-
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Oct 2023To perform a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes following lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament...
Lateral meniscus posterior root repair in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores joint mechanics to the intact state and improves clinical function: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes.
PURPOSE
To perform a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes following lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
METHODS
A literature search was performed systematically using PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases in April 2022. The search included the following terms combined with Boolean operators: 'Meniscus repairs', 'Meniscal Repair', 'Posterior Horn', 'Root', 'Radial'. Inclusion criteria consisted of level I-IV human clinical and biomechanical studies reporting biomechanical data and/or outcomes following LMPR repair in the setting of ACLR.
RESULTS
Three biomechanical studies, all utilizing a transtibial pullout technique, were identified, all of which reported significant improvement in joint contact pressures and mechanics and 3/4 of which reported significant improvement in anterior or rotational stability with LMPR repair. Five clinical studies, consisting of 146 patients (mean age 28.5 ± 1.1 years) undergoing LMPR repair, were identified with an average follow-up of 19.1 months (range 6.2-46 months). Across all clinical studies, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were found to improve postoperatively, with 3/4 reporting significant improvement in Lysholm (all, p ≤ 0.001) scores and 3/5 reporting significant improvement in IKDC scores when compared to preoperative values (all, p ≥ 0.004). Meniscal extrusion decreased significantly following repair in 2/4 studies (all, p ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Biomechanically, transtibial pullout repair of the LMPR restored joint contact pressures and joint mechanics to intact levels when performed with concomitant ACLR. Clinically, LMPR repair with concurrent ACLR resulted in improved Lysholm and IKDC scores. These findings enable surgeons to determine optimal treatment plans and discuss realistic outcomes with patients when encountering LMPR injuries.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
Topics: Humans; Infant; Child, Preschool; Menisci, Tibial; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Knee Joint; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
PubMed: 37516986
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07461-5 -
Arthroscopy : the Journal of... Mar 2024To investigate the up-to-date clinical outcomes of tissue-engineered meniscus implants for meniscus defects. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To investigate the up-to-date clinical outcomes of tissue-engineered meniscus implants for meniscus defects.
METHODS
A search was performed by 3 independent reviewers on PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane from 2016 to June 18, 2023, with the term "meniscus" with all the following terms: "scaffolds," "constructs," "implant," and "tissue engineering." Inclusion criteria included "Clinical trials" and "English language articles" that involved isolated meniscus tissue engineering strategies for meniscus injuries. Only Level I to IV clinical studies were considered. The modified Coleman Methodology score was used for quality analysis of included clinical trials. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies was employed for analysis of the risk of study bias and methodological quality.
RESULTS
The search identified 2,280 articles, and finally 19 original clinical trials meeting the inclusion criteria were included. Three types of tissue-engineered meniscus implants (CMI-Menaflex, Actifit, and NUsurface) have been clinically evaluated for meniscus reconstruction. Lack of standardized outcome measures and imaging protocols limits comparison between studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Tissue-engineered meniscus implants can provide short-term knee symptom and function improvements, but no implants have been shown to propose significant long-term benefits for meniscus defects.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.
Topics: Humans; Tissue Engineering; Menisci, Tibial; Meniscus; Knee Joint; Prostheses and Implants
PubMed: 37414105
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.06.043 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong... 2021To report of efficacy repair treatment for meniscus posterior root tears repair. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To report of efficacy repair treatment for meniscus posterior root tears repair.
METHODS
We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for relevant articles. Coleman Methodology Score was used for a quality assessment of the included studies. A meta-analysis was performed to analyze for efficacy of MMPRTs repair.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies, 14 level III and 8 level IV, were included in this systematic review, with a total of 926 cases. Studies comparing repair with either meniscectomy or conservative treatment found greater improvement and slower progression of Kellgrene-Lawrence grade with meniscal repair. Decreased meniscus extrusion is beneficial to the prognosis of patients undergoing MMPRTs repair. As treatment efficacy, the Lysholm score increased 28.87 (P < 0.001), IKDC score increased 31.73. The overall pooled event rates of progression of K-L grade is 0.200. Difference of Lysholm score and IKDC score between repair and meniscectomy were 8.72 and 9.67.
CONCLUSIONS
The clinical subjective score after MMPRT repair was significantly improved compared with the preoperative status. Considering the progression of joint K-L grade, it can prevent the progression of arthrosis to some extent, but not completely. Decreased meniscus extrusion is beneficial to the prognosis of patients undergoing MMPRTs repair. Based on these results, MMPRTs repair cloud result favorable outcomes.
Topics: Arthroscopy; Humans; Joint Diseases; Meniscectomy; Meniscus; Osteoarthritis; Prognosis; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Retrospective Studies; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33832364
DOI: 10.1177/23094990211003350 -
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.... Jul 2022The utilization of meniscal repair techniques continues to evolve in an effort to maximize the rate of healing. Meniscal repair outcomes at a minimum of 5 years... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The utilization of meniscal repair techniques continues to evolve in an effort to maximize the rate of healing. Meniscal repair outcomes at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively appear to better represent the true failure rates. Thus, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature was conducted to assess the rate of failure at a minimum of 5 years after meniscal repair.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of studies reporting the outcomes of meniscal repair at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively. A standardized search and review strategy was utilized. Failure was defined as recurrent clinical symptoms or a meniscal reintervention to repair or resect the meniscus in any capacity, as defined by the study. When reported, outcomes were assessed relative to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) status, sex, age, and postoperative rehabilitation protocol. Meta-analyses were performed with a random-effects model.
RESULTS
A total of 27 studies of 1,612 patients and 1,630 meniscal repairs were included in this review and meta-analysis. The pooled overall failure rate was 22.6%, while the failure rate of modern repairs (excluding early-generation all-inside devices) was 19.5%. Medial repairs were significantly more likely to fail compared with lateral repairs (23.9% versus 12.6%, p = 0.04). Failure rates were similar for inside-out (14.2%) and modern all-inside repairs (15.8%). Early-generation all-inside devices had a significantly higher failure rate (30.2%) compared with modern all-inside devices (15.8%, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in meniscal failure rate between repairs with concomitant ACL reconstruction (21.2%) and repairs in ACL-intact knees (23.3%, p = 0.54).
CONCLUSIONS
Modern meniscal repair had an overall failure rate of 19.5% at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively. Modern all-inside techniques appear to have improved the success rate of meniscal repair compared with use of early-generation all-inside devices. Lateral repairs were significantly more likely to be successful compared with medial repairs, while no difference was seen between patients undergoing meniscal repair with and without concomitant ACL reconstruction.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Topics: Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Arthroscopy; Humans; Menisci, Tibial; Meniscus; Retrospective Studies; Tibial Meniscus Injuries
PubMed: 35856932
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01303 -
Arthroscopy : the Journal of... Aug 2022To compare biomechanical properties of various radial tear repair techniques in the medial and lateral menisci. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To compare biomechanical properties of various radial tear repair techniques in the medial and lateral menisci.
METHODS
A search was performed for key words regarding mechanical properties of repair of radial meniscal tears in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, yielding 1791 articles. Articles were screened using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines against inclusion criteria and underwent Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) methodologic quality assessment. Repair constructs evaluated were classified based on repair technique, use of a transtibial augmentation, and the number, orientation, and pattern of stitches. Results published across different studies were compared but not subjected to meta-analysis due to variability in testing procedures and heterogeneity of repair methods.
RESULTS
We identified 20 studies that performed mechanical testing on 21 different radial meniscal tear repair techniques. The greatest reported mean load-to-failure (LtF) were the transtibial 2-tunnel + 4 horizontal inside-out sutures (191.2 N ± 17.3, cadaver) and all-inside double vertical repair (146.3 N ± 36.2, porcine). The transtibial technique improved LtF and displacement of an inside-out (IO) horizontal repair. All-inside vertical repairs demonstrated greater LtF, stiffness, and displacement compared with IO horizontal repairs in 2 studies. Compared with IO double horizontal repairs, all-inside double vertical or IO double horizontal repairs with reinforcing stitches parallel to the tear exhibited greater LtF in 3 studies and stiffness in 2 studies. Two studies reported that parallel reinforcing stitches significantly reduced suture tear-through compared with similar, nonreinforced repairs. Mean MINORS score for all studies analyzed was 19.88 ± 1.47 points.
CONCLUSIONS
A systematic review demonstrated that there may be alternatives to traditional IO horizontal repairs for radial meniscus tears. Less-invasive all-inside vertical techniques reinforced with suture parallel to the tear instead of standard IO horizontal sutures may improve strength of repair. In addition, transtibial 2-tunnel augmentation may also increase strength of radial meniscus tear repairs.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
There may be alternatives to IO horizontal repairs for radial meniscus tears.
Topics: Animals; Biomechanical Phenomena; Cartilage Diseases; Knee Injuries; Lacerations; Menisci, Tibial; Meniscus; Rupture; Suture Techniques; Sutures; Swine; Tibial Meniscus Injuries
PubMed: 35189305
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.02.010 -
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Jun 2024This study aimed to reach a consensus for ideal surgical treatment of discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) and to evaluate its long term surgical and radiological outcome. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
This study aimed to reach a consensus for ideal surgical treatment of discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) and to evaluate its long term surgical and radiological outcome.
METHODS
All authors independently searched for peer reviewed publications with keywords like discoid lateral meniscus, tibial menisci abnormalities, tibial menisci surgery and clinical outcome and their representative Medical Subjects Headings (MeSH) in databases of PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception to December 2022. Original articles in English language on discoid lateral meniscus reporting clinical, surgical, or radiological outcomes with five or more years of follow-up were included in this systematic review. Study details and outcome data were analysed according to the age, follow-up period, kind of surgery, DLM type, and alignment.
RESULTS
Our search strategy yielded 654 articles in PubMed, 222 articles in EBSCO and 5 articles in CENTRAL i.e. a total of 881 articles. After detailed assessment and screening, 12 articles were included in the final analysis, which included 444 DLM cases. The mean patient age at surgery ranged from 9.9 to 35.9 years, and the mean follow-up period ranged from 5.2 to 16 years. Partial meniscectomy and meniscoplasty are the recommended treatment because of the concerns of degenerative arthritis development after the total and subtotal meniscectomies. Two studies have documented better results with meniscal allograft transplantation.
CONCLUSION
Satisfactory clinico-radiological outcome can be obtained after surgical treatment of discoid lateral meniscus with meniscus reshaping and repair of peripheral unstable part. Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is gaining popularity in patients with total meniscectomy with satisfactory long term functional outcome.
PubMed: 38812876
DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01137-z -
The Knee Jun 2021Discoid meniscus (DM) is a rare variant of regular knee anatomy. Compared to standard meniscus it is thicker and abnormal in shape; these characteristics make it more...
BACKGROUND
Discoid meniscus (DM) is a rare variant of regular knee anatomy. Compared to standard meniscus it is thicker and abnormal in shape; these characteristics make it more prone to tear. It is a congenital defect whose correct etiology is still debated and far from being clarified. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate evidences of DM in human fetuses in order to assess whether embryological development may have a role.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Embase with different combinations of the keywords "discoid meniscus", "embryology", "fetus", "neonatal". Search yielded 1013 studies, on which we performed a primary evaluation.
RESULTS
Seven studies were considered including a total of 1378 fetal menisci specimens, from 396 different fetuses. Discoid shape was not found represented as a normal stage of prenatal development. From 782 lateral menisci analyzed, only 86 (10.86%) were discoid (13 complete, 73 incomplete type). None of medial menisci was found to be discoid. Lateral meniscus was observed to cover a larger surface of tibial plateau than medial one until 28th gestational week.
CONCLUSION
Lateral meniscus seems to be more prone to discoid shape for its natural tendency of covering a larger surface of the tibial plateau during fetal stages. However the fact that a discoid shape was not found in the majority of fetuses suggests that it is not a normal stage of fetal development. To support a single etiological factor it will be appropriate to have further morphological and morphometric studies.
Topics: Bibliometrics; Female; Humans; Male; Menisci, Tibial; Tibia
PubMed: 33945980
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.04.006 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Jun 2021The incidence of concomitant injuries, including meniscal and cartilage injuries, has not been adequately reported in previous studies on multiligament knee injury... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The incidence of concomitant injuries, including meniscal and cartilage injuries, has not been adequately reported in previous studies on multiligament knee injury (MLKI) because their primary focal points have been the degree of ligament injury, treatment strategy, involvement of other soft tissues, and neurovascular injury.
PURPOSE
To analyze the incidence of associated lesions in MLKIs, including medial and lateral meniscal injuries, cartilage lesions, and complications.
STUDY DESIGN
Systemic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were searched between inception and April 30, 2020. Studies were included if they reported the incidence rates of medial and/or lateral meniscal tears and cartilage injuries in cases of MLKIs. For the meta-analysis, data were extracted on clinical outcomes measured according to the number of medial and/or lateral meniscal tears, cartilage injuries, and complications.
RESULTS
A total of 45 studies were included in the MLKI analysis (3391 patients). The pooled rate of medial meniscal tears was 30.4% (95% CI, 24.1%-37.1%; < .0001; = 85.8%). The pooled rate of lateral meniscal tears was 27.5% (95% CI, 20.3%-35.3%; < .0001; = 89.6%). The pooled rate of cartilage injuries was 27.5% (95% CI, 22.1%-33.3%; < .0001; = 86.8%). The pooled rates of peroneal nerve injuries, vascular injuries, and arthrofibrosis were 19.2% (95% CI, 14.2%-24.7%; < .001; = 81.3%), 18.4% (95% CI, 13.2%-24.3%; < .0001; = 81.0%), and 11.2% (95% CI, 8.1%-14.7%; = .0018; = 54.0%), respectively.
CONCLUSION
The pooled rates of meniscal tears and cartilage injuries concomitant with MLKIs were high, ranging from 27% to 30%, and the pooled rates of peroneal nerve injury, vascular injury, and arthrofibrosis were considerable, ranging from 11% to 19%. The influence of these associated lesions on clinical results should be evaluated in future clinical studies.
PubMed: 34368374
DOI: 10.1177/23259671211010409 -
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) May 2024(1) Background: Bone bruises in acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are closely linked to the occurrence of simultaneous meniscal and cartilage damage.... (Review)
Review
(1) Background: Bone bruises in acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are closely linked to the occurrence of simultaneous meniscal and cartilage damage. Despite the frequent occurrence of associated injuries including bone bruises, meniscus, and cartilage damage in patients with ACL injuries, a systematic review of the relationships between the presence of bone bruises and the extent of meniscus and cartilage injuries has yet to be conducted. (2) Methods: Multiple comprehensive databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were searched for studies that evaluated the relationship between bone bruises and meniscus or cartilage injuries following ACL injuries. Study selection, data extraction, and meta-analysis were performed. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used for quality assessments, and Review Manager 5.3 was used for data analysis. (3) Results: Data were extracted from 22 studies encompassing a total of 2891 patients with ACL injuries. Among the included studies, six studies investigated the relationships between bone bruises and medial meniscus (MM) or lateral meniscus (LM) injuries, while three studies investigated the relationships between bone bruises and cartilage injuries. There were no significant correlations between the presence of bone bruises and MM injuries (relative risk (RR) = 1.32; = 0.61). A quantitative analysis indicated that individuals with bone bruises had a 2.71-fold higher likelihood of sustaining LM injuries than those without bone bruises (RR = 2.71; = 0.0003). The analysis confirmed a significant relationship between bone bruises and cartilage injuries (RR = 6.18; = 0.003). (4) Conclusions: Bone bruises occur most frequently in the lateral compartment. Bone bruises resulting from ACL injuries are related to accompanying LM injuries and cartilage injuries. Knowing these associations and the frequency of injuries may allow orthopedic surgeons to promptly address ACL-related meniscus and cartilage injuries on MRI results and in future clinical practice.
PubMed: 38790382
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050515 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Jan 2022To compare the results of two meniscal scaffolds, CMI and Actifit, for the treatment of partial meniscal lesions. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To compare the results of two meniscal scaffolds, CMI and Actifit, for the treatment of partial meniscal lesions.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed on the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases in January 2021, including randomized controlled trails (RCTs) and prospective and retrospective observational studies on the clinical results of meniscal scaffolds. A meta-analysis of the clinical results was performed; the rate of failures was recorded, as well as radiological results. The quality of the included studies was assessed with a modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS).
RESULTS
The search identified 37 studies (31 in the last 10 years): 2 RCTs, 5 comparative studies, 26 prospective and 4 retrospective series on a total of 1276 patients (472 CMI, 804 Actifit). The quality of evidence was generally low. An overall significant improvement in all clinical scores was documented for both scaffolds. The meta-analysis showed no differences between the two scaffolds in terms of patient reported outcome measures and activity level. The meta-analysis on the risk of failures documented a risk of failures of 7% in the CMI and of 9% in the Actifit group.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a growing interest on the results of meniscal scaffolds, with most studies published recently. However, long-term data on the Actifit scaffold and high-level comparative studies are missing. Both CMI and Actifit offered good clinical results with a significant and comparable improvement in symptoms and function, and with a low number of failures over time. Accordingly, with the proper indication, their use may be encouraged in the clinical practice.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV.
Topics: Humans; Knee Injuries; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Menisci, Tibial; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Tissue Scaffolds
PubMed: 33864114
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06548-1