-
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2024Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) can be non-functional or functional, e.g. insulinoma and glucagonoma. The majority of PNETs are sporadic,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) can be non-functional or functional, e.g. insulinoma and glucagonoma. The majority of PNETs are sporadic, but PNETs also occur in hereditary syndromes, primarily multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). The Knudson hypothesis stated a second, somatic hit in as the cause of PNETs of MEN1 syndrome. In the recent years, reports on genetic somatic events in both sporadic and hereditary PNETs have emerged, providing a basis for a more detailed molecular understanding of the pathophysiology. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we made a collation and statistical analysis of aggregated frequent genetic alterations and potential driver events in human grade G1/G2 PNETs.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines of 2020. A search in Pubmed for published studies using whole exome, whole genome, or targeted gene panel (+400 genes) sequencing of human G1/G2 PNETs was conducted at the 25 of September 2023. Fourteen datasets from published studies were included with data on 221 patients and 225 G1/G2 PNETs, which were divided into sporadic tumors, and hereditary tumors with pre-disposing germline variants, and tumors with unknown germline status. Further, non-functioning and functioning PNETs were distinguished into two groups for pathway evaluation. The collated genetical analyses were conducted using the 'maftools' R-package.
RESULTS
Sporadic PNETs accounted 72.0% (162/225), hereditary PNETs 13.3% (30/225), unknown germline status 14.7% (33/225). The most frequently altered gene was , with somatic variants and copy number variations in overall 42% (95/225); hereditary PNETs (germline variations in , , , , , , and/or ) 57% (16/30); sporadic PNETs 36% (58/162); unknown germline status 64% (21/33). The point mutations/indels were distributed throughout . Overall, (16%, 37/225) and -variants (12%, 27/225) were also abundant with missense mutations clustered in mutational hotspots associated with histone binding, and translocase activity, respectively. mutations occurred more frequently in PNETs with mutations, p<0.05. While functioning PNETs shared few variated genes, non-functioning PNETs had more recurrent variations in genes associated with the Phosphoinositide 3-kinase, Wnt, NOTCH, and Receptor Tyrosine Kinase-Ras signaling onco-pathways.
DISCUSSION
The somatic genetic alterations in G1/G2 PNETs are diverse, but with distinct differences between sporadic vs. hereditary, and functional vs. non-functional PNETs. Increased understanding of the genetic alterations may lead to identification of more drivers and driver hotspots in the tumorigenesis in well-differentiated PNETs, potentially giving a basis for the identification of new drug targets. (Funded by Novo Nordisk Foundation, grant number NNF19OC0057915).
Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Mutation
PubMed: 38868744
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1351624 -
Endocrine-related Cancer Jun 2020Metastatic duodenopancreatic neuro-endocrine tumors (dpNETs) are the most important disease-related cause of death in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1...
Metastatic duodenopancreatic neuro-endocrine tumors (dpNETs) are the most important disease-related cause of death in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Nonfunctioning pNETs (NF-pNETs) are highly prevalent in MEN1 and clinically heterogeneous. Therefore, management is controversial. Data on prognostic factors for risk stratification are limited. This systematic review aims to establish the current state of evidence regarding prognostic factors in MEN1-related NF-pNETs. We systematically searched four databases for studies assessing prognostic value of any factor on NF-pNET progression, development of distant metastases, and/or overall survival. In- and exclusion, critical appraisal and data-extraction were performed independently by two authors according to pre-defined criteria. Thirteen studies (370 unique patients) were included. Prognostic factors investigated were tumor size, timing of surgical resection, WHO grade, methylation, p27/p18 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC), ARX/PDX1 IHC and alternative lengthening of telomeres. Results were complemented with evidence from studies in MEN1-related pNET for which data could not be separately extracted for NF-pNET and data from sporadic NF-pNET. We found that the most important prognostic factors used in clinical decision making in MEN1-related NF-pNETs are tumor size and grade. NF-pNETs <2 cm may be managed with watchful waiting, while surgical resection is advised for NF-pNETs ≥2 cm. Grade 2 NF-pNETs should be considered high risk. The most promising and MEN1-relevant avenues of prognostic research are multi-analyte circulating biomarkers, tissue-based molecular factors and imaging-based prognostication. Multi-institutional collaboration between clinical, translation and basic scientists with uniform data and biospecimen collection in prospective cohorts should advance the field.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1; Prognosis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32229700
DOI: 10.1530/ERC-19-0372 -
Annales D'endocrinologie Aug 2023
Topics: Humans; Astrocytoma; Brain Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Pituitary Gland; Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1; Male; Adolescent
PubMed: 37169283
DOI: 10.1016/j.ando.2023.04.004 -
JAMA Otolaryngology-- Head & Neck... Aug 2019Identifying parathyroid glands correctly before a surgical procedure is essential to perform minimally invasive surgery. First-line tests with discordant or negative...
IMPORTANCE
Identifying parathyroid glands correctly before a surgical procedure is essential to perform minimally invasive surgery. First-line tests with discordant or negative results underscore the need for more accurate imaging tests, thus decreasing the requirement for bilateral neck exploration or reintervention.
OBJECTIVE
To review the available evidence to determine positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity in clinical cases in which 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) could be useful as a method to locate the lesions, and the benefits and controversial aspects of the method.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
A search was conducted using the PubMed Central and Cochrane Library databases for studies published in English from July 26, 2014, to November 30, 2018, using the search terms 18 choline, 18F choline, 18F-choline, 18 fluorocholine PET CT, hyperparathyroidism, primary hyperparathyroidism, secondary hyperparathyroidism, tertiary hyperparathyroidism, persistent hyperparathyroidism, recurrent hyperparathyroidism, ectopic hyperparathyroidism, and parathyroid adenoma. Other inclusion criteria were reporting at least 1 of the following measurements: negative or positive predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity of 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in the diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism (HPT). Exclusion criteria were language other than English, use of a tracer other than 18F-fluorocholine, reports of a single case, and studies not related to HPT. The Oxford Centre classifications for levels of evidence were used.
FINDINGS
Sixteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 619 patients. Selected studies included 10 prospective cohort studies, 5 retrospective cohort studies, and 1 case series. Of the subtypes of HPT diagnosed using 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT, 579 were primary HPT, 22 were secondary HPT, 1 was tertiary HPT, and 7 were associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I. Pathologically, the neoplasms comprised 459 adenomas, 59 hyperplasia, and 19 double adenomas.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
18F-fluorcholine PET/CT may be indicated when results of first-line tests are negative or discordant and in challenging clinical situations where locating the source of HPT is difficult.
PubMed: 31145436
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.0574