-
World Journal of Surgical Oncology Jul 2020Additional studies comparing several reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy have been published; of note, it is necessary to update systematic reviews and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Additional studies comparing several reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy have been published; of note, it is necessary to update systematic reviews and meta-analysis from the current evidence-based literature.
AIM
To expand the current knowledge on feasibility and safety, and also to analyze postoperative outcomes of several reconstructive techniques after proximal gastrectomy.
METHODS
PubMed, Google Scholar, and Medline databases were searched for original studies, and relevant literature published between the years 1966 and 2019 concerning various reconstructive techniques on proximal gastrectomy were selected. The postoperative outcomes and complications of the reconstructive techniques were assessed. Meta-analyses were performed using Rev-Man 5.0. A total of 29 studies investigating postoperative outcomes of double tract reconstruction, jejunal pouch interposition, jejunal interposition, esophagogastrostomy, and double flap reconstruction were finally selected in the quantitative analysis.
RESULT
Pooled incidences of reflux esophagitis for double tract reconstruction, jejunal pouch interposition, jejunal interposition esophagogastrostomy, and double flap reconstruction were 8.6%, 13.8%, 13.8%, 19.3%, and 8.9% respectively. Meta-analysis showed a decreased length of hospital in the JI group as compared to the JPI group (heterogeneity: Chi = 1.34, df = 1 (P = 0.25); I = 26%, test for overall effect: Z = 2.22 (P = 0.03). There was also a significant difference between JI and EG in length of hospital stay with heterogeneity: Chi = 1.40, df = 3 (P = 0.71); I = 0%, test for overall effect: Z = 5.04 (P < 0.00001). Operative time was less in the EG group as compared to the JI group (heterogeneity: Chi = 31.09, df = 5 (P < 0.00001); I = 84%, test for overall effect: Z = 32.35 (P < 0.00001).
CONCLUSION
Although current reconstructive techniques present excellent anti-reflux efficacy, the optimal reconstructive method remains to be determined. The double flap reconstruction proved to lower the rate of complication, but the DTR, JI, JPI, and EG groups showed higher incidence of complications in anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, and residual food. In the meta-analysis result, the complications between the JI, JPI, and EG were comparable but the EG group showed to have better postoperative outcomes concerning the operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay.
Topics: Gastrectomy; Humans; Jejunum; Postoperative Complications; Prognosis; Stomach Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32677956
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01936-2 -
Updates in Surgery Jan 2023Double tract reconstruction (DTR) is the main digestive tract reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy (PG). Single tract jejunal interposition (STJI) derived... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Double tract reconstruction (DTR) is the main digestive tract reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy (PG). Single tract jejunal interposition (STJI) derived from the double tract reconstruction is also increasingly used in clinical practice. However, there is still a great controversy as to which of the two reconstruction methods can achieve better results. In this study, we systematically reviewed studies on DTR and STJI after PG and performed a meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for clinical studies comparing DTR and STJI after PG to December 2021 without language restriction. Review Manager (version5.4) software was used to perform meta-analysis on operative outcomes, postoperative complications and nutritional outcomes. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022301455). Five randomized controlled trials involving 453 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between DTR and STJI in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of reflux esophagitis, anastomotic complications and total complications. The operation time of STJI group was longer than that of DTR group [WMD - 0.79; 95% CI (- 1.55, - 0.03)] [heterogeneity: χ = 4.94, df = 3 (P = 0.18); I = 39%, test for overall effect: Z = 2.04 (P = 0.04)]. The body weight of STJI group was significantly higher than that of DTR group at 6 months after surgery [WMD 3.90; 95% CI (0.56, 7.23)] [heterogeneity: τ = 7.67, χ = 19.76, df = 2 (P < 0.0001); I = 90%, test for overall effect: Z = 2.29 (P = 0.02)]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of DTR and STJI after PG. There were no significant differences in operative outcomes and postoperative complications between DTR and STJI after PG. Although STJI prolonged the operation time compared to DTR, postoperative nutritional outcomes of patients in the STJI group was significantly better than that in the DTR group. Therefore, compared to DTR, STJI may be more suitable for the vast majority of patients undergoing PG due to its better postoperative nutritional status.
Topics: Humans; Anastomosis, Surgical; Gastrectomy; Jejunum; Nutritional Status; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36208365
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01393-4 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery :... Jun 2022The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has rapidly increased in recent years. Popular surgical approaches for AEG are proximal gastrectomy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has rapidly increased in recent years. Popular surgical approaches for AEG are proximal gastrectomy (PG) and total gastrectomy (TG), but it is controversial as to which approach is superior. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of PG and TG for AEG.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 1 June 2021. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to conduct quality assessments, and RevMan (Version 5.4) was used to perform the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
In all, 1,734 patients with Siewert II/III AEG in 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis. PG was associated with less number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD = - 9.00, 95% CI - 12.61 to - 5.39, P < 0.00001), smaller tumor size (WMD = - 1.02, 95% CI - 1.71 to - 0.33, P = 0.004), shorter hospital length of stay (WMD = - 3.99, 95% CI - 7.27 to - 0.71, P = 0.02), and better long-term nutritional status compared with TG. Overall complications, other complications, and overall survival were not significantly different between the two groups. Moreover, subgroup analysis revealed that the occurrence of anastomotic strictures and reflux esophagitis was associated with the use of novel gastrointestinal tract (GI) anastomoses (double-tract reconstruction, jejunal interposition, and semi-embedded valve anastomosis) after PG.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the available evidence, we recommend that surgeons accept PG combined with multiple novel anastomoses as an optimal surgical approach in patients diagnosed with resectable Siewert type II/III AEG.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Gastrectomy; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms
PubMed: 35355172
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05304-1 -
Digestive Surgery 2023A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was carried out to determine the clinical and oncological outcome of patients who had enucleation of solitary... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was carried out to determine the clinical and oncological outcome of patients who had enucleation of solitary pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma.
METHODS
Operative mortality, postoperative complications, observed survival, and disease-free survival were analyzed. The clinical outcomes of patients who had enucleation were compared to those of 947 patients collected from the literature who had standard or atypical pancreatic resection for the same disease using propensity score matching.
RESULTS
There was no postoperative mortality in the 56 patients who had enucleation of pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma. In 51 patients, postoperative complications could be analyzed. Ten patients (10/51 = 19.6%) had postoperative complications. Three patients (3/51 = 5.9%) had major complications (Clavien-Dindo III or more). Five-year observed survival rates and disease-free survival for patients with enucleation were 92% and 79%, respectively. These results compared favorably with those obtained in patients who had standard resection and other forms of atypical resection (also using propensity score matching). Patients who had partial pancreatic resection (atypical or not) with pancreatic-jejunal anastomosis had increased rates of postoperative complications and local recurrences.
CONCLUSIONS
Enucleation of pancreatic metastases offers a valid solution in selected patients.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreas; Pancreatectomy; Postoperative Complications; Kidney Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36809760
DOI: 10.1159/000528823 -
Diseases of the Esophagus : Official... Aug 2019Gastric conduit used for reconstruction after esophagectomy for cancer has the potential to develop a metachronous neoplasm known as gastric tube cancer (GTC). The aim...
Gastric conduit used for reconstruction after esophagectomy for cancer has the potential to develop a metachronous neoplasm known as gastric tube cancer (GTC). The aim of this study was to review literature and evaluate outcomes and possible treatment strategies for GTC. A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials. No restriction was set for the type of publication, number, age, or sex of the patients. The search was limited to articles in English. Characteristics of esophageal cancer (EC) and its treatment and GTC and its treatment were analyzed. A total of 28 studies were analyzed, 12 retrospective analyses and 16 case reports, involving 229 patients with 250 GTCs in total. The majority of ECs (88.2%) were squamous cell carcinomas. In 120 patients (52.4%) a posterior mediastinal reconstructive route was used when esophagectomy was performed. The mean interval between esophagectomy and diagnosis of GTC was 55.8 months, with a median interval of 56.8 months (4-236 months). One hundred and twenty-four GTCs (49.6%) were located in the lower part of the gastric tube. One hundred and forty patients were endoscopically treated. Eighty-five patients underwent surgery. Thirty-six total gastrectomies with lymphadenectomy with colon or jejunal interposition were performed. Forty-three subtotal gastrectomies and 6 wedge resections were performed. The main reported postoperative complications were anastomotic leak, vocal cord palsy, and respiratory failure. Twenty-five patients were treated with palliative chemotherapy. Three-year survival rates were 69.3% for endoscopically treated patients, 58.8% for surgically resected patients, and 4% for patients who underwent palliative treatment. The feasibility of endoscopic resections in patients diagnosed with superficial GTC has been reported. Surgical treatment represented the preferred treatment method in operable patients with locally invasive tumor. Patients treated with conservative therapy have a scarce prognosis. The development of GTC should be taken into consideration during the extended follow-up of patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. Total gastrectomy plus lymphadenectomy should be considered the preferred treatment modality in operable patients with locally invasive tumor, when endoscopy is contraindicated. Long-term yearly endoscopic follow-up is recommended.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophagectomy; Female; Gastrectomy; Humans; Intubation, Gastrointestinal; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms, Second Primary; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31111880
DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz049 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Jul 2019Neoplasms arising in the esophagus may coexist with other solid organ or gastrointestinal tract neoplasms in 6% to 15% of patients. Resection of both tumors...
BACKGROUND
Neoplasms arising in the esophagus may coexist with other solid organ or gastrointestinal tract neoplasms in 6% to 15% of patients. Resection of both tumors synchronously or in a staged procedure provides the best chances for long-term survival. Synchronous resection of both esophageal and second primary malignancy may be feasible in a subset of patients; however, literature on this topic remains rather scarce.
AIM
To analyze the operative techniques employed in esophageal resections combined with gastric, pancreatic, lung, colorectal, kidney and liver resections and define postoperative outcomes in each case.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched the Medline database for cases of patients with esophageal tumors coexisting with a second primary tumor located in another organ that underwent synchronous resection of both neoplasms. All English language articles deemed eligible for inclusion were accessed in full text. Exclusion criteria included: (1) Hematological malignancies; (2) Head/neck/pharyngeal neoplasms; (3) Second primary neoplasms in the esophagus or the gastroesophageal junction; (4) Second primary neoplasms not surgically excised; and (5) Preclinical studies. Data regarding the operative strategy employed, perioperative outcomes and long-term outcomes were extracted and analyzed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS
The systematic literature search yielded 23 eligible studies incorporating a total of 117 patients. Of these patients, 71% had a second primary neoplasm in the stomach. Those who underwent total gastrectomy had a reconstruction using either a colonic ( = 23) or a jejunal ( = 3) conduit while for those who underwent gastric preserving resections (., non-anatomic/wedge/distal gastrectomies) a conventional gastric pull-up was employed. Likewise, in cases of patients who underwent esophagectomy combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy (15% of the cohort), the decision to preserve part of the stomach or not dictated the reconstruction method (whether by a gastric pull-up or a colonic/jejunal limb). For the remaining patients with coexisting lung/colorectal/kidney/liver neoplasms (14% of the entire patient population) the types of resections and operative techniques employed were identical to those used when treating each malignancy separately.
CONCLUSION
Despite the poor quality of available evidence and the great interstudy heterogeneity, combined procedures may be feasible with acceptable safety and satisfactory oncologic outcomes on individual basis.
Topics: Clinical Decision-Making; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophagectomy; Feasibility Studies; Gastrectomy; Hepatectomy; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Neoplasms, Multiple Primary; Nephrectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Patient Selection; Pneumonectomy; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31341367
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3438 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery :... Mar 2024Increased survival of patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer has prompted several efforts to improve long-term postgastrectomy syndrome (PGS) outcomes.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Increased survival of patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer has prompted several efforts to improve long-term postgastrectomy syndrome (PGS) outcomes. Whether a J-pouch (JP) reconstruction may be more beneficial than a standard Roux-en-Y (RY) is controversial.
METHODS
A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted, including studies reporting long-term outcomes of patients treated with total gastrectomy and JP vs RY esophagojejunostomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Primary endpoints were symptom control, weight loss, eating capacity (EC), and quality of life (QoL) with at least 6 months of follow-up. Safety endpoints were explored.
RESULTS
Overall, 892 patients were included from 15 studies (6 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 9 non-RCTs): 452 (50.7%) in the JP group and 440 (49.3%) in the RY group. Compared with RY, JP showed a significantly lower rate of dumping syndrome (13.8% vs 26.9%, odds ratio [OR], 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.58; P < .001; I = 22%) and heartburn symptoms (20.4% vs 39.0%; OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.14-0.64; P = .002; I = 0%). Reflux (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.28-1.32; P = .21; I = 42%) and epigastric fullness (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.18-2.05; P = .41; I = 69%) were similar in both groups. Weight loss and EC were similar between the groups. QoL outcome seemed to be burdened by bias. There was no difference in morbidity, mortality, and anastomotic leak rate between groups. Operative time was significantly longer for JP than for RY (271.9 vs 251.6 minutes, respectively; mean difference, 21.55; 95% CI, 4.64-38.47; P = .01; I = 96%).
CONCLUSION
JP reconstruction after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer is as safe as RY and may provide an advantage in postgastrectomy dumping syndrome and heartburn symptoms.
Topics: Humans; Colonic Pouches; Dumping Syndrome; Gastrectomy; Heartburn; Postgastrectomy Syndromes; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stomach Neoplasms; Weight Loss
PubMed: 38445924
DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2023.12.015