-
BMJ Open Dec 2021The objective of this scoping review was to map the current situation and available evidence and gaps on rabies morbidity, mortality, integrated rabies surveillance... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this scoping review was to map the current situation and available evidence and gaps on rabies morbidity, mortality, integrated rabies surveillance programmes, and existing prevention and control strategies in Africa.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic scoping review following the Joanna Briggs methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews checklist. Medline, Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOHost), Scopus, Web of Science and rabies web conferences were used to search for peer-reviewed publications between January 1946 and May 2020. Two researchers reviewed the studies and extracted data based on author (year) and region, study design and data collection duration, participants/comparators, interventions, control conditions/exposures and outcomes (rabies mortality and morbidity) and key findings/gaps/challenges. The results were reported narratively using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework.
RESULTS
Electronic search yielded 2775 records, of which 43 studies were included. A total of 543 714 bite victims were censored through the included studies. Most of the victims were less than 15 years of age. The studies included rabies morbidity (21) and mortality (15) fluctuating in space and time across Africa depending on countries' rabies prevention and control practices (16). Others were surveillance (nine studies); surveillance and prevention (five studies); management and control (seven studies); and surveillance, prevention and control (six studies). We found challenges in rabies reporting, existing dog vaccination programmes and post-exposure prophylaxis availability or compliance.
CONCLUSION
This study found challenges for dog rabies control and elimination in Africa and the need for a policy to drive the goal of zero dog-transmitted rabies to humans by 2030.This is an open-access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build on this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated and the use is non-commercial (see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Topics: Africa; Animals; Bites and Stings; Dogs; Morbidity; Post-Exposure Prophylaxis; Rabies
PubMed: 34857556
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048551 -
BMC Oral Health Feb 2024Moebius syndrome (MS) is a rare, non-progressive, neuromuscular, congenic disease involving the oral maxillofacial region. The present study aimed to describe the oral...
BACKGROUND
Moebius syndrome (MS) is a rare, non-progressive, neuromuscular, congenic disease involving the oral maxillofacial region. The present study aimed to describe the oral and extraoral findings in MS patients and their comprehensive dental management.
METHODS
A digital search was carried out in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, restricted to articles in English from Jan 01, 2000, to Apr 02, 2023, following PRISMA guidelines. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated following the JBI guidelines. Qualitative analysis was carried out on the overall result, extraoral and intraoral manifestations, considering dental management as appropriate.
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies were included, and a total of 124 cases of patients with MS were analyzed. The 82% of patients with MS were younger than 15 years of age. The most frequent extraoral manifestations were blinking and visual problems (78,22%), malformations of the upper and lower limbs (58,22%), bilateral facial paralysis (12,90%), lack of facial expression (12.09%), and unilateral facial paralysis (6,45%). On the other hand, the most frequent oral manifestations were tongue deformities (78,22%), micrognathia (37,90%), labial incompetence (36,29%), cleft palate (22,87%), gothic palate (16,12%), microstomia (15,32%), anterior open bite (15,32%), dental caries (8,87%), and periodontal disease (8,06%). The majority of MS patients were treated by pediatric dentistry (60,86%), using a surgical approach (56,52%), and orthodontic and orthopedic maxillary (43,47%) followed by restorative (39,13%), and periodontal treatments (21,73%).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review demonstrates that patients with MS present a wide variety of oral and extraoral manifestations, for which dental treatments are planned and tailored to each patient in accordance with oral manifestations. These treatments encompass problem resolution and oral health maintenance, incorporating recent techniques in managing and treating patients with MS.
Topics: Child; Humans; Mobius Syndrome; Facial Paralysis; Dental Caries; Cleft Palate; Dental Care
PubMed: 38321523
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-03968-6 -
The International Journal of Oral &... 2020To investigate the odds of developing open proximal contact (OPC) between implant-supported fixed prostheses and adjacent teeth compared with that between... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To investigate the odds of developing open proximal contact (OPC) between implant-supported fixed prostheses and adjacent teeth compared with that between tooth-supported fixed prostheses and adjacent teeth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A search was conducted in the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases for clinical studies on OPC developed with implant-supported prostheses or tooth-supported prostheses. A meta-analysis was performed using statistical software to estimate the odds of developing OPC with implant-supported prostheses compared with tooth-supported prostheses, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The statistical significance was defined as P < .05.
RESULTS
The odds ratio (OR) of developing OPC with implant-supported prostheses was 2.46 compared with tooth-supported prostheses (95% CI [1.21 to 5.01]; P = .013]. However, the data were highly heterogenous (τ = 0.40, I = 95.67%). The total estimates of developing OPC were 41% (95% CI [30% to 54%]) with implant-supported prostheses and 22% (95% CI [18% to 26%]) with tooth-supported prostheses. OPC was more prevalent at the mesial side than at the distal side of implant-supported prostheses (OR = 2.38, 95% CI [0.94 to 6]; P = .066), whereas OPC was more prevalent at the distal side than at the mesial side of tooth-supported prostheses (OR = 1.94, 95% CI [1.09 to 3.45]; P = .024). There was no statistically significant difference in developing OPC with covariates of sex, age, arch, splinting of implants or adjacent teeth, region, and vitality of adjacent teeth, retention type, opposing dentition, occlusal force, parafunctional activities, and follow-up time. OPC was found to increase 9% per year with implant-supported prostheses (OR = 1.09). The estimate of interproximal gap next to implant-supported prostheses was 245.8 μm (95% CI [86.4 to 405.3 μm]).
CONCLUSION
Within the limitations of this systematic review and meta-analysis, the odds of developing OPC were significantly higher with implant-supported prostheses than with tooth-supported prostheses. However, the data were highly heterogenous, and thus, a well-designed randomized clinical study needs to be conducted to validate the results of this systematic review.
Topics: Bite Force; Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Denture, Partial, Fixed
PubMed: 33270050
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.8415 -
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 2023The use of lingual spurs has been described as one efficient option, with great stability of results, but with scarce information of toleration for use in the mixed and...
INTRODUCTION
The use of lingual spurs has been described as one efficient option, with great stability of results, but with scarce information of toleration for use in the mixed and permanent dentition phases.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of lingual spurs on the oral health-related quality of life of children and/or adolescents during anterior open bite treatment.
METHODS
The review was recorded in the PROSPERO database. Eight electronic databases and partial gray literature were searched, without restrictions until march 2022. A manual search was also performed in the references of the included articles. Studies assessing the impact of lingual spurs on the oral health-related quality of life were included. Risk of bias was assessed using JBI or ROBINS-I tool, according to the study design. The level of evidence was assessed through GRADE.
RESULTS
Five studies met the eligibility criteria. Two non-randomized clinical trials had a serious risk of bias. Of the case-series studies, two had a low risk of bias and the other, a moderate risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was classified as very low for all the evaluated results. In general, the studies reported an initial negative impact with the use of lingual spurs, however this was transitory in nature. A quantitative analysis was not performed due to the great heterogeneity between the studies.
CONCLUSION
Current evidence, although limited, suggests that lingual spurs have an initial transient negative impact during interceptive treatment. Additional well-conducted randomized clinical trials are needed.
Topics: Child; Adolescent; Humans; Open Bite; Quality of Life; Tongue; Dentition, Permanent
PubMed: 37075416
DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.28.1.e2321298.oar -
Cureus Oct 2023This study presents a case series and systematic review of pediatric patients who sustained long bone fractures following dog bites. A systematic review of the studies...
This study presents a case series and systematic review of pediatric patients who sustained long bone fractures following dog bites. A systematic review of the studies on "pediatric fracture dog bite" based on a search of PubMed and OVID Medline databases was performed by adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Articles in English describing pediatric long bone fractures due to dog bites were included. Studies not differentiating pediatric from adult patients and not describing long bone fractures due to dog bites were excluded. Study characteristics, fracture epidemiology, management decisions, and follow-up data were extracted. Additionally, a seven-year retrospective chart review of cases treated at our level one pediatric trauma center was performed. Data on fracture characteristics, surgical management, choice of antibiotic therapy, and follow-up were collected. Five studies that met our criteria were analyzed. Pediatric long bone fractures from dog bites were identified in 0.35% (11/3,156) of patients. Such fractures most commonly involved the upper extremity (9/11, 82%). None of the studies described the choice of antibiotics, surgical decision-making, or wound closure preference for an underlying fracture. Our chart review elicited three cases of long bone fractures due to dog bites. Pediatric long bone fractures after dog bites are a rare injury pattern in the United States. These injuries should be treated as contaminated open fractures, and urgent immunization, intravenous antibiotic administration, wound care, and fracture stabilization should be provided. We recommend meticulous surgical debridement in the operating room, as wounds often probe deep into the bone. Nevertheless, there is much that remains unclear about these injuries. Hence, further research with greater power is needed to improve treatment decisions.
PubMed: 38022042
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47230 -
International Journal of Environmental... May 2020The global epidemic of Zika virus has been a major public health problem affecting pregnant women and their infants. Zika virus causes a viral disease transmitted to...
The global epidemic of Zika virus has been a major public health problem affecting pregnant women and their infants. Zika virus causes a viral disease transmitted to humans mainly by the infected mosquito bite. The infection is not severe in most cases; however, there is evidence that infection during pregnancy may be associated with fetal genetic abnormalities (including microcephaly). In addition to microcephaly and other malformations, some specific lesions in the central nervous system have been reported. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the risk of developing microcephaly in infants whose mothers were infected with Zika virus in pregnancy. Epidemiological studies and case reports were incorporated in our review, finally including 15 articles from an initial pool of 355 related papers. Most studies have linked maternal infection during pregnancy to the development of neonatal microcephaly. The period considered most dangerous is the first trimester and the beginning or the whole of the second trimester. In order to understand the relationship between Zika virus and microcephaly in infants, a cohort study will be able to estimate the time from the onset of Zika infection and the full spectrum of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant; Microcephaly; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnancy Trimesters; Zika Virus; Zika Virus Infection
PubMed: 32471131
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17113806 -
L' Orthodontie Francaise Dec 2020The first publication on the use of magnets in dentistry for stabilizing prosthetics on implants dates back to 1953. Clinical development in orthodontics, without having...
The first publication on the use of magnets in dentistry for stabilizing prosthetics on implants dates back to 1953. Clinical development in orthodontics, without having experienced a real boom, has increased over the past ten years, in parallel with the improvement of the device. The objective of this review of the literature is to synthesize clinical applications and reported iatrogenic effects. A systematic review of the international literature from the Pubmed and Cochrane databases from 1999 to July 2018 was conducted which resulted in 36 articles. The factors studied are the indications and contraindications, the means or procedure, as well as the iatrogenic effects. Original cases are presented. The correction of infraclusions is the main indication, followed by the correction of anteroposterior malocclusions and then the correction of over-erupted teeth. Traction of an impacted teeth and diastema closure have not been found in recent publications probably because of the low benefit-risk ratio. The future no longer seems to be buried magnets or left in the long term in the mouth considering there seems to be concerns in terms of toxicity (or even the risk in terms of vital prognosis). The magnets could offer interesting perspectives to manage the current limits of the aligners, the movements of anterior egression, rotation and previous torque being still problematic...
Topics: Humans; Magnets; Malocclusion; Orthodontics; Orthodontics, Corrective; Tooth, Impacted
PubMed: 33372663
DOI: 10.1684/orthodfr.2020.26