-
European Journal of Pharmacology Oct 2020Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) is recommended for ejection fraction reduction in heart failure. However, studies comparing the effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) is recommended for ejection fraction reduction in heart failure. However, studies comparing the effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease (CKD) with the inhibitor of renal angiotensin system (RAS) are limited. To further demonstrate the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with both heart failure and CKD, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for RCTs. A total of 3460 individuals with heart failure and CKD were included in this meta-analysis. Sacubitril/valsartan was compared with irbesartan, valsartan and enalapril. It was found that sacubitril/valsartan significantly increased estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR, MD = 1.90, 95% CI (0.30, 3.50), P = 0.02]. However, sacubitril/valsartan had no difference in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio [UACR, MD = -0.30, 95% CI (-1.38, 0.78), P = 0.59] compared to the control group. Sacubitril/valsartan showed dramatically decrease in systolic blood pressure [SBP, MD = -4.39, 95% CI (-6.11, -2.68), P < 0.001], diastolic blood pressure [DBP, MD = -2.69, 95% CI (-4.04, -1.35), P < 0.001], and N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP, MD = -45.34, 95% CI (-46.63, -44.06), P < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between sacubitril/valsartan and the control group. Compared with the RAS inhibitor, sacubitril/valsartan significantly increased eGFR and decreased BP and NT-proBNP, which indicates that it might have cardiovascular and renal benefits in patients with heart failure and CKD.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Heart Failure; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Neprilysin; Protease Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan
PubMed: 32739172
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173444 -
Journal of Drugs in Dermatology : JDD Sep 2023Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) exhibits inhibitory effects on the neuromuscular junction, and its use is well established in cosmetic dermatology. Our review aims to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) exhibits inhibitory effects on the neuromuscular junction, and its use is well established in cosmetic dermatology. Our review aims to analyze the evidence for its use in the treatment of various dermatological, neurological, gastroenterological, ophthalmological, otorhinolaryngological, dental, urological, gynecological, and cardiovascular disorders.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was performed for studies published between 2012 and 2022 that discussed the therapeutic use of BoNT in human participants. A total of 58 studies were selected for inclusion in this review.
RESULTS
We discovered a large range of therapeutic applications of BoNT toxin beyond aesthetic and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved non-aesthetic uses.
CONCLUSIONS
BoNT is a powerful neurotoxin that has varied FDA-approved indications and has been studied in a wide range of therapeutic applications. Further investigation through higher power studies is needed to assess the potential of BoNT and expand its versatility across other medical specialties. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(9): doi:10.36849/JDD.7243e.
Topics: Humans; Botulinum Toxins; Cardiovascular Diseases; Esthetics; Neurotoxins; Ophthalmology; United States
PubMed: 37683072
DOI: 10.36849/JDD.7243e -
International Journal of Molecular... Oct 2023Recently, advances in molecular biology and bioinformatics have allowed a more thorough understanding of tumorigenesis in aggressive PitNETs (pituitary neuroendocrine... (Review)
Review
Recently, advances in molecular biology and bioinformatics have allowed a more thorough understanding of tumorigenesis in aggressive PitNETs (pituitary neuroendocrine tumors) through the identification of specific essential genes, crucial molecular pathways, regulators, and effects of the tumoral microenvironment. Target therapies have been developed to cure oncology patients refractory to traditional treatments, introducing the concept of precision medicine. Preliminary data on PitNETs are derived from preclinical studies conducted on cell cultures, animal models, and a few case reports or small case series. This study comprehensively reviews the principal pathways involved in aggressive PitNETs, describing the potential target therapies. A search was conducted on Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science for English papers published between 1 January 2004, and 15 June 2023. 254 were selected, and the topics related to aggressive PitNETs were recorded and discussed in detail: epigenetic aspects, membrane proteins and receptors, metalloprotease, molecular pathways, PPRK, and the immune microenvironment. A comprehensive comprehension of the molecular mechanisms linked to PitNETs' aggressiveness and invasiveness is crucial. Despite promising preliminary findings, additional research and clinical trials are necessary to confirm the indications and effectiveness of target therapies for PitNETs.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Pituitary Neoplasms; Pituitary Gland; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Aggression; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 37958702
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242115719 -
Biomolecules Apr 2023Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic condition determined by an altered collagen turnover of the extracellular matrix. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and... (Review)
Review
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic condition determined by an altered collagen turnover of the extracellular matrix. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors (TIMPs) are abnormally released in patients with HCM. The purpose of this systematic review was to thoroughly summarize and discuss the existing knowledge of MMPs profile in patients with HCM. All studies meeting the inclusion criteria (detailed data regarding MMPs in patients with HCM) were selected, after screening the literature from July 1975 to November 2022. Sixteen trials that enrolled a total of 892 participants were included. MMPs-particularly MMP2-levels were found higher in HCM patients compared to healthy subjects. MMPs were used as biomarkers after surgical and percutaneous treatments. Understanding the molecular processes that control the cardiac ECM's collagen turnover allows for a non-invasive evaluation of HCM patients through the monitoring of MMPs and TIMPs.
Topics: Humans; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Heart; Collagen; Matrix Metalloproteinases
PubMed: 37189412
DOI: 10.3390/biom13040665 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Nov 2023Minimally invasive techniques for treatment-resistant migraine have been developed on recent insights into the peripheral pathogenesis of migraines. Although there is a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Minimally invasive techniques for treatment-resistant migraine have been developed on recent insights into the peripheral pathogenesis of migraines. Although there is a growing body of evidence supporting these techniques, no study has yet compared the effects of these treatments on headache frequency, severity, duration, and cost.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify randomized placebo-controlled trials that compared radiofrequency ablation, botulinum toxin type A (BT-A), nerve block, neurostimulation, or migraine surgery to placebo for preventive treatment. Data on changes from baseline to follow-up in headache frequency, severity, duration, and quality of life were analyzed.
RESULTS
A total of 30 randomized controlled trials and 2680 patients were included. Compared with placebo, there was a significant decrease in headache frequency in patients with nerve block ( P = 0.04) and surgery ( P < 0.001). Headache severity decreased in all treatments. Duration of headaches was significantly reduced in the BT-A ( P < 0.001) and surgery cohorts ( P = 0.01). Quality of life improved significantly in patients with BT-A, nerve stimulator, and migraine surgery. Migraine surgery had the longest lasting effects (11.5 months) compared with nerve ablation (6 months), BT-A (3.2 months), and nerve block (11.9 days).
CONCLUSIONS
Migraine surgery is a cost-effective, long-term treatment to reduce headache frequency, severity, and duration without significant risk of complication. BT-A reduces headache severity and duration, but it is short-lasting and associated with greater adverse events and lifetime cost. Although efficacious, radiofrequency ablation and implanted nerve stimulators have high risks of adverse events and explantation, whereas benefits of nerve blocks are short in duration.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Migraine Disorders; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Headache; Nerve Block; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36940145
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010429 -
Toxins May 2023Some 14% of global prevalence, based on high-income country populations, suffers from migraine. Chronic migraine is very disabling, being characterized by at least 15... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Some 14% of global prevalence, based on high-income country populations, suffers from migraine. Chronic migraine is very disabling, being characterized by at least 15 headache days per month of which at least 8 days present the features of migraine. Onabotulinumtoxin A, targeting the machinery for exocytosis of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides, has been approved for use in chronic migraine since 2010. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraises the safety of onabotulinumtoxin A treatment for chronic migraine and the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in randomized, clinical studies in comparison with placebo or other comparators and preventative treatments according to the most updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 recommendations. The search retrieved 888 total records. Nine studies are included and seven were eligible for meta-analysis. The present study demonstrates that toxin produces more TRAEs than placebo, but less than oral topiramate, supporting the safety of onabotulinumtoxin A, and highlights the heterogeneity of the studies present in the literature (I = 96%; < 0.00001). This points to the need for further, adequately powered, randomized clinical trials assessing the safety of onabotulinumtoxin A in combination with the newest treatment options.
Topics: Humans; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Migraine Disorders; Headache
PubMed: 37235366
DOI: 10.3390/toxins15050332 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2023Infantile esotropia (IE) is the inward deviation of the eye. Various aspects of the clinical management of IE are unclear; mainly, the most effective type of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Infantile esotropia (IE) is the inward deviation of the eye. Various aspects of the clinical management of IE are unclear; mainly, the most effective type of intervention and the age at intervention.
OBJECTIVES
To examine the effectiveness and optimal timing of surgical and non-surgical treatment options for IE to improve ocular alignment and achieve or allow the development of binocular single vision.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, one other database, and three trials registers (November 2021). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized trials and quasi-randomized trials comparing any surgical or non-surgical intervention for IE.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methodology and graded the certainty of the body of evidence for six outcomes using the GRADE classification.
MAIN RESULTS
We included two studies with 234 children with IE. The first study enrolled 110 children (mean age 26.9 ± 14.5 months) with an onset of esotropia before six months of age, and large-angle IE defined as esotropia of ≥ 40 prism diopters. It was conducted between 2015 and 2018 in a tertiary care hospital in South Africa. It compared a maximum of three botulinum toxin injections with surgical intervention of bimedial rectus muscle recession, and children were followed for six months. There were limitations in study design and implementation; the risk of bias was high, or we had some concerns for most domains. Surgery may increase the incidence of treatment success, defined as orthophoria or residual esotropia of ≤ 10 prism diopters, compared with botulinum toxin injections, but the evidence was very uncertain (risk ratio (RR) of treatment success 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27 to 2.77; 1 study, 101 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The results should be read with caution because 23 children with > 60 prism diopters at baseline in the surgery arm also received botulinum toxin at the time of surgery to augment the recessions. There was no evidence of an important difference between surgery and botulinum toxin injections for over-correction (> 10 prism diopters) of deviation (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.37; 1 study, 101 participants; very low-certainty evidence), or additional interventions required (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.19; 1 study, 101 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No major complications of surgery were observed in the surgery arm, while children experienced various complications in the botulinum toxin arm, including partial transient ptosis in 9 (16.7%) children, transient vertical deviation in 3 (5.6%) children, and consecutive exotropia in 13 (24.1%) children. No other outcome data for our prespecified outcomes were reported. The second study enrolled 124 children with onset of esotropia before one year of age in 12 university hospitals in Germany and the Netherlands. It compared bilateral recession with unilateral recession surgeries, and followed children for three months postoperatively. Very low-certainty evidence suggested that there was no evidence of an important difference between bilateral and unilateral surgeries in the presence of binocular vision (numbers with event unclear, P = 0.35), and over-correction (RR of having exotropia 1.09, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.63; 1 study, 118 participants). Dissociated vertical deviation, latent nystagmus, or both were observed in 8% to 21% of participants.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Medial rectus recessions may increase the incidence of treatment success compared with botulinum toxin injections alone, but the evidence was very uncertain. No evidence of important difference was found between bilateral surgery and unilateral surgery. Due to insufficient evidence, it was not possible to resolve the controversies regarding type of surgery, non-surgical intervention, or age of intervention in this review. There is clearly a need to conduct good quality trials in these areas to improve the evidence base for the management of IE.
Topics: Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Botulinum Toxins; Esotropia; Exotropia; Strabismus; Treatment Outcome; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 36645238
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004917.pub4 -
Pain Physician Aug 2022Piriformis syndrome (PS) is a painful condition caused by entrapment of the sciatic nerve within the piriformis muscle. PS is typically unilateral and mainly occurs... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Piriformis syndrome (PS) is a painful condition caused by entrapment of the sciatic nerve within the piriformis muscle. PS is typically unilateral and mainly occurs related to entrapment of the sciatic nerve. Treatments include physiotherapy, analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs, behavioral modifications, injection therapy with local anesthetics (LAs) and steroids, epidural injection, botulinum toxin (BT) injection, and surgery.
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the efficacy of BT, LA, and corticosteroid (CS) injections in relieving pain in patients affected by PS.
STUDY DESIGN
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the "Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions" and the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses (PRISMA)" guidelines.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted through PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus through April 2021 for studies investigating the efficacy of BT, LA, or CS injection in improving pain in patients with PS. After screening retrieved studies, data were extracted from included studies and pooled. Overall results were reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Analysis was performed using RevMan software version 5.4.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were included in this systematic review, and 12 of them were included in the quantitative synthesis. The pain scores decreased significantly after treatment with BT (SMD = -2.00; 95% CI [-2.84, -1.16], P < 0.001), LA and CS (SMD = -4.34; 95% CI [-5.77, 2.90], P < 0.001), LA (SMD = -3.73; 95% CI [-6.47, -0.99], P = 0.008), CS (SMD = -2.78; 95% CI [-3.56, -2.00], P < 0.001), and placebo injection (SMD = -0.04; 95% CI [-0.07, -0.01], P = 0.002). BT injection was less effective than LA and CS together (P = 0.006), more effective than placebo (P = 0.001), and similar to LA (P = 0.24) and CS (P = 0.18), when injected alone.
LIMITATIONS
A wide variety of study designs were utilized to obtain the largest sample size available. Many of the included studies lack randomization, and some are retrospective in nature. These limitations may introduce bias into the analyzed data and affect the results. Many studies had a low sample size and are of moderate quality, limiting the generalizability of the results. Also, we could not conduct a direct meta-analysis due to the lack of sufficient double-arm studies comparing different types of injection therapies.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with PS, satisfactory pain improvement can be obtained by BT, LA plus CS, LA, or CS injection therapy. Injection of LA plus CS showed the best efficacy.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Anesthetics, Local; Botulinum Toxins; Humans; Piriformis Muscle Syndrome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35901473
DOI: No ID Found -
Biomolecules Jan 2023The role of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in routine cardiac operations including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is still poorly explored. The purpose of this... (Review)
Review
The role of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in routine cardiac operations including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is still poorly explored. The purpose of this systematic review was to thoroughly summarize and discuss the existing knowledge of the MMP profile in cardiac surgery. All studies meeting the inclusion criteria (i.e., those reporting detailed data about MMP release during and after CPB) were selected after screening the literature published between July 1975 and August 2022. Fifteen trials that enrolled a total of 431 participants were included. MMP levels were found to be significantly correlated with CPB in all included studies. The gelatinases MMP-2 and MMP-9 were highly released in cardiac surgery with CPB. MMP-9 levels were found to be increased after CPB start and during the duration of CPB. Particularly, it is overexpressed both in the myocardial tissue and circulating in the bloodstream. Also, MMP-2 levels increased after CPB both in plasma and in myocardial tissue. MMP-7, MMP-8, and MMP-13 levels increased after CPB start and remained elevated up to 6 h later. Increased levels of MMPs were associated with adverse post-operative outcomes. Conversely, TIMP-1 decreased with CPB. Mechanical and pharmacological strategies were applied in two studies to analyze their effect on the inflammatory response to cardiac surgery and CPB and on postoperative outcomes. New targeted MMP inhibitor therapies could protect against systemic inflammatory response syndrome after CPB and should be the subject of future large prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials.
Topics: Humans; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9; Matrix Metalloproteinase 2; Prospective Studies; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Myocardium; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 36671498
DOI: 10.3390/biom13010113 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2023The use of botulinum toxin as an investigative and treatment modality for strabismus is well reported in the medical literature. However, it is unclear how effective it... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The use of botulinum toxin as an investigative and treatment modality for strabismus is well reported in the medical literature. However, it is unclear how effective it is in comparison with other treatment options for strabismus.
OBJECTIVES
The primary objective was to examine the efficacy of botulinum toxin therapy in the treatment of strabismus compared with alternative conservative or surgical treatment options. This review sought to ascertain those types of strabismus that particularly benefit from the use of botulinum toxin as a treatment option (such as small angle strabismus or strabismus with binocular potential, i.e. the potential to use both eyes together as a pair). The secondary objectives were to investigate the dose effect and complication rates associated with botulinum toxin.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and three trials registers on 6 July 2022, together with reference checking to identify additional studies. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We planned to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing botulinum toxin with strabismus surgery, botulinum toxin alternatives (i.e. bupivacaine) and conservative therapy such as orthoptic exercises, prisms, or lens therapy for people of any age with strabismus. All relevant RCTs identified in this update compared botulinum toxin with strabismus surgery.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methods expected by Cochrane and assessed the certainty of the body of evidence using GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
We included four RCTs with 242 participants that enrolled adults with esotropia or exotropia, children with acquired esotropia, and children with infantile esotropia. The follow-up period ranged from six to 36 months. Two studies were conducted in Spain, and one each in Canada and South Africa. We judged the included studies to have a mixture of low, unclear and high risk of bias. We did not consider any of the included studies to be at low risk of bias for all domains. All four studies reported the proportion of participants who improved or corrected strabismus, defined as ≤ 10 prism diopters (PD) at six months (two studies) or ≤ 8 PD at one year (two studies). Low-certainty evidence suggested that participants treated with the surgery may be more likely to improve or correct strabismus compared with those who treated with botulinum toxin (risk ratio (RR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.99; I² = 50%; 4 studies, 242 participants; low-certainty evidence). One study, which enrolled 110 children with infantile esotropia, suggested that surgery may reduce the incidence of additional surgical intervention required, but the evidence was very uncertain (RR 3.05, 95% CI 1.34 to 6.91; 1 study, 101 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Two studies conducted in Spain compared botulinum toxin with surgery in children who required retreatment for acquired or infantile esotropia. These two studies provided low-certainty evidence that botulinum toxin may have little to no effect on achieving sensory fusion (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.23; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 102 participants) and stereopsis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.25; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 102 participants) compared with surgery. Three studies reported non-serious adverse events. Partial transient ptosis (range 16.7% to 37.0%) and transient vertical deviation (range 5.6% to 18.5%) were observed among participants treated with botulinum toxin in three studies. In one study, 44.7% participants in the surgery group experienced discomfort. No studies reported serious adverse events or postintervention quality of life.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
It remains unclear whether botulinum toxin may be an alternative to strabismus surgery as an independent treatment modality among certain types of strabismus because we found only low and very low-certainty evidence in this review update. Low-certainty evidence suggests that strabismus surgery may be preferable to botulinum toxin injection to improve or correct strabismus when types of strabismus and different age groups are combined. We found low-certainty evidence suggesting botulinum toxin may have little to no effect on achievement of binocular single vision compared with surgery in children with acquired or infantile esotropia. We did not find sufficient evidence to draw any meaningful conclusions with respect to need for additional surgery, quality of life, and serious adverse events. We identified three ongoing trials comparing botulinum toxin with conventional surgeries in the varying types of strabismus, whose results will provide relevant evidence for our stated objectives. Future trials should be rigorously designed, and investigators should analyze outcome data appropriately and report adequate information to provide evidence of high certainty. Quality of life and cost-effectiveness should be examined in addition to clinical and safety outcomes.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Botulinum Toxins; Esotropia; Strabismus; Canada
PubMed: 36916692
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006499.pub5