-
Seizure Apr 2024Numerous anti-seizure medications (ASMs) have been developed to treat Dravet syndrome (DS). This network meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively analyse the efficacy of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Numerous anti-seizure medications (ASMs) have been developed to treat Dravet syndrome (DS). This network meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively analyse the efficacy of ASMs in DS patients, especially in non-seizure-free patients after treatment.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched. The treatment efficacy was assessed by the percentage reduction in monthly convulsive seizure frequency (MCSF) from baseline or individuals who achieved at least a 50 % or 75 % reduction from baseline in convulsive seizure frequency (CSF).
RESULTS
Six randomised controlled trials with 633 participants and seven regimens based on four add-on ASMs-fenfluramine (FFA), stiripentol (STP), cannabidiol (CBD), and soticlestat-were included. All drug regimens were superior to the placebo at achieving at least 50 % and 75 % reductions in CSF, but only STP, 0.4 mg/kg/d FFA (FFA0.4), and 0.7 mg/kg/d FFA (FFA0.7) reduced MCSF. STP (50 mg/kg/d) had the highest correlation with reducing MCSF and achieving at least a 50 % reduction from baseline in CSF, followed by FFA0.4 and FFA0.7. Soticlestat and CBD may also be effective in reducing seizures in DS patients.
CONCLUSION
STP can be recommended as the first choice among the included drug regimens for reducing seizures in DS patients, while FFA0.4 may be considered the second choice. Other drug regimens can be used as alternative treatments. STP, FFA0.4, and FFA0.7 may consistently present favourable efficacy in most DS patients, while other regimens may present prominent inter-individual variability. Appropriate dose selection and intense monitoring are necessary when treating DS using these drugs.
Topics: Humans; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Anticonvulsants; Network Meta-Analysis; Cannabidiol; Dioxolanes
PubMed: 38354598
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.02.004 -
CNS Drugs Mar 2020Dravet syndrome (DS) is one of the most severe forms of drug-resistant epilepsy and available interventions fail to control seizures in most patients. Cannabidiol (CBD)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Dravet syndrome (DS) is one of the most severe forms of drug-resistant epilepsy and available interventions fail to control seizures in most patients. Cannabidiol (CBD) is the first in a new class of antiepileptic drugs with a distinctive chemical structure and mechanism of action.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CBD as adjunctive treatment for seizures in patients with DS using meta-analytical techniques.
METHODS
We searched for randomized, placebo-controlled, single- or double-blinded trials. Main outcomes included ≥ 50% reduction in baseline convulsive seizure frequency and the incidence of treatment withdrawal and adverse events (AEs). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated through the inverse variance method.
RESULTS
Three trials were included involving 359 participants, 228 for CBD and 131 for placebo groups. In all trials, the active treatment was a plant-derived pharmaceutical formulation of purified CBD oral solution. The pooled RR for 50% response during the treatment was 1.69 (95% CI 1.21-2.36; p = 0.002). Across the trials, treatment was discontinued in 20 (9.0%) and 3 (2.3%) cases in the add-on CBD and placebo groups, respectively; the RR for CBD withdrawal was 3.12 (95% CI 1.07-9.10; p = 0.037). The RR to develop any AE during add-on CBD treatment was 1.06 (95% CI 0.87-1.28; p = 0.561). AEs significantly associated with adjunctive CBD were somnolence, decreased appetite, diarrhea, and increased serum aminotransferases.
CONCLUSIONS
Adjunctive CBD resulted in a greater reduction in convulsive seizure frequency than placebo and a higher rate of AEs in patients with DS presenting with seizures uncontrolled by concomitant antiepileptic therapy.
Topics: Cannabidiol; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Humans; Odds Ratio; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 32040850
DOI: 10.1007/s40263-020-00708-6 -
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica Apr 2021Dravet syndrome (DS) is a severe, drug-resistant, developmental epileptic encephalopathy. Despite multiple anti-epileptic drug regimens, the syndrome remains poorly... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Dravet syndrome (DS) is a severe, drug-resistant, developmental epileptic encephalopathy. Despite multiple anti-epileptic drug regimens, the syndrome remains poorly controlled and nearly half of patients still experience at least four tonic-clonic seizure per month. Recently, several clinical trials demonstrated that fenfluramine may provide a significant reduction in convulsive seizure frequency in the treatment of Dravet syndrome.
METHODS
A computerized literature search of Web of Science, MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed), Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was performed from inception until December 31, 2019. We included randomized placebo-controlled trials for the treatment of Dravet syndrome. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) of ≥50% and 100% reduction seizure frequency from baseline, along with the treatment-related withdrawals and serious adverse events, using the fixed-effect model. Quality assessment of included studies was performed with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool.
KEY RESULTS
Two trials with a total of 206 patients were included. The pooled RR of 5.49 (95% CI 3.13-9.65) showed that a significantly greater proportion in the fenfluramine group achieved ≥50% reduction in monthly convulsive seizure frequency (MCSF). As for the complete seizure free rate, the pooled RR of 5.75 (95% CI 1.03-32.07) also demonstrated the favorable efficacy of fenfluramine, even though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.046). However, a significantly greater proportion of patients in the fenfluramine group experienced no more than one seizure during the treatment period (RR 13.82, 95% CI 2.68-71.27, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in withdrawals and serious adverse events between the two treatment groups. No valvular heart disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension was observed in participants. The most common adverse events reported by included trials were diarrhea, fatigue, lethargy, nasopharyngitis, pyrexia, seizure, decreased appetite, and weight loss.
CONCLUSIONS
Fenfluramine is an effective antiepileptic drug for pediatric patients with Dravet syndrome, demonstrating clinically meaningful reduction in convulsive frequency, and generally could be well tolerated.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Fatigue; Fenfluramine; Fever; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures
PubMed: 33336426
DOI: 10.1111/ane.13387 -
Epilepsy Research May 2024Pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy (PDE-ALDH7A1) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder due to a deficiency of α-aminoadipic semialdehyde dehydrogenase. This study aimed to...
Pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy (PDE-ALDH7A1) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder due to a deficiency of α-aminoadipic semialdehyde dehydrogenase. This study aimed to systematically explore genotypic and phenotypic features and prognostic factors of neonatal-onset PDE. A literature search covering PubMed, Elsevier, and Web of Science was conducted from January 2006 to August 2023. We identified 56 eligible studies involving 169 patients and 334 alleles. The c.1279 G>C variant was the most common variant of neonatal-onset PDE (25.7 %). All patients were treated with pyridoxine; forty patients received dietary intervention therapy. 63.9 % of the patients were completely seizure-free; however, 68.6 % of the patients had neurodevelopmental delays. Additionally, homozygous c.1279 G>C variants were significantly associated with ventriculomegaly, abnormal white matter signal, and cysts (P<0.05). In contrast, homozygous c.1364 T>C was associated with clonic seizure (P=0.031). Pyridoxine used immediately at seizure onset was an independent protective factor for developmental delay (P=0.035; odds ratio [OR]: 3.14). Besides, pyridoxine used early in the neonatal period was a protective factor for language delay (P=0.044; OR: 4.59). In contrast, neonatal respiratory distress (P=0.001; OR: 127.44) and abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging (P=0.049; OR: 3.64) were risk factors. Prenatal movement abnormality (P=0.041; OR: 20.56) and abnormal white matter signal (P=0.012; OR: 24.30) were risk factors for motor delay. Myoclonic seizure (P=0.023; OR: 7.13) and status epilepticus (P=0.000; OR: 9.93) were risk factors for breakthrough seizures. In conclusion, our study indicated that pyridoxine should be started immediately when unexplained neonatal seizures occur and not later than the neonatal period to prevent poor neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Infant, Newborn; Aldehyde Dehydrogenase; Epilepsy; Genotype; Phenotype; Prognosis; Pyridoxine; Seizures
PubMed: 38636407
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107363 -
European Journal of Medical Research Mar 2024Dravet Syndrome (DS) is a rare and severe form of childhood epilepsy that is often refractory to conventional antiepileptic drugs. Emerging evidence suggests that... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Dravet Syndrome (DS) is a rare and severe form of childhood epilepsy that is often refractory to conventional antiepileptic drugs. Emerging evidence suggests that Cannabidiol (CBD) offer therapeutic benefits for DS. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CBD in pediatric patients with DS based on data from ten clinical trials.
METHODS
A review was conducted to identify clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of CBD in pediatric patients diagnosed with DS. PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and relevant grey literature were systematically searched for relevant articles up to October 2023, and clinical trials within the last 10 years were included. The search strategy incorporated controlled vocabulary terms and keywords related to "Cannabidiol," "Dravet Syndrome," and "pediatric patients."
RESULTS
The analysis revealed promising efficacy outcomes. Notably, CBD demonstrated substantial reductions in seizure frequency, with some patients achieving seizure freedom. The findings emphasised the consistency of CBD's efficacy across different patient subgroups. The safety profile of CBD was generally acceptable, with adverse events often being manageable.
CONCLUSION
This review consolidates evidence from multiple clinical trials, affirming the potential of CBD as a promising treatment option for pediatric patients with DS. While further research is needed to address existing knowledge gaps, CBD's efficacy and acceptable safety profile make it a valuable addition to the therapeutic tools for DS.
Topics: Child; Humans; Anticonvulsants; Cannabidiol; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Lennox Gastaut Syndrome; Seizures
PubMed: 38500226
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-01788-6 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2020This is an update of the Cochrane Review first published in 2010; it includes one additional study. Primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures are a type of generalised... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This is an update of the Cochrane Review first published in 2010; it includes one additional study. Primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures are a type of generalised seizure. Other types of seizures include: absence, myoclonic, and atonic seizures. Effective control of tonic-clonic seizures reduces the risk of injury and death, and improves quality of life. While most people achieve seizure control with one antiepileptic drug, around 30% do not, and require a combination of antiepileptic drugs.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of add-on lamotrigine for drug-resistant primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures.
SEARCH METHODS
For the latest update, we searched these databases on 19 March 2019: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS) Web, MEDLINE Ovid, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). The CRS includes records from the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We imposed no language restrictions. We also contacted GlaxoSmithKline, manufacturers of lamotrigine.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled parallel or cross-over trials of add-on lamotrigine for people of any age with drug-resistant primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We followed standard Cochrane methodology; two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, evaluated risk of bias, extracted relevant data, and GRADE-assessed evidence. We investigated these outcomes: (1) 50% or greater reduction in primary generalised tonic-clonic seizure frequency; (2) seizure freedom; (3) treatment withdrawal; (4) adverse effects; (5) cognitive effects; and (6) quality of life. We used an intention-to-treat (ITT) population for all analyses, and presented results as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); for adverse effects, we used 99% CIs to compensate for multiple hypothesis testing.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three studies (total 300 participants): two parallel-group studies and one cross-over study. We assessed varied risks of bias across studies; most limitations arose from the poor reporting of methodological details. We meta-analysed data extracted from the two parallel-group studies, and conducted a narrative synthesis for data from the cross-over study. Both parallel-group studies (270 participants) reported all dichotomous outcomes. Participants taking lamotrigine were almost twice as likely to attain a 50% or greater reduction in primary generalised tonic-clonic seizure frequency than those taking a placebo (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.45; low-certainty evidence). The results between groups were inconclusive for the likelihood of seizure freedom (RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.72; very low-certainty evidence); treatment withdrawal (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.99; very low-certainty evidence); and individual adverse effects: ataxia (RR 3.05, 99% CI 0.05 to 199.36); dizziness (RR 0.91, 99% CI 0.29 to 2.86; very low-certainty evidence); fatigue (RR 1.02, 99% CI 0.13 to 8.14; very low-certainty evidence); nausea (RR 1.60, 99% CI 0.48 to 5.32; very low-certainty evidence); and somnolence (RR 3.73, 99% CI 0.36 to 38.90; low-certainty evidence). The cross-over trial (26 participants) reported that 7/14 participants with generalised tonic-clonic seizures experienced a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency with add-on lamotrigine compared to placebo. The authors reported four treatment withdrawals, but did not specify during which treatment allocation they occurred. Rash (seven lamotrigine participants; zero placebo participants) and fatigue (five lamotrigine participants; zero placebo participants) were the most frequently reported adverse effects. None of the included studies measured cognition. One parallel-group study (N = 153) evaluated quality of life. They reported inconclusive results for the overall quality of life score between groups (P = 0.74).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review provides insufficient information to inform clinical practice. Low-certainty evidence suggests that lamotrigine reduces the rate of generalised tonic-clonic seizures by 50% or more. Very low-certainty evidence found inconclusive results between groups for all other outcomes. Therefore, we are uncertain to very uncertain that the results reported are accurate, and suggest that the true effect could be grossly different. More trials, recruiting larger populations, over longer periods, are necessary to determine lamotrigine's clinical use.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Dizziness; Drug Eruptions; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic; Exanthema; Fatigue; Humans; Lamotrigine; Nausea; Patient Dropouts; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sleepiness
PubMed: 32609387
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007783.pub3 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2022Dravet syndrome (DS) is a severe epileptic encephalopathy mainly caused by haploinsufficiency of the gene , which encodes the voltage-gated sodium channel Na1. 1 in the...
BACKGROUND
Dravet syndrome (DS) is a severe epileptic encephalopathy mainly caused by haploinsufficiency of the gene , which encodes the voltage-gated sodium channel Na1. 1 in the brain. While mutations are known to be the primary cause of DS, other genes that may cause DS are poorly understood. Several genes with pathogenic mutations result in DS or DS-like phenotypes, which may require different drug treatment approaches. Therefore, it is urgent for clinicians, especially epilepsy specialists to fully understand these genes involved in DS in addition to . Particularly for healthcare providers, a deep understanding of these pathogenic genes is useful in properly selecting and adjusting drugs in a more effective and timely manner.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to identify genes other than that may also cause DS or DS-like phenotypes.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of relevant Dravet syndrome and severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy was performed in PubMed, until December 1, 2021. Two independent authors performed the screening for potentially eligible studies. Disagreements were decided by a third, more professional researcher or by all three. The results reported by each study were narratively summarized.
RESULTS
A PubMed search yielded 5,064 items, and other sources search 12 records. A total of 29 studies published between 2009 and 2021 met the inclusion criteria. Regarding the included articles, seven studies on , three on , two on , five on , two on , three on , three on , and three on were included. Only one study was recorded for and , respectively. It is worth noting that a few articles reported on more than one epilepsy gene.
CONCLUSION
DS is not only identified in variants of , but other genes such as can also be involved in DS or DS-like phenotypes. As genetic testing becomes more widely available, more genes associated with DS and DS-like phenotypes may be identified and gene-based diagnosis of subtypes of phenotypes in this spectrum may improve the management of these diseases in the future.
PubMed: 35359639
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.832380 -
The Canadian Journal of Neurological... Sep 2023Long latency reflexes (LLRs) are impaired in a wide array of clinical conditions. We aimed to illustrate the clinical applications and recent advances of LLR in various...
BACKGROUND
Long latency reflexes (LLRs) are impaired in a wide array of clinical conditions. We aimed to illustrate the clinical applications and recent advances of LLR in various neurological disorders from a systematic review of published literature.
METHODS
We reviewed the literature using appropriately chosen MeSH terms on the database platforms of MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, and Google Scholar for all the articles from 1st January 1975 to 2nd February 2021 using the search terms "long loop reflex", "long latency reflex" and "C-reflex". The included articles were analyzed and reported using synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines.
RESULTS
Based on our selection criteria, 40 articles were selected for the systematic review. The various diseases included parkinsonian syndromes (11 studies, 217 patients), Huntington's disease (10 studies, 209 patients), myoclonus of varied etiologies (13 studies, 127 patients) including progressive myoclonic epilepsy (5 studies, 63 patients) and multiple sclerosis (6 studies, 200 patients). Patients with parkinsonian syndromes showed large amplitude LLR II response. Enlarged LLR II was also found in myoclonus of various etiologies. LLR II response was delayed or absent in Huntington's disease. Delayed LLR II response was present in multiple sclerosis. Among the other diseases, LLR response varied according to the location of cerebellar lesions while the results were equivocal in patients with essential tremor.
CONCLUSIONS
Abnormal LLR is observed in many neurological disorders. However, larger systematic studies are required in many neurological disorders in order to establish its role in diagnosis and management.
Topics: Humans; Myoclonus; Huntington Disease; Reflex; Multiple Sclerosis; Neurology; Reaction Time; Electromyography
PubMed: 35801267
DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2022.270 -
CNS Drugs Aug 2021The effectiveness of adjunctive perampanel has not been systematically assessed in seizure types other than its approved indications of focal seizures and primary...
BACKGROUND
The effectiveness of adjunctive perampanel has not been systematically assessed in seizure types other than its approved indications of focal seizures and primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) in idiopathic generalised epilepsies (IGEs).
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to identify and review available evidence on outcomes with perampanel in generalised seizures and epilepsies to examine its potential as a broad-spectrum anti-seizure medication.
METHODS
Bibliographic databases of publications, clinical trials, and conference abstracts were searched up to August 2020 to identify studies reporting seizure or safety outcomes in patients of any age, with any type of epilepsy-associated generalised seizures treated with perampanel. Data extracted from selected records were tabulated by seizure type and syndrome, and analysed qualitatively (PROSPERO protocol CRD42020201564).
RESULTS
Ninety-one reports met inclusion criteria and were selected: 15 reports of 1 randomised controlled trial (RCT), 8 reports of 4 non-randomised interventional studies, 37 reports of observational studies, 21 case reports and 10 systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Extracted data included 359 patients with PGTCS of any aetiology, 251 with myoclonic seizures, 112 with absence seizures, 50 with tonic seizures and 32 children with epileptic spasms. The most commonly reported epilepsy type was IGE (N = 378) and the most common syndromes were juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (N = 92), progressive myoclonic epilepsies (N = 59) and absence epilepsies (N = 43). The RCT provided Class I evidence of the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel for PGTCS in patients aged ≥ 12 years with IGE. Data from other studies provides weaker (observational) evidence of its effectiveness in multiple generalised seizure types, including myoclonic, absence and tonic seizures. There were no patterns suggesting seizure worsening or aggravation in any seizure or epilepsy type.
CONCLUSIONS
The identified studies suggest the potential of perampanel as a broad-spectrum antiseizure medication. Much of the available data, however, come from non-randomised, non-controlled studies and are open to high risk of bias. Further studies are warranted to provide more robust evidence.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy, Generalized; Humans; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Nitriles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34232492
DOI: 10.1007/s40263-021-00831-y -
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Aug 2021Lafora disease (LD) is a rare fatal autosomal recessive form of progressive myoclonus epilepsy. It affects previously healthy children or adolescents, causing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Lafora disease (LD) is a rare fatal autosomal recessive form of progressive myoclonus epilepsy. It affects previously healthy children or adolescents, causing pharmacoresistant epilepsy, myoclonus and severe psychomotor deterioration. This work aims to describe the clinical course of LD and identify predictors of outcome by means of a prognostic systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis.
METHODS
A search was conducted on MEDLINE and Embase with no restrictions on publication date. Only studies reporting genetically confirmed LD cases were included. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to assess probability of death and loss of autonomy. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models with mixed effects (clustered survival data) were performed to evaluate prognostic factors.
RESULTS
Seventy-three papers describing 298 genetically confirmed LD cases were selected. Mean age at disease onset was 13.4 years (SD 3.7), with 9.1% aged ≥ 18 years. Overall survival rates in 272 cases were 93% [95% CI 89-96] at 5 years, 62% [95% CI 54-69] at 10 years and 57% [95% CI 49-65] at 15 years. Median survival time was 11 years. The probability of loss of autonomy in 110 cases was 45% [95% CI 36-55] at 5 years, 75% [95% CI 66-84] at 10 years, and 83% [95% CI 74-90] at 15 years. Median loss of autonomy time was 6 years. Asian origin and age at onset < 18 years emerged as negative prognostic factors, while type of mutated gene and symptoms at onset were not related to survival or disability.
CONCLUSIONS
This study documented that half of patients survived at least 11 years. The notion of actual survival rate and prognostic factors is crucial to design studies on the effectiveness of upcoming new disease-modifying therapies.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Humans; Lafora Disease; Prognosis
PubMed: 34399803
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-01989-w