-
Neuropsychology Review Mar 2024Olfactory training (OT), or smell training,consists of repeated exposure to odorants over time with the intended neuroplastic effect of improving or remediating... (Review)
Review
Olfactory training (OT), or smell training,consists of repeated exposure to odorants over time with the intended neuroplastic effect of improving or remediating olfactory functioning. Declines in olfaction parallel declines in cognition in various pathological conditions and aging. Research suggests a dynamic neural connection exists between olfaction and cognition. Thus, if OT can improve olfaction, could OT also improve cognition and support brain function? To answer this question, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine whether there is evidence that OT translates to improved cognition or altered brain morphology and connectivity that supports cognition. Across three databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, & Embase), 18 articles were identified in this systematic review. Overall, the reviewed studies provided emerging evidence that OT is associated with improved global cognition, and in particular, verbal fluency and verbal learning/memory. OT is also associated with increases in the volume/size of olfactory-related brain regions, including the olfactory bulb and hippocampus, and altered functional connectivity. Interestingly, these positive effects were not limited to patients with smell loss (i.e., hyposmia & anosmia) but normosmic (i.e., normal ability to smell) participants benefitted as well. Implications for practice and research are provided.
Topics: Humans; Brain; Cognition; Olfaction Disorders; Olfactory Training; Smell
PubMed: 36725781
DOI: 10.1007/s11065-022-09573-0 -
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 2022SARS-CoV-2 is the pathogen of COVID-19. The virus is composed of the spike, membrane and envelope. On physiological smell, odoriferous substances bind to proteins... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
SARS-CoV-2 is the pathogen of COVID-19. The virus is composed of the spike, membrane and envelope. On physiological smell, odoriferous substances bind to proteins secreted by sustentacular cells in order to be processed by olfactory receptor neurons. Olfactory disorder is one of the main manifestations of COVID-19, however, research is still required to clarify the mechanism involved in SARS-CoV-2 induced anosmia.
OBJECTIVE
This article aims to analyze current scientific evidence intended to elucidate the pathophysiological relationship between COVID-19 and the cause of olfactory disorders.
METHODS
Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and ScienceDirect were used to compose this article. The research was conducted on November 24th, 2020. Original articles with experimental studies in human, animal and in vitro, short communications, viewpoint, published in the English language and between 2019 and 2020 were included, all related to the pathophysiological relationship between olfactory disorders and COVID-19 infection.
RESULTS
Both human cell receptors ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are essential for the SARS-CoV-2 entrance. These receptors are mostly present in the olfactory epithelium cells, therefore, the main hypothesis is that anosmia is caused due to damage to non-neuronal cells which, thereafter, affects the normal olfactory metabolism. Furthermore, magnetic resonance imaging studies exhibit a relationship between a reduction on the neuronal epithelium and the olfactory bulb atrophy. Damage to non-neuronal cells explains the average recovery lasting a few weeks. This injury can be exacerbated by an aggressive immune response, which leads to damage to neuronal cells and stem cells inducing a persistent anosmia. Conductive anosmia is not sufficient to explain most cases of COVID-19 induced anosmia.
CONCLUSION
Olfactory disorders such as anosmia and hyposmia can be caused by COVID-19, the main mechanism is associated with olfactory epithelium damage, targeting predominantly non-neuronal cells. However, neuronal cells can also be affected, worsening the condition of olfactory loss.
Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Animals; Anosmia; COVID-19; Humans; Olfaction Disorders; SARS-CoV-2; Smell
PubMed: 33965353
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.04.001 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Feb 2021Olfactory dysfunction is a common problem that is most frequently attributed to upper respiratory infection. Postviral olfactory dysfunction (PVOD) can be prolonged and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Olfactory dysfunction is a common problem that is most frequently attributed to upper respiratory infection. Postviral olfactory dysfunction (PVOD) can be prolonged and clinically challenging to treat. Olfactory training (OT) has demonstrated potential benefit for patients with nonspecific olfactory dysfunction. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of OT specifically for PVOD by pooled analysis of the existing evidence.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science.
REVIEW METHODS
Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were queried and abstracts screened independently by 2 investigators. We included studies evaluating the efficacy of OT for PVOD and excluded studies evaluating pharmacologic interventions or olfactory loss from other causes.
RESULTS
Of the initial 1981 abstracts reviewed, 16 full-text articles were included. Sniffin' Sticks olfactory testing results were reported in 15 (93%) studies as threshold (T), discrimination (D), and identification (I) subscores and TDI total scores. All studies reported clinically significant results after OT, defined as a score improvement of TDI >5.5. Four studies were included in the meta-analysis, in which pooled estimates revealed that patients with PVOD who received OT had a 2.77 (95% confidence interval, 1.67-4.58) higher odds of achieving a clinically important difference in TDI scores compared to controls.
CONCLUSION
Meta-analysis of existing data demonstrates clinically significant improvements in PVOD associated with OT. Variability exists among OT protocols and may benefit from further optimization. Existing data supports the use of OT for the treatment of existing and newly emerging cases of PVOD.
Topics: Humans; Olfaction Disorders; Respiratory Tract Infections; Virus Diseases
PubMed: 32660334
DOI: 10.1177/0194599820943550 -
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Jun 2021Olfactory impairment is a common clinical motif across neurodevelopmental disorders, suggesting olfactory circuits are particularly vulnerable to disease processes and... (Review)
Review
Olfactory impairment is a common clinical motif across neurodevelopmental disorders, suggesting olfactory circuits are particularly vulnerable to disease processes and can provide insight into underlying disease mechanisms. The mouse olfactory bulb is an ideal model system to study mechanisms of neurodevelopmental disease due to its anatomical accessibility, behavioral relevance, ease of measuring circuit input and output, and the feature of adult neurogenesis. Despite the clinical relevance and experimental benefits, olfactory testing across animal models of neurodevelopmental disease has been inconsistent and non-standardized. Here we performed a systematic literature review of olfactory function testing in mouse models of neurodevelopmental disorders, and identified intriguing inconsistencies that include evidence for both increased and decreased acuity in odor detection in various mouse models of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Based on our identified gaps in the literature, we recommend direct comparison of different mouse models of ASD using standardized tests for odor detection and discrimination. This review provides a framework to guide future olfactory function testing in mouse models of neurodevelopmental diseases.
Topics: Adult; Animals; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Humans; Mice; Neurogenesis; Olfaction Disorders; Olfactory Bulb; Smell
PubMed: 33610612
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.024 -
The Laryngoscope Jun 2022Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is a common presenting symptom of COVID-19 infection. Radiological imaging of the olfactory structures in patients with COVID-19 and OD can... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is a common presenting symptom of COVID-19 infection. Radiological imaging of the olfactory structures in patients with COVID-19 and OD can potentially shed light on its pathogenesis, and guide clinicians in prognostication and intervention.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, SCOPUS were searched from inception to August 1, 2021. Three reviewers selected observational studies, case series, and case reports reporting radiological changes in the olfactory structures, detected on magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or other imaging modalities, in patients aged ≥18 years with COVID-19 infection and OD, following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines and a PROSPERO-registered protocol (CRD42021275211). We described the proportion of radiological outcomes, and used random-effects meta-analyses to pool the prevalence of olfactory cleft opacification, olfactory bulb signal abnormalities, and olfactory mucosa abnormalities in patients with and without COVID-19-associated OD.
RESULTS
We included 7 case-control studies (N = 353), 11 case series (N = 154), and 12 case reports (N = 12). The pooled prevalence of olfactory cleft opacification in patients with COVID-19 infection and OD (63%, 95% CI = 0.38-0.82) was significantly higher than that in controls (4%, 95% CI = 0.01-0.13). Conversely, similar proportions of cases and controls demonstrated olfactory bulb signal abnormalities (88% and 94%) and olfactory mucosa abnormalities (2% and 0%). Descriptive analysis found that 55.6% and 43.5% of patients with COVID-19 infection and OD had morphological abnormalities of the olfactory bulb and olfactory nerve, respectively, while 60.0% had abnormal olfactory bulb volumes.
CONCLUSION
Our findings implicate a conductive mechanism of OD, localized to the olfactory cleft, in approximately half of the affected COVID-19 patients. Laryngoscope, 132:1260-1274, 2022.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; COVID-19; Humans; Olfaction Disorders; Olfactory Bulb; Olfactory Mucosa; Smell
PubMed: 35318656
DOI: 10.1002/lary.30078 -
Neuroradiology Jan 2023The neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2 and the consequential damage to the olfactory system have been proposed as one of the possible underlying causes of olfactory dysfunction... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2 and the consequential damage to the olfactory system have been proposed as one of the possible underlying causes of olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19. We aimed to aggregate the results of the studies which reported imaging of the olfactory system of patients with COVID-19 versus controls.
METHODS
PubMed and EMBASE were searched to identify relevant literature reporting the structural imaging characteristics of the olfactory bulb (OB), olfactory cleft, olfactory sulcus (OS), or olfactory tract in COVID-19 patients. Hedge's g and weighted mean difference were used as a measure of effect size. Quality assessment, subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analysis were also conducted.
RESULTS
Ten studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, out of which seven studies with 183 cases with COVID-19 and 308 controls without COVID-19 were enrolled in the quantitative synthesis. No significant differences were detected in analyses of right OB volume and left OB volume. Likewise, right OS depth and left OS depth were also not significantly different in COVID-19 cases compared to non-COVID-19 controls. Also, we performed subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and sensitivity analysis to investigate the potential effect of confounding moderators.
CONCLUSION
The findings of this review did not confirm alterations in structural imaging of the olfactory system, including OB volume and OS depth by Covid-19 which is consistent with the results of recent histopathological evaluations.
Topics: Humans; Olfaction Disorders; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Olfactory Bulb
PubMed: 35843987
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-03014-8 -
Translational Research : the Journal of... Oct 2022Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) represent some of the most commonly employed vectors for targeted gene delivery and their extensive study has resulted in the approval of... (Review)
Review
Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) represent some of the most commonly employed vectors for targeted gene delivery and their extensive study has resulted in the approval of multiple gene therapies to treat human diseases. The intranasal route of vector application in gene therapy offers several advantages over traditional ways of administration. In addition to targeting local tissue like the olfactory epithelium, it provides minimally invasive access to various organ systems, including the central nervous system and the respiratory tract. Through a systematic literature review, a total of 53 articles that investigated the intranasal application of AAVs were identified, included, and summarized in this manuscript. Within these studies, AAV-based gene therapy was mainly investigated for its application in various infectious, pulmonary, or neurologic and/or psychiatric diseases. This review gives a comprehensive overview of the current technological state of the art regarding the intranasal application of AAVs for gene transfer and discusses remaining hurdles, which still have to be resolved before this approach can effectively be implemented in the routine clinical setting.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Dependovirus; Gene Transfer Techniques; Genetic Therapy; Genetic Vectors; Humans
PubMed: 35597541
DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2022.05.002 -
Journal of Neurology Nov 2023Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with nervous system involvement, with more than one-third of COVID-19 patients experiencing neurological... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with nervous system involvement, with more than one-third of COVID-19 patients experiencing neurological manifestations. Utilizing a systematic review, this study aims to summarize brain MRI findings in COVID-19 patients presenting with neurological symptoms.
METHODS
Systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist. The electronic databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for literature addressing brain MRI findings in COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms.
RESULTS
25 publications containing a total number of 3118 COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms who underwent MRI were included. The most common MRI findings and the respective pooled incidences in decreasing order were acute/subacute infarct (22%), olfactory bulb abnormalities (22%), white matter abnormalities (20%), cerebral microbleeds (17%), grey matter abnormalities (12%), leptomeningeal enhancement (10%), ADEM (Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis) or ADEM-like lesions (10%), non-traumatic ICH (10%), cranial neuropathy (8%), cortical gray matter signal changes compatible with encephalitis (8%), basal ganglia abnormalities (5%), PRES (Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome) (3%), hypoxic-ischemic lesions (4%), venous thrombosis (2%), and cytotoxic lesions of the corpus callosum (2%).
CONCLUSION
The present study revealed that a considerable proportion of patients with COVID-19 might harbor neurological abnormalities detectable by MRI. Among various findings, the most common MRI alterations are acute/subacute infarction, olfactory bulb abnormalities, white matter abnormalities, and cerebral microbleeds.
PubMed: 37535100
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11914-9 -
European Journal of Neurology Dec 2023Alpha-synuclein seed amplification assays (α-syn SAAs) are promising diagnostic methods for Parkinson's disease (PD) and other synucleinopathies. However, there is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Alpha-synuclein seed amplification assays (α-syn SAAs) are promising diagnostic methods for Parkinson's disease (PD) and other synucleinopathies. However, there is limited consensus regarding the diagnostic and differential diagnostic performance of α-syn SAAs on biofluids and peripheral tissues.
METHODS
A comprehensive research was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. A network meta-analysis based on an ANOVA model was conducted to compare the relative accuracy of α-syn SAAs with different specimens.
RESULTS
The pooled sensitivity and specificity of α-syn SAAs in distinguishing PD from healthy controls or non-neurodegenerative neurological controls were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.92) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.94-0.96) for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.94) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.87-0.95) for skin; 0.80 (95% CI 0.66-0.89) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.69-0.96) for submandibular gland; 0.44 (95% CI 0.30-0.59) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.79-0.98) for gastrointestinal tract; 0.79 (95% CI 0.70-0.86) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.77-0.95) for saliva; and 0.51 (95% CI 0.39-0.62) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.84-0.96) for olfactory mucosa (OM). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.93) and 0.50 (95% CI 0.44-0.55) for CSF, 0.92 (95% CI 0.83-0.97) and 0.22 (95% CI 0.06-0.48) for skin, and 0.55 (95% CI 0.42-0.68) and 0.50 (95% CI 0.35-0.65) for OM in distinguishing PD from multiple system atrophy. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94) and 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.91) for CSF, 0.92 (95% CI 0.83-0.97) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.64-0.99) for skin and 0.63 (95% CI 0.52-0.73) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.64-0.97) for OM in distinguishing PD from progressive supranuclear palsy. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.97) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.77-1.00) for CSF and 0.94 (95% CI 0.84-0.99) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.42-1.00) for skin in distinguishing PD from corticobasal degeneration.
CONCLUSIONS
α-Synuclein SAAs of CSF, skin, saliva, submandibular gland, gastrointestinal tract and OM are promising diagnostic assays for PD, with CSF and skin α-syn SAAs demonstrating higher diagnostic performance.
Topics: Humans; Parkinson Disease; alpha-Synuclein; Network Meta-Analysis; Biomarkers; Multiple System Atrophy
PubMed: 37573472
DOI: 10.1111/ene.16041 -
Brain Sciences Jul 2021Olfactory decline is an early symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is a predictor of conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD. Olfactory decline could... (Review)
Review
Olfactory decline is an early symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is a predictor of conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD. Olfactory decline could reflect AD-related atrophy of structures related to the sense of smell. The aim of this study was to verify whether the presence of a clinical diagnosis of AD or MCI is associated with a volumetric decrease in the olfactory bulbs (OB) and the primary olfactory cortex (POC). We conducted two systematic reviews, one for each region and a meta-analysis. We collected articles from PsychNet, PubMed, Ebsco, and ProQuest databases. Results showed large and heterogeneous effects indicating smaller OB volumes in patients with AD (k = 6, = -1.21, 95% CI [-2.19, -0.44]) and in patients with MCI compared to controls. There is also a trend for smaller POC in patients with AD or MCI compared to controls. Neuroanatomical structures involved in olfactory processing are smaller in AD and these volumetric reductions could be measured as early as the MCI stage.
PubMed: 34439629
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11081010