-
Emerging Infectious Diseases Jul 2020A high prevalence rate of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MRMP) has been reported in Asia. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A high prevalence rate of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MRMP) has been reported in Asia. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of macrolide resistance on the manifestations and clinical judgment during M. pneumoniae infections. We found no difference in clinical severity between MRMP and macrolide-sensitive Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MSMP) infections. However, in the pooled data, patients infected with MRMP had a longer febrile period (1.71 days), length of hospital stay (1.61 day), antibiotic drug courses (2.93 days), and defervescence time after macrolide treatment (2.04 days) compared with patients infected with MSMP. The risk of fever lasting for >48 hours after macrolide treatment was also significantly increased (OR 21.24), and an increased proportion of patients was changed to second-line treatment (OR 4.42). Our findings indicate diagnostic and therapeutic challenges after the emergence of MRMP. More precise diagnostic tools and clearly defined treatment should be appraised in the future.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Asia; Child; Community-Acquired Infections; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Humans; Macrolides; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma
PubMed: 32568052
DOI: 10.3201/eid2607.200017 -
JAMA Network Open Jul 2022The proportion of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MRMP) infections has changed, and it differs according to geographical region. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
The proportion of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MRMP) infections has changed, and it differs according to geographical region.
OBJECTIVE
To analyze the global patterns, including the temporal trends, regional variations, and variant types, in the proportion of MRMP infections in this systematic review and meta-anaysis.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched for observational studies from inception to September 10, 2021.
STUDY SELECTION
Observational studies reporting the proportion of MRMP infections were screened independently by 2 authors. The presence of MRMP infection was defined as any case of M pneumoniae infection positive for any variants associated with macrolide resistance identified using respiratory samples.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data were extracted independently and in duplicate by 2 reviewers. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline was used. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate the proportion of MRMP infections.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The global patterns in the proportion of MRMP infections were estimated, and the temporal trends and variant types of MRMP infection with regional differences were investigated.
RESULTS
This study included 153 studies from 150 articles (27 408 samples in 26 countries) in the meta-analysis. The global patterns in the proportion of MRMP infections showed an increasing trend with regional differences. The proportion of MRMP infections was highest in the Western Pacific regions (53.4%; 95% CI, 47.4%-60.3%), followed by the South East Asian region (9.8%; 95% CI, 0.8%-100%), the region of the Americas (8.4%; 95% CI, 6.1%-11.6%), and the European region (5.1%; 95% CI, 3.3%-8.0%). The most commonly identified variant of MRMP infection was A2063G (96.8%; 95% CI, 95.8%-97.7%), followed by A2064G (4.8%; 95% CI, 3.5%-6.7%). The proportion of MRMP infections was the highest in studies including only children (37.0%; 95% CI, 29.8%-46.1%), followed by those including only adults (15.9%; 95% CI, 6.4%-39.7%) and those including both children and adults (16.7%; 95% CI, 10.1%-27.6%).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This study provides global trends in the proportion of MRMP infections and suggests that strategies to prevent the spread of MRMP infection and to treat MRMP infections are needed to decrease disease burden.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Humans; Macrolides; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; United States
PubMed: 35816304
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20949 -
BMC Infectious Diseases Sep 2021Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a common pathogen that causes community-acquired pneumonia in school-age children. Macrolides are considered a first-line treatment for M.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy of tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones for the treatment of macrolide-refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a common pathogen that causes community-acquired pneumonia in school-age children. Macrolides are considered a first-line treatment for M. pneumoniae infection in children, but macrolide-refractory M. pneumoniae (MRMP) strains have become more common. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones in MRMP treatment in children through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
Two reviewers individually searched 10 electronic databases (Medline/Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and core Korean, Chinese, and Japanese journals) for papers published from January 1, 1990 to March 8, 2018. The following data for each treatment group were extracted from the selected studies: intervention (tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones/comparator), patient characteristics (age and sex), and outcomes (fever duration, hospital stay length, treatment success rate, and defervescence rates 24, 48, and 72 h after starting treatment).
RESULTS
Eight studies involving 537 participants were included. Fever duration and hospital stay length were shorter in the tetracycline group than in the macrolide group (weighted mean difference [WMD] = - 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: - 2.55 to - 0.36, P = 0.009; and WMD = - 3.33, 95% CI: - 4.32 to - 2.35, P < 0.00001, respectively). The therapeutic efficacy was significantly higher in the tetracycline group than in the macrolide group (odds ratio [OR]: 8.80, 95% CI: 3.12-24.82). With regard to defervescence rate, patients in the tetracycline group showed significant improvement compared to those in the macrolide group (defervescence rate after 24 h, OR: 5.34, 95% CI: 1.81-15.75; after 48 h, OR 18.37, 95% CI: 8.87-38.03; and after 72 h, OR: 40.77, 95% CI: 6.15-270.12). There were no differences in fever improvement within 24 h in patients in the fluoroquinolone group compared to those in the macrolide group (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.25-5.00), although the defervescence rate was higher after 48 h in the fluoroquinolone group (OR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.41-5.51).
CONCLUSION
Tetracyclines may shorten fever duration and hospital stay length in patients with MRMP infection. Fluoroquinolones may achieve defervescence within 48 h in patients with MRMP infection. However, these results should be carefully interpreted as only a small number of studies were included, and they were heterogeneous.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Macrolides; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; Tetracyclines
PubMed: 34563128
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06508-7 -
The Journal of Infection Aug 2020In previous influenza pandemics, bacterial co-infections have been a major cause of mortality. We aimed to evaluate the burden of co-infections in patients with COVID-19. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
In previous influenza pandemics, bacterial co-infections have been a major cause of mortality. We aimed to evaluate the burden of co-infections in patients with COVID-19.
METHODS
We systematically searched Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, LILACS and CINAHL for eligible studies published from 1 January 2020 to 17 April 2020. We included patients of all ages, in all settings. The main outcome was the proportion of patients with a bacterial, fungal or viral co-infection. .
RESULTS
Thirty studies including 3834 patients were included. Overall, 7% of hospitalised COVID-19 patients had a bacterial co-infection (95% CI 3-12%, n=2183, I=92·2%). A higher proportion of ICU patients had bacterial co-infections than patients in mixed ward/ICU settings (14%, 95% CI 5-26, I=74·7% versus 4%, 95% CI 1-9, I= 91·7%). The commonest bacteria were Mycoplasma pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Haemophilus influenzae. The pooled proportion with a viral co-infection was 3% (95% CI 1-6, n=1014, I=62·3%), with Respiratory Syncytial Virus and influenza A the commonest. Three studies reported fungal co-infections.
CONCLUSIONS
A low proportion of COVID-19 patients have a bacterial co-infection; less than in previous influenza pandemics. These findings do not support the routine use of antibiotics in the management of confirmed COVID-19 infection.
Topics: Bacterial Infections; Betacoronavirus; COVID-19; Coinfection; Coronavirus Infections; Humans; Mycoses; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; SARS-CoV-2; Virus Diseases
PubMed: 32473235
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.046 -
BMJ Open Respiratory Research Sep 2023Epidemiological information is essential in providing appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy for pneumonia. This study aimed to clarify the epidemiology of...
OBJECTIVE
Epidemiological information is essential in providing appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy for pneumonia. This study aimed to clarify the epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) by conducting a systematic review of published studies in Japan.
DESIGN
Systematic review.
DATA SOURCE
PubMed and Ichushi web database (January 1970 to October 2022).
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Clinical studies describing pathogenic micro-organisms in CAP written in English or Japanese, excluding studies on pneumonia other than adult CAP, investigations limited to specific pathogens and case reports.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Patient setting (inpatient vs outpatient), number of patients, concordance with the CAP guidelines, diagnostic criteria and methods for diagnosing pneumonia pathogens as well as the numbers of each isolate. A meta-analysis of various situations was performed to measure the frequency of each aetiological agent.
RESULTS
Fifty-six studies were included and 17 095 cases of CAP were identified. Pathogens were undetectable in 44.1% (95% CI 39.7% to 48.5%). was the most common cause of CAP requiring hospitalisation or outpatient care (20.0% (95% CI 17.2% to 22.8%)), followed by (10.8% (95% CI 7.3% to 14.3%)) and (7.5% (95% CI 4.6% to 10.4%)). However, when limited to CAP requiring hospitalisation, was the third most common at 4.9% (95% CI 3.9% to 5.8%). was more frequent in hospitalised cases, while atypical pathogens were less common. Methicillin-resistant accounted for 40.7% (95% CI 29.0% to 52.4%) of cases. In studies that used PCR testing for pan-respiratory viral pathogens, human enterovirus/human rhinovirus (9.4% (95% CI 0% to 20.5%)) and several other respiratory pathogenic viruses were detected. The epidemiology varied depending on the methodology and situation.
CONCLUSION
The epidemiology of CAP varies depending on the situation, such as in the hospital versus outpatient setting. Viruses are more frequently detected by exhaustive genetic searches, resulting in a significant variation in epidemiology.
PubMed: 37751988
DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001800 -
BMJ Open Apr 2023We aimed to summarise the prevalence of atypical pathogens in patients with severe pneumonia to understand the prevalence of severe pneumonia caused by atypical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to summarise the prevalence of atypical pathogens in patients with severe pneumonia to understand the prevalence of severe pneumonia caused by atypical pathogens, improve clinical decision-making and guide antibiotic use.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched through November 2022.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
English language studies enrolled consecutive cases of patients diagnosed with severe pneumonia, with complete aetiological analysis.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
We conducted literature retrieval on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library to estimate the prevalence of , and in patients with severe pneumonia. After double arcsine transformation of the data, a random-effects model was used for meta-analyses to calculate the pooled prevalence of each pathogen. Meta-regression analysis was also used to explore whether the region, different diagnostic method, study population, pneumonia categories or sample size were potential sources of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
We included 75 eligible studies with 18 379 cases of severe pneumonia. The overall prevalence of atypical pneumonia is 8.1% (95% CI 6.3% to 10.1%) In patients with severe pneumonia, the pooled estimated prevalence of , and was 1.8% (95% CI 1.0% to 2.9%), 2.8% (95% CI 1.7% to 4.3%) and 4.0% (95% CI 2.8% to 5.3%), respectively. We noted significant heterogeneity in all pooled assessments. Meta-regression showed that the pneumonia category potentially influenced the prevalence rate of . The mean age and the diagnostic method of pathogens were likely moderators for the prevalence of and , and contribute to the heterogeneity of their prevalence.
CONCLUSIONS
In severe pneumonia, atypical pathogens are notable causes, especially . The diagnostic method, regional difference, sample size and other factors contribute to the heterogeneity of prevalence. The estimated prevalence and relative heterogeneity factors can help with microbiological screening, clinical treatment and future research planning.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022373950.
Topics: Humans; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Prevalence; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; Legionella; Chlamydia
PubMed: 37041056
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066721 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Dec 2022Extra-pulmonary features sometimes occur in association with atypical bacterial pneumonia and include neurologic manifestations, diarrhea, rashes, altered liver enzymes,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Extra-pulmonary features sometimes occur in association with atypical bacterial pneumonia and include neurologic manifestations, diarrhea, rashes, altered liver enzymes, or kidney injury, among other conditions. Acute pancreatitis has been associated with atypical pneumonias since 1973.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the literature in the Excerpta Medica, National Library of Medicine, and Web of Science databases. We retained 27 reports published between 1973 and 2022 describing subjects with an otherwise unexplained pancreatitis temporally associated with an atypical pneumonia.
RESULTS
The reports included 33 subjects (19 males, and 14 females; 8 children and 25 adults) with acute pancreatitis temporally associated with atypical pneumonia caused by ( = 18), species ( = 14), or ( = 1). Approximately 90% of patients ( = 29) concurrently presented with respiratory and pancreatic diseases. No cases associated with , , or species were found.
CONCLUSIONS
Acute pancreatitis has been associated with various infectious agents. The present review documents the association with atypical pneumonia induced by , species, and .
PubMed: 36498822
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11237248 -
Journal of Immunology Research 2022Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a common pathogen of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children. infection is usually regarded as a self-limiting disease, but in some... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a common pathogen of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children. infection is usually regarded as a self-limiting disease, but in some special cases, it can also develop into refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (RMPP). The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical characteristics of CRP (C-reactive protein), LDH (lactate dehydrogenase), ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), , neutrophils (%), lymphocytes (%), and lung consolidation in RMPP and explore their prediction results in the early stage of RMPP, which is important for early treatment.
METHODS
This systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wangfang, and Cqvip, and the date was set until February 23, 2021. For the continuous variables, mean difference (MD) with 95% CI was adopted to evaluate CRP, LDH, ESR, D-dimer, neutrophils (%), lymphocytes (%), and the correlation between lung consolidation and RMPP.
RESULTS
20 studies including 5289 patients were included in the analysis, and the results showed that the CRP of the RMPP group (MD (95% CI): 22.29 (12.20, 32.38), < 0.001), LDH (MD (95% CI): 145.13 (78.62, 211.64), < 0.001), neutrophils (%) (MD (95% CI): 7.27 (0.31, 14.23), = 0.04), and D-dimer (MD (95% CI): 1.79 (-1.17, 4.74), = 0.24) was higher than that of the NRMPP group; the risk of lung consolidation in the RMPP group (OR (95% CI): 14.29 (4.52, 45.12), < 0.001) was higher than that in the NRMPP group, and there was no difference in ESR (MD (95% CI): 8.11 (-1.34, 17.56), = 0.09) and lymphocytes (%) (MD (95% CI): -6.27 (-12.81, 0.27), = 0.06) between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
So, the available evidence indicates that CRP, LDH, neutrophils (%), , and lung consolidation are predictive factors for RMPP.
Topics: Blood Sedimentation; C-Reactive Protein; Child; Humans; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma
PubMed: 35795531
DOI: 10.1155/2022/9227838 -
Minerva Pediatrics Apr 2024The relationship between cytokines and refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (RMPP) in children was conflicting. The aim of the current study was to perform a...
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between cytokines and refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (RMPP) in children was conflicting. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review to determine the relationship between cytokines and RMPP in children.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We searched PubMed, and the search was done on 21 November 2022. This search was limited to human studies, with language restriction of English. Studies were included if they reported the relationship between cytokines and RMPP.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
A total of 22 relevant full articles were included in the review. TNF-α levels in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and IL-18 levels in the blood samples were likely to be associated with RMPP. IL-2 and IL-4 lost significance regardless in the BALF or blood samples. Additionally, there was no significant difference in IFN-γ levels between RMPP patients and non-refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (NRMPP) patients in the BALF. Patients receiving different treatments had different levels of cytokines.
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis offers evidence linking abnormalities of cytokines with RMPP in children, which may be essential for identifying individuals with RMPP. Large prospective studies are needed for further clarification of roles of cytokines in RMPP.
Topics: Child; Humans; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Cytokines; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
PubMed: 37155205
DOI: 10.23736/S2724-5276.23.07158-6 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2021This study was intended to provide data to support the effect of Shashen Maidong Decoction in improving pneumonia in pediatric patients through systematic evaluation....
This study was intended to provide data to support the effect of Shashen Maidong Decoction in improving pneumonia in pediatric patients through systematic evaluation. PubMed, the Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, CQVIP, Wan-Fang, and CBM databases were comprehensively searched from established in June 2021. Randomized controlled trials of TRQI were selected by screening the literature and extracting information. The Cochrane RCT Evaluation Manual was used to evaluate the methodological quality of all included studies, and Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 14.0 and Review Manager 5.4 software. A total of 1,127 patients from 12 clinical studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis results showed that the treatment group of Shashen Maidong Decoction was able to significantly increase the overall efficiency level and significantly reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, time for disappearance of cough, time for relief of cough, time for defervescence, time for disappearance of lung rales, time for return to normal of chest X-ray, T lymphocyte subpopulation (CD3) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and other index levels ( < 0.05). Shashen Maidong Decoction has a significant improvement in the levels of relevant indexes in pediatric pneumonia, which provides a basis for the safety and efficacy of pediatric pneumonia. However, due to the small sample size included in the study, the study quality was not high, and more randomized controlled trials of high quality are required for further validation.
PubMed: 34712144
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.765656