-
Genes May 2023Skeletal dysplasias are a group of diseases characterized by bone and joint abnormalities, which can be detected during prenatal ultrasound. Next-generation sequencing... (Review)
Review
Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in Fetuses with Sonographic Features of Skeletal Dysplasias but Normal Karyotype or Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: A Systematic Review.
Skeletal dysplasias are a group of diseases characterized by bone and joint abnormalities, which can be detected during prenatal ultrasound. Next-generation sequencing has rapidly revolutionized molecular diagnostic approaches in fetuses with structural anomalies. This review studies the additional diagnostic yield of prenatal exome sequencing in fetuses with prenatal sonographic features of skeletal dysplasias. This was a systematic review by searching PubMed for studies published between 2013 and July 2022 that identified the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing after normal karyotype or chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for cases with suspected fetal skeletal dysplasias based on prenatal ultrasound. We identified 10 out of 85 studies representing 226 fetuses. The pooled additional diagnostic yield was 69.0%. The majority of the molecular diagnoses involved de novo variants (72%), while 8.7% of cases were due to inherited variants. The incremental diagnostic yield of exome sequencing over CMA was 67.4% for isolated short long bones and 77.2% for non-isolated cases. Among phenotypic subgroup analyses, features with the highest additional diagnostic yield were an abnormal skull (83.3%) and a small chest (82.5%). Prenatal exome sequencing should be considered for cases with suspected fetal skeletal dysplasias with or without a negative karyotype or CMA results. Certain sonographic features, including an abnormal skull and small chest, may indicate a potentially higher diagnostic yield.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Prenatal Diagnosis; Exome Sequencing; Microarray Analysis; Fetus; Osteochondrodysplasias; Karyotype
PubMed: 37372383
DOI: 10.3390/genes14061203 -
International Journal of Surgery... Jan 2020Advanced colorectal has poor survival and are difficult to treat. Therefore, there is an urgent need for biomarkers to diagnose this cancer at earlier manageable stages.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Advanced colorectal has poor survival and are difficult to treat. Therefore, there is an urgent need for biomarkers to diagnose this cancer at earlier manageable stages. Micro-RNAs (miRNAs) are amongst the most significant biomarkers that have shown promise in improving management and early detection of different types of cancers. However, since MiRNAs are non-coding, the main limitation of using them as biomarkers is that they do not have associated phenotype and therefore difficult to validate using other techniques. This makes it difficult to understand the mechanism of miRNA is disease initiation and progression, therefore any methodology that can provide semantics to miRNA expression would enhance the understanding of the role of miRNA in disease.
METHODS
Here we report an integrative meta-analysis and bioinformatics methodology that showed microRNA-21 and its associated target mRNA to be the most significant predictive biomarkers for colorectal adenoma and adenocarcinoma. After drawing key inferences by meta-analysis, the authors then developed a bioinformatics method to identify mir-21 gene targeting in a specific tissue using two different bioinformatics approaches; absolute GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) and LIMMA (Linear Models for MicroArray data) to identify differentially expressed genes of miRNA-21.
RESULTS
Results from GSEA intersection with mir-21 gene targets was a subset of longer gene list that was obtained from the GEO2R intersect. In our study, both of longer GEO2R gene target list and the more focused GSEA list established the fact that mir-21 target numerous functional pathways that are mostly interconnected. Our three steps bioinformatics approach identified ABCB1, HPGD, BCL2, TIAM1, TLR3, and PDCD4 as common targets for mir-21 in both of adenoma as well as adenocarcinoma suggesting they are biomarkers for early CRC.
CONCLUSIONS
The approach in this study proposed combining the big data from the scientific literature together with novel bioinformatics to bring about a methodology that can be used to first identify which microRNAs are involved in a specific disease, and then to identify a panel of biomarkers derived from the microRNAs target genes, and from these target genes the functional significance of these microRNAs can be inferred providing better clinical value for the surgeon.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenoma; Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins; Biomarkers, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; Computational Biology; Early Detection of Cancer; Humans; MicroRNAs; RNA-Binding Proteins
PubMed: 31756546
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.017 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Oct 2021To determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES), a microarray analysis was carried out of fetuses with recurrent fetal structural anomalies (with similar... (Review)
Review
To determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES), a microarray analysis was carried out of fetuses with recurrent fetal structural anomalies (with similar anomalies in consecutive pregnancies). This is a systematic review conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The selected studies describing ES in fetuses with recurrent fetal malformation were assessed using the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) criteria for risk of bias. Incidence was used as the pooled effect size by single-proportion analysis using random-effects modeling (weighted by inverse of variance). We identified nine studies on ES diagnostic yield that included 140 fetuses with recurrent structural anomalies. A pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was found in 57 fetuses, resulting in a 40% (95%CI: 26% to 54%) incremental performance pool of ES. As expected, the vast majority (86%: 36/42) of the newly identified diseases had a recessive inheritance pattern, and among these, 42% (15/36) of variants were found in homozygosity. Meckel syndrome was the monogenic disease most frequently found, although the genes involved were diverse. The ES diagnostic yield in pregnancies with recurrent fetal structural anomalies was 40% (57/140). Homozygous disease-causing variants were found in 36% (15/57) of the newly identified monogenic disorders.
PubMed: 34682862
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204739 -
Prenatal Diagnosis Mar 2020To evaluate the test accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal trisomy 21, 18, and 13 using cell-free (cf) DNA analysis in maternal plasma with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the test accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal trisomy 21, 18, and 13 using cell-free (cf) DNA analysis in maternal plasma with microarray quantitation.
METHOD
Systematic review and meta-analysis. Searches in MEDLINE, Pre-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to 09.07.2018.
RESULTS
Five studies analyzing 3074 samples, including 187 trisomy 21, 43 trisomy 18, and 19 trisomy 13 cases, were identified. Risk of bias was high in all studies, introduced particularly by exclusions from analysis and by the role of the sponsor. Sensitivity of microarray-based cfDNA testing was 99.5% (95%CI 96.3%-99.9%) for trisomy 21, 97.7% (95%CI 87.9%-99.6%) for trisomy 18, and 100% (95%CI 83.2%-100%) for trisomy 13. Specificity was 100% (95% CI 99.87%-100%) for trisomy 21, 99.97% (95%CI 99.81%-99.99%) for trisomy 18, and 99.97% (95%CI 99.81%-99.99%) for trisomy 13. Pooled test failure rate was 1.1%. A direct comparison of microarray- and sequencing-based cfDNA found equivalent test accuracy.
CONCLUSION
Included studies suggest that NIPT using microarray-based cfDNA testing has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting fetal trisomy 21, 18, and 13. However, the evidence base is small and at high risk of bias.
Topics: Cell-Free Nucleic Acids; Down Syndrome; Female; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Microarray Analysis; Noninvasive Prenatal Testing; Pregnancy; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Trisomy 13 Syndrome; Trisomy 18 Syndrome
PubMed: 31834626
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5621 -
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Jun 2022To determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) above that of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or karyotyping in fetuses with multisystem structural... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) above that of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or karyotyping in fetuses with multisystem structural anomalies (at least two major anomalies in different anatomical systems).
METHOD
This was a systematic review conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searching PubMed, Web of Knowledge and Cochrane database, we identified studies describing ES, whole-genome and/or next-generation sequencing in fetuses with multisystem malformations. Included were observational studies involving five or more eligible fetuses. A fetus was eligible for inclusion if it had at least two major anomalies of different anatomical systems and a negative CMA or karyotyping result. Only positive variants classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic determined to be causative of the fetal phenotype were considered. A negative CMA or karyotype result was treated as the reference standard. The diagnostic yield of the primary outcome was calculated by single-proportion analysis using random-effects modeling. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic yield of the solo approach (fetus alone sequenced) with that of the trio approach (fetus and both parents sequenced).
RESULTS
Seventeen articles with data on ES diagnostic yield, including 694 individuals with multisystem malformations, were identified. Overall, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant potentially causative of the fetal phenotype was found in 213 fetuses, giving a 33% (95% CI, 27-40%) incremental yield of ES. A stratified analysis showed similar diagnostic yields of ES using the solo approach (30%; 95% CI, 11-52%) and the trio approach (35%; 95% CI, 26-44%).
CONCLUSIONS
ES applied in fetuses with multisystem structural anomalies was able to identify a potentially causative gene when CMA or karyotyping had failed to do so in an additional one-third of cases. No differences were observed between the solo and trio approaches for ES. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Topics: Exome; Female; Fetus; Humans; Karyotyping; Pregnancy; Prenatal Diagnosis; Exome Sequencing
PubMed: 35041238
DOI: 10.1002/uog.24862 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Feb 2022Fetal malformations occur in 2-3% of pregnancies. They require invasive procedures for cytogenetics and molecular testing. "Structural anomalies" include non-transient... (Review)
Review
Fetal malformations occur in 2-3% of pregnancies. They require invasive procedures for cytogenetics and molecular testing. "Structural anomalies" include non-transient anatomic alterations. "Soft markers" are often transient minor ultrasound findings. Anomalies not fitting these definitions are categorized as "dynamic". This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in fetuses undergoing molecular testing (chromosomal microarray (CMA), exome sequencing (ES), genome sequencing (WGS)) due to ultrasound findings. The CMA diagnostic yield was 2.15% in single soft markers (vs. 0.79% baseline risk), 3.44% in multiple soft markers, 3.66% in single structural anomalies and 8.57% in multiple structural anomalies. Rates for specific subcategories vary significantly. ES showed a diagnostic rate of 19.47%, reaching 27.47% in multiple structural anomalies. WGS data did not allow meta-analysis. In fetal structural anomalies, CMA is a first-tier test, but should be integrated with karyotype and parental segregations. In this class of fetuses, ES presents a very high incremental yield, with a significant VUSs burden, so we encourage its use in selected cases. Soft markers present heterogeneous CMA results from each other, some of them with risks comparable to structural anomalies, and would benefit from molecular analysis. The diagnostic rate of multiple soft markers poses a solid indication to CMA.
PubMed: 35328129
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030575 -
Experimental Biology and Medicine... Jan 2020Association between microRNA (miRNA) expression signatures and atrial fibrillation has been evaluated with inconsistent findings in different studies. This study aims to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
UNLABELLED
Association between microRNA (miRNA) expression signatures and atrial fibrillation has been evaluated with inconsistent findings in different studies. This study aims to identify miRNAs that actually play vital role in pathophysiological process of atrial fibrillation and explore miRNA-targeted genes and the involved pathways. Relevant studies were retrieved from the electronic databases of Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library to determine the miRNA expression profiles between atrial fibrillation subjects and non-atrial fibrillation controls. Robustness of results was assessed using sensitivity analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed based on species, miRNA detection method, sample source, and ethnicity. Quality assessment of studies was independently conducted according to QUADAS-2. Bioinformatics analysis was applied to explore the potential genes and pathways associated with atrial fibrillation, which were targeted by differentially expressed miRNAs. Form of pooled results was shown as log10 odds ratios (logORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and random-effects model was used. In total, 40 articles involving 283 differentially expressed miRNAs were reported. And 51 significantly dysregulated miRNAs were identified in consistent direction, with 22 upregulated and 29 downregulated. Among above-mentioned miRNAs, miR-223-3p (logOR 6.473; P < 0.001) was the most upregulated, while miR-1-5p (logOR 7.290; P < 0.001) was the most downregulated. Subgroup analysis confirmed 53 significantly dysregulated miRNAs (21 upregulated and 32 downregulated) in cardiac tissue, with miRNA-1-5p and miRNA-223-3p being the most upregulated and downregulated miRNAs, respectively. Additionally, miR-328 and miR-1-5p were highly blood-specific, and miR-133 was animal-specific. In the detection method sub-groups, miRNA-29b and miRNA-223-3p were differentially expressed consistently. Four miRNAs, including miRNA-223-3p, miRNA-21, miRNA-328, and miRNA-1-5p, were consistently dysregulated in both Asian and non-Asian. Results of sensitivity analysis showed that 47 out of 51 (92.16%) miRNAs were dysregulated consistently. Totally, 51 consistently dysregulated miRNAs associated with atrial fibrillation were confirmed in this study. Five important miRNAs, including miR-29b, miR-328, miR-1-5p, miR-21, and miR-223-3p may act as potential biomarkers for atrial fibrillation.
IMPACT STATEMENT
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is considered as the most common arrhythmia, and it subsequently causes serious complications including thrombosis and heart failure that increase the social burden. The definite mechanisms underlying AF pathogenesis remain complicated and unclear. Many studies attempted to discover the transcriptomic changes using microarray technologies, and the present studies for this hot topic have assessed individual miRNAs profiles for AF. However, results of different articles are controversial and not each reported miRNA is actually associated with the pathogenesis of AF. The present systematic review and meta-analysis identified that 51 consistently dysregulated miRNAs were associated with AF. Of these miRNAs, five miRNAs (miRNA-1-5p, miRNA-328, miRNA-29b, miRNA-21, and miRNA-223-3p) may act as novel biomarkers for AF. The findings could offer a better description of the biological characteristics of miRNAs, meanwhile might serve as new target for the intervention and monitoring AF in future studies.
Topics: Animals; Atrial Fibrillation; Computational Biology; Down-Regulation; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Expression Regulation; Gene Regulatory Networks; Humans; MicroRNAs; Up-Regulation
PubMed: 31766887
DOI: 10.1177/1535370219890303 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Dec 2022Fetal Nuchal fluid collections can manifest with two distinct presentations attributable to the same phenotypic spectrum: increased nuchal translucency (iNT) and cystic... (Review)
Review
A Pain in the Neck: Lessons Learnt from Genetic Testing in Fetuses Detected with Nuchal Fluid Collections, Increased Nuchal Translucency versus Cystic Hygroma-Systematic Review of the Literature, Meta-Analysis and Case Series.
Fetal Nuchal fluid collections can manifest with two distinct presentations attributable to the same phenotypic spectrum: increased nuchal translucency (iNT) and cystic hygroma. The prenatal detection of these findings should prompt an accurate assessment through genetic counseling and testing, including karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and multigene RASopathy panel. We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, to calculate diagnostic yields of genetic testing in fetuses with iNT and cystic hygroma. We compared the results with a cohort of 96 fetuses with these isolated findings. Fetuses with isolated NT ≥ 2.5 mm showed karyotype anomalies in 22.76% of cases and CMA presented an incremental detection rate of 2.35%. Fetuses with isolated NT ≥ 3 mm presented aneuploidies in 14.36% of cases and CMA had an incremental detection rate of 3.89%. When the isolated NT measured at least 3.5 mm the diagnostic yield of karyotyping was 34.35%, the incremental CMA detection rate was 4.1%, the incremental diagnostic rate of the RASopathy panel was 1.44% and it was 2.44% for exome sequencing. Interestingly, CMA presents a considerable diagnostic yield in the group of fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Similarly, exome sequencing appears to show promising results and could be considered after a negative CMA result.
PubMed: 36611340
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010048 -
Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Apr 2022The introduction of massive parallel sequencing has contributed to a decline in sequencing costs. In recent years, whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Incremental net benefit of whole genome sequencing for newborns and children with suspected genetic disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-effectiveness evidence.
BACKGROUND
The introduction of massive parallel sequencing has contributed to a decline in sequencing costs. In recent years, whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) have been increasingly adopted for diagnostic purposes in individuals with suspected genetic diseases. However, a debate is still ongoing in the scientific community about the superiority of WGS over WES in terms of cost-effectiveness. The aim of this study is to assess whether WGS, for the pediatric population with suspected genetic disorders, is cost-effective with respect to WES and chromosomal microarray (CMA) by pooling incremental net benefits.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus from 2015 to 2021. The dominance ranking matrix (DRM) tool was adopted to provide a qualitative synthesis of all the included studies. Incremental net benefits (INBs) were estimated and meta-analysis was implemented to pool INBs across studies.
RESULTS
The database search identified 1600 publications of which four articles were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The pooled INB of WGS over WES was estimated at I$4073 (95% CI I$2426 - I$5720). The pooled INB of WGS over CMA amounted to I$6003 (95% CI I$2863 - I$9143).
CONCLUSIONS
WGS could be cost-effective in the diagnostic workup of affected infants and children. Further economic evaluations however are needed for comparing WGS versus WES and confirm the present conclusions.
Topics: Child; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Exome Sequencing; Whole Genome Sequencing
PubMed: 35317923
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.03.001 -
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Jan 2022To determine the diagnostic yield of exome or genome sequencing (ES/GS) over chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To determine the diagnostic yield of exome or genome sequencing (ES/GS) over chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT) and no concomitant anomalies.
METHODS
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies describing ES/GS in fetuses with isolated increased NT. Inclusion criteria were: (1) study written in English; (2) more than two fetuses with increased NT > 99 percentile and no concomitant anomalies; and (3) a negative CMA result considered as the reference standard. Only positive variants identified on ES/GS that were classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic and determined to be causative of the fetal phenotype were considered. Risk was assessed as the pooled effect size by single-proportion analysis using random-effects modeling (weighted by inverse of variance).
RESULTS
Eleven studies reporting on the diagnostic yield of ES/GS in fetuses with isolated increased NT > 99 percentile were identified and included 309 cases. All studies were high quality according to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Overall, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was identified on ES/GS in 15 fetuses, resulting in a pooled incremental yield of 4% (95% CI, 2-6%). Six (40%) of these fetuses had NT of 5 mm or more. The observed inheritance pattern was autosomal dominant in 12 cases, including four fetuses with Noonan syndrome, autosomal recessive in two cases and X-linked in one case.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a 4% incremental diagnostic yield of ES/GS over CMA in fetuses with increased NT > 99 percentile without a concomitant anomaly. It is unclear whether a NT cut-off higher than 3.5 mm may be more useful in case selection for ES/GS. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Topics: Female; Fetus; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Microarray Analysis; Nuchal Translucency Measurement; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Prenatal Diagnosis; Reference Values
PubMed: 34309942
DOI: 10.1002/uog.23746