-
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Jul 2020Consensus is lacking regarding the influence of the maxillary dentition on the survival rate of a mandibular metal-resin implant-supported fixed complete denture... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Does the natural maxillary dentition influence the survival rate of mandibular metal-resin implant-supported fixed complete dentures? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Consensus is lacking regarding the influence of the maxillary dentition on the survival rate of a mandibular metal-resin implant-supported fixed complete denture (MRISFCD) with distal cantilevers.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this systematic review was to identify whether an opposing natural dentition influences the survival rate of mandibular MRISFCDs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A literature search was performed up to February 2018 from MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, BBO/LILACS databases and also in the non-peer-reviewed literature through Open Grey. Clinical studies regarding natural (ND), removable prostheses (RP), and complete fixed maxillary implant dentitions (ID) with at least a year of follow-up were included. The quality of the included studies was analyzed, and the risk of bias was reported. A meta-analysis comparing the survival rate of ND with RP and ND with ID was performed with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%, and heterogeneity was tested by an I index. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to determine the certainty of the evidence.
RESULTS
From a total of 112 ND, 69 ID, and 204 RP in the maxillary dentition, the overall prevalence of failures was 5.4% (6/112; 95% CI [2.3 to 10.76]) for ND, 13.99% (20/69; 95% CI [0.77 to 39.41]) for ID, and 4.9% (10/204; 95% CI [0.69 to 12.18]) for RP. No statistical differences were detected in the success rates between ND and RP (risk difference = 0.00 [-0.06, 0.06]; P=.93; I=27%) or between ND and ID (risk difference=0.00 [-0.06, 0.07]; P=.97; I=0%), both with moderate evidence.
CONCLUSION
With a moderate certainty of evidence, it is suggested that natural maxillary dentitions do not affect the survival rate of mandibular MRISFCDs differently from other prosthetic designs.
Topics: Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dentition; Denture, Complete; Metals; Survival Rate
PubMed: 31753454
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.018 -
Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry May 2024The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which assessed the efficacy of mini dental implants... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Retention of Mandibular Complete Overdentures using Mini Dental Implants (Ø < 3 mm) and Standard Diameter Implants (Ø > 3mm): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
PURPOSE
The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which assessed the efficacy of mini dental implants (MDIs) and standard-diameter implants (SDIs) in retaining mandibular overdentures (MO).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The focused question was "Is there a difference in the mechanical stability between MDIs and SDIs in retaining MO?" Indexed databases were searched up to and including November 2023 using different keywords. Boolean operators were used during the search. The literature was searched in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The PICO characteristics were: patients (P) = individuals with complete mandibular dentures requiring dental implants; Intervention (I) = placement of MDIs under mandibular dentures; Control (C) = placement of SDIs under mandibular dentures; Outcome (O) = comparison of stability between MDIs and SDIs in supporting mandibular dentures. Only RCTs were included. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool.
RESULTS
Five RCTs were included. The numbers of participants ranged between 45 and 120 edentulous individuals wearing complete mandibular dentures. The mean age of patients ranged between 59.5 ± 8.5 and 68.3 ± 8.5 years. The number of MDIs and SDIs ranged between 22 and 152 and 10 and 80 implants, respectively. The follow-up duration ranged between one week and 12 months. Three RCTs reported an improvement in the quality of life (QoL) of all patients after stabilisation of mandibular dentures using MDIs or SDIs. In one RCT, peri-implant soft tissue profiles were comparable between MDIs and SDIs at the 1-year follow-up. The implant survival rate was reported in two RCTs, which were from 89% to 98% and 99% to 100% for MDIs and SDIs, respectively. All RCTs had a low RoB.
CONCLUSION
Mini dental implants represent a viable alternative to traditional standard-diameter implants when seeking optimal retention for mandibular overdentures.
Topics: Denture, Overlay; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Denture Retention; Mandible; Denture, Complete, Lower; Dental Prosthesis Design
PubMed: 38713458
DOI: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5282167 -
Journal of Prosthodontic Research Jan 2024This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of implant placement sites on the biomechanical behavior of implant-assisted removable partial dentures (IARPDs)...
PURPOSE
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of implant placement sites on the biomechanical behavior of implant-assisted removable partial dentures (IARPDs) using finite element analysis (FEA).
STUDY SELECTION
Two reviewers independently conducted manual searches of the PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest databases for articles investigating implant location in IARPDs using FEA, according to the 2020 Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Studies published in English up to August 1, 2022, were included in the analysis based on the critical question.
RESULTS
Seven articles meeting the inclusion criteria were systematically reviewed. Six studies investigated mandibular Kennedy Class I and one study investigated mandibular Kennedy Class II. Implant placement reduced the displacement and stress distribution of the IARPD components, including dental implants and abutment teeth, regardless of the Kennedy Class type and dental implant placement site. Most of the included studies showed that, based on the biomechanical behavior, the molar region, rather than the premolar region, is the preferred implant placement site. None of the selected studies investigated the maxillary Kennedy Class I and II.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the FEA regarding mandibular IARPDs, we concluded that implant placement in both the premolar and molar regions improves the biomechanical behaviors of IARPD components, regardless of the Kennedy Class. Implant placement in the molar region results in more suitable biomechanical behaviors compared with implant placement in the premolar region in Kennedy Class I. No conclusion was reached for Kennedy Class II due to the lack of relevant studies.
Topics: Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Denture, Partial, Removable; Finite Element Analysis; Mandible; Humans
PubMed: 37211409
DOI: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00032 -
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation Jan 2021To review the literatures concerning the effect of the single-implant mandibular overdenture (SIMO) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and masticatory function...
AIM
To review the literatures concerning the effect of the single-implant mandibular overdenture (SIMO) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and masticatory function in the fully edentulous patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science) were searched, complemented with manual resources. Prospective studies published in English up to February 2020 reporting the effect of SIMO on PROMs and masticatory function in the edentulous patients were included. This review focused on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), satisfaction and masticatory function outcomes.
RESULTS
Of 1157 initially screened articles, 9 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 8 prospective studies involving 551 subjects fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Two RCTs were graded as high risk of bias or some concern, while others were low risk. All prospective studies had adequate representativeness and assessment, but only one study had a controlled cohort. In general, the edentulous patients restored with SIMOs had improved OHRQoL and general satisfaction compared to those with conventional complete dentures (CCDs), but the outcome of masticatory function was controversial. Compared with two-implant mandibular overdenture (TIMO), SIMO showed no significant differences regarding general satisfaction and satisfaction with speech, comfort, chewing ability, aesthetics and social life. Conflicting results were observed in OHRQoL and satisfaction with retention and stability. Better masticatory performance was observed in TIMO group than SIMO group.
CONCLUSION
Within the limitation of this review, SIMO is featured with better OHRQoL and satisfaction than CCD. SIMO and TIMO rendered similar patient satisfaction, but TIMO had better masticatory performance.
Topics: Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Denture, Overlay; Esthetics, Dental; Humans; Mandible; Mastication; Mouth, Edentulous; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life
PubMed: 32989781
DOI: 10.1111/joor.13103 -
Dental and Medical Problems 2023Narrow-diameter dental implants (NDDIs) are suggested to be a reliable alternative to bone augmentation techniques, but the evidence regarding the feasibility of NDDIs... (Review)
Review
Narrow-diameter dental implants (NDDIs) are suggested to be a reliable alternative to bone augmentation techniques, but the evidence regarding the feasibility of NDDIs in the posterior area is limited. This review investigated the survival rates of NDDIs, as well as peri-implant clinical and radiographic parameters for fixed dental prostheses in the posterior regions in comparison with standard-diameter dental implants (SDDIs). One investigator performed an electronic search of the English literature until December 2020 in the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases. The focused question was: "Do narrowdiameter dental implants restoring a fixed dental prosthesis demonstrate more alveolar bone loss as compared to standard-diameter dental implants in posterior maxillary and mandibular regions?" The 9 studies selected for this review assessed a total of 498 patients (250 males and 206 females; 42 patients not described in terms of gender) aged 19-81 years, with 725 NDDIs and 260 SDDIs placed. The mean follow-up duration was 71 months (range: 12-176 months). A high survival rate of NDDIs was noticed (97.4%; range: 94.7-100%). The mean probing depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) scores ranged between 3.12 mm and 3.67 mm, and between 10.00% and 33.42%, respectively. However, the only study reporting the plaque index (PI) demonstrated a mean PI score of 1.39. The majority of the studies reported the mean marginal bone loss (MBL) scores below 1 mm. In conclusion, NDDIs appear to be a feasible treatment option in patients requiring a fixed dental prosthesis in the posterior region, since they exhibit comparable survival rates to SDDIs, as well as a clinically acceptable peri-implant clinical and radiographic tissue response.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Dental Implants; Follow-Up Studies; Survival Rate; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dental Implantation, Endosseous
PubMed: 37669472
DOI: 10.17219/dmp/140757 -
Journal of Prosthodontic Research Oct 2021Purpose To clarify the rate of posterior residual ridge resorption (PRRR) in different denture treatments and the factors that can affect PRRR.Study selection A...
Purpose To clarify the rate of posterior residual ridge resorption (PRRR) in different denture treatments and the factors that can affect PRRR.Study selection A bibliographical electronic search was conducted on MeSH, Web of Science, and Ovid databases. Hand searching was also conducted. Longitudinal studies recording the average rate of PRRR in the mandible were included. The effect size was calculated based on the mean rate of PRRR with standard deviation and group size. The random-effects analysis was used to perform meta-analyses across qualified studies.Results A total of 2245 eligible studies were collected from the MeSH, Web of Science, and Ovid databases and hand searching. In the end, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria and were extracted. The average rate of PRRR in different mandibular denture treatments was assessed in this systematic review. The mean combined effect size was -1.05 ± 0.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.18-1.08) between four-implant overdentures and two-implant overdentures. The combined effect size was -0.01 ± 0.22 (95% CI: -0.93-0.82) between complete dentures and two-implant overdentures. Body mass index, number of dentures used, denture wearing habit, impression technique, artificial tooth material, and peri-implant bone resorption showed no significant effect on the rate of PRRR. Gender, denture material, and relining frequency showed a significant effect on the rate of PRRR.Conclusions This review summarized different average rates of PRRR in mandibular denture treatments. Meta-analyses have reported that four-implant overdenture treatments can lower the rate of PRRR compared to two-implant overdenture treatments. However, there was no significant difference in the treatment effect between the complete denture and two-implant overdenture treatments.
Topics: Bone Resorption; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Denture, Complete; Denture, Overlay; Humans; Mandible
PubMed: 33281173
DOI: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00075 -
Journal of Cranio-maxillo-facial... Mar 2024This study assessed the current evidence for the use of TMJR reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA... (Review)
Review
This study assessed the current evidence for the use of TMJR reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search in PubMed and Embase was performed. Meta-analysis randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, observational studies, case series, and case reports were eligible for inclusion. Case reports were also included due to the limited number of publications identified with the predefined terms. Exclusion criteria were: (1) studies written in a language other than English; (2) full-text unavailability (i.e., posters and conference abstracts). The selected studies were assessed for risk of bias. A meta-analysis was not performed as it necessitates a substantial between-study design homogeneity; hence, a descriptive synthesis of data was performed. There were 9 TMJR device reconstruction studies involving 14 subjects 13 years of age or younger. Follow-up ranged from 7 months to 120 months. All papers reported significant decrease in pain and improvement of diet. All prostheses were functional. No material failures of the prosthesis components were observed. The mandible continued to show limited growth following TMJR and most of the cases required no secondary or revision surgery even when the patient reached skeletal maturity. This systematic review had some limitations. The studies included had a low level of evidence and a high risk of bias. Most of the studies had a small patient sample, and no study had a control group. The literature reviewed supports the use of TMJR devices in the restoration of mandibular function and form in skeletally immature patients.
PubMed: 38637252
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.03.028 -
The International Journal of Oral &... 2021This study aimed to assess the survival rate, marginal bone levels, and prosthetic success of short implants when placed in posterior areas of severely reabsorbed...
PURPOSE
This study aimed to assess the survival rate, marginal bone levels, and prosthetic success of short implants when placed in posterior areas of severely reabsorbed mandibles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review was performed of all randomized controlled trials with at least 10 patients with a control group where bone augmentations were performed that were published between January 2015 and February 2020. From 77 pertinent studies, 14 full-text publications were studied, and 6 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria.
RESULTS
The implant survival rates of short dental implants ranged from 92% to 96.9% with a follow-up from 1 to 5 years, and the prosthetic success rate ranged from 90% to 100% during the same follow-up. The mean marginal bone level values of involved short implants ranged from -0.51 to -2.30 mm.
CONCLUSION
The obtained data showed that short dental implants are a valid therapeutic choice to rehabilitate severe mandibular atrophy in the medium to long term.
Topics: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation; Atrophy; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis Design; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dental Restoration Failure; Humans; Mandible; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33600520
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.8510 -
Medical Science Monitor : International... Dec 2023This systematic review aimed to identify and analyze in vitro studies on the marginal adaptation values of computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufacturing (CAD/CAM)...
A Comparative Analysis of Marginal Adaptation Values between Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramics and Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Endocrowns: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.
This systematic review aimed to identify and analyze in vitro studies on the marginal adaptation values of computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and heat-pressed lithium disilicate glass ceramics and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicates and endocrown restorations. A full literature search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ProQuest electronic databases. The following keywords: endocrown [(marginal adaption) or (marginal fit) or internal fitting)], endocrown [(molar(s)) or (premolar(s) or (posterior teeth) or (maxillary arch) or (mandibular arch)] and ceramic materials as [(lithium disilicate glass ceramic CAD/CAM) or (zirconia) or (heat-press)] were used. Articles were manually searched utilizing their reference lists. Study selection was restricted or limited to the time of publication but not to the type of tested teeth or ceramic material, endocrown design, system of endocrown construction, abutment scanning, and system of the marginal adaption measurement. A total of 17 in vitro studies published between 2016 and 2023 were included in this systemic review. Less than half of the studies were published during 2023. Most studies used lithium disilicate glass ceramic and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate all-ceramic materials by CAD/CAM or heat-press systems. Marginal adaptation, or marginal gap, was almost equal in the 2 materials, while it was slightly or marginally higher in the heat-press than in the CAD/CAM system. All-ceramic lithium disilicate glass ceramic and/or zirconia endocrowns fabricated for posterior teeth in both arches using CAD/CAM or heat-press had recorded marginal adaptation values within an acceptable range.
Topics: Lithium; Materials Testing; Ceramics; Dental Porcelain; Silicates; Dental Prosthesis Design
PubMed: 38148601
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.942649 -
Quintessence International (Berlin,... 2020To investigate bone loss in the anterior edentulous maxilla restored with maxillary complete dentures and opposed by mandibular two-implant-supported overdentures... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To investigate bone loss in the anterior edentulous maxilla restored with maxillary complete dentures and opposed by mandibular two-implant-supported overdentures (2-IODs) or complete dentures.
METHOD AND MATERIALS
A systematic search was conducted using the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases for studies investigating bone loss in the anterior edentulous maxilla with mandibular 2-IODs or complete dentures. Two reviewers assessed the eligibility of studies and risk of bias assessment was conducted according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was performed using statistical software to estimate weighted mean difference in bone loss with 95% confidence interval (CI). The level of significance was defined as P value (< .05).
RESULTS
A total of 2,510 studies were identified through electronic and manual searching. Six studies were selected and compounded for quantitative synthesis of 163 patients. Bone loss in the anterior edentulous maxilla was greater with 2-IODs than with complete dentures. The total estimate of weighted mean difference between 2-IODs and complete dentures was -1.40 (95% CI -3.12 to 0.31). However, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .11). The data were heterogenous across the studies based on chi-square statistics (χ2 [df = 7] = 52.75, P < .0001; τ2 = 5.53, I2 = 95.21%). In addition, the impact of implant splinting on bone loss was not significant (P > .29). None of the included studies were considered to be at high risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
Within the limitations of the current systematic review and meta-analysis, the estimate of bone loss in the anterior edentulous maxilla was greater with 2-IODs than with complete dentures. However, the difference was not statistically significant. A well-designed randomized clinical study needs to be conducted to validate the results of this systematic review.
Topics: Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Denture, Complete; Denture, Overlay; Humans; Jaw, Edentulous; Mandible; Maxilla
PubMed: 32696032
DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a44928