-
Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and... Apr 2024To perform a systematic review on clinical and radiologic outcomes for meniscus tears treated nonoperatively with platelet-rich plasma (PRP). (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To perform a systematic review on clinical and radiologic outcomes for meniscus tears treated nonoperatively with platelet-rich plasma (PRP).
METHODS
A literature search was performed according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using keywords and Boolean operators in SCOPUS, PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials in April 2023. Inclusion criteria were limited to Level I to IV human studies reporting on outcomes of meniscus tears treated nonoperatively with PRP.
RESULTS
A total of 6 studies, consisting of 184 patients, were identified. There was 1 Level I study and 5 Level IV studies. Mean patient age was 47.8 ± 7.9 years, with 62% (n = 114/184) being female. The medial meniscus was treated in 95.7% (n = 157/164) of patients. Mean follow-up ranged from 75.9 days to 31.9 months. Meniscus tears were generally described as chronic, degenerative, or intrasubstance. In 4 studies, magnetic resonance imaging revealed variable improvement in meniscus grade with complete healing in 0% to 44% of patients and partial healing in 0% to 40% of patients. Four of 5 studies reported significant statistical improvement in pain from baseline to final follow-up. Studies reporting on clinical outcomes showed significant improvements Lysholm score (2 studies), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score total score (2 studies), and Tegner score (1 study). Successful return to sport occurred in 60% to 100% of patients. Two studies reported that most patients were either very satisfied or satisfied following treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of PRP injections for the treatment of meniscus tears led to variable results based on postoperative magnetic resonance evaluation and improvements in clinical outcomes, although the clinical significance remains unclear. The heterogeneity of PRP protocols, short-term follow-up, and lack of comparative studies limit findings.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.
PubMed: 38525288
DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100916 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Oct 2023To perform a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes following lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament...
Lateral meniscus posterior root repair in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores joint mechanics to the intact state and improves clinical function: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes.
PURPOSE
To perform a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes following lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
METHODS
A literature search was performed systematically using PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases in April 2022. The search included the following terms combined with Boolean operators: 'Meniscus repairs', 'Meniscal Repair', 'Posterior Horn', 'Root', 'Radial'. Inclusion criteria consisted of level I-IV human clinical and biomechanical studies reporting biomechanical data and/or outcomes following LMPR repair in the setting of ACLR.
RESULTS
Three biomechanical studies, all utilizing a transtibial pullout technique, were identified, all of which reported significant improvement in joint contact pressures and mechanics and 3/4 of which reported significant improvement in anterior or rotational stability with LMPR repair. Five clinical studies, consisting of 146 patients (mean age 28.5 ± 1.1 years) undergoing LMPR repair, were identified with an average follow-up of 19.1 months (range 6.2-46 months). Across all clinical studies, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were found to improve postoperatively, with 3/4 reporting significant improvement in Lysholm (all, p ≤ 0.001) scores and 3/5 reporting significant improvement in IKDC scores when compared to preoperative values (all, p ≥ 0.004). Meniscal extrusion decreased significantly following repair in 2/4 studies (all, p ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Biomechanically, transtibial pullout repair of the LMPR restored joint contact pressures and joint mechanics to intact levels when performed with concomitant ACLR. Clinically, LMPR repair with concurrent ACLR resulted in improved Lysholm and IKDC scores. These findings enable surgeons to determine optimal treatment plans and discuss realistic outcomes with patients when encountering LMPR injuries.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
Topics: Humans; Infant; Child, Preschool; Menisci, Tibial; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Knee Joint; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
PubMed: 37516986
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07461-5 -
Arthroscopy : the Journal of... Mar 2024To investigate the up-to-date clinical outcomes of tissue-engineered meniscus implants for meniscus defects. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To investigate the up-to-date clinical outcomes of tissue-engineered meniscus implants for meniscus defects.
METHODS
A search was performed by 3 independent reviewers on PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane from 2016 to June 18, 2023, with the term "meniscus" with all the following terms: "scaffolds," "constructs," "implant," and "tissue engineering." Inclusion criteria included "Clinical trials" and "English language articles" that involved isolated meniscus tissue engineering strategies for meniscus injuries. Only Level I to IV clinical studies were considered. The modified Coleman Methodology score was used for quality analysis of included clinical trials. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies was employed for analysis of the risk of study bias and methodological quality.
RESULTS
The search identified 2,280 articles, and finally 19 original clinical trials meeting the inclusion criteria were included. Three types of tissue-engineered meniscus implants (CMI-Menaflex, Actifit, and NUsurface) have been clinically evaluated for meniscus reconstruction. Lack of standardized outcome measures and imaging protocols limits comparison between studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Tissue-engineered meniscus implants can provide short-term knee symptom and function improvements, but no implants have been shown to propose significant long-term benefits for meniscus defects.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.
Topics: Humans; Tissue Engineering; Menisci, Tibial; Meniscus; Knee Joint; Prostheses and Implants
PubMed: 37414105
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.06.043 -
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP Aug 2023Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent rheumatic pathology. However, OA is not simply a process of wear and tear affecting articular cartilage but rather a disease of...
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent rheumatic pathology. However, OA is not simply a process of wear and tear affecting articular cartilage but rather a disease of the entire joint. One of the most common locations of OA is the knee. Knee tissues have been studied using molecular strategies, generating a large amount of complex data. As one of the goals of the Rheumatic and Autoimmune Diseases initiative of the Human Proteome Project, we applied a text-mining strategy to publicly available literature to collect relevant information and generate a systematically organized overview of the proteins most closely related to the different knee components. To this end, the PubPular literature-mining software was employed to identify protein-topic relationships and extract the most frequently cited proteins associated with the different knee joint components and OA. The text-mining approach searched over eight million articles in PubMed up to November 2022. Proteins associated with the six most representative knee components (articular cartilage, subchondral bone, synovial membrane, synovial fluid, meniscus, and cruciate ligament) were retrieved and ranked by their relevance to the tissue and OA. Gene ontology analyses showed the biological functions of these proteins. This study provided a systematic and prioritized description of knee-component proteins most frequently cited as associated with OA. The study also explored the relationship of these proteins to OA and identified the processes most relevant to proper knee function and OA pathophysiology.
Topics: Humans; Cartilage, Articular; Knee Joint; Osteoarthritis, Knee
PubMed: 37356495
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100606 -
Life (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2020In recent years, the interest in biological treatment of knee lesions has increased, especially the application of platelet-rich plasma is of particular note. The number... (Review)
Review
In recent years, the interest in biological treatment of knee lesions has increased, especially the application of platelet-rich plasma is of particular note. The number of articles evaluating platelet-rich plasma (PRP) efficacy in the recovery of knee disorders and during knee surgery has exponentially increased over the last decade. A systematic review with meta-analyses was performed by assessing selected studies of local PRP injections to the knee joint. The study was completed in accordance with 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A multistep search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed to identify studies on knee surgery and knee lesion treatment with PRP. Of the 4004 articles initially identified, 357 articles focusing on knee lesions were selected and, consequently, only 83 clinical trials were analyzed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to evaluate risk. In total, seven areas of meta-analysis reported a positive effect of PRP. Among them, 10 sub-analyses demonstrated significant differences in favor of PRP when compared to the control groups ( < 0.05). This study showed the positive effects of PRP, both on the recovery of knee disorders and during knee surgery; however further prospective and randomized studies with a higher number of subjects and with lower biases are needed.
PubMed: 32630404
DOI: 10.3390/life10060094 -
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine May 2020Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proved to be an invaluable component of pathogenesis research in osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, the detection of a meniscal lesion... (Review)
Review
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proved to be an invaluable component of pathogenesis research in osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, the detection of a meniscal lesion from magnetic resonance (MR) images is always challenging for both clinicians and researchers, because the surrounding tissues lead to similar signals within MR measurements, thus being difficult to discriminate. Moreover, the size and shape of osteoarthritic and non-osteoarthritic menisci vary to a large extent between individuals of same features, e.g. height, weight, age, etc. An effective way to visualize the entire volume of knee menisci is to segment the menisci voxels from the MR images, which is also useful to evaluate particular properties quantitatively. However, segmentation is a tedious and time-consuming task, and requires adequate training for being done properly. With the advancement of both MRI technology and computer methods, researchers have developed several algorithms to automate the task of meniscus segmentation of the individual knee during the last two decades. The objective of this systematic review was to present available fully automatic and semi-automatic segmentation methods of the knee meniscus published in different scientific articles according to the PRISMA statement. This review should provide a vivid description of the scientific advancements to clinicians and researchers in this field to help developing novel automated methods for clinical applications.
Topics: Algorithms; Humans; Knee Joint; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Meniscus; Osteoarthritis
PubMed: 32505421
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101849 -
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Jun 2024This study aimed to reach a consensus for ideal surgical treatment of discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) and to evaluate its long term surgical and radiological outcome. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
This study aimed to reach a consensus for ideal surgical treatment of discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) and to evaluate its long term surgical and radiological outcome.
METHODS
All authors independently searched for peer reviewed publications with keywords like discoid lateral meniscus, tibial menisci abnormalities, tibial menisci surgery and clinical outcome and their representative Medical Subjects Headings (MeSH) in databases of PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception to December 2022. Original articles in English language on discoid lateral meniscus reporting clinical, surgical, or radiological outcomes with five or more years of follow-up were included in this systematic review. Study details and outcome data were analysed according to the age, follow-up period, kind of surgery, DLM type, and alignment.
RESULTS
Our search strategy yielded 654 articles in PubMed, 222 articles in EBSCO and 5 articles in CENTRAL i.e. a total of 881 articles. After detailed assessment and screening, 12 articles were included in the final analysis, which included 444 DLM cases. The mean patient age at surgery ranged from 9.9 to 35.9 years, and the mean follow-up period ranged from 5.2 to 16 years. Partial meniscectomy and meniscoplasty are the recommended treatment because of the concerns of degenerative arthritis development after the total and subtotal meniscectomies. Two studies have documented better results with meniscal allograft transplantation.
CONCLUSION
Satisfactory clinico-radiological outcome can be obtained after surgical treatment of discoid lateral meniscus with meniscus reshaping and repair of peripheral unstable part. Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is gaining popularity in patients with total meniscectomy with satisfactory long term functional outcome.
PubMed: 38812876
DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01137-z -
The Knee Oct 2023To critically evaluate the efficacy and safety of early versus delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To critically evaluate the efficacy and safety of early versus delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries based on the different cut-off values of the timing of operation.
METHODS
PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature, and Wanfang Digital Periodical database were searched from inception to November 2022 without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) comparing early ACLR with delayed ACLR for ACL injuries were included.
RESULTS
Twenty-four studies (10 RCTs and 14 CSs) were included. According to the information from included studies, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after ACL injuries were considered as the cut-off values of early and delayed ACLR. When 4 weeks were considered as the cut-off value, early ACLR could significantly improve Lysholm score, IKDC score and VAS score at 6 and 12 months postoperatively and decrease the incidence of adverse events compared with delayed ACLR (P < 0.05). However, no statistically significant difference in positive rate of Lachman test and incidence of meniscus injuries and chondral lesions between the two groups when 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months or 12 months after ACL injuries were considered as the cut-off values of early and delayed ACLR (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The present study suggests that early ACLR, especially conducted within 3-4 weeks after ACL injuries, may be more effective for improving knee function and relieving pain compared with delayed ACLR. More high-quality RCTs are warranted.
Topics: Humans; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Knee Joint; Meniscus; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37517167
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.07.008 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Dec 2021Treatment options for pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries include early operative, delayed operative, and nonoperative management.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Early Operative Versus Delayed Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Pediatric and Adolescent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Treatment options for pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries include early operative, delayed operative, and nonoperative management. Currently, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal treatment for these injuries.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS
The purpose was to determine the optimal treatment strategy for ACL injuries in pediatric and adolescent patients. We hypothesized that (1) early ACL reconstruction results in fewer meniscal tears than delayed reconstruction but yields no difference in knee stability and (2) when compared with nonoperative management, any operative management results in fewer meniscal tears and cartilage injuries, greater knee stability, and higher return-to-sport rates.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
A systematic search of databases was performed including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were a pediatric and adolescent patient population (≤19 years old at surgery), the reporting of clinical outcomes after treatment of primary ACL injury, and original scientific research article. Exclusion criteria were revision ACL reconstruction, tibial spine avulsion fracture, case report or small case series (<5 patients), non-English language manuscripts, multiligamentous injuries, and nonclinical studies.
RESULTS
A total of 30 studies containing 50 cohorts and representing 1176 patients met our criteria. With respect to nonoperative treatment, knee instability was observed in 20% to 100%, and return to preinjury level of sports ranged from 6% to 50% at final follow-up. Regarding operative treatment, meta-analysis results favored early ACL reconstruction over delayed reconstruction (>12 weeks) for the presence of any meniscal tear (odds ratio, 0.23; = .006) and irreparable meniscal tear (odds ratio, 0.31; = .001). Comparison of any side-to-side differences in KT-1000 arthrometer testing did not favor early or delayed ACL reconstruction in either continuous mean differences ( = .413) or proportion with difference ≥3 mm ( = .181). Return to preinjury level of competition rates for early and delayed ACL reconstruction ranged from 57% to 100%.
CONCLUSION
Delaying ACL reconstruction in pediatric or adolescent patients for >12 weeks significantly increased the risk of meniscal injuries and irreparable meniscal tears; however, early and delayed operative treatment achieved satisfactory knee stability. Nonoperative management resulted in high rates of residual knee instability, increased risk of meniscal tears, and comparatively low rates of return to sports.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Child; Humans; Knee Injuries; Retrospective Studies; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Young Adult
PubMed: 33720764
DOI: 10.1177/0363546521990817 -
The Journal of Knee Surgery Feb 2023Injuries to the menisci of the knee are common in orthopedic sports medicine. Bibliometric studies can identify the core literature on a topic and help further our...
Injuries to the menisci of the knee are common in orthopedic sports medicine. Bibliometric studies can identify the core literature on a topic and help further our collective knowledge for both clinical and educational purposes. The purpose of the current study was to (1) identify and describe the 50 most cited articles in meniscus research over an 80-year time period to capture a wide range of influential articles and (2) identify the "citation classics" and milestone articles related to the meniscus of the knee. The Science Citation Index Expanded subsection of the Web of Science Core Collection was systematically searched for the 50 most cited meniscus articles. Data pertaining to bibliometric and publication characteristics were extracted and reported using descriptive statistics. The top 50 articles were published between the years 1941 and 2014 and collectively cited 13,152 times. The median (interquartile [IQR]) number of total citations per article was 203.5 (167.0-261.8), while the median citation rate was 9.6 (7.4-13.9) citations per year. The most cited article was "Knee joint changes after meniscectomy," published in 1948. The article with the highest citation rate of 78.4 citations per year was "The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligaments and meniscus injuries - osteoarthritis," published in 2007. The majority of articles were clinical outcome studies ( = 28, 56%). The top 50 most cited meniscus articles represent a compilation of highly influential articles which may augment reading curriculums and provide a strong knowledge base for orthopaedic surgery residents and fellows. The decade with the most articles was the 2000s, representing a recent acceleration in meniscus-based research. This is a level IV, cross-sectional study.
Topics: Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Bibliometrics; Orthopedics; Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Meniscus
PubMed: 34359092
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1733881