-
Abdominal Radiology (New York) May 2022Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a less common but devastating complication of COVID-19 disease. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the most common CT...
BACKGROUND
Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a less common but devastating complication of COVID-19 disease. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the most common CT imaging features of AMI in COVID-19 and also provide an updated review of the literature on symptoms, treatment, histopathological and operative findings, and follow-up of these patients.
METHODS
A systematic literature search of four databases: Pubmed, EMBASE, WHO database, and Google Scholar, was performed to identify all the articles which described abdominal CT imaging findings of AMI in COVID-19.
RESULTS
A total of 47 studies comprising 75 patients were included in the final review. Small bowel ischemia (46.67%) was the most prevalent abdominal CT finding, followed by ischemic colitis (37.3%). Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI; 67.9%) indicating microvascular involvement was the most common pattern of bowel involvement. Bowel wall thickening/edema (50.9%) was more common than bowel hypoperfusion (20.7%). While ileum and colon both were equally involved bowel segments (32.07% each), SMA (24.9%), SMV (14.3%), and the spleen (12.5%) were the most commonly involved artery, vein, and solid organ, respectively. 50% of the patients receiving conservative/medical management died, highlighting high mortality without surgery. Findings on laparotomy and histopathology corroborated strikingly with CT imaging findings.
CONCLUSION
In COVID-19 patients with AMI, small bowel ischemia is the most prevalent imaging diagnosis and NOMI is the most common pattern of bowel involvement. Contrast-enhanced CT is a powerful decision-making tool for prompt diagnosis of AMI in COVID-19, thereby potentially improving time to treat as well as clinical outcomes.
Topics: Abdomen; COVID-19; Humans; Ischemia; Mesenteric Ischemia; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 34761305
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03337-9 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Feb 2022Although sigmoidectomy is a well-standardized procedure for diverticular disease, there are still unclear areas related to the varying morphology and vascular supply of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Although sigmoidectomy is a well-standardized procedure for diverticular disease, there are still unclear areas related to the varying morphology and vascular supply of the sigmoid colon. The level of vascular ligation could affect the functional outcomes of patients operated on for diverticular disease. The aim of this review is to primarily evaluate sexual, urinary and defecatory function outcomes, as well as postoperative results, in patients who underwent surgery for diverticular disease, with or without inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) preservation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The MEDLINE/PubMed, WOS and Scopus databases were interrogated. Comparative studies including patients who underwent sigmoidectomy for diverticular diseases were considered. Bowel function, genitourinary function, anastomotic leak, operation time, conversion to open surgery, anastomotic bleeding, bowel obstruction were the main items of interest.
RESULTS
Twelve studies were included in the review, three randomized and nine comparative studies. Bowel and genitourinary function are not differently affected by the level of vascular ligation. The site of ligation of IMA did not influence the rate of functional complications, anastomotic leak and bleeding. Of note, the preservation of IMA is associated with a higher conversion rate and longer operative time.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the heterogeneity of patient groups, and although the findings should be interpreted with caution, functional and clinical outcomes after sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease do not seem to be affected by the level of vascular ligation as long as the IMA is ligated far from its origin.
PubMed: 35207190
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11040917 -
International Journal of Surgery... Mar 2023Because of relatively little data for management and evaluation surrounding spontaneous isolated visceral artery dissection (IVAD), existing studies have failed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparative analysis of prevalence, evaluation, management, and rehabilitation outcome of spontaneous isolated visceral artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 80 reports.
BACKGROUND
Because of relatively little data for management and evaluation surrounding spontaneous isolated visceral artery dissection (IVAD), existing studies have failed to provide comprehensive analysis for the management, evaluation, prevalence, as well as natural course of the disease. Therefore, we collected and analyzed current evidence on spontaneous IVAD with the aim of providing quantitative pooled data for the natural course and treatment standardization of the disease.
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to 1 June 2022, was conducted for relevant studies that investigating the natural course, treatment, classification, and outcomes of IVAD. The primary outcomes were to determine the difference in prevalence, risk factors, and characteristics between different spontaneous IVAD. Two reviewers assessed the trial quality and extracted the data independently. All statistical analyses were performed using the standard statistical procedures provided in Review Manager 5.2 and Stata 12.0.
RESULTS
A total of 80 reports with 1040 patients were identified. The pooled results indicated that in IVAD, isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (ISMAD) was more prevalent, with a pooled prevalence of 60% (95% CI: 50-71%), followed by isolated celiac artery dissection (ICAD) (prevalence: 37%; 95% CI: 27-46%). IVAD was male predominated with a pooled proportion of 80% (95% CI: 72-89%). Similar results were found in ICAD (prevalence: 73%; 95% CI: 52-93%). More IVAD patients were diagnosed with symptoms than ICAD (64 vs. 59%). Regarding to the risk factors, this pooled analysis found smoking and hypertension were the top two conditions in both spontaneous IVAD and ICAD patients, with proportion of 43, 41, 44, and 32%, respectively. It was observed that ICAD appeared shorter dissection length (mean difference: -3.4 cm; 95% CI: -4.9 to -2.0; P <0.0001), higher prevalence of Sakamoto's classification Π (odds ratio: 5.31; 95% CI: 1.77-15.95; P= 0.003) and late progression (odds ratio: 2.84; 95% CI: 1.02-7.87; P= 0.05) than ISAMD.
CONCLUSIONS
Spontaneous IVAD was male predominant and ISMAD was most prevalent followed by ICAD. Smoking and hypertension were the top two conditions in both spontaneous IVAD and ICAD patients. The majority of patients diagnosed with IVAD received observation and conservative treatment and experienced a low proportion of reintervention or progression, especially for ICAD patients. In addition, ICAD and ISMAD had several differences in clinical features and dissection characteristics. Future studies with enough sample size and long follow-up are required to clear the management, long-term outcome, and risk factors of the IVAD prognosis.
Topics: Humans; Male; Prevalence; Treatment Outcome; Prognosis; Aortic Dissection; Hypertension; Arteries
PubMed: 36912770
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000301 -
Journal of Endovascular Therapy : An... Aug 2022Thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) has emerged as an attractive alternative option in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) has emerged as an attractive alternative option in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) diseases, reporting lower morbidity and mortality rates compared with open or hybrid repair. A challenging situation arises when the aneurysm involves the celiac artery (CA), precluding a safe distal landing zone. We investigated the safety and efficacy of CA coverage in the treatment of complex TAAA diseases during endovascular management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The electronic bibliographic sources searched were MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases. Primary outcomes of interest were perioperative and 30-day mortality. Any type of endoleak, mesenteric ischemia, perioperative spinal cord ischemia, and reintervention rates were secondary end points. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Summary statistics of event risks were expressed as proportions and 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
Ten observational cohort studies published between 2009 and 2020, reporting a total of 175 patients, were eligible for quantitative synthesis. Indications for TEVAR were primary TAAAs in 82% of patients, aortic dissection in 14% of patients, type Ib endoleak after previous endograft deployment in 3% of patients, and penetrating aortic ulcer in 1 patient. Reintervention rate was 9% (95% CI, 4%-20%) and spinal cord ischemia was 7% (95% CI, 4%--12%). Type II endoleak was the predominant type of endoleak in 10% of patients (95% CI, 4%-22%), followed by type I endoleak in 5% of patients (95% CI, 2%-12%) and type III endoleak in 1% (95% CI, 0%-16%) of patients. Mesenteric ischemia occurred in 6% of patients (95% CI, 3%-10%). Thirty-day mortality was 5% (95% CI, 2%-13%) and the pooled estimate for overall mortality was 21% (95% CI, 14%-31%).
CONCLUSIONS
Celiac artery coverage during TEVAR is a challenging but feasible option for the treatment of TAAA diseases, providing acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Demonstration of adequate visceral collateral pathways before definitive CA coverage is the sine quo non for the success of the technique.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Celiac Artery; Endoleak; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Mesenteric Ischemia; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Spinal Cord Ischemia; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34836463
DOI: 10.1177/15266028211059451 -
Journal of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic... Jan 2022Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is increasingly performed worldwide; however, the surgical anatomy required to safely perform MIDP has not yet been fully... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is increasingly performed worldwide; however, the surgical anatomy required to safely perform MIDP has not yet been fully considered. This review evaluated the literature concerning peripancreatic vascular anatomy, which is considered important to conduct safe MIDP.
METHODS
A database search of PubMed and Ichushi (Japanese) was conducted. Qualified studies investigating the anatomical variations of peripancreatic vessels related to MIDP were evaluated using SIGN methodology.
RESULTS
Of 701 articles yielded by our search strategy, 76 articles were assessed in this systematic review. The important vascular anatomy required to recognize MIDP included the pancreatic parenchymal coverage on the root and the running course of the splenic artery, branching patterns of the splenic artery, confluence positions of the left gastric vein and the inferior mesenteric vein, forms of pancreatic veins including the centro-inferior pancreatic vein, characteristics of the left renal vein, and collateral routes perfusing the spleen following Warshaw's technique. Very few articles evaluating the relationship between the anatomical variations and surgical outcomes of MIDP were found.
CONCLUSIONS
The precise knowledge of peripancreatic vessels is important to adequately complete MIDP. More detailed anatomic analyses and descriptions will benefit surgeons and their patients who are facing these operations.
Topics: Humans; Laparoscopy; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Splenic Artery; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33527704
DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.903 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2021Whether high or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is superior in surgery for rectal and sigmoid colon cancers remains controversial. Although several...
BACKGROUND
Whether high or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is superior in surgery for rectal and sigmoid colon cancers remains controversial. Although several meta-analyses have been conducted, the level of lymph node clearance was poorly defined. We performed a meta-analysis comparing high and low ligation of the IMA for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers, with emphasis on high dissection of the lymph node at the IMA root in all the included studies.
METHODS
PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched to identify relevant articles published until 2020. The patient's perioperative and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical software RevMan version 5.4.
RESULTS
A total of 17 studies, including four randomized controlled trials, published between 2011 and 2020 were selected. In total, 1,846 patients received low ligation of the IMA plus high dissection of lymph nodes (LL+HD), and 2,648 patients received high ligation of the IMA (HL). LL+HD was associated with low incidence of anastomotic leakage ( < 0.001), borderline long operative time ( = 0.06), and less yields of total lymph nodes ( = 0.03) but equivalent IMA root lymph nodes ( = 0.07); moreover, LL+HD exhibited non-inferior long-term oncological outcomes.
CONCLUSION
In comparison with HL, LL+HD was an effective and safe oncological procedure for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers. Therefore, to ligate the IMA below the level of the left colic artery with D3 high dissection for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers might be suggested once the surgeons are familiar with this technique.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
INPLASY.com, identifier 202190029.
PubMed: 34858855
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.774782 -
JTCVS Open Dec 2022Mesenteric malperfusion is a feared complication of aortic dissection, with high mortality. The purpose of this study was to systematically review in-hospital mortality...
OBJECTIVES
Mesenteric malperfusion is a feared complication of aortic dissection, with high mortality. The purpose of this study was to systematically review in-hospital mortality (IHM) of endovascular and surgical management of acute and chronic Stanford type B aortic dissections (TBAD) complicated by mesenteric malperfusion (MesMP).
METHODS
A systematic search of English language articles was conducted in relevant databases. Data on patient demographics, procedure details, and survival outcomes were collected. Reports were classified by type of intervention performed. Studies that failed to report patient-level outcomes based on specific intervention performed or IHM were excluded. Retrospective chart review of previously published data from a single institution was also performed to further identify cases of TBAD that were managed endovascularly. The Fisher exact test was performed to determine statistical significance.
RESULTS
In total, 37 articles were suitable for inclusion in this systematic review, which yielded 149 patients with a median age 55.0 years (interquartile range, 46.5-65 years) and 79% being male. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 12.8% (19/149) and was similar between endovascular and open surgical interventions (13% vs 11%, = .99). Among endovascular strategies, IHM was greater, although not statistically significant in the thoracic endovascular aortic repair group compared with the fenestration/stenting without thoracic endovascular aortic repair group (24% vs 11%, = .15).
CONCLUSIONS
Multiple strategies exist for the management of TBAD with MesMP; however, a majority of cases were managed endovascularly. Despite advances in therapies, mortality remains high at 13%.
PubMed: 36590716
DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.07.012 -
Annals of Coloproctology Aug 2020Anastomosis leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery is an embarrassing problem. It is associated with poor consequence. This review aims to summarize published evidence on... (Review)
Review
Anastomosis leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery is an embarrassing problem. It is associated with poor consequence. This review aims to summarize published evidence on prevention of AL after colorectal surgery and provide recommendations according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. We conducted bibliographic research on January 15, 2020, of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We retained meta-analysis, reviews, and randomized clinical trials. We concluded that mechanical bowel preparation did not reduce AL. It seems that oral antibiotic or oral antibiotic with mechanical bowel preparation could reduce the risk of AL. The surgical approach did not affect the AL rate. The low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery could reduce the AL rate. The mechanical anastomosis is superior to handsewn anastomosis only in case of right colectomies, with similar results in rectal surgery between the 2 anastomosis techniques. In the case of right colectomies, this anastomosis could be performed intracorporeally or extracorporeally with similar outcomes. The air leak test did not reduce AL. There is no interest of external drainage in colonic surgery but drains reduced the rate of AL and rate of reoperation after low anterior resection. The transanal tube reduced the rate of AL.
PubMed: 32919437
DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.05.14.2 -
Future Oncology (London, England) Sep 2021The level of ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is a critical factor that can influence outcomes. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare outcomes... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The level of ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is a critical factor that can influence outcomes. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare outcomes following high or low ligation of IMA. A systematic search was performed for relevant articles published between 2000 and 2020. Meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effects or random-effects models; 31 studies were included. Results show significantly lower rates of anastomotic leak, postoperative morbidity and urinary dysfunction with low ligation compared with high ligation. Though recurrence rates were similar, 5-year overall survival was longer in the low ligation group. Low ligation of IMA decreases anastomotic leak rates and overall morbidity. Addition of IMA nodal clearance to low ligation appears to improve overall survival in colorectal cancer.
Topics: Anastomotic Leak; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Ligation; Mesenteric Artery, Inferior; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34259582
DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0149 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Nov 2020Type II endoleaks are the most common type of endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and may cause late sac expansion and rupture. To prevent this,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Type II endoleaks are the most common type of endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and may cause late sac expansion and rupture. To prevent this, prophylactic embolization of aortic side branches has been suggested. The aim of this review was to assess the current evidence for this prophylactic treatment and its association with sac size enlargement as well as rate of and reintervention for type II endoleak.
METHODS
This was a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The MEDLINE and Scopus databases were used to search for related articles until March 2019. After screening, original studies reporting outcome comparing patients having prophylactic embolization with those undergoing EVAR without prophylactic embolization were included. An assessment of the quality of the included studies as well as data extraction was performed by two independent observers. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Center, Copenhagen, Denmark).
RESULTS
There were 3777 publications identified. After elimination of duplicate entries and review of titles and abstracts, 13 retrospective cohort studies including 1427 patients comparing prophylactic embolization with standard EVAR therapy were identified. No randomized trials were available. Five of these 13 studies reported sac growth, with a frequency of 7.4% (14/90) in the embolization group vs 13.4% in controls (odds ratio [OR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-1). The rate of type II endoleak was 18.5% (100/540) in the embolization group vs 38.6% in the control group (342/887; OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.26-0.44). Based on 10 studies, the rate of reintervention was 1.5% (7/468) in the embolization group vs 12.4% (80/646) in the control group (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.06-0.24). Nine of these 13 studies showed that technical success of inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar artery embolization was 82.3% and 69.1%, respectively. Regarding complications, 10 of 108 patients (9.3%) in one study reported nonspecific abdominal pain after embolization, and all resolved with overnight rehydration. Only one patient, who previously had right hemicolectomy, died after inferior mesenteric artery embolization of ischemic colitis.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that prophylactic aortic side branch embolization may be associated with lower rate of sac enlargement, incidence of type II endoleaks, and reinterventions. However, high-quality unbiased studies are lacking in this field, and this review and meta-analysis may be affected by selection bias and residual confounders remaining in the retrospective studies. To conclude whether prophylactic embolization should be routinely performed, a prospective, randomized trial is required.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Embolization, Therapeutic; Endoleak; Endovascular Procedures; Humans
PubMed: 32442608
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.020