-
The Journal of Infection Oct 2020Compared with guideline recommendations, antibiotic overuse is common in treating cellulitis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses on antibiotic route and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Compared with guideline recommendations, antibiotic overuse is common in treating cellulitis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses on antibiotic route and duration of treatment for cellulitis in adults and children.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and trial registries from inception to Dec 11, 2019 for interventional and observational studies of antibiotic treatment for cellulitis. Exclusions included case series/reports, pre-septal/orbital cellulitis and non-English language articles. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to produce summary relative risk (RR) estimates for our primary outcome of clinical response.
PROSPERO
CRD42018100602.
RESULTS
We included 47/8423 articles, incorporating data from eleven trials (1855 patients) in two meta-analyses. The overall risk of bias was moderate. Only two trials compared the same antibiotic agent in each group. We found no evidence of difference in clinical response rates for antibiotic route or duration (RR(oral:IV)=1.12, 95%CI 0.98-1.27, I=32% and RR(shorter:longer)=0.99, 95%CI 0•96-1.03, I = 0%, respectively). Findings were consistent in observational studies. Follow-up data beyond 30 days were sparse.
CONCLUSIONS
The evidence base for antibiotic treatment decisions in cellulitis is flawed by biased comparisons, short follow-up and lack of data around harms of antibiotic overuse. Future research should focus on developing patient-tailored antibiotic prescribing for cellulitis to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cellulitis; Child; Humans
PubMed: 32745638
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.07.030 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2021Periorbital and orbital cellulitis are infections of the tissue anterior and posterior to the orbital septum, respectively, and can be difficult to differentiate...
BACKGROUND
Periorbital and orbital cellulitis are infections of the tissue anterior and posterior to the orbital septum, respectively, and can be difficult to differentiate clinically. Periorbital cellulitis can also progress to become orbital cellulitis. Orbital cellulitis has a relatively high incidence in children and adults, and potentially serious consequences including vision loss, meningitis, and death. Complications occur in part due to inflammatory swelling from the infection creating a compartment syndrome within the bony orbit, leading to elevated ocular pressure and compression of vasculature and the optic nerve. Corticosteroids are used in other infections to reduce this inflammation and edema, but they can lead to immune suppression and worsening infection.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of adjunctive corticosteroids for periorbital and orbital cellulitis, and to assess their effectiveness and safety in children and in adults separately.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2020, Issue 3); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 2 March 2020.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included studies of participants diagnosed with periorbital or orbital cellulitis. We excluded studies that focused exclusively on participants who were undergoing elective endoscopic surgery, including management of infections postsurgery as well as studies conducted solely on trauma patients. Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. Any study that administered corticosteroids was eligible regardless of type of steroid, route of administration, length of therapy, or timing of treatment. Comparators could include placebo, another corticosteroid, no treatment control, or another intervention.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane.
MAIN RESULTS
The search yielded 7998 records, of which 13 were selected for full-text screening. We identified one trial for inclusion. No other eligible ongoing or completed trials were identified. The included study compared the use of corticosteroids in addition to antibiotics to the use of antibiotics alone for the treatment of orbital cellulitis. The study included a total of 21 participants aged 10 years and older, of which 14 participants were randomized to corticosteroids and antibiotics and 7 participants to antibiotics alone. Participants randomized to corticosteroids and antibiotics received adjunctive corticosteroids after initial antibiotic response (mean 5.13 days), at an initial dose of 1.5 mg/kg for three days followed by 1 mg/kg for another three days before being tapered over a one- to two-week period. We assessed the included study as having an unclear risk of bias for allocation concealment, masking (blinding), selective outcome reporting, and other sources of bias. Risk of bias from sequence generation and incomplete outcome data were low. The certainty of evidence for all outcomes was very low, downgraded for risk of bias (-1) and imprecision (-2). Length of hospital stay was compared between the group receiving antibiotics alone compared to the group receiving antibiotics and corticosteroids (mean difference (MD) 4.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.48 to 9.08; 21 participants). There was no observed difference in duration of antibiotics between treatment groups (MD 3.00, 95% CI -0.48 to 6.48; 21 participants). Likewise, preservation of visual acuity at 12 weeks of follow-up between group was also assessed (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.22; 21 participants). Pain scores were compared between groups on day 3 (MD -0.20, 95% CI -1.02 to 0.62; 22 eyes) along with the need for surgical intervention (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.11 to 9.23; 21 participants). Exposure keratopathy was reported in five participants who received corticosteroids and antibiotics and three participants who received antibiotic alone (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.63; 21 participants). No major complications of orbital cellulitis were seen in either the intervention or the control group. No side effects of corticosteroids were reported, although it is unclear which side effects were assessed.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of periorbital and orbital cellulitis. Since there is significant variation in how corticosteroids are used in clinical practice, additional high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials is needed to inform decision making. Future studies should explore the effects of corticosteroids in children and adults separately, and evaluate different dosing and timing of corticosteroid therapy.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bias; Cellulitis; Child; Humans; Length of Stay; Orbital Cellulitis; Pain Measurement; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 33908631
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013535.pub2 -
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aug 2023Cellulitis is a clinical diagnosis with several mimics and no gold standard diagnostic criteria. Misdiagnosis is common. This review aims to quantify the proportion of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Cellulitis is a clinical diagnosis with several mimics and no gold standard diagnostic criteria. Misdiagnosis is common. This review aims to quantify the proportion of cellulitis misdiagnosis in primary or unscheduled care settings based on a second clinical assessment and describe the proportion and types of alternative diagnoses.
METHODS
Electronic searches of Medline, Embase and Cochrane library (including CENTRAL) using MeSH and other subject terms identified 887 randomised and non-randomised clinical trials, and cohort studies. Included articles assessed the proportion of cellulitis misdiagnosis in primary or unscheduled care settings through a second clinical assessment up to 14 days post initial diagnosis of uncomplicated cellulitis. Studies on infants and patients with (peri-)orbital, purulent and severe or complex cellulitis were excluded. Screening and data extraction was conducted independently in pairs. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified risk of bias tool from Hoy et al. Meta-analyses were undertaken where ≥ 3 studies reported the same outcome.
RESULTS
Nine studies conducted in the USA, UK and Canada, including a total of 1600 participants, were eligible for inclusion. Six studies were conducted in the inpatient setting; three were in outpatient clinics. All nine included studies provided estimates of the proportion cellulitis misdiagnosis, with a range from 19 to 83%. The mean proportion misdiagnosed was 41% (95% CI 28 to 56% for random effects model). Heterogeneity between studies was very high both statistically (I 96%, p-value for heterogeneity < 0.001) and clinically. Of the misdiagnoses, 54% were attributed to three conditions (stasis dermatitis, eczematous dermatitis and edema/lymphedema).
DISCUSSION
The proportion of cellulitis misdiagnosis when reviewed within 14 days was substantial though highly variable, with the majority attributable to three diagnoses. This highlights the need for timely clinical reassessment and system initiatives to improve diagnostic accuracy of cellulitis and its most common mimics.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/9zt72 ).
Topics: Humans; Cellulitis; Diagnostic Errors; Canada
PubMed: 37231210
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08229-w -
Journal of Hospital Medicine Nov 2021Pediatric orbital cellulitis/abscess (OCA) can lead to vision loss, intracranial extension of infection, or cavernous thrombosis if not treated promptly. No widely... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Pediatric orbital cellulitis/abscess (OCA) can lead to vision loss, intracranial extension of infection, or cavernous thrombosis if not treated promptly. No widely recognized guidelines exist for the medical management of OCA. The objective of this review was to summarize existing evidence regarding the role of inflammatory markers in distinguishing disease severity and need for surgery; the role of imaging in OCA evaluation; and the microbiology of OCA over the past 2 decades.
METHODS
This review was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches were performed in MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCO), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), most recently on February 9, 2021.
RESULTS
A total of 63 studies were included. Most were descriptive and assessed to have poor quality with high risk of bias. The existing publications evaluating inflammatory markers in the diagnosis of OCA have inconsistent results. Computed tomography imaging remains the modality of choice for evaluating orbital infection. The most common organisms recovered from intraoperative cultures are Streptococcus species (Streptococcus anginosus group, group A Streptococcus, and pneumococcus) and Staphylococcus aureus. Methicillin-resistant S aureus in culture-positive cases had a median prevalence of 3% (interquartile range, 0%-13%).
CONCLUSION
This systematic review summarizes existing literature concerning inflammatory markers, imaging, and microbiology for OCA evaluation and management. High-quality evidence is still needed to define the optimal medical management of OCA.
Topics: Abscess; Child; Humans; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Orbital Cellulitis; Staphylococcal Infections; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 34730499
DOI: 10.12788/jhm.3707 -
PloS One 2023Periorbital and orbital cellulitis are inflammatory conditions of the eye that can be difficult to distinguish using clinical examination alone. Computer tomography (CT)...
BACKGROUND
Periorbital and orbital cellulitis are inflammatory conditions of the eye that can be difficult to distinguish using clinical examination alone. Computer tomography (CT) scans are often used to differentiate these two infections and to evaluate for complications. Orbital ultrasound (US) could be used as a diagnostic tool to supplement or replace CT scans as the main diagnostic modality. No prior systematic review has evaluated the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of ultrasound compared to cross-sectional imaging.
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review of studies evaluating the DTA of orbital ultrasound compared with cross-sectional imaging, to diagnose orbital cellulitis.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched from inception to August 10, 2022. All study types were included that enrolled patients of any age with suspected or diagnosed orbital cellulitis who underwent ultrasound and a diagnostic reference standard (i.e., CT or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]). Two authors screened titles/abstracts for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias.
RESULTS
Of the 3548 studies identified, 20 were included: 3 cohort studies and 17 case reports/series. None of the cohort studies directly compared the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound with CT or MRI, and all had high risk of bias. Among the 46 participants, diagnostic findings were interpretable in 18 (39%) cases which reported 100% accuracy. We were unable to calculate sensitivity and specificity due to limited data. In the descriptive analysis of the case reports, ultrasound was able to diagnose orbital cellulitis in most (n = 21/23) cases.
CONCLUSION
Few studies have evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of orbital ultrasound for orbital cellulitis. The limited evidence based on low quality studies suggests that ultrasound may provide helpful diagnostic information to differentiate orbital inflammation. Future research should focus studies to determine the accuracy of orbital US and potentially reduce unnecessary exposure to radiation.
Topics: Humans; Orbital Cellulitis; Ultrasonography; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Radionuclide Imaging; Diagnostic Tests, Routine; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 37410730
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288011 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Apr 2022Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) can cause infectious orbital, intracranial, and osseous complications. Diagnosis and management of complicated ODS have not been discussed in...
OBJECTIVE
Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) can cause infectious orbital, intracranial, and osseous complications. Diagnosis and management of complicated ODS have not been discussed in recent sinusitis guidelines. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe epidemiological and clinical features, as well as management strategies of complicated ODS.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library.
REVIEW METHODS
A systematic review was performed to describe various features of complicated ODS. All complicated ODS studies were included in qualitative analysis, but studies were only included in quantitative analysis if they reported specific patient-level data.
RESULTS
Of 1126 studies identified, 75 studies with 110 complicated ODS cases were included in qualitative analysis, and 47 studies with 62 orbital and intracranial complications were included in quantitative analyses. About 70% of complicated ODS cases were orbital complications. Only 23% of complicated ODS studies were published in otolaryngology journals. Regarding ODS-related orbital and intracranial complications, about 80% occurred in adults, and 75% were male. Complicated ODS occurred most commonly from apical periodontitis of maxillary molars. There were no relationships between sinusitis extent and orbital or intracranial complications. High rates of anaerobic and α-hemolytic streptococcal bacteria were identified in complicated ODS. Management generally included systemic antibiotics covering aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, and surgical interventions were generally performed to address both the complications (orbital and/or intracranial) and possible infectious sources (dentition and sinuses).
CONCLUSION
ODS should be considered in all patients with infectious extrasinus complications. Multidisciplinary management between otolaryngologists, dental specialists, ophthalmologists, and neurosurgeons should be considered to optimize outcomes.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Humans; Male; Orbital Diseases; Otolaryngologists; Otolaryngology; Paranasal Sinuses; Sinusitis
PubMed: 34253072
DOI: 10.1177/01945998211026268 -
Journal of Personalized Medicine Sep 2022Although they can occur at all ages, orbital (OC) and periorbital cellulitis (POC) prevail in the pediatric population. Acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is the most frequent... (Review)
Review
Although they can occur at all ages, orbital (OC) and periorbital cellulitis (POC) prevail in the pediatric population. Acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is the most frequent predisposing factor of OC. Recent literature has suggested a medical management approach for OC and POC, with surgery reserved only for more severe cases. However, there is still a lack of consensus on the clinical markers of a need for surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to identify clinical markers of a need for surgery in children with OC. Our systematic review, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) process, yielded 1289 articles finally screened. This resulted in 31 full texts that were included in a qualitative analysis. The results of this review suggest that in children aged over 9 years, large subperiosteal orbital abscesses (SPOAs), impaired vision, ophthalmoplegia, proptosis, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and absolute neutrophil counts (ANC), hemodynamic compromise, no clinical improvement after 48/72 h of antibiotic therapy, and a Chandler III score or higher are clinical markers of the need for surgery. However, most of the studies are observational and retrospective, and further studies are needed to identify reliable and repeatable clinical markers of the need for surgery.
PubMed: 36143312
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091527 -
European Archives of... Jul 2021The role of adjuvant systemic corticosteroids in the management of periorbital cellulitis and subperiosteal/orbital abscesses secondary to sinonasal infections is not... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The role of adjuvant systemic corticosteroids in the management of periorbital cellulitis and subperiosteal/orbital abscesses secondary to sinonasal infections is not well understood. Our objective was to systematically review the current evidence on the efficacy and side effects of systemic steroids when used in the management of periorbital cellulitis.
METHODOLOGY
A systematic review of literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidance. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases, MetaRegister and ISI conference proceedings was conducted. The outcomes of interest were duration of inpatient stay, requirement for surgical intervention, adverse effects and recurrent/residual symptoms.
RESULTS
Four studies were identified involving 118 patients. Of these, 78 underwent treatment with systemic corticosteroids and 40 were controls. Meta-analysis demonstrated that the mean duration of inpatient stay was significantly shorter in the steroid group (WMD - 2.90 days; 95% CI - 3.07, - 2.73; p < 0.00001). There were no significant differences in requirement for surgical intervention (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.50, 1.75; p = 0.83). Side effects were reported in 6/78 patients (7.7%), with 5 patients showing signs of hyperactivity and 1 patient with insomnia. These were mild except in one case, which required early cessation of corticosteroids. There was one case of recurrence of symptoms in each cohort (steroid vs. non-steroid) following discharge.
CONCLUSIONS
The evidence suggests that systemic corticosteroids may offer some benefit in the management of periorbital cellulitis secondary to sinonasal infections. However, there is significant heterogeneity and risk of bias. A well-designed randomised controlled trial may provide a better insight into the efficacy of systemic steroids for this condition.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Orbital Cellulitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sinusitis; Steroids
PubMed: 32833055
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06294-z -
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive...The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of orbital blow-in fractures involving compression of the globe by bone...
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of orbital blow-in fractures involving compression of the globe by bone fragments.
METHODS
A retrospective case series and systematic literature review were performed.
RESULTS
Three male patients (mean age 29 years) with orbital blow-in fractures causing globe indentation presented with extraocular movement restriction, choroidal folds, and B-scan ultrasonography demonstrating deformation of the globe contour by a hyperechoic bone fragment. All underwent surgical repair within 1 day of presentation resulting in improved visual outcomes. An additional 10 cases were identified in the literature review. The majority of patients were male (80%) with a mean age of 29 years. Fractures originated primarily from the lateral orbital wall (50%) or the orbital roof (40%). Globe compression was evident on CT of the orbit (100%) and ultrasonography (30%). Common presenting signs included decreased visual acuity (70%), restriction of supraduction (40%) or abduction (40%), choroidal folds (30%), brow laceration (40%), periorbital edema (40%), and hypoglobus (40%). Most patients underwent surgical intervention (80%) involving fracture reduction (50%) or fragment removal (38%). Reported postsurgical outcomes were excellent with resolution of diplopia, motility, and visual acuity.
CONCLUSION
Globe indentation from blow-in fractures are rare. Clinicians should be suspicious in cases of high-velocity trauma to the superolateral orbit with hypoglobus, motility limitation, and indentation of the globe upon dilated exam. Prompt diagnosis and early surgical removal of the compressive orbital bone fragments in a multidisciplinary fashion can lead to good visual, functional, and cosmetic outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Adult; Retrospective Studies; Orbital Fractures; Cellulitis; Diplopia
PubMed: 36190787
DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002272 -
Canadian Association of Radiologists... Feb 2024Fungal rhinosinusitis (FRS) includes non-invasive and invasive subtypes with the latter having significant morbidity and mortality. This systematic review aims to... (Review)
Review
Fungal rhinosinusitis (FRS) includes non-invasive and invasive subtypes with the latter having significant morbidity and mortality. This systematic review aims to identify the imaging features most correlated with invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (IFRS) and present a checklist of these features to aid diagnosis. PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Science Direct were searched from inception to May 2023, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Primary research articles published in English describing the imaging features of IFRS were included. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Forty-eight articles were identified for inclusion. Six studies examined radiological features in acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFRS), and 9 studies of chronic invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (CIFRS). A majority of studies did not specify whether IFRS cases were acute or chronic. On CT, bony erosion and mucosal thickening were the most common features. Other features include nasal soft tissue thickening, nasal cavity opacification, opacification of the affected sinus, and perisinus soft tissue infiltration. Extra-sinus extension was commonly observed on MRI, most often invading intraorbitally and intracranially. Other sites of extra-sinus extension included the cavernous sinus, pterygopalatine fossa, infratemporal fossa, masticator space, and facial soft tissue. IFRS is a condition with potential for high morbidity and mortality. Several radiological features are highly suggestive of IFRS. Early identification of high-risk radiological features using a checklist may aid prompt diagnosis and early treatment. Future research investigating the radiological differentiation between IFRS and other significant pathology including bacterial orbital cellulitis would be beneficial.
PubMed: 38344986
DOI: 10.1177/08465371241227424