-
North American Spine Society Journal Jun 2023Combined atlas-axis fractures are rare occurrences with substantially higher rates of neurologic deficits compared with isolated injuries. Given the intricate anatomic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Combined atlas-axis fractures are rare occurrences with substantially higher rates of neurologic deficits compared with isolated injuries. Given the intricate anatomic relationship between the atlas and axis vertebra, variable fracture patterns may occur, warranting special considerations from surgeons.
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies on acute combined atlas-axis fractures that provided data on patient demographics, presentation (injury mechanism, neurologic deficits, fracture type), management, complications, and study conclusions were reviewed.
RESULTS
A total of 22 articles published from 1977 to 2022, comprising 230 patients, were included in the final analysis. Thirty-seven of the 213 patients (17%) presented with neurologic deficits. The most common atlas injuries were posterior arch fractures (54/169 patients; 32%), combined posterior arch/anterior arch fractures (44/169 patients; 26%), and anterior arch fractures (43/169 patients; 25%). The most common axis injuries were type II odontoid fractures (115/175 patients; 66%). Of the 127 patients managed operatively (127/230 patients; 55%), 45 patients (35%) were treated with C1-C2 posterior spinal fusion, 33 patients (26%) were treated with odontoid screw fixation and anterior/posterior C1-C2 trans-articular screws, 16 patients (13%) were treated with occiputocervical fusion and 12 patients (9%) were treated with odontoid screw fixation alone.
CONCLUSIONS
Management strategies are generally based on the type of axis fracture as well as the condition of the transverse ligament. Patients with stable fractures can be successfully managed nonoperatively with a cervical collar or halo immobilization. Combined atlas-axis fractures with an atlantodental interval >5 mm, C1 lateral mass displacement >7 mm, C2-C3 angulation >11° or an MRI demonstrating a disrupted transverse ligament are suggestive of instability and are often successfully managed with surgical intervention. There is no consensus regarding surgical technique.
PubMed: 37440984
DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100224 -
European Spine Journal : Official... Oct 2023Odontoid fractures are the most common cervical spine fractures in the elderly, with a controversial optimal treatment. The objective of this review was to compare the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Odontoid fractures are the most common cervical spine fractures in the elderly, with a controversial optimal treatment. The objective of this review was to compare the outcome of surgical and conservative treatments in elderly (≥ 65 years), by updating a systematic review published by the authors in 2013.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was conducted in seven databases. Clinical outcome was the primary outcome. Fracture union- and stability were secondary outcomes. Pooled point estimates and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived using the random-effects model. A random-effects multivariable meta-regression model was used to correct for baseline co-variates when sufficiently reported.
RESULTS
Forty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, of which forty were case series and one a cohort study. No clinical differences in outcomes including the Neck Disability Index (NDI, 700 patients), Visual Analogue Scale pain (VAS, 180 patients), and Smiley-Webster Scale (SWS, 231 patients) scores were identified between surgical and conservative treatments. However, fracture union was higher in surgically treated patients (pooled incidence 72.7%, 95% CI 66.1%, 78.5%, 31 studies, 988 patients) than in conservatively treated patients (40.2%, 95% CI 32.0%, 49.0%, 22 studies, 912 patients). This difference remained after correcting for age and fracture type. Fracture stability (41 studies, 1917 patients), although numerically favoring surgery, did not appear to differ between treatment groups.
CONCLUSION
While surgically treated patients showed higher union rates than conservatively treated patients, no clinically relevant differences were observed in NDI, VAS pain, and SWS scores and stability rates. These results need to be further confirmed in well-designed comparative studies with proper adjustment for confounding, such as age, fracture characteristics, and osteoporosis degree.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Cohort Studies; Spinal Fractures; Odontoid Process; Fractures, Bone; Pain; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37439865
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07779-1 -
European Spine Journal : Official... Feb 2021The primary goal of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles focused on odontoid screw fixation (OSF) and screw-related complications... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The primary goal of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles focused on odontoid screw fixation (OSF) and screw-related complications or non-union rates.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed and Crossref databases between January 1982 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria comprised detailed descriptions of the surgical technique and screw-related complications (screw cut-out, loosening, breakage, malposition) or fusion rates.
RESULTS
The initial selection consisted of 683 abstracts. A total of 150 full texts were chosen for detailed study, and 83 articles were included in the analysis. The point estimates for screw-related complications were as follows: 1. screw malposition frequency-4.8%; 2. screw cut-out rate-5.0%; 3. screw loosening/pull-out-3.8%; and 4. screw fracture rate-3.1%. The point estimate for the non-union rate was 9.7%. Statistical analysis of the screw-related complications rate based on surgical technique details was also performed CONCLUSIONS: Double-screw OSF performance in elder patients resulted in a higher risk of post-operative screw cut-out. In other cases, the development of screw-related complications did not depend on the method of intraoperative head fixation, selection of the implant entry point for OSF, type of the used screws, or cannulated instruments application. The outcomes of single-screw fixation through the anterior lip of the C2 vertebra were comparable to other techniques of OSF. Further, statistically reliable studies should be carried out to identify the optimal technique of OSF.
Topics: Aged; Bone Screws; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Odontoid Process; Spinal Fractures
PubMed: 32556628
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06501-9 -
World Neurosurgery Nov 2022Odontoidectomy for symptomatic irreducible ventral brainstem compression at the craniovertebral junction may result in spine instability requiring subsequent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Odontoidectomy for symptomatic irreducible ventral brainstem compression at the craniovertebral junction may result in spine instability requiring subsequent instrumentation. There is no consensus on the importance of C1 anterior arch preservation in prevention of iatrogenic instability. We conducted a systematic review of the impact of C1 anterior arch preservation on postodontoidectomy spine stability.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched following the PRISMA guidelines to include studies of patients undergoing odontoidectomy. Random-effect model meta-analyses were performed to compare spine stability between C1 anterior arch preservation versus removal and posttreatment outcomes between transoral approaches (TOAs) versus endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs).
RESULTS
We included 27 studies comprising 462 patients. The most common lesions were basilar invagination (73.3%) and degenerative arthritis (12.6%). Symptoms included myelopathy (72%) and neck pain (43.9%). Odontoidectomy was performed through TOA (56.1%) and EEA corridors (34.4%). The C1 anterior arch was preserved in 16.7% of cases. Postodontoidectomy stabilization was performed in 83.3% patients. Median follow-up was 27 months (range, 0.1-145). Rates of spine instability were significantly lower (P = 0.004) when the C1 anterior arch was preserved. Postoperative clinical improvement and pooled complications were reported in 78.8% and 12.6% of patients, respectively, with no significant differences between TOA and EEA (P = 0.892; P = 0.346). Patients undergoing EEA had significantly higher rates of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS
Odontoidectomy is safe and effective for treating craniovertebral junction lesions. Preservation of the C1 anterior arch seems to improve maintenance of spine stability. TOA and EEA show comparable outcomes and complication rates.
Topics: Humans; Spine; Nose; Decompression, Surgical; Spinal Cord Diseases; Spinal Diseases; Odontoid Process
PubMed: 36049722
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.105 -
World Neurosurgery Aug 2022Nonoperative management of odontoid fractures can result in solid fusion, unstable nonunion, and fibrous nonunion. Odontoid fractures with fibrous nonunion will not... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Nonoperative management of odontoid fractures can result in solid fusion, unstable nonunion, and fibrous nonunion. Odontoid fractures with fibrous nonunion will not demonstrate dynamic instability on imaging studies. However, the safety of accepting this outcome has been debated. We have provided, to the best of our knowledge, the first systematic review of the existing literature to explore the safety of allowing fibrous nonunion as an acceptable outcome for odontoid fractures.
METHODS
The PubMed and Embase databases were searched in January 2022. The outcomes were extracted and categorized according to the mortality, neurologic sequelae, pain, neck disability index, and satisfaction.
RESULTS
Of a total of 700 abstracts screened, the full text of 79 reports was assessed, with 13 studies included. Of the included patients, 141 had had a fibrous nonunion, all described in observational studies. The follow-up ranged from 0.6 to 5.8 years. None of the 141 patients had experienced a neurologic event. One patient had died of trauma-related issues; however, causality was not reported. Most of the studies had reported good to excellent pain scores. Most of the neck disabilities reported had ranged from mild to moderate in severity. However, 1 study of 5 patients had reported severe disability. All the patients reported good or excellent satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS
The evidence we found supports that it is safe to forgo surgery for carefully selected patients with nonunited odontoid fractures when near-anatomic alignment is present, dynamic instability is lacking on imaging studies, the neurologic examination findings are normal, and the risk of neck injury is low. Further study is needed to define the full natural history of fibrous nonunion of odontoid fractures.
Topics: Fractures, Bone; Humans; Odontoid Process; Pseudarthrosis; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fractures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35659587
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.116 -
Neuro-Chirurgie Jul 2023Basilar invagination (BI) is an uncommon clinical condition of the craniocervical junction (CCJ). Surgical management depends on 2 factors: mobility and reducibility;... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Basilar invagination (BI) is an uncommon clinical condition of the craniocervical junction (CCJ). Surgical management depends on 2 factors: mobility and reducibility; in cases of irreducible dislocation or persistent compression, odontoidectomy should be considered.
CASE DISCUSSION
We present the case of a 13-year-old boy with severe BI, causing cervical myelopathy with progressive gait disorder. The patient underwent cervical traction followed by posterior decompression and occipitocervical fusion. Postoperatively, symptoms initially improved, until new neurological deterioraton set in 4 months later. Follow-up neuroimaging showed compression of the bulbo-medullary junction, with severe brainstem kinking and appearance of a cervical syrinx. Secondary surgery via an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) was deemed necessary to relieve the compression. Postoperative course was unremarkable, with steady clinical improvement and a return to independent activities of daily living within 6 months.
LITERATURE REVIEW
A systematic literature review indicated that EEA conserves the palate and oropharynx mucosae, thus causing less airway and swallowing complications than the transoral approach.
CONCLUSION
In selected cases with persistent anterior compression, odontoidectomy on EEA is a safe, effective and valid alternative for managing CCJ pathology.
Topics: Male; Humans; Child; Adolescent; Activities of Daily Living; Odontoid Process; Endoscopy; Joint Dislocations; Syringomyelia; Decompression, Surgical
PubMed: 37061181
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2023.101445 -
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine Aug 2023Odontoid fractures can be managed surgically when indicated. The most common approaches are anterior dens screw (ADS) fixation and posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis (PA). Each... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Odontoid fractures can be managed surgically when indicated. The most common approaches are anterior dens screw (ADS) fixation and posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis (PA). Each approach has theoretical advantages, but the optimal surgical approach remains controversial. The goal in this study was to systematically review the literature and synthesize outcomes including fusion rates, technical failures, reoperation, and 30-day mortality associated with ADS versus PA for odontoid fractures.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed and the I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.
RESULTS
In total, 22 studies comprising 963 patients (ADS 527, PA 436) were included. The average age of the patients ranged from 28 to 81.2 years across the included studies. The majority of the odontoid fractures were type II based on the Anderson-D'Alonzo classification. The ADS group was associated with statistically significantly lower odds to achieve bony fusion at last follow-up compared to the PA group (ADS 84.1%; PA 92.3%; OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23-0.91; I2 42.6%). The ADS group was associated with statistically significantly higher odds of reoperation compared to the PA group (ADS 12.4%; PA 5.2%; OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.50-4.35; I2 0%). The rates of technical failure (ADS 2.3%; PA 1.1%; OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.52-2.37; I2 0%) and all-cause mortality (ADS 6%; PA 4.8%; OR 1.35; 95% CI 0.67-2.74; I2 0%) were similar between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis of patients > 60 years old, the ADS was associated with statistically significantly lower odds of fusion compared to the PA group (ADS 72.4%; PA 89.9%; OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.06-0.91; I2 58.7%).
CONCLUSIONS
ADS fixation is associated with statistically significantly lower odds of fusion at last follow-up and higher odds of reoperation compared to PA. No differences were identified in the rates of technical failure and all-cause mortality. Patients receiving ADS fixation at > 60 years old had significantly higher and lower odds of reoperation and fusion, respectively, compared to the PA group. PA is preferred to ADS fixation for odontoid fractures, with a stronger effect size for patients > 60 years old.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Spinal Fractures; Odontoid Process; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Arthrodesis; Fractures, Bone; Bone Screws; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37148232
DOI: 10.3171/2023.3.SPINE221001 -
World Neurosurgery Apr 2021Intraoperative vascular injuries in the cervical spine are rare, but carry significant morbidity and mortality when they do occur. There is a need to better characterize... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Intraoperative vascular injuries in the cervical spine are rare, but carry significant morbidity and mortality when they do occur. There is a need to better characterize the risk of vertebral artery injury (VAI) after posterior C1-C2 fusion. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of VAI in patients undergoing posterior C1-C2 cervical fusion.
METHODS
An electronic database search was performed to identify studies that reported rates of VAI following posterior cervical fusion at C1-C2 level. Patient-specific risk factors, surgical indication, surgical technique, and other data were collected for each study. Forest plots were created to outline the pooled ratios of VAI in the literature.
RESULTS
Eleven studies with 773 patients were identified. Mean age of patients was 48.47 years (range, 6-78 years), and most patients were female (61.7%, n = 399). Trauma was the most frequent indication for surgery (18.8%, n = 146), followed by inflammatory processes affecting the vertebrae (13.2%, n = 102). The rate of VAI per patient was 2% (95% confidence interval = 1%-4%) among 773 patients, while injury rate per screw was 1% (95% confidence interval = 0%-2%) among 2238 screws placed.
CONCLUSIONS
The rate of VAI after C1-C2 posterior cervical fusion was found to be 2% for each operated patient and 1% for each screw placed.
Topics: Atlanto-Axial Joint; Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Cerebral Angiography; Cervical Atlas; Humans; Intraoperative Complications; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Spinal Fusion; Vascular System Injuries; Vertebral Artery
PubMed: 33516865
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.165 -
World Neurosurgery Apr 2021Arachnoid cysts are benign cerebrospinal fluid collection within a duplication of arachnoid membrane and, when found in the retrocerebellar site, they may be associated...
Coexisting Retrocerebellar Arachnoid Cyst and Chiari Type 1 Malformation: 3 Pediatric Cases of Surgical Management Tailored to the Pathogenic Mechanism and Systematic Review of the Literature.
INTRODUCTION
Arachnoid cysts are benign cerebrospinal fluid collection within a duplication of arachnoid membrane and, when found in the retrocerebellar site, they may be associated with tonsils herniation. This rare situation of coexisting retrocerebellar arachnoid cyst (AC) and Chiari malformation type 1 (CM-1) have been previously reported in few cases (10 patients) with syringomyelia and hydrocephalus described to be the most relevant issues. The aim of this paper is to describe 3 pediatric cases of this condition with a systematic review of the literature, underlining the importance of surgical management tailored to the pathogenic mechanism.
METHODS
A restrospective analysis of patients treated for coexisting CM-1 and ACs at the authors' institution has been carried out.
RESULTS
A case of a 10-month-old baby with coexisting AC and CM-1 with tri-ventricular hydrocephalus treated with endoscopic third ventriculostomy, a case of a 1-year-old child with a huge retrocerebellar AC and CM-1 treated with a cysto-peritoneal shunt, and a case of a 15-year-old child with retrocerebellar AC causing symptomatic CM-1 treated with C0-C2 decompression, AC fenestration and duraplasty are described. A long-term follow-up is reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Surgical management of coexisting ACs and CM-1 should not aim at the complete resolution of the cyst or of tonsil herniation, especially when pediatric patients are treated. Rather, the purpose of the neurosurgeon should be to understand the underlying pathogenic mechanism, and then restoring both the cerebrospinal fluid flow in the posterior fossa and the dynamic equilibrium between ventricles, cyst, and subarachnoid space.
Topics: Adolescent; Arachnoid Cysts; Arnold-Chiari Malformation; Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts; Cranial Fossa, Posterior; Decompression, Surgical; Humans; Hydrocephalus; Infant; Male; Neuroendoscopy; Peritoneal Cavity; Ventriculostomy
PubMed: 33385608
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.094 -
World Neurosurgery Sep 2020Odontoid fracture is a common injury especially in elderly people. Despite some recent studies arguing in favor of surgery, the best treatment is still being debated. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Odontoid fracture is a common injury especially in elderly people. Despite some recent studies arguing in favor of surgery, the best treatment is still being debated.
OBJECTIVE
We systematically review and analyze the comparative literature between surgical and conservative treatments of odontoid fractures.
METHODS
We systematically searched Medline and the Cochrane Library for studies reported from January 1990 to May 2019 in English. Comparative studies evaluating the results of surgical and conservative treatments for odontoid fractures were eligible for inclusion. Combined relative risks (RRs) for mortality at last follow-up, union or nonunion rates, and complications were calculated. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Influence of age and year of publication on treatment effect was explored using a meta-regression analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 1438 articles were identified, of which 30 articles with 2463 patients were eligible for inclusion. There was a trend toward lower mortality in the surgical group (RR, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.02). Nonunion rates (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.6) were lower in the surgical group. Union rates were higher in the surgical group (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.11-1.45). No significant influence of age or year of publication on treatment effect was found.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on this meta-analysis of nonrandomized comparative studies, surgical treatment seems not to be inferior to conservative treatments. The conclusions of this study remain limited by the low quality of the evidence available. Randomized controlled studies are required.
Topics: Conservative Treatment; Fracture Fixation; Humans; Odontoid Process; Spinal Fractures
PubMed: 32151771
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.169