-
Medicine Oct 2023Myasthenia Gravis (MG), a chronic neuromuscular junction disorder, emerged as one of the serious side effects of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. We...
BACKGROUNDS
Myasthenia Gravis (MG), a chronic neuromuscular junction disorder, emerged as one of the serious side effects of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. We aimed to summarize the findings of studies on the clinical features and outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination-associated MG.
METHODS
We performed a systematic search on 3 databases, Medline, Embase, and Scopus, using the query "COVID-19 vaccine" and "Myasthenia Gravis." Patients' data, including clinical data, MG subtype, vaccine type, and vaccine dose number, were extracted from the eligible studies.
RESULTS
A total of 20 COVID-19 vaccination-related MGs have been reported worldwide. The median (interquartile range) age was 64 (51, 75) years; 85% (17/20) of them were male, and 70% (14/20) of patients had received messenger RNA-based vaccines. The most common symptoms, in order of frequency, were binocular diplopia (8/11) and ptosis (4/11); the median (interquartile range) time from vaccine to MG symptoms was 6 (2, 7.5) days. Repetitive nerve stimulation showed abnormal decrement in 85% (11/13) of patients, and all 4 patients getting single-fiber electromyography showed an abnormal finding. Nine out of twelve patients with data on clinical outcomes experienced partial/complete improvement of symptoms within 1 month.
CONCLUSION
MG cases after the COVID-19 vaccine are more likely to occur among males and adults older than 50 years. Our pooled cohort data suggest MG symptoms appear within 2 weeks after receiving the vaccine. The presenting symptoms in MG cases associated with COVID-19 vaccine are possibly similar to non-vaccination related MGs. Most patients are expected to experience partial/complete improvement within 1 month.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Male; Female; COVID-19 Vaccines; COVID-19; Myasthenia Gravis; Diplopia; Vaccines; Vaccination
PubMed: 37800781
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034890 -
Seminars in Ophthalmology Nov 2023Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune condition affecting the neuromuscular junction of skeletal muscles and may be difficult to diagnose. Several clinical signs may have... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune condition affecting the neuromuscular junction of skeletal muscles and may be difficult to diagnose. Several clinical signs may have diagnostic utility, including Cogan's lid twitch. This systematic review aims to synthesise the literature on the accuracy of Cogan's lid twitch for diagnosing myasthenia gravis.
METHODS
A systematic search of the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL was performed from inception to August 2022. Risk of bias analysis and data extraction were performed in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
RESULTS
Seven articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. The results showed that for the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis, Cogan's lid twitch has a sensitivity between 50% and 99% and specificity between 75% and 100%.
CONCLUSIONS
Cogan's lid twitch is a physical examination finding with moderate diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis with ocular involvement. Future studies may seek to evaluate the performance of Cogan's lid twitch in conjunction with other signs of myasthenia gravis with ocular involvements, such as fatigable ptosis or a positive icepack test.
Topics: Humans; Myasthenia Gravis; Blepharoptosis
PubMed: 37166275
DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2211134 -
Journal of Neurology May 2024Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease that causes local or generalized muscle weakness. Complement inhibitors and targeting of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease that causes local or generalized muscle weakness. Complement inhibitors and targeting of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) to block IgG cycling are two novel and successful mechanisms.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before May 18, 2023. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to assess the data.
RESULTS
We pooled 532 participants from six randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Compared to the placebo, the FcRn inhibitors were more efficacy in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) (MD = - 1.69 [- 2.35, - 1.03], P < 0.00001), MG-ADL responder (RR = 2.01 [1.62, 2.48], P < 0.00001), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) (MD = - 2.45 [- 4.35, - 0.55], P = 0.01), Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) (MD = - 2.97 [- 4.27, - 1.67], P < 0.00001), 15-item revised version of the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MGQoL15r) (MD = - 2.52 [- 3.54, - 1.50], P < 0.00001), without increasing the risk of safety. The subgroup analysis showed that efgartigimod was more effective than placebo in MG-ADL responders. Rozanolixizumab was more effective than the placebo except in QMG, and batoclimab was more effective than the placebo except in MG-ADL responder. Nipocalizumab did not show satisfactory efficacy in all outcomes. With the exception of rozanolixizumab, all drugs showed non-inferior safety profiles to placebo.
CONCLUSION
FcRn inhibitors have good efficacy and safety in patients with MG. Among them, efgartigimod and nipocalimab were effective without causing an increased safety risk. Rozanolixizumab, despite its superior efficacy, caused an increased incidence of adverse events. Current evidence does not suggest that nipocalimab is effective in patients with MG.
Topics: Myasthenia Gravis; Humans; Receptors, Fc; Histocompatibility Antigens Class I; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Outcome Assessment, Health Care
PubMed: 38431900
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12247-x -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023A series of clinical trials support the effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies for generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) compared to the placebo, but the priority among... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
A series of clinical trials support the effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies for generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) compared to the placebo, but the priority among drugs remains unclear. Therefore, we conduct a frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the relative effects of different drugs for generalized MG.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched for eligible studies up to 1 June 2023. The primary outcome was efficacy (Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living [MG-ADL] score and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis [QMG] score) and safety (adverse events [AEs]). Mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) with their 95% credible intervals (95%CrIs) were used to show the effect size of continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies involving 1167 individuals were identified for NMA. For efficacy outcomes, belimumab, efgartigimod, mezagitamab 600mg, and nipocalimab 60mg/kg were inferior to rozanolixzumab 7mg/kg (MD ranged from 2 to 3.69) and rozanolixzumab 10mg/kg (MD ranged from 2.04 to 3.72) in MG-ADL score, and rozanolixzumab had the highest rank probability (83%) according to the subjective surface under the curve ranking area (SUCRA). For QMG score, batoclimab 340mg (MD ranged from 4.32 to 8.52) and batoclimab 680mg (MD ranged from 4.11 to 9.31) were more effective than placebo and other monoclonal antibodies except for rozanolixzumab, with the highest SUCRA value (93% and 97% respectively). For safety outcomes, belimumab achieved the highest SUCRA value (89.8%) with significant statistical difference compared to rozanolixzumab 7mg/kg (RR 0.08, 95%CrI 0.01 to 0.94) and rozanolixzumab 10mg/kg (RR 0.08, 95%CrI 0.01 to 0.86).
CONCLUSION
While all monoclonal antibodies were superior to the placebo, rozanolixzumab and batoclimab might be the most effective for generalized MG. However, rozanolixzumab was associated with higher incidence of AEs. Given the limitations inherent in indirect comparisons, further head-to-head and extensive observational studies are necessary to confirm our findings.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://inplasy.com/?s=202370112, identifier 202370112.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Activities of Daily Living; Bayes Theorem; Myasthenia Gravis
PubMed: 38022544
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1280226 -
Neurology International Sep 2023The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to determine differences in cardiovascular autonomic parameters between patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) and... (Review)
Review
The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to determine differences in cardiovascular autonomic parameters between patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) and healthy controls (HCs). Two reviewers searched four electronic databases, namely PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and SCOPUS, from database inception to 7 July 2023 for studies investigating cardiovascular autonomic parameters in MG vs. HCs. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compute Hedges' g ± 95% confidence intervals (CI). Out of a total of 2200 records, 8 observational studies with a sample size of 301 patients with MG and 454 HCs were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis revealed lower values of expiration/inspiration ratio (g = -0.45, I = 74.7), baroreflex sensitivity (g = -0.56, 95%CI -0.80, -0.33; I = 0.3), percentage of adjacent NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms (g = -1.2, I = 82.8), square root of the mean of squared differences between successive beat intervals (g = -1.94, I = 95.1), mean of the standard deviations of all NN intervals (g = -0.83, 95%CI -1.37, -0.28; I = 55.5), and high frequency of HRV during tilt (g = -0.75, 95%CI -0.11, -0.39; I = 0). MG patients vs. HCs had higher systolic blood pressure (g = 0.39; I = 56.1), sympathovagal balance at rest/during tilt (LF/HF-RRI, g = 0.44; I = 0; LF/HF-RRI, g = 0.86; I = 0; LF/HF, g = 0.40; I = 0). As a group, MG patients have altered cardiac autonomic function, including decreased parasympathetic function, lower baroreflex sensitivity, and higher sympathovagal balance at rest and during orthostatic challenges.
PubMed: 37755362
DOI: 10.3390/neurolint15030071 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2021Patients with Myasthenia Gravis (MG) can be treated acutely with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) or intravenous immune globulin (IVIG). To date, there is no...
Patients with Myasthenia Gravis (MG) can be treated acutely with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) or intravenous immune globulin (IVIG). To date, there is no definitive understanding of which of the two treatments is more effective and safer. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on the comparative efficacy and safety of TPE to other available treatments for MG. A systematic literature search for studies published between 1997 and 2017 was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using two database sources, MEDLINE (through the PubMed database) and Cochrane Library. The search strategy resulted in 535 articles whose abstracts were reviewed. Among these, 165 full texts articles were reviewed for eligibility and 101 articles were excluded. Of the 165 articles, 64 articles were included for a systematic literature and 11 articles for a meta-analysis. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis of treatment options showed that there was a higher response rate with TPE than IVIG in acute MG patients and patients undergoing thymectomy. There was no difference in mortality between the two treatment options. Our findings highlight the need for additional randomized clinical trials in these patients with MG.
PubMed: 34531809
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.662856 -
Autoimmunity Reviews Jun 2023Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is a common and highly effective treatment for non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder. BCG may... (Review)
Review
Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is a common and highly effective treatment for non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder. BCG may cause an autoimmune reaction in some patients. One hundred and fifty-eight papers were analyzed, for a total of hundred and thirty patients with reactive arthritis, sixty patients with ocular manifestations and eighteen patients with other rheumatologic diseases. Among 130 subjects with reactive arthritis, an autoimmune symptom occurred after 5 instillations of intravesical BCG (IQR 4-6), which represents 5 weeks in most cases. Fifty-one patients had concurrent ocular involvement. The resolution of symptoms was achieved in a median of 32.5 days (IQR 14-90). Forty-two men and twenty women had ocular manifestations, most commonly conjunctivitis. Patients with HLA-B27 typing had earlier presentation of ocular symptoms related to the number of instillations (4.5 vs 6 [p < 0.05]. Resolution of symptoms was achieved at a median of 128 days (IQR 21-150). Among patients treated with NSAIDs (either with or without steroids), the duration of the disease was significantly shorter in both the articular and the ocular groups (28 vs. 120 [p < 0.05] and 30 vs.105 [p < 0.05], respectively). Other autoimmune manifestations included general autoimmune diseases, such as vasculitis, psoriasis and myasthenia gravis.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Adjuvants, Immunologic; Administration, Intravesical; Arthritis, Reactive; Autoimmune Diseases; BCG Vaccine; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 37061015
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103329 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2021Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neuromuscular disease. Nearly 10-30% of patients with MG are refractory to conventional therapy. Rituximab (RTX), a monoclonal...
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neuromuscular disease. Nearly 10-30% of patients with MG are refractory to conventional therapy. Rituximab (RTX), a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20, is increasingly used in autoimmune disorders. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RTX for refractory MG. Studies published between January 1, 2000 and January 17, 2021 were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClincalTrails.gov. Primary outcomes included proportion of patients achieving minimal manifestation status (MMS) or better and quantitative MG (QMG) score change from baseline. Secondary outcomes were glucocorticoids (GC) doses change from baseline and proportion of patients discontinuing oral immunosuppressants. A total of 24 studies involving 417 patients were included in the meta-analysis. An overall 64% (95% confidence interval, 49-77%) of patients achieved MMS or better. The estimated reduction of QMG score was 1.55 (95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.22). The mean reduction of GC doses was 1.46 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.82). The proportion of patients discontinuing oral immunosuppressants was 81% (95% confidence interval, 66-93%). Subgroup analyses showed that the proportion of patients achieving MMS or better and discontinuing oral immunosuppressants was higher in MuSK-MG group than those in AChR-MG group. Improvement was more pronounced in patients with mild to moderate MG compared to those with severe MG. Moreover, the efficacy appeared to be independent of the dose of RTX. 19.6% of patients experienced adverse events, most of which were mild to moderate. Only one patient developed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. RTX can alleviate the symptom of weakness, decrease QMG score and reduce the doses of steroids and non-steroid immunosuppressive agents in refractory MG. It is well-tolerated with few severe adverse events. Randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to study the efficacy of RTX in treating refractory MG and to identify the characteristics of patients who might respond well to RTX.
PubMed: 34721267
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.736190 -
Eye and Brain 2020Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel cancer therapies that may be associated with immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) and come to the attention of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel cancer therapies that may be associated with immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) and come to the attention of neuro-ophthalmologists. This systematic review aims to synthesize the reported ICI-associated IRAEs relevant to neuro-ophthalmologists to help in the diagnosis and management of these conditions.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature indexed by MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases was searched from inception to May 2020. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Primary studies on ICIs and neuro-ophthalmic complications were included. Outcomes included number of cases and incidence of neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs.
RESULTS
Neuro-ophthalmic complications of ICIs occurred in 0.46% of patients undergoing ICI and may affect the afferent and efferent visual systems. Afferent complications include optic neuritis (12.8%), neuroretinitis (0.9%), and giant cell arteritis (3.7%). Efferent complications include myasthenia gravis (MG) (45.0%), thyroid-like eye disease (11.9%), orbital myositis (13.8%), general myositis with ptosis (7.3%), internuclear ophthalmoplegia (0.9%), opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome (0.9%), and oculomotor nerve palsy (0.9%). Pembrolizumab was the most common causative agent for neuro-ophthalmic complications (32.1%). Mortality was highest for MG (19.8%). Most patients (79.8%) experienced improvement or complete resolution of neuro-ophthalmic symptoms due to cessation of ICI and immunosuppression with systemic corticosteroids.
CONCLUSION
While incidence of neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs is low, clinicians involved in the care of cancer patients must be aware of their presentation to facilitate prompt recognition and management. Collaboration between oncology and neuro-ophthalmology teams is required to effectively manage patients and reduce morbidity and mortality.
PubMed: 33173368
DOI: 10.2147/EB.S277760 -
Brain and Behavior Aug 2021Among many of the autoimmune diseases observed in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), myocarditis is one of the most critical. The goal of this review is to... (Review)
Review
Among many of the autoimmune diseases observed in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), myocarditis is one of the most critical. The goal of this review is to systematically describe and investigate the characteristics of MG complicated with myocarditis. We identified 183 records in PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and EMBASE from 1948 to September 10, 2020. Studies were included if they presented clinical data on MG complicated with myocarditis. Of the 35 patients from 28 studies in this review, 57.14% (20/35) were males, with a mean age of 59.11 ± 15.87. Dyspnea was the most common cardiac symptom accounting for over 60% in the study. Among the 35 patients, 13 cases of myocarditis occurred concomitantly with MG and the longest interval between MG and myocarditis was 7 years. Forty percent of patients developed myocarditis caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Among the patients with myocarditis, over half of the patients were diagnosed by myocardial biopsy. After active immune regulation and symptomatic treatment, only 15 of 35 patients with MG complicated with myocarditis improved, 18 patients died during hospitalization, one patient died due to tumor progression and 1patient died 5 years later. The prognosis of patients with MG complicated with myocarditis is poor, and myocardial enzymes and other indexes need to be monitored for patients taking ICI drugs. Patients with dyspnea who are still not ideally treated by mechanical ventilation should be vigilant against the occurrence of MG complicated with myocarditis.
Topics: Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Male; Myasthenia Gravis; Myocarditis
PubMed: 34105901
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2242