-
Acta Otorrinolaringologica Espanola 2021Hypertrophic pachymeningitis is an infrequent inflammatory disease resulting in thickening and fibrosis of the dura mater. In most cases, the cause in unknown and is... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Hypertrophic pachymeningitis is an infrequent inflammatory disease resulting in thickening and fibrosis of the dura mater. In most cases, the cause in unknown and is called idiopathic hypertrophic pachymeningitis (IHP). Audiovestibular symptoms are infrequent and the pathogenesis is still unclear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature review of cases with IHP and vestibular symptoms from 2000 to February 2020 was performed. PRISMA Checklist was followed and PubMED database, Web of Science and Cochrane library were searched. We report a case of an adolescent with a diagnosis of vestibular neuritis in the context of IHP attended in our clinic.
RESULTS
We reviewed 5 articles related to IHP and vestibular disorders. A total of 7 cases (5 women and 2 men), with ages between 27 and 68 years with IHP were found. They all had audiovestibular symptoms. In contrast to our patient, uni or bilateral neurosensorial hearing loss was reported in all cases. Furthermore, there is no other case report published describing the association between IHP and vestibular neuritis. High dose steroids improved symptoms in 85.7% of the patients.
CONCLUSION
Vestibular symptoms in IHP are uncommon and the pathogenesis is still debatable. Entrapment of nerves in the internal auditory canal and secondary neuronal damage could be suspected as the main cause of hearing and vestibular loss.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Dura Mater; Female; Humans; Hypertrophy; Male; Meningitis; Middle Aged
PubMed: 34844678
DOI: 10.1016/j.otoeng.2020.08.006 -
Neurosurgical Review Nov 2023Incidental durotomies are frequent complications of spine surgery associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak-related symptoms. Management typically involves... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Incidental durotomies are frequent complications of spine surgery associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak-related symptoms. Management typically involves prolonged bed rest to reduce CSF pressure at the durotomy site. However, early ambulation may be a safer, effective alternative. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus were systematically searched for studies comparing early ambulation (bed rest ≤ 24 h) with prolonged bed rest (> 24 h) for patients with incidental durotomies in spine surgeries. The outcomes of interest were CSF leak, hypotensive headache, additional surgical repair, pseudomeningocele, and pulmonary complications. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis were performed following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We included a total of 704 patients from 6 studies. There was a significant reduction in the incidence of pulmonary complications (RR 0.23; 95% CI 0.08-0.67; p = 0.007) in the early mobilization group. The incidence of CSF leak (RR 1.34; 95% CI 0.83-2.14; p = 0.23), hypotensive headache (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.27-1.90; p = 0.50), additional repair surgery (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.76-2.2; p = 0.35), and pseudomeningocele (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.20-8.48; p = 0.79) did not differ significantly. In patients with incidental durotomy following spinal surgery, early mobilization was associated with a lower incidence of pulmonary complications as compared with prolonged bed rest. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of CSF leak, need for additional repair, pseudomeningocele, and hypotensive headache.
Topics: Humans; Early Ambulation; Bed Rest; Spine; Neurosurgical Procedures; Headache; Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak; Dura Mater; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 37989906
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02201-2 -
Spine Surgery and Related Research May 2024Idiopathic spinal cord herniation (ISCH) is a rare condition that is characterized by ventral herniation of the spinal cord through a defect in the dura mater into the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Idiopathic spinal cord herniation (ISCH) is a rare condition that is characterized by ventral herniation of the spinal cord through a defect in the dura mater into the epidural space, with no identifiable cause. ISCH is frequently underdiagnosed, and the information available in case reports is limited. To provide an overview of the clinical manifestations and diagnosis of this condition, this study aims to conduct a review of reported cases of ISCH.
METHODS
A literature review was carried out using seven databases. The search was conducted using the keywords "Idiopathic spinal cord herniation" OR "Idiopathic Ventral Spinal Cord Herniation" AND "Case report" OR "case series."
RESULTS
A total of 92 relevant papers reporting 224 cases, besides the index case, were determined. Of the cases, 58.5% were females and the mean age was 50.7 (SD 13.2) years. Symptoms, diagnoses, and outcomes were similar between genders. The most common clinical signs included motor symptoms (82.6%), instability (61.3%), hypoesthesia (59.2%), and disturbance of thermal sensitivity (47.3%). Brown-Séquard syndrome was observed in 27.2% of the cases, and surgical treatment was employed in 89.7% of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS
ISCH is a pathology that is principally treated with surgical approach. This study provides valuable insights into the clinical manifestations and diagnosis of ISCH, which can aid in the early recognition and treatment of this rare condition.
PubMed: 38868787
DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2023-0102 -
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience :... Apr 2021The subdural evacuating port system (SEPS) is a minimally invasive option for treating chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Individual case series have shown it to be safe... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The subdural evacuating port system (SEPS) is a minimally invasive option for treating chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Individual case series have shown it to be safe and effective, but outcomes have not been systematically reviewed. We sought to review the literature in order to determine the safety and efficacy of SEPS as a first line treatment for cSDH. A comprehensive literature search for outcomes following SEPS placement as a primary treatment for cSDH was performed. The primary outcome was treatment success, which was defined as a composite of improvement in presenting symptoms and no need for further treatment in the operating room. Additional outcomes included discharge disposition, length of stay (LOS), hematoma recurrence, and complications. A total of 12 studies comprising 953 patients who underwent SEPS placement met the inclusion criteria. The pooled rate of a successful outcome was 0.79 (95% CI 0.75-0.83). Frequency of delayed hematoma recurrence was 0.15 (95% CI 0.10-0.21). The pooled inpatient mortality rate was 0.02 (95% CI 0.01-0.03). Complications rates included 0.02 (95% CI 0.00-0.03) for any acute hemorrhage, 0.01 (95% CI 0.00-0.01) for acute hemorrhage requiring surgery, and 0.02 (95% CI 0.01-0.03) for seizure. SEPS placement is associated with a success rate of 79% and very low rates of acute hemorrhage and seizure. This data supports its use as a first-line management strategy, although prospective randomized studies are needed.
Topics: Craniotomy; Disease Management; Drainage; Female; Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Mortality; Operating Rooms; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Subdural Space; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33775320
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.01.039 -
Medicine Oct 2023Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a relatively common disease, especially in the elderly, for which there is no clear standard of treatment available. The authors... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a relatively common disease, especially in the elderly, for which there is no clear standard of treatment available. The authors systematically evaluated the efficacy of various surgical procedures for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma.
METHODS
Electronic databases of PubMed, EmBase, Web of Science, Medicine, and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically. Based on the PRISMA template, we finally selected and analyzed 13 eligible papers to evaluate the effect of different drainage methods on CSDH. The primary outcomes were recurrence and clinical outcomes. Secondary outcomes were mortality and postoperative complications and other parameters.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included 3 randomized controlled trials and 10 retrospective studies (non-randomized controlled trials) involving 3619 patients. The pooled results showed no statistically significant difference between non-subdural drainage (NSD) and subdural drainage (SD) in mortality and complication rates (P > 0.05). Additionally, overall pooled results showed that the use of NSD (10.9%) has a lower recurrence rate than the use of SD (11.7%), but the results were not statistically significant (relative risk ratio [RR] = 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-1.45; I2 = 47%; P = .92). However, the difference between NSD and SD in postoperative bleeding rate reached statistical significance (RR = 2.39; 95% CI = 1.31-4.36; I2 = 0 %; P = .004). Subgroup analysis showed that SD was associated with similar recurrent CSDH (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.52-1.09; I2 = 0%; P = .14), good recovery (RR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.93-1.04; I2 = 0%; P = .50), and mortality (RR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.37-2.57; I2 = 0%; P = .96), compared to NSD.
CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that NSD and SD are equally effective in the treatment of patients with CSDH, with no difference in final clinical characteristics and radiologic outcomes. However, in patients with limited subdural space after evacuation of a hematoma, NSD may be the preferred strategy to avoid iatrogenic brain injury.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Subdural Space; Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Drainage; Periosteum; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37904357
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035731 -
World Neurosurgery Jun 2020Surgical management of high-grade spondylolisthesis is controversial. Both reduction and in situ fusion are available options, but it remains unclear which approach... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Surgical management of high-grade spondylolisthesis is controversial. Both reduction and in situ fusion are available options, but it remains unclear which approach provides better outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting outcomes following reduction or in situ fusion for adult high-grade spondylolisthesis.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were last searched on June 24, 2019. We identified 1236 studies after excluding duplicates. After screening, 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Random-effects models were used to pool effect estimates.
RESULTS
A total of 188 patients were analyzed. Compared with reduction, in situ fusion had a higher mean estimated blood loss (584 mL vs. 451 mL) and a clinically higher incidence of neurologic (48% vs. 15%), pseudarthrosis (13% vs. 8%), and infectious (20% vs. 10%) complications; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Reduction was associated with a clinically higher incidence of overall complications (32% vs. 25%) and dural tears (22% vs. 7%). Reduction provided better pain relief (mean difference [MD] = 5.24 vs. 4.77) and greater change in pelvic tilt (MD = 5.33 vs. 2.60); however, these differences were not statistically significant. Patients who underwent reduction had significantly greater decline in Oswestry Disability Index scores (MD = 55.7 vs. 11.5; P < 0.01) and greater change in slip angle (MD = 25.0 vs. 11.4; P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
In management of adult high-grade spondylolisthesis, both approaches appeared to be safe and effective. Reduction appeared to offer better disability relief and spinopelvic parameter correction than in situ fusion.
Topics: Adult; Blood Loss, Surgical; Bone Screws; Decompression, Surgical; Dura Mater; Humans; Neurosurgical Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Pseudarthrosis; Severity of Illness Index; Spinal Fusion; Spondylolisthesis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32179186
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.030 -
World Neurosurgery Nov 2023Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is 1 of the common complications of spine surgery and is largely caused by intraoperative or postoperative dural tears. Associations of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is 1 of the common complications of spine surgery and is largely caused by intraoperative or postoperative dural tears. Associations of different factors with postoperative CSF leakage have not been consistent. In this study we aimed to identify demographic, disease-related, and surgical risk factors for CSF leakage after extradural spine surgery in a systematic review and meta-anlysis.
METHODS
The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Wanfang data, Chinese Weipu Database, and SinoMed databases were searched from inception until October 24, 2022. Fixed-effects or random-effects models were used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. The quality of observational studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale instrument.
RESULTS
A total of 15 observational studies with 1,719,923 participants were included in this systematic review. All studies had a Newcastle-Ottawa scale score greater than or equal to 6. Age older than 70 years, smoking, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, adhesion of spinal dura, spinal canal stenosis, cervical fracture, spondylolisthesis, revision surgery, and multiple surgical segments were all related to CSF leakage in the pooled analysis. Obesity and disease duration>1 year were not associated with the leakage of CSF.
CONCLUSIONS
This study will provide a reference for the identification of patients at high risk of developing CSF leakage, which suggests clinicians to strengthen the observation of drainage fluid in high-risk groups.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak; Spine; Risk Factors; Drainage; Reoperation; Dura Mater; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37625633
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.08.075 -
European Journal of Medical Research Mar 2024Enterocystoplasty is the most commonly used treatment for bladder reconstruction. However, it has some major complications. In this study, we systematically reviewed the... (Review)
Review
Enterocystoplasty is the most commonly used treatment for bladder reconstruction. However, it has some major complications. In this study, we systematically reviewed the alternative techniques for enterocystoplasty using different scaffolds. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, and a total of 10 studies were included in this study. Five different scaffolds were evaluated, including small intestinal submucosa (SIS), biodegradable scaffolds seeded with autologous bladder muscle and urothelial cells, dura mater, human cadaveric bladder acellular matrix graft, and bovine pericardium. The overall results revealed that bladder reconstruction using regenerative medicine is an excellent alternative method to enterocystoplasty regarding the improvement of bladder capacity, bladder compliance, and maximum detrusor pressure; however, more large-scale studies are required.
Topics: Humans; Animals; Cattle; Regenerative Medicine; Urinary Bladder; Urologic Surgical Procedures; Muscles; Plastic Surgery Procedures
PubMed: 38475865
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-01757-z -
Acta Neurochirurgica Jan 2021Surgery for symptomatic Chiari type I malformation (CM-I) patients include posterior fossa decompression (PFD) involving craniectomy with or without dural opening, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Surgery for symptomatic Chiari type I malformation (CM-I) patients include posterior fossa decompression (PFD) involving craniectomy with or without dural opening, and posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD). This review aims to examine the evidence to aid surgical decision-making.
METHODS
A medical database search was expanded to include article references to identify all relevant published case series. Animal studies, editorials, letters, and review articles were excluded. A systemic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess clinical and radiological improvement, complications, and reoperation rates.
RESULTS
Seventeen articles, containing data on 3618 paediatric and adult participants, met the inclusion criteria. In the group, 5 papers included patients that had the dura left open. PFDD is associated with better clinical outcomes (RR 1.24, 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.44; P = 0.004), but has a higher complication rate (RR 4.51, 95% CI, 2.01 to 10.11; P = 0.0003). In adults, clinical outcomes differences did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) but re-operation rates were higher with PFD (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.86; P = 0.03), whilst in children re-operation rates were no different (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.30; P = 0.94). Patients with a syrinx did better with PFDD (P = 0.02). No significant differences were observed concerning radiological improvement.
CONCLUSIONS
In the absence of hydrocephalus and craniocervical region instability, PFDD provides better clinical outcomes but with higher risk. The use of PFD may be justified in some cases in children, and in the absence of a syrinx. To help with future outcome assessments in patients with a CM-I, standardization of clinical and radiological grading systems are required.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
not required.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Arnold-Chiari Malformation; Child; Child, Preschool; Craniotomy; Decompression, Surgical; Dura Mater; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Reoperation
PubMed: 32577895
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04403-9 -
Neurosurgical Review Dec 2022Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a well-known complication of craniotomies and there are several dural closure techniques. One commonly used commercial product as...
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a well-known complication of craniotomies and there are several dural closure techniques. One commonly used commercial product as adjunct for dural closure is the collagen-bound fibrin sealant TachoSil®. We analysed whether the addition of TachoSil has beneficial effects on postoperative complications and outcomes. Our prospective, institutional database was retrospectively queried, and 662 patients undergoing craniotomy were included. Three hundred fifty-two were treated with dural suture alone, and in 310, TachoSil was added after primary suture. Our primary endpoint was the rate of postoperative complications associated with CSF leakage. Secondary endpoints included functional, disability and neurological outcome. Systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines was performed to identify studies comparing primary dural closure with and without additional sealants. Postoperative complications associated with CSF leakage occurred in 24 (7.74%) and 28 (7.95%) procedures with or without TachoSil, respectively (p = 0.960). Multivariate analysis confirmed no significant differences in complication rate between the two groups (aOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.53-1.80, p = 0.930). There were no significant disparities in postoperative functional, disability or neurological scores. The systematic review identified 661 and included 8 studies in the qualitative synthesis. None showed a significant superiority of additional sealants over standard technique regarding complications, rates of revision surgery or outcome. According to our findings, we summarize that routinary use of TachoSil and similar products as adjuncts to primary dural sutures after intracranial surgical procedures is safe but without clear advantage in complication avoidance or outcome. Future studies should investigate whether their use is beneficial in high-risk settings.
Topics: Humans; Fibrin Tissue Adhesive; Dura Mater; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Cohort Studies; Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak; Neurosurgical Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Collagen
PubMed: 36322203
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01886-1