-
The Lancet. Global Health May 2023Sub-Saharan Africa is highly endemic for hepatitis B virus (HBV); historically, most people were exposed during childhood through vertical or horizontal transmission.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Sub-Saharan Africa is highly endemic for hepatitis B virus (HBV); historically, most people were exposed during childhood through vertical or horizontal transmission. Although all African countries now provide a three-dose infant hepatitis B vaccination starting at age 6-8 weeks, only a third of African countries have introduced birth dose (HepB-BD) vaccine. Adding HepB-BD is fundamental to prevent vertical transmission, but its effectiveness in preventing horizontal transmission, compared with the three-dose infant vaccination alone, is unknown. We aimed to estimate the risk of early horizontal transmission in children of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative mothers in sub-Saharan Africa stratified according to the vaccination schedule.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis we searched MEDLINE, Global Health, Embase, African Index Medicus and African Journals Online from their inception to Oct 24, 2022, for studies reporting HBsAg or HBV DNA, or both, in children (aged 0-5 years) of HBsAg-negative mothers. We excluded studies if children were only tested at birth. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of all articles and data were extracted using a standardised pre-piloted data extraction sheet, and authors were contacted if any important information was missing. The primary outcome was the risk of HBV infection in children of HBsAg-negative mothers, stratified by vaccination schedule (no vaccination, first dose at 6-8 weeks, or first dose at birth). We pooled the child risks of HBsAg or HBV DNA-positivity from the age of 0 years to 5 years via a random-effect meta-analysis using a generalised linear mixed model. The study was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42021236203.
FINDINGS
Of 8856 articles identified, 27 studies evaluating 10 003 children of HBsAg-negative mothers were included. The pooled risks of infection were 6·16% (95% CI 3·05-12·04; 155/1407) in the no vaccination group, 0·21% (0·04-1·15; 10/3425) in children who received their first dose at 6-8 weeks, and 0·05% (0·00-1·32; 3/2902) in children who received their first dose at birth. The difference was not statistically significant in children who received their first dose at 6-8 weeks and children who received their first dose at birth after adjusting for the study period, region, and maternal HIV status (test of moderators p=0·37).
INTERPRETATION
In children of HBsAg-negative mothers, the risk of infection might be minimal even with the vaccination starting at 6-8 weeks, without clear additional benefit from HepB-BD. When births take place at home and timely administration of HepB-BD is challenging, antenatal HBsAg screening and selective HepB-BD might allow efficient allocation of resources to mother and child pairs at high risk compared with universal HepB-BD.
FUNDING
None.
TRANSLATION
For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Topics: Infant; Infant, Newborn; Child; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Hepatitis B virus; Mothers; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; DNA, Viral; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B Vaccines; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Africa South of the Sahara
PubMed: 37061310
DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00131-6 -
BMC Cancer Feb 2024Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections is an important public health problem worldwide and closely affect extrahepatic cancer. Several recent studies have investigated the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections is an important public health problem worldwide and closely affect extrahepatic cancer. Several recent studies have investigated the relationship between HBV infection and head and neck cancer (HNC), but their findings were inconsistent.In order to address the limitations of small sample sizes, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the association between HBV and HNC.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from inception to August 2023. Original articles published as a case-control or cohort study were included. HBV infection was identified by HBsAg, HBV DNA or ICD codes. Review articles, meeting abstracts, case reports, communications, editorials and letters were excluded, as were studies in a language other than English or Chinese. According to the MOOSE guidelines, frequencies reported for all dichotomous variables were extracted by two reviewers independently. Similarly, the outcomes of OR, RR or HR, and 95% CIs after adjusting for age and gender were collected.
RESULTS
Thirteen relevant studies and 58,006 patients with HNC were included. Our analysis revealed a positive correlation between HBV and HNC (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.28-1.77). After adjusting for age and gender, the similar result (OR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.10-1.54) was obtained. Subgroup analysis further demonstrated a significant association between HBV infection and oral cancer (OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.05-1.47), as well as nasopharyngeal carcinoma (OR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.26-1.58). However, due to the limited number of studies included, the statistical significance was not reached for cancer of the oropharynx (OR = 1.82; 95% CI: 0.66-5.05), hypopharynx (OR = 1.33; 95% CI: 0.88-2.00), and larynx (OR = 1.25; 95% CI: 0.69-2.24) after adjusting for age and gender. When excluding the interference of HIV/HCV, smoking and alcohol use, the final outcome (OR = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.01-1.35) got the same conclusion.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study confirmed a positive relationship between HNC, specifically oral cancer and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and HBV infection. However, further investigation is required at the molecular level to gather additional evidence in HNC.
Topics: Humans; Hepatitis B virus; Cohort Studies; Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma; Hepatitis B; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms; Mouth Neoplasms
PubMed: 38365701
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11967-7 -
Acta Histochemica Jan 2024The combined pathogenesis of Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and several viruses such as HBV, EBV and influenza virus have been investigated yet the molecular mechanism of their... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The combined pathogenesis of Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and several viruses such as HBV, EBV and influenza virus have been investigated yet the molecular mechanism of their interaction and possible synergistic effects is not fully understood.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of the current systematic review was to review in-vitro and in-vivo studies investigating the combined pathogenesis of aflatoxins and viruses.
METHODS
This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PECO (Population, Exposure, Comparator, and Outcome) criteria for invitro and invivo studies were used to evaluate the eligibility of the studies for systematic review.
RESULTS
21 studies were eligible for qualitative analysis based on the inclusion criteria. Of all the included studies, 9 (42.9 %) were invivo, 7 (33.3 %) were invitro-invivo and 5(23.8) articles conducted only invitro assay. Furthermore 14 (66.6 %) article explored hepatitis B virus (HBV) combination with AFB1, 4 (19 %) studied influenza A virus (SIV), 2 (9.7 %) were about Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and only 1 (4.7 %) included hepatitis C virus (HCV).
CONCLUSION
The limited collected evidence suggests that AFB1 enhanced EBV and influenza virus pathogenesis. AFB1 also operated as a cofactor for HBV and EBV-mediated carcinogenesis. On the other hand HBV and HCV also induced AFB-1 carcinogenesis. Due to the limited amount of included studies and the inconsistency of their results further studies especially on HBV and SIV are essential for better understanding of their combined mechanisms.
Topics: Humans; Aflatoxin B1; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Hepatitis B virus; Carcinogenesis; Hepatitis C
PubMed: 38101290
DOI: 10.1016/j.acthis.2023.152116 -
Clinical Gastroenterology and... Feb 2021Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir are recommended as first-line treatments for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, there is debate over... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir are recommended as first-line treatments for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, there is debate over the comparative effectiveness of these drugs in preventing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of TDF vs entecavir in reducing the incidence of HCC among patients with chronic HBV infection.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from 2010 through 2019 for full-text articles and conference abstracts on studies of effects of TDF vs entecavir in patients with HBV infection. Extracted data were analyzed with the random-effects model. Potential sources of heterogeneity were investigated using sensitivity, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses.
RESULTS
Our final analysis comprised 15 studies (61,787 patients; 16,101 patients given TDF and 45,686 given entecavir). TDF treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of HCC than entecavir (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93; P = .003; I = 13%). The lower risk of HCC in patients given TDF compared with entecavir persisted in sensitivity and subcohort analyses performed with propensity score-matched cohorts and cirrhosis subcohorts. Inclusion of patients with decompensated cirrhosis and the sample size were the factors with the largest effects on between-study heterogeneity in meta-regression analyses. Subsequent subgroup analyses showed no statistical differences in the incidence of death or transplantation (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73-1.17; P = .519; I = 6%) between patients given TDF vs entecavir.
CONCLUSIONS
In a meta-analysis of studies of patients with chronic HBV infection, we found that TDF treatment was associated with a significantly lower (20%) risk of HCC than entecavir treatment. Randomized trials are needed to support this finding.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Guanine; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32407970
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.05.008 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Aug 2022This study investigated the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic interventions to prevent vertical transmission of the hepatitis B virus. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacologic interventions to prevent mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
This study investigated the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic interventions to prevent vertical transmission of the hepatitis B virus.
DATA SOURCES
Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were searched up to October 28, 2020.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
All randomized controlled trials reporting vertical hepatitis B virus transmission with pharmacologic intervention were included.
METHODS
Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool, version 2. Treatment efficacy was estimated using stratified network meta-analysis on the basis of maternal hepatitis B envelope antigen status.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies were included for mothers positive for hepatitis B surface and envelope antigens. Pooling indicated that a combination of hepatitis B vaccination and hepatitis B immunoglobulin in infants significantly reduced transmission risk compared with vaccination alone, with a risk ratio of 0.52 (95% confidence interval; 0.30-0.91). Only the addition of maternal tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, but not telbivudine, lamivudine, or maternal hepatitis B immunoglobulin further reduced transmission risk compared with a combination of hepatitis B vaccination and hepatitis B immunoglobulin in infants, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.10 (0.03-0.35). Twelve studies conducted in mothers with hepatitis B surface antigen positivity and mixed, unknown, or negative hepatitis B envelope antigen status provided limited evidence to suggest that maternal hepatitis B immunoglobulin combined with hepatitis B vaccination and immunoglobulin in infants was the likely best treatment, but this failed to reach statistical significance compared with a combination of hepatitis B vaccination and immunoglobulin in infants. Similarly, infant hepatitis B immunoglobulin, added to vaccination, likely provides additional benefit but failed to reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSION
A combination of hepatitis B vaccination and immunoglobulin in infants is the cornerstone for prevention of vertical transmission for mothers positive for both hepatitis B surface and envelope antigens. The addition of maternal tenofovir to this infant combination regimen was considered the likely most effective treatment. For infants of mothers with hepatitis B surface antigen positivity and mixed, unknown, or negative hepatitis B envelop antigen status, no additional agents provided further benefit beyond hepatitis B vaccination alone.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Female; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Hepatitis B virus; Humans; Immunoglobulins; Infant; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Network Meta-Analysis; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Tenofovir; Viral Load
PubMed: 35263648
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.042 -
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics Jul 2021Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one the most common in the world. Aim of this study is to perform a systematic review on the relationship between HBV vaccination... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one the most common in the world. Aim of this study is to perform a systematic review on the relationship between HBV vaccination and multiple sclerosis. Research was conducted on Pubmed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus. Terms " and "" were used. Meta-analysis and metaregression were performed. 414 papers were found. Seven articles were selected. For the reported crude risk estimates for MS no statistically significant association was observed with pooled OR 1,19 (95%CI: 0,96-1,49). For the adjusted ORs, the pooled odds ratio (OR) was 0, 965 (95%CI: 0,886- 1,051). Meta regression show that year of publication is negatively (β: -0,019; P < 0.001) and NOS score and publishing in Europe are positively associated with O.R. value. Funnel plot showed the presence of publication bias. Results showed that Hepatitis B vaccination is not associated with an increased risk of developing MS.
Topics: Europe; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B Vaccines; Hepatitis B virus; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis
PubMed: 30260264
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1528835 -
BMC Public Health Jul 2022Persons who experience homelessness remain at increased risk for three viral blood-borne infections: human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Persons who experience homelessness remain at increased risk for three viral blood-borne infections: human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). We assessed the yield of testing and linkage to care programs targeting this population for these infections in the United States (US).
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central for peer-reviewed articles through August 27, 2020. Additionally, we searched the grey literature. Two individuals independently reviewed all relevant studies to check for eligibility and extracted data for each step in the care cascade. We used random-effects model to generate weighted pooled proportions to assess yield at each step. Cumulative proportions were calculated as products of adjacent-step pooled proportions. We quantitatively synthesized data from the studies that focused on non-drug injecting individuals.
RESULTS
We identified 24 studies published between 1996-2019 conducted in 19 US states. Seventeen studies screened for HIV, 12 for HCV, and two screened for HBV. For HIV, 72% of approached were recruited, 64% had valid results, 4% tested positive, 2% were given results, and 1% were referred and attended follow-up. Of positives, 25% were referred to treatment and started care. For HCV, 69% of approached were recruited, 63% had valid results, 16% tested positive, 14% were given results, and 3% attended follow-up. Of positives, 30% were referred for treatment and 19% started care. The yield at each care cascade step differs widely by recruitment strategy (for example, for HIV: 71.6% recruited of reached under service-based with zero yield under healthcare facility-based and outreach).
CONCLUSIONS
A very large proportion of this population reached for HIV and HCV care were lost in the follow-up steps and never received treatment. Future programs should examine drop-out reasons and intervene to reduce health disparities in this population.
Topics: Blood-Borne Infections; HIV Infections; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C; Ill-Housed Persons; Humans; United States
PubMed: 35883158
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13786-6 -
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Jan 2021The World Health Organization (WHO) has set an elimination goal for hepatitis B virus (HBV) by 2030, so a comprehensive review of current HBV testing and care gaps are... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The World Health Organization (WHO) has set an elimination goal for hepatitis B virus (HBV) by 2030, so a comprehensive review of current HBV testing and care gaps are needed to help formulate solutions and opportunities for action.
AIMS
To summarise current gaps and barriers, and to propose solutions for HBV prevention, testing and linkage to care in the United States METHODS: Relevant guidelines and studies were reviewed including a systematic review of HCC surveillance adherence.
RESULTS
A total of 64.5 million (95% CI, 61.3-67.5) high-risk US adults had no evidence of HBV immunity. Only 18.6% (95% CI, 13.5-29.9) of privately insured patients with HBV infection have been diagnosed. Among those with known HBV infection, linkage to care rate (33.3%-57%) was poor and the adherence to guidelines regarding anti-viral therapy (30.66% [95% CI, 30.28-31.03]) and HCC surveillance (8%-87%, from a systematic review) were poor with even more concerning data for care and treatment retention. The causes are complex and include lack of access to medical care, lack of physician knowledge, lack of patient health literacy and awareness, linguistic and cultural barriers and fear of stigma.
CONCLUSIONS
A 'scale-up' effort is needed to optimise the care continuum to achieve the WHO 2030 targets. As targeted screening policy has leftover 80% of patients undiagnosed, we advocate for universal screening which can help to remove barriers regarding stigma. More active and system level interventions are also needed to improve linkage to care for patients with HBV infection.
Topics: Adult; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B virus; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Mass Screening; United States
PubMed: 33222252
DOI: 10.1111/apt.16125 -
International Journal of Environmental... Feb 2023While Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are endemic in West Africa, the prevalence of HBV/HIV coinfection and their associated risk... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
While Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are endemic in West Africa, the prevalence of HBV/HIV coinfection and their associated risk factors in children remains unclear. In this review, we sought to assess HBsAg seroprevalence among 0- to 16-year-olds with and without HIV in West African countries and the risk factors associated with HBV infection in this population. Research articles between 2000 and 2021 that reported the prevalence of HBV and associated risk factors in children in West Africa were retrieved from the literature using the Africa Journals Online (AJOL), PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases as search tools. StatsDirect, a statistical software, was used to perform a meta-analysis of the retained studies. HBV prevalence and heterogeneity were then assessed with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plot asymmetry and Egger's test. Twenty-seven articles conducted across seven West African countries were included in this review. HBV prevalence among persons aged 0 to 16 years was 5%, based on the random analysis, given the great heterogeneity of the studies. By country, the highest prevalence was observed in Benin (10%), followed by Nigeria (7%), and Ivory Coast (5%), with Togo (1%) having the lowest. HBV prevalence in an HIV-infected population of children was (9%). Vaccinated children had lower HBV prevalence (2%) than unvaccinated children (6%). HBV prevalence with a defined risk factor such as HIV co-infection, maternal HBsAg positivity, undergoing surgery, scarification, or being unvaccinated ranged from 3-9%. The study highlights the need to reinforce vaccination of newborns, screening for HBV, and HBV prophylaxis among pregnant women in Africa, particularly in West Africa, to achieve the WHO goal of HBV elimination, particularly in children.
Topics: Humans; Female; Child; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; HIV; Seroepidemiologic Studies; Hepatitis B; HIV Infections; Cote d'Ivoire; Prevalence; Coinfection
PubMed: 36901164
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054142 -
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers &... Dec 2021Apart from the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), the etiology of the hematologic malignancy Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is not well defined. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Apart from the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), the etiology of the hematologic malignancy Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is not well defined. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are associated with some lymphoproliferative diseases with similarities to HL.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, by searching Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases on March 9, 2021, for studies reporting a measure of association for HBV and HL or HCV and HL. We calculated pooled relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS
Pooling nine HBV studies with 1,762 HL cases yielded an RR of 1.39 (95% CI, 1.00-1.94) and pooling 15 HCV studies with 4,837 HL cases resulted in an RR of 1.09 (95% CI, 0.88-1.35). Meta-analyzing by study design, hepatitis detection method, and region revealed two subgroups with statistically significant associations-HCV studies that used hospital-based controls and/or were conducted in the West Pacific. No included study assessed age or EBV tumor status in relation to HL.
CONCLUSIONS
Although we did not find an association between HBV or HCV and HL, research assessing the impact of age and EBV tumor status was lacking.
IMPACT
The effect of HBV or HCV infection in the development of HL remains unclear.
Topics: Causality; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Hodgkin Disease; Humans; Risk
PubMed: 34548328
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0548