-
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Mar 2023Medial meniscal extrusion (MME) has received significant interest because of its correlation with medial meniscus root tears (MMRTs), its potential as a diagnostic tool,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Medial meniscal extrusion (MME) has received significant interest because of its correlation with medial meniscus root tears (MMRTs), its potential as a diagnostic tool, and its significance in the progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA).
PURPOSE
To (1) evaluate if MMRTs significantly increase MME compared with nonroot tears (NRTs) and no tears and (2) determine the clinical outcomes of increased MME.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
Electronic database searches of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were conducted on June 6, 2022, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist criteria. The searches were conducted using the keywords "meniscus tear" and "extrusion." No restrictions were placed on the date of publication. Quality and sensitivity assessments were conducted on included studies. Major MME was defined as an extrusion ≥3 mm.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies involving 7882 knees were included. Compared with patients with NRTs, those with MMRTs had a 1.12-mm greater mean absolute meniscal extrusion (AME) and were 3.45 times more likely to have major MME ( < .001 for both). Compared with patients with no tears, those with MMRTs had a 2.13-mm greater AME ( < .001). Within patients with MMRT, those with widely displaced MMRT had a 1.01-mm greater AME compared with nondisplaced MMRT ( < .001). Patients with OA had a 0.73-mm greater AME and were 3.86 times more likely to have major MME compared with patients without OA ( < .001 for both). Within patients who were not stratified according to MMRT, NRT, or no tears, those who eventually developed OA had a 0.79-mm greater AME than those who did not have OA ( = .02).
CONCLUSION
Patients with MMRTs had higher MME values compared with those with other types of meniscal tears and those without any meniscal tears. Patients with knee OA were more likely to have higher MME compared with those without OA.
PubMed: 36909671
DOI: 10.1177/23259671231151698 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Aug 2023Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) refers to the protrusion of the medial meniscus beyond the tibial edge by more than 3 mm, leading to a deficiency of the hoop strain.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Radiographic OA, bone marrow lesions, higher body mass index and medial meniscal root tears are significantly associated with medial meniscus extrusion with OA or medial meniscal tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) refers to the protrusion of the medial meniscus beyond the tibial edge by more than 3 mm, leading to a deficiency of the hoop strain. MME commonly occurs in conjunction with osteoarthritis (OA) or medial meniscal tears (MMT). However, factors associated with concomitant MME in patients with OA or MMT have not been systematically reviewed. This study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify factors associated with concomitant MME in OA or MMT.
METHODS
The systematic review of the literature was performed according to PRISMA. A literature search was conducted in 4 databases. All original human studies that reported the available evidence on factors associated with concomitant MME in patients with OA or MMT were included. Pooled binary variables were analyzed by odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs, and pooled continuous variables were evaluated by mean difference (MD) and 95% CIs.
RESULTS
Ten studies on OA (5993 patients) and eight studies on MMT (872 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled incidence of MME was 43% (95% CI, 37-50%) for OA, 61% (95% CI 43-77%) for MMT, and 85% (95% CI 72-94%) for medial meniscal root tears (MMRT). For the population with OA, Factors significantly associated with MME included radiographic OA [OR 4.24; 95% CI 3.07-5.84; P < 0.0001], bone marrow lesions [OR, 3.35; 95% CI 1.61-6.99; P = 0.0013], cartilage damage [OR, 3.25; 95% CI 1.60-6.61; P = 0.0011], and higher body mass index (BMI) [MD, 1.81; 95% CI 1.15-2.48; P < 0.0001]. Factors strongly associated with increased risk of MME for MMT included medial meniscal root [OR, 8.39; 95% CI 2.84-24.82; P < 0.0001] and radial tears [OR, 2.64; 95% CI 1.18-5.92; P < 0.0001].
CONCLUSION
Radiographic OA, bone marrow lesions, cartilage damage, and higher BMI were significantly associated with concomitant MME with OA. Furthermore, medial meniscal root and radial tears were significantly associated with an increased risk of MME in patients with MMT.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
Topics: Humans; Menisci, Tibial; Body Mass Index; Bone Marrow; Retrospective Studies; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Osteoarthritis; Cartilage Diseases; Bone Diseases
PubMed: 37099153
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07418-8 -
International Orthopaedics Jul 2022The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine the outcomes and failure rates for revision meniscus repairs in patients with re-tears after primary repair failure. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine the outcomes and failure rates for revision meniscus repairs in patients with re-tears after primary repair failure.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase with the terms "Meniscus," "Meniscal," "Revised," and "Revision." The search strategy was based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) protocol and included four articles (79 patients). The search criteria were limited to studies reporting outcomes and failure rates. The exclusion criteria included languages other than English, biomechanical studies, letters to editors, non-full text, review articles, meta-analysis, and case reports.
RESULTS
Four comparative studies with 79 patients (53 males, 26 females) with a mean age of 23.9 ± 6.4 years treated with a revision meniscus repair were included in the final analysis. Within this analysis, we found a failure rate of 25.3% (20 of 79 patients). Of these failed repairs, 30.95% (13 of 42) were of the medial meniscus, and 18.9% (7 of 37) were of the lateral meniscus. In the four articles, the postoperative Tegner sports activity score was found to be 6.1 ± 1.6 (range, 2 to 10). The post-operative Lysholm score was reported in three articles (45 patients). At a mean follow-up of 58.3 ± 23.9 months, the mean post-operative Lysholm score was 89.1 ± 7.6 (range, 38 to 100). The Coleman score for the included articles ranged between 52 and 59.
CONCLUSION
This analysis found that revision meniscus repairs in patients with re-tears after primary repair failure result in clinical outcomes similar to that of primary repairs.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Arthroscopy; Female; Humans; Lysholm Knee Score; Male; Menisci, Tibial; Retrospective Studies; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Young Adult
PubMed: 35477793
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05413-1 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Mar 2024Medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tears are recognized as a substantial cause of disability and morbidity. However, meniscus root repair, regardless of technique, is...
BACKGROUND
Medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tears are recognized as a substantial cause of disability and morbidity. However, meniscus root repair, regardless of technique, is not without potential complications.
PURPOSE
To evaluate the reported incidence of complications and adverse events after isolated MMPR repair.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases with the following search terms combined with Boolean operators: "meniscus,""root," and "repair." Inclusion criteria consisted of level 1 to 4 human clinical studies in English or English-language translation reporting complications and adverse events after isolated posterior medial meniscus root repairs. The overall incidence of specific complications was estimated from the pooled sample of the included studies.
RESULTS
Eleven studies with a total pooled sample of 442 patients were identified. The mean patient age was 58.1 years, while the mean final follow-up time was 37.2 months (range, 12-84.8 months). The overall incidence of complications was 9.7% (n = 43/442), with the most commonly reported complication being progressive degenerative changes within the knee (10.4%; n = 25/240; n = 5 studies). A total of 1.25% (n = 3/240) of patients who experienced degenerative changes required conversion to total knee arthroplasty. Repair failures were reported in 3.1% (n = 10/327; n = 8 studies) of patients.
CONCLUSION
Repairing MMPR tears is critical in preventing accelerated progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients without significant knee osteoarthritis preoperatively. While this repair is still recommended and necessary in appropriate patients, this review found that the incidence of complications after isolated posterior medial meniscus root repair was 9.7%, primarily involving the presence of progressive degeneration, while repair failure was reported in 3% of patients.
Topics: Humans; Infant; Child, Preschool; Child; Menisci, Tibial; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Knee Injuries; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Knee Joint; Meniscus; Retrospective Studies; Arthroscopy
PubMed: 37129097
DOI: 10.1177/03635465231157758 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Sep 2023To evaluate the overall evidence of published health-economic evaluation studies on meniscus tear treatment. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To evaluate the overall evidence of published health-economic evaluation studies on meniscus tear treatment.
METHODS
Our systematic review focuses on health-economic evaluation studies of meniscus tear treatment interventions found in PubMed and Embase databases. A qualitative, descriptive approach was used to analyze the studies' results and systematically report them following PRISMA guidelines. The health-economic evaluation method for each included study was categorized following one of the four approaches: partial economic evaluation (PEE), cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), cost-benefit analysis (CBA), or cost-utility analysis (CUA). The quality of each included study was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) list. Comparisons of input variables and outcomes were made, if applicable.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were included; of these, six studies performed PEE, seven studies CUA, two studies CEA, and one study combined CBA, CUA, and CEA. The following economic comparisons were analyzed and showed the respective comparative outcomes: (1) meniscus repair was more cost-effective than arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (meniscectomy) for reparable meniscus tear; (2) non-operative treatment or physical therapy was less costly than meniscectomy for degenerative meniscus tear; (3) physical therapy with delayed meniscectomy was more cost-effective than early meniscectomy for meniscus tear with knee osteoarthritis; (4) meniscectomy without physical therapy was less costly than meniscectomy with physical therapy; (5) meniscectomy was more cost-effective than either meniscus allograft transplantation or meniscus scaffold procedure; (6) the conventional arthroscopic instrument cost was lower than laser-assisted arthroscopy in meniscectomy procedures.
CONCLUSION
Results from this review suggest that meniscus repair is the most cost-effective intervention for reparable meniscus tears. Physical therapy followed by delayed meniscectomy is the most cost-effective intervention for degenerative meniscus tears. Meniscus scaffold should be avoided, especially when implemented on a large scale.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Systematic review of level IV studies.
Topics: Humans; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Meniscectomy; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Meniscus; Arthroscopy; Menisci, Tibial
PubMed: 36637478
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07278-8 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Jun 2023Medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) injuries accelerate the progression of osteoarthritis. While partial meniscectomy was once considered the gold standard for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) injuries accelerate the progression of osteoarthritis. While partial meniscectomy was once considered the gold standard for treatment, meniscus root repair has become increasingly utilized with reported improvements in clinical and biomechanical outcomes.
PURPOSE
To perform a systematic review of biomechanical outcomes and a meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes after MMPR repair.
STUDY DESIGN
Meta-analysis and systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried in August 2021 for studies reporting biomechanical, clinical, and radiographic outcomes after MMPR repair. Biomechanical studies were assessed for main results and conclusions. Data including study characteristics, cohort demographics, and outcomes were extracted. Included clinical studies were analyzed with a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions for binary outcomes or continuous outcomes for mean differences between preoperative and postoperative time points. Subgroup analysis for studies reporting repair outcomes with concomitant high tibial osteotomy (HTO) was performed where appropriate.
RESULTS
A total of 13 biomechanical studies were identified and reported an overall improvement in mean and peak contact pressures after MMPR repair. There were 24 clinical studies, consisting of 876 patients (877 knees), identified, with 3 studies (106 knees) reporting outcomes with concomitant HTO. The mean patient age was 57.1 years (range, 23-74 years), with a mean follow-up of 27.7 months (range, 2-64 months). Overall, clinical outcomes (Lysholm, Hospital for Special Surgery, International Knee Documentation Committee, visual analog scale for pain, Tegner, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score scores) were noted to improve postoperatively compared with preoperatively, with improved Lysholm scores in patients undergoing concomitant HTO versus MMPR repair alone. Meniscal extrusion was not significantly improved after MMPR repair compared with preoperative measurements. The progression in Kellgren-Lawrence grades from grade 0 to grades 1 to 3 occurred in 5.9% (21/354) of patients after repair, with no patients progressing from grades 1 to 3 to grade 4.
CONCLUSION
MMPR repair generally improved biomechanical outcomes and led to improved patient-reported outcomes with greater improvements noted in patients undergoing concomitant HTO. Repair did not significantly improve meniscal extrusion, while only 5.9% of patients were noted to progress to low-grade osteoarthritis. The high level of heterogeneity in the included biomechanical and clinical investigations emphasizes the need for more well-designed studies that evaluate outcomes after MMPR repair.
Topics: Humans; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Menisci, Tibial; Retrospective Studies; Knee Joint; Meniscectomy; Osteoarthritis; Arthroscopy
PubMed: 35384728
DOI: 10.1177/03635465221077271 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Sep 2021The purpose of this study was to systematically review case reports and case series about meniscal ossicle, to summarize existing evidence. Specifically, to identify the... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to systematically review case reports and case series about meniscal ossicle, to summarize existing evidence. Specifically, to identify the etiology, demographic characteristics, localization, clinical features, diagnostic procedures and treatment options of this rare entity. Although, case reports/ series are of low level of evidence, a systematic review of such studies can provide and help us to gain a better understanding and awareness of meniscal ossicle.
METHODS
Two authors searched three online databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS and GOOGLE SCHOLAR) from inception until March 2020 for the literature on meniscal ossicle. Inclusion criteria included case series, case reports and case-based reviews, available in full-text version, in English and that concern humans. Reports published in languages other than English were excluded, as well as articles with no electronic full text availability. Case reports using the term "meniscal ossicle" to describe an acute avulsion fracture of the tibial root of the meniscus, were also excluded.
RESULTS
Of 453 initial studies, 38 studies satisfied inclusion criteria. In total 169 patients were included of whom 107 (63%) were males and 62 (37%) were females. Mean age was 44 years (range 12-87). According to Magnetic resonance imaging findings, in 144 knees (86%) the ossicle was localized at the posterior root or horn of the medial meniscus. 60% of the patients had a history of trauma. The predominant symptom in 87% of patients was knee pain. In all patients was detected an intra-articular density structure in computed radiography. 76% had associated meniscal tear, 61% had intraarticular cartilage loss, 34% meniscal extrusion and 28% anterior cruciate ligament injury. Treatment modalities included conservative regimen in 40 patients, while 59 patients underwent surgical excision.
CONCLUSION
The most possible etiology of meniscal ossicle is posttraumatic heterotopic ossification and small occult bony avulsion fracture. It is commonly observed in individuals complaining about knee pain with history of antecedent trauma. The presence of a meniscal ossicle should alert the physician to the high likelihood of the patient having an associated meniscal tear, articular cartilage loss, ACL injury or meniscal extrusion. Along with the meniscal ossicle, the associated meniscal tear should be treated as well.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Child; Female; Humans; Knee Injuries; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Menisci, Tibial; Middle Aged; Osteogenesis; Retrospective Studies; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Young Adult
PubMed: 33128588
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06338-1 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Feb 2022Whereas there has been growing interest in surgical repair of posterior medial meniscus root tears (PMMRTs), our understanding of the medium- and long-term results of...
BACKGROUND
Whereas there has been growing interest in surgical repair of posterior medial meniscus root tears (PMMRTs), our understanding of the medium- and long-term results of this procedure is still evolving.
PURPOSE
To report midterm clinical outcomes from PMMRT repairs.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
METHODS
A literature review for this systematic analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We identified studies that reported the results of arthroscopic repair of PMMRTs. Functional and imaging outcomes were reviewed and summarized.
RESULTS
In total, 28 studies with a total of 994 patients (83% female) with an overall mean age of 57.1 were included in this review. Clinical outcomes (Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Tegner scores) were improved at final follow-up in all studies. Of patients, 49% had radiographic progression of at least 1 grade in the Kellgren-Lawrence scale at a mean follow-up of 4.0 years in 11 studies. Cartilage degeneration had progressed at least 1 grade on magnetic resonance imaging scans in 23% of patients at a mean follow-up of 31.6 months in 4 studies.
CONCLUSION
PMMRT repairs provide a functional benefit with consistent improvements in clinical outcome scores. There is some evidence that PMMRT repair slows the progression of osteoarthritis but does not prevent it at midterm follow-up.
Topics: Arthroscopy; Female; Humans; Knee Joint; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Menisci, Tibial; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33780278
DOI: 10.1177/0363546521998297 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Apr 2024Intact meniscus roots are a prerequisite for normal meniscal function, including even distribution of compressive forces across the knee joint. An injury to the root...
BACKGROUND
Intact meniscus roots are a prerequisite for normal meniscal function, including even distribution of compressive forces across the knee joint. An injury to the root disrupts the hoop strength of the meniscus and may lead to its extrusion and the development of osteoarthritis. A medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) is often thought to have a primary degenerative pathogenesis. However, there is mention of some cases of MMPRTs where the patients have a solely traumatic injury to a previously healthy meniscus.
PURPOSE
To describe a subpopulation of patients with traumatic MMPRT.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 5.
METHODS
The Web of Science database (www.webofscience.com) was queried using the Medical Subject Headings term "medial root tear." Articles were reviewed, and those evaluated for MMPRTs in a degenerative meniscus were excluded. A total of 25 articles describing cases of acute traumatic causes were included in this study. For these articles, the patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, and concomitant injuries evaluated were recorded and pooled.
RESULTS
The search revealed 660 articles, and 25 were selected for inclusion. A total of 113 patients with a traumatic MMPRT were identified and included in this review. The study population had a mean age of 27.1 years and a high share of men (64%). Also, this review displays how most patients with traumatic MMPRTs also suffer concomitant injuries (68%).
CONCLUSION
The findings in this review support our hypothesis that there is a unique subgroup with acute traumatic MMPRTs that have unique patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, and combined injuries, compared with previously published reviews on MMPRTs.
PubMed: 38600780
DOI: 10.1177/03635465241237254 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Feb 2023Given the paucity of literature on the re-revision of ACL, the current study was undertaken. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesise and qualitatively... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Given the paucity of literature on the re-revision of ACL, the current study was undertaken. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesise and qualitatively assess the currently available evidence in the literature regarding the re-revision of ACL reconstruction (rrACLR).
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted based on the PRISMA guidelines. The following search terms were used in the title, abstract and keywords fields: "ACL" or "anterior cruciate ligament" AND "revision" or "multiple" or "repeat". The outcome data extracted from the studies were the Lysholm score, Subjective IKDC, Marx Score, Tegner, Marx Score, KOOS score, radiological changes and the rate of return to sports. Complications, failures and/or revision surgery were also analysed.
RESULTS
The cohort consisted of 295 patients [191 (64.7%) men and 104 (35.3%) women] with a mean age of 29.9 ± 2.8 years (range 14-58 years) from 10 studies. The mean postoperative follow-up (reported in all studies except one) was 66.9 ± 44.7 months (range 13-230.4 months). Associated injuries were 103 (34.9%) medial meniscus tears, 57 (19.3%) lateral meniscus tears, 14 (4.7%) combined medial plus lateral meniscus tears, 11 (3.7%) meniscal tears (not specified), 252 (85.4%) cartilage lesions, 6 (2.0%) medial collateral ligament injury and 2 (0.7%) lateral collateral ligament injuries. In 47 (15.9%) patients an extra-articular plasty was performed for the anterolateral ligament. In all studies that reported pre- and post-operative IKDC (subjective and objective) and Lysholm score, there was a significant improvement compared to the pre-operative value (p < 0.05). At the final follow-up, laxity measured with KT-1000 was found to be 2.2 ± 0.6 mm. 31 (10.5%) out of 295 patients returned to their pre-injury activity level. A total of 19 (6.4%) re-ruptures were found, while only 4 (1.4%) complications (all minors) were reported, out of which 2 (0.7%) were superficial infections, 1 (0.3%) cyclops lesion and 1 (0.3%) flexion loss.
CONCLUSION
Multiple revisions of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction allow acceptable clinical results and a good degree of knee stability with a low rate of subsequent new re-ruptures but the possibility of regaining pre-injury sports activity is poor; whenever possible, it is preferred to revise the ligament in one stage. This surgery remains a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons and many doubts persist regarding the ideal grafts, additional extra-articular procedures and techniques to use.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
STUDY REGISTRATION
PROSPERO-CRD42022352164 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ).
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Knee Joint; Knee Injuries; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Reoperation; Follow-Up Studies
PubMed: 36224291
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07197-8