-
Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) Feb 2022Body-fluid loss during prolonged continuous exercise can impair cardiovascular function, harming performance. Delta percent plasma volume (dPV) represents the change in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The Hydrating Effects of Hypertonic, Isotonic and Hypotonic Sports Drinks and Waters on Central Hydration During Continuous Exercise: A Systematic Meta-Analysis and Perspective.
BACKGROUND
Body-fluid loss during prolonged continuous exercise can impair cardiovascular function, harming performance. Delta percent plasma volume (dPV) represents the change in central and circulatory body-water volume and therefore hydration during exercise; however, the effect of carbohydrate-electrolyte drinks and water on the dPV response is unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To determine by meta-analysis the effects of ingested hypertonic (> 300 mOsmol kg), isotonic (275-300 mOsmol kg) and hypotonic (< 275 mOsmol kg) drinks containing carbohydrate and electrolyte ([Na] < 50 mmol L), and non-carbohydrate drinks/water (< 40 mOsmol kg) on dPV during continuous exercise.
METHODS
A systematic review produced 28 qualifying studies and 68 drink treatment effects. Random-effects meta-analyses with repeated measures provided estimates of effects and probability of superiority (p) during 0-180 min of exercise, adjusted for drink osmolality, ingestion rate, metabolic rate and a weakly informative Bayesian prior.
RESULTS
Mean drink effects on dPV were: hypertonic - 7.4% [90% compatibility limits (CL) - 8.5, - 6.3], isotonic - 8.7% (90% CL - 10.1, - 7.4), hypotonic - 6.3% (90% CL - 7.4, - 5.3) and water - 7.5% (90% CL - 8.5, - 6.4). Posterior contrast estimates relative to the smallest important effect (dPV = 0.75%) were: hypertonic-isotonic 1.2% (90% CL - 0.1, 2.6; p = 0.74), hypotonic-isotonic 2.3% (90% CL 1.1, 3.5; p = 0.984), water-isotonic 1.3% (90% CL 0.0, 2.5; p = 0.76), hypotonic-hypertonic 1.1% (90% CL 0.1, 2.1; p = 0.71), hypertonic-water 0.1% (90% CL - 0.8, 1.0; p = 0.12) and hypotonic-water 1.1% (90% CL 0.1, 2.0; p = 0.72). Thus, hypotonic drinks were very likely superior to isotonic and likely superior to hypertonic and water. Metabolic rate, ingestion rate, carbohydrate characteristics and electrolyte concentration were generally substantial modifiers of dPV.
CONCLUSION
Hypotonic carbohydrate-electrolyte drinks ingested continuously during exercise provide the greatest benefit to hydration.
Topics: Bayes Theorem; Dehydration; Exercise; Humans; Osmolar Concentration; Sodium; Water-Electrolyte Balance
PubMed: 34716905
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01558-y -
Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Aug 2023Low-intake dehydration amongst older people, caused by insufficient fluid intake, is associated with mortality, multiple long-term health conditions and hospitalisation.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Low-intake dehydration amongst older people, caused by insufficient fluid intake, is associated with mortality, multiple long-term health conditions and hospitalisation. The prevalence of low-intake dehydration in older adults, and which groups are most at-risk, is unclear. We conducted a high-quality systematic review and meta-analysis, implementing an innovative methodology, to establish the prevalence of low-intake dehydration in older people (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021241252).
METHOD
We systematically searched Medline (Ovid), Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL and Proquest from inception until April 2023 and Nutrition and Food Sciences until March 2021. We included studies that assessed hydration status for non-hospitalised participants aged ≥65 years, by directly-measured serum/plasma osmolality, calculated serum/plasma osmolarity and/or 24-h oral fluid intake. Inclusion, data extraction and risk of bias assessment was carried out independently in duplicate.
RESULTS
From 11,077 titles and abstracts, we included 61 (22,398 participants), including 44 in quality-effects meta-analysis. Meta-analysis suggested that 24% (95% CI: 0.07, 0.46) of older people were dehydrated (assessed using directly-measured osmolality >300 mOsm/kg, the most reliable measure). Subgroup analyses indicated that both long-term care residents (34%, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.61) and community-dwelling older adults (19%, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.48) were highly likely to be dehydrated. Those with more pre-existing illnesses (37%, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.62) had higher low-intake dehydration prevalence than others (15%, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.43), and there was a non-significant suggestion that those with renal impairment (42%, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.61) were more likely to be dehydrated than others (23%, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.47), but there were no clear differences in prevalence by age, sex, functional, cognitive or diabetic status. GRADE quality of evidence was low as to the exact prevalence due to high levels of heterogeneity between studies.
CONCLUSION
Quality-effects meta-analysis estimated that a quarter of non-hospitalised older people were dehydrated. Widely varying prevalence rates in individual studies, from both long-term care and community groups, highlight that dehydration is preventable amongst older people.
IMPLICATIONS
One in every 4 older adults has low-intake dehydration. As dehydration is serious and prevalent, research is needed to better understand drinking behaviour and assess effectiveness of drinking interventions for older people.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Dehydration; Prevalence; Long-Term Care; Nutritional Status; Hospitalization
PubMed: 37330324
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.06.010 -
Harms and Benefits of Subcutaneous Hydration in Older Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Geriatrics... Dec 2020To review all available original publications on the harms and benefits of subcutaneous (SC) hydration in older patients. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To review all available original publications on the harms and benefits of subcutaneous (SC) hydration in older patients.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
PARTICIPANTS
All studies on SC hydration in older patients without restrictions on design or language.
MEASUREMENTS
The Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases and trial registries were searched from inception to November 5, 2019, and two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of individual outcomes.
RESULTS
Thirty-one publications from 29 studies met the eligibility criteria. The data from six randomized controlled trials were used for the meta-analyses. The subgroup analysis including only the studies with the lowest risk of bias showed that SC hydration was associated with fewer adverse effects than intravenous (IV) hydration (risk ratio (RR) = 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.53-0.88; P = .003; n = 4; I = 0.0%; 545 infusions in each group). In absolute numbers, patients treated with SC hydration had an incidence rate of 90 adverse effects per 1,000 infusions versus 130 adverse effects per 1,000 infusions (95% CI = 102-169) with IV hydration. Secondary outcomes comparing IV with SC hydration showed that SC was 3.2 minutes faster to set up and markedly reduced the risk of agitation (RR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.22-0.79; P = .007; I = 65%; n = 3); however, SC hydration delivered a lower volume of fluid and was less efficient at reducing serum osmolality (s-osmolality).
CONCLUSIONS
SC hydration is safer than IV hydration and potentially reduces the risk of agitation, but it is less effective. SC hydration should be available as an alternative to IV hydration when treating older patients for mild-to-moderate dehydration. More high-quality studies are needed in the field to increase the confidence in the estimates.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Hypodermoclysis; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 33411351
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16707 -
Critical Care (London, England) Feb 2023Ethylene glycol (EG) is metabolized into glycolate and oxalate and may cause metabolic acidemia, neurotoxicity, acute kidney injury (AKI), and death. Historically,...
Ethylene glycol (EG) is metabolized into glycolate and oxalate and may cause metabolic acidemia, neurotoxicity, acute kidney injury (AKI), and death. Historically, treatment of EG toxicity included supportive care, correction of acid-base disturbances and antidotes (ethanol or fomepizole), and extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs), such as hemodialysis. With the wider availability of fomepizole, the indications for ECTRs in EG poisoning are debated. We conducted systematic reviews of the literature following published EXTRIP methods to determine the utility of ECTRs in the management of EG toxicity. The quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations, either strong ("we recommend") or weak/conditional ("we suggest"), were graded according to the GRADE approach. A total of 226 articles met inclusion criteria. EG was assessed as dialyzable by intermittent hemodialysis (level of evidence = B) as was glycolate (Level of evidence = C). Clinical data were available for analysis on 446 patients, in whom overall mortality was 18.7%. In the subgroup of patients with a glycolate concentration ≤ 12 mmol/L (or anion gap ≤ 28 mmol/L), mortality was 3.6%; in this subgroup, outcomes in patients receiving ECTR were not better than in those who did not receive ECTR. The EXTRIP workgroup made the following recommendations for the use of ECTR in addition to supportive care over supportive care alone in the management of EG poisoning (very low quality of evidence for all recommendations): i) Suggest ECTR if fomepizole is used and EG concentration > 50 mmol/L OR osmol gap > 50; or ii) Recommend ECTR if ethanol is used and EG concentration > 50 mmol/L OR osmol gap > 50; or iii) Recommend ECTR if glycolate concentration is > 12 mmol/L or anion gap > 27 mmol/L; or iv) Suggest ECTR if glycolate concentration 8-12 mmol/L or anion gap 23-27 mmol/L; or v) Recommend ECTR if there are severe clinical features (coma, seizures, or AKI). In most settings, the workgroup recommends using intermittent hemodialysis over other ECTRs. If intermittent hemodialysis is not available, CKRT is recommended over other types of ECTR. Cessation of ECTR is recommended once the anion gap is < 18 mmol/L or suggested if EG concentration is < 4 mmol/L. The dosage of antidotes (fomepizole or ethanol) needs to be adjusted during ECTR.
Topics: Humans; Antidotes; Fomepizole; Ethanol; Renal Dialysis; Glycolates; Ethylene Glycol; Poisoning
PubMed: 36765419
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-04227-2 -
Bioresource Technology Nov 2021The importance of lipopeptide micelles in environmental applications has been highlighted. These vessels exhibit various sizes, shapes, and surface properties under... (Review)
Review
The importance of lipopeptide micelles in environmental applications has been highlighted. These vessels exhibit various sizes, shapes, and surface properties under different environmental conditions. An in-depth understanding of the tunable assembling behavior of biosurfactant micelles is of great importance for their applications. However, a systematic review of such behaviors with assorted micro/nano micellar structures under given environmental conditions, particularly under low temperature and high salinity, remains untapped. Such impacts on their environmental applications have yet to be summarized. This review tried to fill the knowledge gaps by providing a comprehensive summary of the recent knowledge advancement in genetically regulated lipopeptides production, micelles associated decontamination mechanisms in low temperature and high salinity environments, and up-to-date environmental applications. This work is expected to deliver valuable insights to guide lipopeptide design and discovery. The mechanisms concluded in this study could inspire the forthcoming research efforts in the advanced environmental application of lipopeptide micelles.
Topics: Biodegradation, Environmental; Lipopeptides; Micelles; Salinity; Surface-Active Agents
PubMed: 34311406
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125602 -
World Neurosurgery Jun 2022Hypertonic saline (HTS) is a widely used adjunct in the treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there is significant variability in practice patterns. Toward... (Review)
Review
Hypertonic saline (HTS) is a widely used adjunct in the treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there is significant variability in practice patterns. Toward the goal of optimality and standardization in the use of HTS in TBI, we performed a comprehensive review of clinical protocols reported in the neurosurgical and neurocritical care literature. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase were independently queried between October and November 2021. The PRISMA guidelines were used throughout the screening process. We identified 15 high-quality studies representing data from 535 patients. We extracted patient demographics, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, mechanism of injury, HTS dosage, and rate of administration. Various HTS concentrations including 3%, 5%, 7.2%, 7.5%, and 20% were used. Modes of HTS administration included bolus (n = 125) and infusion (n = 376). Average length of stay was 22.4 days. Patient GCS score on initiation of HTS was depressed (average mean, 7.15; average median, 4.25 for studies reporting mean and median GCS, respectively). Excluding 2 studies with ambiguous doses, the mean HTS dosage was 2.7 × 10 mL across 8 studies and 2.5 mL/kg across 5 (with average post-HTS osmolality level of 304.6 mOsm/L reported in 3 studies). Infusions of 3% and 7.5% HTS are the most used concentrations given their efficacy in reducing intracranial pressure (ICP) and improving GCS score. In addition, lower HTS concentrations strongly correlated with greater ICP reduction. Therefore, lower concentrations of HTS may be practical therapeutic agents for patients with TBI given their efficacy in ICP reduction and safer complication profile compared with greater HTS concentrations. Evidence-based parametric use of HTS stands to improve patient outcomes by standardization of varied clinical practice.
Topics: Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Glasgow Coma Scale; Humans; Intracranial Hypertension; Intracranial Pressure; Retrospective Studies; Saline Solution, Hypertonic
PubMed: 35318155
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.056 -
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN Apr 2023Peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) refers to the delivery of artificial nutrition via a peripheral intravenous cannula. As a nutritional intervention it remains... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) refers to the delivery of artificial nutrition via a peripheral intravenous cannula. As a nutritional intervention it remains under-utilised in peri-operative care. This is despite purported advantages which includes avoiding the risks associated with central venous lines and preventing potential delays to the initiation of nutrition support. This systematic review and meta-analysis will detail the available evidence for PPN use in surgery.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of the EMBASE and Medline databases was undertaken to identify randomised control trials (RCTs) involving PPN use in surgical patients published until July 30th 2022. Three domains of PPN use were reviewed including: PPN compared to crystalloid intravenous fluids on nutritional and clinical outcomes; PPN compared to Central PN (CPN) on nutritional outcomes and complications; and strategies to prevent thrombophlebitis associated with PPN.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included 8 studies which included 698 patients. Use of PPN led to reduced post-operative weight loss (% body weight change) with a mean difference of -1.45% (95% CI -2.9 to -0.01, p = 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of length of stay, infectious/non-infectious complications, surgical site infections or phlebitis. 42 RCTs were included in the systematic review. 14 RCTs compared PPN to crystalloid infusion. There was significant heterogeneity in the trial populations, interventions and measured outcomes. Most trials found that PPN may improve nitrogen balance and positively impact nutritional markers. Quality of life and post-operative complications were either improved or no difference found in trials assessing these outcomes. Four RCTs showed that PPN is a safe and feasible alternative to CPN. 22 RCTs reported on measures that may impact on thrombophlebitis rates associated with PPN. These included lower osmolality of PPN solution, cyclical PPN delivery, use of a small gauge polyurethane cannula in an upper limb vein, addition of heparin/hydrocortisone to PPN solutions and placement of a GTN patch over infusion sites.
CONCLUSION
PPN is a safe and effective mode of delivery of peri-operative nutrition. It is a feasible short-term alternative to central-line delivered PN. There are a number of strategies to reduce thrombophlebitis associated with PPN use. Further high-quality RCTs are required to assess the use of PPN in contemporary surgical practice.
Topics: Humans; Parenteral Nutrition; Nutritional Support; Parenteral Nutrition Solutions; Thrombophlebitis; Nutritional Status
PubMed: 36963880
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.02.004 -
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN Feb 2022Advice to drink plenty of fluid is common in respiratory infections. We assessed whether low fluid intake (dehydration) altered outcomes in adults with pneumonia. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Advice to drink plenty of fluid is common in respiratory infections. We assessed whether low fluid intake (dehydration) altered outcomes in adults with pneumonia.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed trials increasing fluid intake and well-adjusted, well-powered observational studies assessing associations between markers of low-intake dehydration (fluid intake, serum osmolality, urea or blood urea nitrogen, urinary output, signs of dehydration) and mortality in adult pneumonia patients (with any type of pneumonia, including community acquired, health-care acquired, aspiration, COVID-19 and mixed types). Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, references of reviews and included studies were searched to 30/10/2020. Studies were assessed for inclusion, risk of bias and data extracted independently in duplicate. We employed random-effects meta-analysis, sensitivity analyses, subgrouping and GRADE assessment. Prospero registration: CRD42020182599.
RESULTS
We identified one trial, 20 well-adjusted cohort studies and one case-control study. None suggested that more fluid (hydration) was associated with harm. Ten of 13 well-powered observational studies found statistically significant positive associations in adjusted analyses between dehydration and medium-term mortality. The other three studies found no significant effect. Meta-analysis suggested doubled odds of medium-term mortality in dehydrated (compared to hydrated) pneumonia patients (GRADE moderate-quality evidence, OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.8 to 2.8, 8619 deaths in 128,319 participants). Heterogeneity was explained by a dose effect (greater dehydration increased risk of mortality further), and the effect was consistent across types of pneumonia (including community-acquired, hospital-acquired, aspiration, nursing and health-care associated, and mixed pneumonia), age and setting (community or hospital). The single trial found that educating pneumonia patients to drink ≥1.5 L fluid/d alongside lifestyle advice increased fluid intake and reduced subsequent healthcare use. No studies in COVID-19 pneumonia met the inclusion criteria, but 70% of those hospitalised with COVID-19 have pneumonia. Smaller COVID-19 studies suggested that hydration is as important in COVID-19 pneumonia mortality as in other pneumonias.
CONCLUSIONS
We found consistent moderate-quality evidence mainly from observational studies that improving hydration reduces the risk of medium-term mortality in all types of pneumonia. It is remarkable that while many studies included dehydration as a potential confounder, and major pneumonia risk scores include measures of hydration, optimal fluid volume and the effect of supporting hydration have not been assessed in randomised controlled trials of people with pneumonia. Such trials, are needed as potential benefits may be large, rapid and implemented at low cost. Supporting hydration and reversing dehydration has the potential to have rapid positive impacts on pneumonia outcomes, and perhaps also COVID-19 pneumonia outcomes, in older adults.
Topics: Aged; COVID-19; Case-Control Studies; Drinking; Humans; Pneumonia; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 35063249
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.11.021 -
Frontiers in Pediatrics 2021Wolfram Syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive disease characterized by early-onset diabetes mellitus, neurodegeneration, and psychological disorders. Mutations in the...
Wolfram Syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive disease characterized by early-onset diabetes mellitus, neurodegeneration, and psychological disorders. Mutations in the gene , coding for the protein wolframin, cause Wolfram Syndrome and are associated with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. This report aims to connect mutations to their impact on protein expression and structure, which ultimately translates to altered cell function and behavioral alterations of an individual. Published data were used to compile mutations associated with psychiatric symptoms, both in homozygous patients and heterozygous carriers of mutations. These mutations were evaluated using SNAP2, PolyPhen-2, and PROVEAN to predict the effects of sequence variants. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the correlation between the locations of the mutations and the damage prediction scores. Several mutations, clustering in the center and C-terminus of the polypeptide, such as A559T and R558C, are found in individuals with psychiatric diseases and appear particularly impactful on protein structure. Our analysis showed that mutations in all regions of wolframin were present in patients with schizophrenia whereas only cytoplasmic and ER luminal mutations were reported in patients with manic episodes and bipolar disorders. According to Poly-Phen-2 predictions, 82.4% of the ER lumen mutations and 85.7% of the membrane mutations are damaging. We propose mood disorders in Wolfram Syndrome and heterozygous carriers of mutations are the consequence of specific mutations in that alter the structure of wolframin, resulting in intracellular calcium dysregulations and impaired cell signaling, Understanding the effect of mutations on bipolar disorder and schizoprenia is integral to designing clinically targeted treatments for both diseases, which need more specialized treatments.
PubMed: 34746052
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.718132 -
Psychiatry Research Mar 2021Despite the clinical importance of polydipsia, no diagnostic criteria or severity scales that comprehensively assess this condition are available. Thus, we aimed to...
Despite the clinical importance of polydipsia, no diagnostic criteria or severity scales that comprehensively assess this condition are available. Thus, we aimed to develop diagnostic criteria and a severity scale for polydipsia based on a systematic review and well-experienced clinicians' consensus. We performed a systematic review, identified 27 studies related to diagnostic criteria or severity classification for polydipsia, and extracted items used to assess polydipsia in these studies. Ten well-experienced clinicians-5 psychiatrists and 5 nurses-participated in the Delphi method. They evaluated 39 items extracted based on the results of the systematic review regarding (1) their necessity in diagnosing and assessing the severity of polydipsia, and (2) their relative importance rated on 7-point scale among the items included in the severity scale. The Polydipsia Diagnostic Criteria (PDC) included 4 essential items-excessive drinking, low serum sodium level or low serum osmolality, abnormal normalized diurnal weight gain, and low urine specific gravity-based on consensus reached using the Delphi method. The Polydipsia Severity Scale (PSS) included 13 items with a maximum score of 59. The first diagnostic criteria and symptom scale for polydipsia were developed based on the findings of a systematic review and well-experienced clinicians' consensus.
Topics: Consensus; Humans; Osmolar Concentration; Polydipsia; Psychiatry; Severity of Illness Index
PubMed: 33461119
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113708