-
Frontiers in Neurology 2020There is an important unmet need to improve long term outcomes of encephalopathy for preterm and term infants. Meta-analyses of large controlled trials suggest that...
There is an important unmet need to improve long term outcomes of encephalopathy for preterm and term infants. Meta-analyses of large controlled trials suggest that maternal treatment with magnesium sulfate (MgSO) is associated with a reduced risk of cerebral palsy and gross motor dysfunction after premature birth. However, to date, follow up to school age has found an apparent lack of long-term clinical benefit. Because of this inconsistency, it remains controversial whether MgSO offers sustained neuroprotection. We systematically reviewed preclinical and clinical studies reported from January 1 2010, to January 31 2020 to evaluate the most recent advances and knowledge gaps relating to the efficacy of MgSO for the treatment of perinatal brain injury. The outcomes of MgSO in preterm and term-equivalent animal models of perinatal encephalopathy were highly inconsistent between studies. None of the perinatal rodent studies that suggested benefit directly controlled body or brain temperature. The majority of the studies did not control for sex, study long term histological and functional outcomes or use pragmatic treatment regimens and many did not report controlling for potential study bias. Finally, most of the recent preterm or term human studies that tested the potential of MgSO for perinatal neuroprotection were relatively underpowered, but nevertheless, suggest that any improvements in neurodevelopment were at best modest or absent. On balance, these data suggest that further rigorous testing in translational preclinical models of perinatal encephalopathy is essential to ensure safety and best regimens for optimal preterm neuroprotection, and before further clinical trials of MgSO for perinatal encephalopathy at term are undertaken.
PubMed: 32536903
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00449 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2023Jellyfish envenomation is common in many coastal regions and varies in severity depending upon the species. Stings cause a variety of symptoms and signs including pain,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Jellyfish envenomation is common in many coastal regions and varies in severity depending upon the species. Stings cause a variety of symptoms and signs including pain, dermatological reactions, and, in some species, Irukandji syndrome (which may include abdominal/back/chest pain, tachycardia, hypertension, cardiac phenomena, and, rarely, death). Many treatments have been suggested for these symptoms, but their effectiveness is unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane Review last published in 2013.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the benefits and harms associated with the use of any intervention, in both adults and children, for the treatment of jellyfish stings, as assessed by randomised and quasi-randomised trials.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science up to 27 October 2022. We searched clinical trials registers and the grey literature, and conducted forward-citation searching of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of any intervention given to treat stings from any species of jellyfish stings. Interventions were compared to another active intervention, placebo, or no treatment. If co-interventions were used, we included the study only if the co-intervention was used in each group. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: We included nine studies (six RCTs and three quasi-RCTs) involving a total of 574 participants. We found one ongoing study. Participants were either stung accidentally, or were healthy volunteers exposed to stings in a laboratory setting. Type of jellyfish could not be confirmed in beach settings and was determined by investigators using participant and local information. We categorised interventions into comparison groups: hot versus cold applications; topical applications. A third comparison of parenteral administration included no relevant outcome data: a single study (39 participants) evaluated intravenous magnesium sulfate after stings from jellyfish that cause Irukandji syndrome (Carukia). No studies assessed a fourth comparison group of pressure immobilisation bandages. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence due to very serious risk of bias, serious and very serious imprecision, and serious inconsistency in some results. Application of heat versus application of cold Four studies involved accidental stings treated on the beach or in hospital. Jellyfish were described as bluebottles (Physalia; location: Australia), and box jellyfish that do not cause Irukandji syndrome (Hawaiian box jellyfish (Carybdea alata) and major box jellyfish (Chironex fleckeri, location: Australia)). Treatments were applied with hot packs or hot water (showers, baths, buckets, or hoses), or ice packs or cold packs. The evidence for all outcomes was of very low certainty, thus we are unsure whether heat compared to cold leads to at least a clinically significant reduction in pain within six hours of stings from Physalia (risk ratio (RR) 2.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42 to 3.56; 2 studies, 142 participants) or Carybdea alata and Chironex fleckeri (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.56 to 4.94; 2 studies, 71 participants). We are unsure whether there is a difference in adverse events due to treatment (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.19; 2 studies, 142 participants); these were minor adverse events reported for Physalia stings. We are also unsure whether either treatment leads to a clinically significant reduction in pain in the first hour (Physalia: RR 2.66, 95% CI 1.71 to 4.15; 1 study, 88 participants; Carybdea alata and Chironex fleckeri: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.89; 1 study, 42 participants) or cessation of pain at the end of treatment (Physalia: RR 1.63, 95% CI 0.81 to 3.27; 1 study, 54 participants; Carybdea alata and Chironex fleckeri: RR 3.54, 95% CI 0.82 to 15.31; 1 study, 29 participants). Evidence for retreatment with the same intervention was only available for Physalia, with similar uncertain findings (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.90; 1 study, 96 participants), as was the case for retreatment with the alternative hot or cold application after Physalia (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.82; 1 study, 54 participants) and Chironex fleckeri stings (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.02 to 11.17; 1 study, 42 participants). Evidence for dermatological signs (itchiness or rash) was available only at 24 hours for Physalia stings (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.65; 2 studies, 98 participants). Topical applications One study (62 participants) included accidental stings from Hawaiian box jellyfish (Carybdea alata) treated on the beach with fresh water, seawater, Sting Aid (a commercial product), or Adolph's (papain) meat tenderiser. In another study, healthy volunteers (97 participants) were stung with an Indonesian sea nettle (Chrysaora chinensis from Malaysia) in a laboratory setting and treated with isopropyl alcohol, ammonia, heated water, acetic acid, or sodium bicarbonate. Two other eligible studies (Carybdea alata and Physalia stings) did not measure the outcomes of this review. The evidence for all outcomes was of very low certainty, thus we could not be certain whether or not topical applications provided at least a clinically significant reduction in pain (1 study, 62 participants with Carybdea alata stings, reported only as cessation of pain). For adverse events due to treatment, one study (Chrysaora chinensis stings) withdrew ammonia as a treatment following a first-degree burn in one participant. No studies evaluated clinically significant reduction in pain, retreatment with the same or the alternative treatment, or dermatological signs.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Few studies contributed data to this review, and those that did contribute varied in types of treatment, settings, and range of jellyfish species. We are unsure of the effectiveness of any of the treatments evaluated in this review given the very low certainty of all the evidence. This updated review includes two new studies (with 139 additional participants). The findings are consistent with the previous review.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Ammonia; Acetic Acid; Pain
PubMed: 37272501
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009688.pub3 -
Digestive Endoscopy : Official Journal... Jan 2022High-quality bowel preparation is paramount for the diagnostic accuracy and safety of colonoscopy; however, it is often difficult for patients to adhere to high-volume... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
High-quality bowel preparation is paramount for the diagnostic accuracy and safety of colonoscopy; however, it is often difficult for patients to adhere to high-volume laxatives, which may contribute to poor bowel preparation. This review aims to assess the efficacy of bowel preparation fluids of 1 L or less (≤1 L).
METHODS
We performed a systematic review including all relevant randomized controlled trials on ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids for colonoscopy published since 2015. Primary endpoint was the percentage of adequately prepared patients. Secondary endpoints included adenoma detection rate (ADR) and safety.
RESULTS
Bowel preparation with sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC; 19 trials, n = 10,287), 1L-polyethylene glycol with ascorbate (PEGA; 10 trials, n = 1717), sodium phosphate (NaP; 2 trials, n = 621), and oral sulfate solution (OSS; 3 trials, n = 597) was adequate in 75.2%, 82.9%, 81.9%, and 92.1%, respectively, of patients; however, heterogeneity between studies was considerable (I range: 86-98%). Pooled ADRs were 31.1% with SPMC, 32.3% with 1L-PEGA, 30.4% with NaP, and 40.9% with OSS. Temporary electrolyte changes were seen with all ultra-low volume bowel preparation fluid solutions but without sustained effects in most patients.
CONCLUSION
Ultra-low volume bowel preparation fluids do not always meet the 90% quality standard for adequate bowel preparation as defined by current guidelines. Nonetheless, they may be considered in patients intolerant for higher-volume laxatives and without risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation or dehydration-related complications.
Topics: Adenoma; Ascorbic Acid; Cathartics; Colonoscopy; Humans; Polyethylene Glycols
PubMed: 33991373
DOI: 10.1111/den.14015 -
American Journal of Otolaryngology 2023To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies exploring the association between antenatal corticosteroids exposure and hearing loss in preterm... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies exploring the association between antenatal corticosteroids exposure and hearing loss in preterm infants.
METHOD
PubMed, Cochrane library, and EMBASE databases from the inception dates to December 22, 2020 without language restriction. Key search terms included hearing loss, cortisol steroid, and antenatal. Included studies were case control or cohort studies examining preterm (<37 weeks' gestation) or very low-birth-weight (<1500 g) infants and reporting primary data that could be used to explore the association between antenatal corticosteroids exposure and the development of hearing outcomes. This meta-analysis follows the reporting guidelines (MOOSE) for observational studies. Data were independently extracted by 2 researchers. A fixed effects model was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95 % CI. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to different types of antenatal steroids exposure (dexamethasone vs betamethasone) and subgroup analyses based on betamethasone and betamethasone combined with magnesium sulfate (betamethasone vs betamethasone combined with magnesium sulfate).
RESULTS
A total of 110 potentially relevant studies were found, of which 7 met the inclusion criteria (A total of 8130 preterm infants were included. 5337 preterm infants were exposed to antenatal corticosteroids, and 2793 preterm infants were not exposed to antenatal corticosteroids.). Meta-analysis showed that antenatal corticosteroids exposure was significantly associated with hearing loss in preterm infants. (OR, 0.64; 95 % CI, 0.48-0.87; P = 0.004) In addition, significant differences were found between antenatal betamethasone exposure and antenatal dexamethasone exposure. (OR, 0.27; 95 % CI, 0.10-0.77; P = 0.01) Betamethasone and betamethasone combined with magnesium sulfate showed that the difference was no statistically significant. (OR, 1.34; 95 % CI, 0.74-2.43; P = 0.33).
CONCLUSION
The results of this study confirm that among preterm infants, exposure to antenatal corticosteroids exposure is associated with a lower risk of developing hearing impairment.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021255665.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Humans; Female; Pregnancy; Infant, Premature; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn; Magnesium Sulfate; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Betamethasone; Hearing Loss; Deafness; Dexamethasone; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 36283163
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103548 -
Journal of Caring Sciences Mar 2020Primary dysmenorrhea is considered as one of the main problems in women. This review study aimed to characterize the effect of micronutrients on primary dysmenorrhea.... (Review)
Review
Primary dysmenorrhea is considered as one of the main problems in women. This review study aimed to characterize the effect of micronutrients on primary dysmenorrhea. In this systematic and meta-analysis study, the articles were searched at Cochrane library, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science databases. The searching process was conducted with the key terms related to dysmenorrhea and micronutrients. Risk of bias assessment was performed, using Rev Man 5.3 software. In view of the heterogeneity of some of the studies, they were analyzed, using a qualitative method (n=10), and only 6 studies were included in Meta analyze. STATA statistical software version 11 was used for the analysis. In this study, finally 16 clinical trials were investigated. Most micronutrients studied in the relevant articles had anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties with a desirable effect on dysmenorrhea pain relief. Vitamins (K, D, B1, and E) and calcium, magnesium, zinc sulfate and boron contributed effectively to dysmenorrhea pain management. Two months after the intervention, there was a significant mean decrease in the pain score for the vitamin D intervention group (SMD: -1.02, 95% CI: -1.9 to - 0.14, P =0.024) , as well as in the vitamin E intervention group compared to placebo group (SMD: -0.47,95% CI:-0.74 to - 0.2, P = 0.001). Despite the paucity of related research, the studies indicated the potential effects of micronutrients on reducing the pain severity in primary dysmenorrhea. But more studies are needed to confirm the safety and effectiveness of various types of micronutrients on primary dysmenorrhea.
PubMed: 32296659
DOI: 10.34172/jcs.2020.008 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Apr 2024Some studies have compared the efficacy of nifedipine with that of other tocolytic drugs in the treatment of preterm labor, but the reported results are conflicting. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Some studies have compared the efficacy of nifedipine with that of other tocolytic drugs in the treatment of preterm labor, but the reported results are conflicting.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy of nifedipine with that of ritodrine, nitroglycerine and magnesium sulfate for the management of preterm labor.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Clarivate Analytics Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched until April 3,2024 using predefined keywords. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical trials that compared the efficacy of nifedipine with that of ritodrine, nitroglycerine and magnesium sulfate for the management of preterm labor were included. Two authors independently reviewed the articles, assessed their quality and extracted the data. The quality of the included RCTs based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 1 for clinical trial studies. The risk difference (RD) with the associated 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. A forest plot diagram was used to show the comparative point estimates of nifedipine and other tocolytic drugs on the prevention of preterm labor and their associated 95% confidence intervals based on the duration of pregnancy prolongation. Study heterogeneity was evaluated by the I index, and publication bias was evaluated by Egger's test.
RESULTS
Forty studies enrolling 4336 women were included. According to our meta-analysis, there was a significant difference in the prolongation of preterm labor within the first 48 h between the nifedipine group and the nitroglycerine group (RD, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.00; I: 32.3%). Additionally, there were significant differences between nifedipine and ritodrine (RD, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.21; I, 51.2%) for more than one week RD, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.19; I, 33.2%) and for 34 weeks and more. The difference between nifedipine and magnesium sulfate was not significant in any of the four time points.
CONCLUSIONS
Considering the superiority of nifedipine over ritodrine and nitroglycerine and its similar efficacy to magnesium sulfate for tocolysis, it seems that the side effects of these options determine the first drug line.
Topics: Humans; Nifedipine; Female; Pregnancy; Obstetric Labor, Premature; Magnesium Sulfate; Ritodrine; Tocolytic Agents; Nitroglycerin; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38664622
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06497-w -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2019Sickle cell disease is an autosomal recessive inherited haemoglobinopathy which causes painful vaso-occlusive crises due to sickle red blood cell dehydration....
BACKGROUND
Sickle cell disease is an autosomal recessive inherited haemoglobinopathy which causes painful vaso-occlusive crises due to sickle red blood cell dehydration. Vaso-occlusive crises are common painful events responsible for a variety of clinical complications; overall mortality is increased and life expectancy decreased compared to the general population. Experimental studies suggest that intravenous magnesium has proven to be well-tolerated in individuals hospitalised for the immediate relief of acute (sudden onset) painful crisis and has the potential to decrease the length of hospital stay. Some in vitro studies and open studies of long-term oral magnesium showed promising effect on pain relief but failed to show its efficacy. The studies show that oral magnesium therapy may prevent sickle red blood cell dehydration and prevent recurrent painful episodes. There is a need to access evidence for the impact of oral and intravenous magnesium effect on frequency of pain, length of hospital stay and quality of life. This is an updated version of the review.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effects of short-term intravenous magnesium on the length of hospital stay and quality of life in children and adults with sickle cell disease. To determine the effects of long-term oral magnesium therapy on the frequency of painful crises and the quality of life in children and adults with sickle cell disease.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books.Date of last search of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 03 February 2019.Date of last search of other resources (clinical trials registries): 04 April 2019.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We searched for published and unpublished randomized controlled studies of oral or intravenous magnesium compared to placebo or no magnesium.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Authors independently assessed the study quality and extracted the data using standard Cochrane methodologies.
MAIN RESULTS
We included five randomized placebo-controlled studies with a total of 386 participants (aged three to 53 years). Of these, two shorter parallel studies (n = 306) compared intravenous magnesium sulphate to placebo (normal saline) for admission to hospital due to a vaso-occlusive crisis, for which we were able to analyse data. The quality of evidence was moderate for studies in this comparison, mainly due to limitations due to risk of bias and imprecision. Two of the three longer-term studies comparing oral magnesium pidolate to placebo had a cross-over design. The third was a parallel factorial study which compared hydroxyurea and oral magnesium to each other and to placebo over a longer period of time; we only present the comparison of oral magnesium to placebo from this study. The quality of evidence was very low with uncertainty of the estimation.The eight-hourly dose levels in the two studies of intravenous magnesium were different; one used 100 mg/kg while the second used 40 mg/kg. Only one of these studies (n = 104) reported the mean daily pain score while hospitalised (a non-significant difference between groups, moderate quality evidence). The second study (n = 202) reported a number of child- and parent-reported quality of life scores. None of the scores showed any difference between treatment groups (low quality evidence). Data from one study (n = 106) showed no difference in length of stay in hospital between groups (low quality evidence). Both studies reported on adverse events, but not defined by severity as we had planned. One study showed significantly more participants receiving intravenous magnesium experienced warmth at infusion site compared to placebo; there were no differences between groups for other adverse events (low quality evidence).Three studies (n = 80) compared oral magnesium pidolate to placebo. None of them reported data which we were able to analyse. One study (n = 24) reported on the number of painful days and stated there was no difference between two groups (low quality evidence). None of the studies reported on quality of life or length of hospital stay. Two studies (n = 68) reported there were no differences in levels of magnesium in either plasma or red blood cells (moderate quality evidence). Two studies (n = 56) reported adverse events. One reported episodes of mild diarrhoea and headache, all of which resolved without stopping treatment. The second study reported adverse events as gastrointestinal disorders, headache or migraine, upper respiratory infections and rash; which were all evenly distributed across treatment groups (moderate quality evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Moderate to low quality evidence showed neither intravenous magnesium and oral magnesium therapy has an effect on reducing painful crisis, length of hospital stay and changing quality of life in treating sickle cell disease. Therefore, no definitive conclusions can be made regarding its clinical benefit. Further randomized controlled studies, perhaps multicentre, are necessary to establish whether intravenous and oral magnesium therapies have any effect on improving the health of people with sickle cell disease.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anemia, Sickle Cell; Antisickling Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Hydroxyurea; Magnesium; Magnesium Sulfate; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Young Adult
PubMed: 31498421
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011358.pub3 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2024Magnesium sulphate is a common therapy in perinatal care. Its benefits when given to women at risk of preterm birth for fetal neuroprotection (prevention of cerebral... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Magnesium sulphate is a common therapy in perinatal care. Its benefits when given to women at risk of preterm birth for fetal neuroprotection (prevention of cerebral palsy for children) were shown in a 2009 Cochrane review. Internationally, use of magnesium sulphate for preterm cerebral palsy prevention is now recommended practice. As new randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and longer-term follow-up of prior RCTs have since been conducted, this review updates the previously published version.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of magnesium sulphate as a fetal neuroprotective agent when given to women considered to be at risk of preterm birth.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) on 17 March 2023, as well as reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included RCTs and cluster-RCTs of women at risk of preterm birth that assessed prenatal magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection compared with placebo or no treatment. All methods of administration (intravenous, intramuscular, and oral) were eligible. We did not include studies where magnesium sulphate was used with the primary aim of preterm labour tocolysis, or the prevention and/or treatment of eclampsia.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed RCTs for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and trustworthiness. Dichotomous data were presented as summary risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and continuous data were presented as mean differences with 95% CI. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
We included six RCTs (5917 women and their 6759 fetuses alive at randomisation). All RCTs were conducted in high-income countries. The RCTs compared magnesium sulphate with placebo in women at risk of preterm birth at less than 34 weeks' gestation; however, treatment regimens and inclusion/exclusion criteria varied. Though the RCTs were at an overall low risk of bias, the certainty of evidence ranged from high to very low, due to concerns regarding study limitations, imprecision, and inconsistency. Primary outcomes for infants/children: Up to two years' corrected age, magnesium sulphate compared with placebo reduced cerebral palsy (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.89; 6 RCTs, 6107 children; number needed to treat for additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 60, 95% CI 41 to 158) and death or cerebral palsy (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98; 6 RCTs, 6481 children; NNTB 56, 95% CI 32 to 363) (both high-certainty evidence). Magnesium sulphate probably resulted in little to no difference in death (fetal, neonatal, or later) (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.13; 6 RCTs, 6759 children); major neurodevelopmental disability (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.44; 1 RCT, 987 children); or death or major neurodevelopmental disability (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.07; 3 RCTs, 4279 children) (all moderate-certainty evidence). At early school age, magnesium sulphate may have resulted in little to no difference in death (fetal, neonatal, or later) (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.02; 2 RCTs, 1758 children); cerebral palsy (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.41; 2 RCTs, 1038 children); death or cerebral palsy (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.20; 1 RCT, 503 children); and death or major neurodevelopmental disability (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.12; 1 RCT, 503 children) (all low-certainty evidence). Magnesium sulphate may also have resulted in little to no difference in major neurodevelopmental disability, but the evidence is very uncertain (average RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.62; 2 RCTs, 940 children; very low-certainty evidence). Secondary outcomes for infants/children: Magnesium sulphate probably reduced severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4) (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.98; 5 RCTs, 5885 infants; NNTB 92, 95% CI 55 to 1102; moderate-certainty evidence) and may have resulted in little to no difference in chronic lung disease/bronchopulmonary dysplasia (average RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.10; 5 RCTs, 6689 infants; low-certainty evidence). Primary outcomes for women: Magnesium sulphate may have resulted in little or no difference in severe maternal outcomes potentially related to treatment (death, cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest) (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.92; 4 RCTs, 5300 women; low-certainty evidence). However, magnesium sulphate probably increased maternal adverse effects severe enough to stop treatment (average RR 3.21, 95% CI 1.88 to 5.48; 3 RCTs, 4736 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Secondary outcomes for women: Magnesium sulphate probably resulted in little to no difference in caesarean section (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.02; 5 RCTs, 5861 women) and postpartum haemorrhage (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.09; 2 RCTs, 2495 women) (both moderate-certainty evidence). Breastfeeding at hospital discharge and women's views of treatment were not reported.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The currently available evidence indicates that magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus, compared with placebo, reduces cerebral palsy, and death or cerebral palsy, in children up to two years' corrected age, and probably reduces severe intraventricular haemorrhage for infants. Magnesium sulphate may result in little to no difference in outcomes in children at school age. While magnesium sulphate may result in little to no difference in severe maternal outcomes (death, cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest), it probably increases maternal adverse effects severe enough to stop treatment. Further research is needed on the longer-term benefits and harms for children, into adolescence and adulthood. Additional studies to determine variation in effects by characteristics of women treated and magnesium sulphate regimens used, along with the generalisability of findings to low- and middle-income countries, should be considered.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Bias; Cerebral Palsy; Magnesium Sulfate; Neuroprotective Agents; Premature Birth; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tocolytic Agents
PubMed: 38726883
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004661.pub4 -
Rheumatology (Oxford, England) Aug 2022Several pharmacological treatments have been proposed for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type-I (CRPS-I) in adults, but data regarding the efficacy of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Several pharmacological treatments have been proposed for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type-I (CRPS-I) in adults, but data regarding the efficacy of various agents for this disease is scarce. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to analyse the efficacy of the various pharmacological approaches in adults with CRPS-I.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from the inception date to 30 June 2021 to identify placebo-controlled or active-controlled RCTs using bisphosphonates, ketamine, CSs, anti-epileptics, NSAIDs/COXIBs, opiates, antidepressants, scavengers/magnesium sulphate or IVIGs for the treatment of CRPS-I. The primary outcomes included changes in the visual analogue scale (VAS) or numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain before and after treatment.
RESULTS
We included 20 placebo-controlled or active-controlled RCTs (including a total of 818 adults with CRPS-I) that used bisphosphonates (n = 7), ketamine (n = 2), CSs (n = 2), anti-epileptics (n = 1), NSAIDs/selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 (COXIBs) (n = 2), scavengers/magnesium sulphate (n = 5), or IVIGs (n = 1) to treat CRPS-I during a median follow-up of 26 weeks. Treatment with bisphosphonates showed a significant reduction in the values of the VAS/NRS pain scale compared with placebo or reference therapy (random effects weighted mean difference [WMD]: -23.8, 95% CI: -28.0 to -19.6; I2 = 36.4%). Treatment with ketamine also documented a reduction in the values of the VAS/NRS for pain (random effects WMD: -8.27, 95% CI: -12.9 to -3.70; I2 = 0%). Treatment with other agents did not reduce the values of the VAS/NRS assessments of pain.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review and meta-analysis supports the recommendation of parenteral bisphosphonates as the first-line agent in the treatment of CRPS-I.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Open Science Framework registries, https://osf.io/et9gu/, osf.io/et9gu.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Diphosphonates; Humans; Ketamine; Magnesium Sulfate; Pain; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy
PubMed: 35104332
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac060 -
European Journal of Clinical... Nov 2022Postoperative atrial fibrillation/flutter (POAF) is one of the most common cardiac complications after lung surgery. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Postoperative atrial fibrillation/flutter (POAF) is one of the most common cardiac complications after lung surgery. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of pharmacological interventions for new-onset POAF prophylaxis in patients with lung cancer after lung surgery.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of pharmacological interventions to prevent POAF following lung surgery.
RESULTS
A total number of 19 studies with 2,922 participants were included. Pharmacological interventions significantly reduced the incidence of POAF (odds ratio [OR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.26-0.52) while did not increase the incidence of severe pulmonary complications (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.57-2.41) after lung surgery compared with placebo/usual care. Among different trials, beta-blockers appeared to be the most effective with an OR of 0.13 (95% CI, 0.07-0.27) and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 3.63 and was considered safe with no serious adverse events recorded. The risk of POAF decreased from 25.6 to 11.4% (P < 0.001) overall and from 34.2 to 6.7% (P < 0.001) with beta-blockers as monotherapy. Pharmacological interventions did not reduce the 30-day mortality (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.43-1.84, I = 0%), but showed a trend toward reducing major cardiovascular complications including myocardial ischemia/infarction, cardiac arrest, heart failure, and stroke (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.13-1.29, I = 0%).
CONCLUSION
Current clinical evidence supports the effectiveness of pharmacological intervention with beta-blockers, amiodarone, magnesium sulfate, or calcium-channel blockers to reduce the incidence of POAF after lung surgery in patients with lung cancer. In the absence of contraindications, prophylaxis with beta-blockers seems to be the most effective of the treatments studied.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Amiodarone; Atrial Fibrillation; Calcium; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Humans; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Magnesium Sulfate; Myocardial Infarction; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 36136141
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03383-2