-
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology May 2023Despite existing several kinds of studies on idiopathic hirsutism (IH) and its association with metabolic disturbances, a limited number of studies have assessed lipid... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Despite existing several kinds of studies on idiopathic hirsutism (IH) and its association with metabolic disturbances, a limited number of studies have assessed lipid profiles in patients with IH with conflicting and inconclusive results. This study aimed to evaluate the lipid profiles in women with IH, compared to those of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and healthy controls.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were searched to obtain studies published from inception to July 2021 investigating the lipid parameters, including triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in women with IH, compared to control groups. A meta-regression and subgroup analysis were conducted to explore heterogeneity sources. Publication bias was assessed by the Egger test.
RESULTS
Of 209 studies retrieved through searching databases and other sources, a total of 12 studies including 3913 participants were included for the meta-analysis. This meta-analysis showed higher standardized mean difference (SMD) of TC (SMD: 0.09 mg/dl; 95% CI: 0.001, 0.18) and lower SMD of HDL-C (SMD: -0.10 mg/dl; 95% CI: -0.18, -0.02) in women with IH, compared to those of the healthy controls, whereas there were no significant differences in the SMDs of TG and LDL-C between the study groups. This study also revealed no difference in the levels of lipid profiles of women with IH in comparison with PCOS patients, except for TG (SMD: -0.24 mg/dl; 95% CI: -0.46, -0.02). The results of subgroup analysis based on the study design revealed no significant differences in the SMD of lipid parameters between women with IH and healthy controls. We also found no significant difference in the levels of lipid profiles of women with IH versus PCOS patients, except for HDL-C in the subgroup of case-control studies (SMD: 0.18 mg/dl; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.34).
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrated that the majority of lipid parameters were not significantly different in women with IH, compared to those of healthy and PCOS controls.
Topics: Humans; Female; Hirsutism; Cholesterol, LDL; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Triglycerides; Dyslipidemias; Cholesterol, HDL
PubMed: 36718809
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.15608 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022Novel atherogenic lipid indices, including non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) which is calculated by subtracting the HDL-C value from the total... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Novel atherogenic lipid indices, including non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) which is calculated by subtracting the HDL-C value from the total cholesterol level, atherogenic index (ratio between triglycerides (TG) and HDL-C concentrations (TG/HDL-C)), and Diff-C (calculated by subtracting low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) from non-HDL-C), have been known as valuable predictors of dyslipidemia and subsequent cardiovascular diseases. Previous studies have reported the potential association of novel atherogenic lipid indices with metabolic syndrome (MetS). This meta-analysis aimed to assess the pooled association of novel atherogenic lipid indices with MetS or its components.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS) databases from January 2000 until March 2021 to evaluate the association of novel atherogenic lipid indices, including non-HDL-C, atherogenic index, and the difference between non-HDL-C and LDL-C (Diff-C) with MetS. Observational studies were included without any language restriction. As exclusive studies evaluating the association of non-HDL-C with metabolic syndrome (MetS) were eligible to be included in quantitative analyses, a random-effect meta-analysis was performed to pool the odds ratios (ORs). A stratified meta-analysis was performed based on the definition of MetS [Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) and International Diabetes Federation (IDF)] and the studied population.
RESULTS
Overall, 318 studies were retrieved from an initial systematic search. After screening, 18 and five studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative syntheses, respectively. Qualitative synthesis revealed an association between non-HDL-C, Diff-C, and atherogenic index with MetS and its components. Stratified meta-analysis showed that an increased non-HDL-C level was associated with an increased odds of MetS based on ATP criteria (OR: 3.77, 95% CI: 2.14-5.39) and IDF criteria (OR: 2.71, 95% CI: 1.98-3.44) in adults (OR: 3.53, 95% CI: 2.29-4.78) and in children (OR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.65-2.90).
CONCLUSION
Novel atherogenic lipid indices, including atherogenic index, Diff-c, and non-HDL-C, are strongly associated with increased odds of MetS and its components. The indices could be considered as potential predictors of MetS and its components in clinical practice.
Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Adult; Child; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, LDL; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Metabolic Syndrome; Triglycerides
PubMed: 36176470
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.957136 -
Advances in Nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) Sep 2023Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally. Habitual consumption of tree nuts and peanuts is associated with cardioprotective benefits.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally. Habitual consumption of tree nuts and peanuts is associated with cardioprotective benefits. Food-based dietary guidelines globally recommend nuts as a key component of a healthy diet. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to examine the relationship between tree nut and peanut consumption and risk factors for CVD in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (PROSPERO: CRD42022309156). MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central databases were searched up to 26 September, 2021. All RCT studies that assessed the effects of tree nut or peanut consumption of any dose on CVD risk factors were included. Review Manager software was used to conduct a random effect meta-analysis for CVD outcomes from RCTs. Forest plots were generated for each outcome, between-study heterogeneity was estimated using the I test statistic and funnel plots and Egger's test for outcomes with ≥10 strata. The quality assessment used the Health Canada Quality Appraisal Tool, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). A total of 153 articles describing 139 studies (81 parallel design and 58 cross-over design) were included in the systematic review, with 129 studies in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed a significant decrease for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), TC:high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, LDL cholesterol:HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B (apoB) following nut consumption. However, the quality of evidence was "low" for only 18 intervention studies. The certainty of the body of evidence for TC:HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol:HDL cholesterol, and apoB were "moderate" because of inconsistency, for TG were "low," and for LDL cholesterol and TC were "very low" because of inconsistency and the likelihood of publication bias. The findings of this review provide evidence of a combined effect of tree nuts and peanuts on a range of biomarkers to create an overall CVD risk reduction.
Topics: Humans; Cardiovascular Diseases; Nuts; Arachis; Cholesterol, LDL; Cholesterol, HDL; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Cholesterol; Triglycerides; Apolipoproteins B
PubMed: 37149262
DOI: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.05.004 -
Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin Sep 2022Byrne P, Demasi M, Jones M, Evaluating the association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and relative and absolute effects of statin treatment: a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Byrne P, Demasi M, Jones M, Evaluating the association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and relative and absolute effects of statin treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2022;182:474-81.
PubMed: 35902108
DOI: 10.1136/dtb.2022.000040 -
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and... Feb 2024Avocados are a rich source of unsaturated fats and bioactives, however, their role in altering cardiometabolic risk factors is unclear. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Avocados are a rich source of unsaturated fats and bioactives, however, their role in altering cardiometabolic risk factors is unclear.
OBJECTIVE
The aim was to review the effects of consuming diets containing avocado compared with control diets containing no or low amounts of avocado on cardiometabolic risk factors in adults who were healthy, had clinical cardiovascular disease, or were at increased risk of cardiovascular disease.
METHODS
Five electronic databases were searched (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, and a Clinical Trials Registry) along with Google Scholar to identify studies published between January 1990 and November 10, 2021. Randomized controlled trials ≥3 weeks and prospective cohort studies were included. Ten studies-9 randomized controlled trials (n = 503 participants) and 1 prospective observational study (n = 55,407)-met the inclusion criteria. Outcomes assessed by means of meta-analysis were low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (primary), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides. Outcomes assessed by narrative review were TC to HDL-C ratio, non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, blood pressure, body weight, body mass index (calculated as kg/m), waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, body composition, and blood glucose and insulin concentrations. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, version 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; quality of evidence was examined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation method. Random-effects models meta-analyses were performed when there were ≥3 studies of the same design (ie, randomized controlled trial) and reporting the same outcome. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by calculating χ and I statistics and publication bias was assessed by funnel plots.
RESULTS
Overall, there was a small, significant reduction in TC (-5.08 mg/dL [to convert to mmol/L, divide by 38.67]; 95% CI -9.29 to -0.87 mg/dL; P = .02) in avocado vs the control groups and no significant difference in LDL-C, HDL-C, or triglycerides. Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant reductions in LDL-C (-9.4 mg/dL [to convert to mmol/L, divide by 38.67]; 95% CI -10.84 to -7.95 mg/dL; P < .00001) and TC (-7.54 mg/dL; 95% CI -9.40 to -5.68 mg/dL; P < .00001) in avocado vs control groups in hypercholesterolemic populations, and no differences were seen in normocholesterolemic populations. However, the certainty in the findings was graded as low to very low. Body weight and composition were not negatively affected by avocado consumption.
CONCLUSIONS
Avocado consumption may reduce TC and LDL-C in people with hypercholesterolemia. Avocado consumption does not negatively impact body weight. Larger, well-conducted studies are needed to have greater confidence in the role of avocado consumption on cardiovascular disease risk factors.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Persea; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol, LDL; Prospective Studies; Cholesterol; Triglycerides; Body Weight; Cholesterol, HDL; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 36565850
DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.12.008 -
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology Jan 2023Lipid-modifying agents steadily lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels with the aim of reducing mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis were... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Lipid-modifying agents steadily lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels with the aim of reducing mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine whether all-cause or cardiovascular (CV) mortality effect size for lipid-lowering therapy varied according to the magnitude of LDL-C reduction. Electronic databases were searched, including PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov , from inception to December 31, 2019. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials that compared lipid-modifying agents (statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK-9 inhibitors) versus placebo, standard or usual care or intensive versus less-intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy in adults, with or without known history of CV disease with a follow-up of at least 52 weeks. All-cause and CV mortality as primary end points, myocardial infarction, stroke, and non-CV death as secondary end points. Absolute risk differences [ARD (ARDs) expressed as incident events per 1000 person-years], number needed to treat (NNT), and rate ratios (RR) were assessed. Sixty randomized controlled trials totaling 323,950 participants were included. Compared with placebo, usual care or less-intensive therapy, active or more potent lipid-lowering therapy reduced the risk of all-cause death [ARD -1.33 (-1.89 to -0.76); NNT 754 (529-1309); RR 0.92 (0.89-0.96)]. Intensive LDL-C percent lowering was not associated with further reductions in all-cause mortality [ARD -0.27 (-1.24 to 0.71); RR 1.00 (0.94-1.06)]. Intensive LDL-C percent lowering did not further reduce CV mortality [ARD -0.28 (-0.83 to 0.38); RR 1.02 (0.94-1.09)]. Our findings indicate that risk reduction varies across subgroups and that overall NNTs are high. Identifying patient subgroups who benefit the most from LDL-C levels reduction is clinically relevant and necessary.
Topics: Humans; Anticholesteremic Agents; Cholesterol, LDL; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Ezetimibe; Cardiovascular Diseases; Myocardial Infarction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36027598
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001345 -
Journal of Pineal Research Sep 2021Melatonin is involved in multiple changes that characterize the aging and can potentially be a safe and effective treatment for menopausal women. The aim of this study... (Review)
Review
Melatonin is involved in multiple changes that characterize the aging and can potentially be a safe and effective treatment for menopausal women. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the medical literature on the health benefits of oral melatonin administration on menopausal women. The electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched systematically on interventional studies that evaluated the association between oral melatonin administration and the health of menopausal women. Risk for bias was assessed for randomized, controlled studies by the RoB v.2 tool and for non-randomized trials by the ROBINS-I tool. Twenty-four studies on melatonin treatment in various aspects of women's health were included in the final systematic review. The studies included 1,173 participants. No evidence was found for an independent effect of melatonin on hemodynamic measures or markers of glucose metabolism. There is some evidence that very low-density lipoprotein and triglycerides levels increase during melatonin administration. There is a fair amount of evidence that melatonin treatment has a favorable effect on bone density and BMI. Melatonin treatment improves EEG patterns and subjective sleep quality in postmenopausal women with preexisting sleep impairment. In a dose of 3 mg and above, melatonin improves climacteric symptoms in one or more domains. The vast majority of the studies had a low risk for bias. In light of multiple health benefits and an excellent safety profile, melatonin administration should be considered in menopausal women.
Topics: Bone Density; Female; Humans; Melatonin; Menopause; Sleep
PubMed: 33969545
DOI: 10.1111/jpi.12743 -
Phytomedicine : International Journal... Apr 2023Berberine has been widely used for the adjuvant therapy of several cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, evidence for its efficacy remains controversial. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Berberine has been widely used for the adjuvant therapy of several cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, evidence for its efficacy remains controversial.
PURPOSE
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of berberine in CVDs.
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
METHODS
We searched ten electronic databases for articles from inception to December 23, 2022. RCTs comparing berberine alone or combined with statins versus statins or routine for CVDs were included. Meta-analysis was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook.
RESULTS
Forty-four RCTs were included with 4606 patients. There were no differences between berberine alone and routine or statins in improving total cholesterol (TC) (SMD, 0.43; 95% CI, -0.39 to 1.24; p = 0.30; I = 95%), triglyceride (TG) (SMD, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.49 to 0.21; p = 0.44; I = 76%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (SMD, 0.69; 95% CI, -0.23 to 1.60; p = 0.14; I = 96%), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (SMD, 0.55; 95% CI, -0.48 to 1.57; p = 0.30; I = 96%), and Crouse score levels. Berberine alone significantly reduced National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and intima-media thickness (IMT) levels than routine therapy. Berberine plus statins significantly reduced TC, TG, LDL-C, NIHSS score, hs-CRP, TNF-α, IMT, Crouse score, and number of unstable plaques levels than routine or statins. However, no differences were found between groups in improving HDL-C and IL-6 levels. There were no significant differences between groups in the incidence of adverse reactions.
CONCLUSION
This study suggests that berberine may be a promising alternative for CVDs with no serious adverse reactions. However, our results may be limited by the quality of existing research. High-quality RCTs are needed to provide more convinced evidence.
Topics: Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Berberine; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol, LDL; C-Reactive Protein; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Interleukin-6; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Triglycerides; Cholesterol, HDL
PubMed: 36805484
DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2023.154716 -
Cellular Oncology (Dordrecht) Oct 2022Disturbance of cholesterol homeostasis is considered as one of the manifestations of cancer. Cholesterol plays an essential role in the pleiotropic functions of cancer...
BACKGROUND
Disturbance of cholesterol homeostasis is considered as one of the manifestations of cancer. Cholesterol plays an essential role in the pleiotropic functions of cancer cells, including mediating membrane trafficking, intracellular signal transduction, and production of hormones and steroids. As a single transmembrane receptor, the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) can participate in intracellular cholesterol uptake and regulate cholesterol homeostasis. It has recently been found that LDLR is aberrantly expressed in a broad range of cancers, including colon cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer and liver cancer. LDLR has also been found to be involved in various signaling pathways, such as the MAPK, NF-κB and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways, which affect cancer cells and their surrounding microenvironment. Moreover, LDLR may serve as an independent prognostic factor for lung cancer, breast cancer and pancreatic cancer, and is closely related to the survival of cancer patients. However, the role of LDLR in some cancers, such as prostate cancer, remains controversial. This may be due to the lack of normal feedback regulation of LDLR expression in cancer cells and the severe imbalance between LDLR-mediated cholesterol uptake and de novo biosynthesis of cholesterol.
CONCLUSIONS
The imbalance of cholesterol homeostasis caused by abnormal LDLR expression provides new therapeutic opportunities for cancer. LDLR interferes with the occurrence and development of cancer by modulating cholesterol homeostasis and may become a novel target for the development of anti-cancer drugs. Herein, we systematically review the contribution of LDLR to cancer progression, especially its dysregulation and underlying mechanism in various malignancies. Besides, potential targeting and immunotherapeutic options are proposed.
Topics: Humans; Cholesterol; Homeostasis; Hormones; Lipoproteins, LDL; NF-kappa B; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Tumor Microenvironment; Neoplasms
PubMed: 35864437
DOI: 10.1007/s13402-022-00694-5 -
Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases 2023Muscular dystrophies (MDs) are characterized by chronic muscle wasting but also poorly understood metabolic co-morbidities. We have recently shown that Duchenne MD (DMD)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Muscular dystrophies (MDs) are characterized by chronic muscle wasting but also poorly understood metabolic co-morbidities. We have recently shown that Duchenne MD (DMD) patients, dogs and asymptomatic carriers are affected by a new form of dyslipidemia that may exacerbate muscle damage.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis for evidence that other types of MDs are associated with dyslipidemia compared to healthy controls.
METHODS
Search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for reports that compare plasma/serum lipids from MD patients and controls, and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies quantifying total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein and triglycerides was performed.
RESULTS
Out of 749 studies, 17 met our inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. 14 of the 17 studies (82%) included investigated myotonic dystrophy (DM); other studies were on pseudohypertrophic MD (PMD) or DMD. As a whole, MD individuals had significantly higher levels of circulating total cholesterol (Hedges' g with 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 [0.03 - 1.56]; p = 0.04) and triglycerides (Hedges' g with 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.28[0.63 - 3.92]; p = 0.01) compared to controls. Meta-regression analysis showed the percentage of male gender was significantly associated with the difference in total cholesterol (beta = 0.05; 95% CI, - 0.02 to 0.11; p = 0.043) and high-density lipoprotein (beta = - 9.38; 95% CI, - 16.26 to - 2.50; p = 0.028).
CONCLUSIONS
MD is associated with significantly higher circulating levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides. However, caution on the interpretation of these findings is warranted and future longitudinal research is required to better understand this relationship.
Topics: Male; Cholesterol; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dyslipidemias; Lipoproteins, HDL; Muscular Dystrophies; Triglycerides; Female; Humans
PubMed: 37182897
DOI: 10.3233/JND-230064