis is that implant failure is higher in these patients, when compared to patients receiving penicillin. To test this hypothesis, a systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken and a protocol for delabeling penicillin allergic patients was presented.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review was undertaken by searching across three different databases, namely PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science.
RESULTS
Out of 572 results, four studies were eligible to be included. Fixed-effects meta-analysis showed a higher number of failed implants in patients who were administered clindamycin, because of a self-reported allergy to penicillin. Results showed that these patients are over three times more likely (OR = 3.30, 95% C.I. 2.58-4.22, p-value < .00001) to undergo implant failure with an average cumulative proportion of 11.0% (95% C.I. 3.5-22.0%) versus 3.8% (95% C.I. 1.2-7.7%) of patients not requiring clindamycin and administered amoxicillin. A protocol for penicillin allergy delabeling is proposed.
CONCLUSIONS
Current evidence is still limited and based on retrospective observational studies, it is difficult to state if penicillin allergy, clindamycin administration or a combination of both is responsible for the current trends and reported findings.
Topics: Humans; Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Clindamycin; Dental Implants; Drug Hypersensitivity; Hypersensitivity; Penicillins; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Self Report; Clinical Protocols
PubMed: 37102260
DOI: 10.1111/clr.14073 -
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2020Microneedles (MNs) have been used to deliver drugs for over two decades. These platforms have been proven to increase transdermal drug delivery efficiency dramatically...
Microneedles (MNs) have been used to deliver drugs for over two decades. These platforms have been proven to increase transdermal drug delivery efficiency dramatically by penetrating restrictive tissue barriers in a minimally invasive manner. While much of the early development of MNs focused on transdermal drug delivery, this technology can be applied to a variety of other non-transdermal biomedical applications. Several variations, such as multi-layer or hollow MNs, have been developed to cater to the needs of specific applications. The heterogeneity in the design of MNs has demanded similar variety in their fabrication methods; the most common methods include micromolding and drawing lithography. Numerous materials have been explored for MN fabrication which range from biocompatible ceramics and metals to natural and synthetic biodegradable polymers. Recent advances in MN engineering have diversified MNs to include unique shapes, materials, and mechanical properties that can be tailored for organ-specific applications. In this review, we discuss the design and creation of modern MNs that aim to surpass the biological barriers of non-transdermal drug delivery in ocular, vascular, oral, and mucosal tissue.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Biological Transport; Drug Delivery Systems; Equipment Design; Humans; Microinjections; Microtechnology; Polymers; Prostheses and Implants
PubMed: 31837356
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2019.11.010 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery May 2023The perioperative use of tranexamic acid (TXA) has become popular among plastic surgeons for a variety of surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to perform a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The perioperative use of tranexamic acid (TXA) has become popular among plastic surgeons for a variety of surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the results reported in the literature regarding the effect of perioperative systemic TXA administration in breast surgery.
METHODS
The PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases were searched for both randomized clinical trials and observational studies. Effect estimates were pooled across studies using random effects models and presented as weighted odds ratio with corresponding 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS
A total of five studies encompassing 1139 patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate implant or free flap-based breast reconstruction or breast-conserving surgery with or without axillary lymph node dissection were included. Perioperative intravenous administration of TXA significantly reduced the risk for hematoma (7.3% versus 12.9%; OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.81) and seroma formation (11.5% versus 19.9%; OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.92) in comparison to the control group. In the studies measuring the postoperative drainage amount, the mean difference was 132 mL (95% CI, 220 to 44 mL). No thromboembolic event occurred in either group. The weighted surgical-site infection rate was higher in the control group (3.1% versus 1.5%). However, these data were too sparse to perform comparative meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
Evidence of this study suggests that perioperative administration of TXA significantly reduces the risk for postoperative hematoma and seroma formation in breast surgery, whereas the risk for thromboembolic events and postoperative infection is not increased.
Topics: Humans; Female; Tranexamic Acid; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Seroma; Breast Neoplasms; Mastectomy; Thromboembolism; Hematoma; Blood Loss, Surgical
PubMed: 36729428
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010071