-
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Sep 2022The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effects of stem cell-based therapies on the treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) and the... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effects of stem cell-based therapies on the treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) and the regeneration of cartilage/osteochondral defects.
METHODS
Data on preclinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of stem cell-based therapies for treating Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) were extracted from PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library and the grey literature by three independent reviewers. A manual search was performed in the databases, the reference list of review studies, and relevant journals in the field. Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines was evaluated for quality assessment. SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal experimental studies was assessed to define internal validity.
RESULTS
After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Regardless of cell origin, stem cell-based therapeutic approaches induced protective, anti-inflammatory, and chondroregenerative potential in the treatment of TMJ-OA. Regeneration of the cartilage layer on the surface of the condyle was achieved when stem cells were directly flushed into the defect or when delivered within a carrier.
CONCLUSION
Stem cell-based therapies may be considered a promising approach for the treatment of TMJ-OA and for the regeneration of full-thickness cartilage and osteochondral defects in the TMJ. Human studies shall be performed to validate these results found in animals.
Topics: Animals; Cartilage, Articular; Humans; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Osteoarthritis; Regeneration; Temporomandibular Joint
PubMed: 35597373
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.05.006 -
Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) Feb 2021Neuromuscular deficits are common following knee injuries and may contribute to early-onset post-traumatic osteoarthritis, likely mediated through quadriceps dysfunction. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Neuromuscular deficits are common following knee injuries and may contribute to early-onset post-traumatic osteoarthritis, likely mediated through quadriceps dysfunction.
OBJECTIVE
To identify how peri-articular neuromuscular function changes over time after knee injury and surgery.
DESIGN
Systematic review with meta-analyses.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL (Trials).
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
Moderate and high-quality studies comparing neuromuscular function of muscles crossing the knee joint between a knee-injured population (ligamentous, meniscal, osteochondral lesions) and healthy controls. Outcomes included normalized isokinetic strength, muscle size, voluntary activation, cortical and spinal-reflex excitability, and other torque related outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 46 studies of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and five of meniscal injury were included. For ACL injury, strength and voluntary activation deficits were evident (moderate to strong evidence). Cortical excitability was not affected at < 6 months (moderate evidence) but decreased at 24+ months (moderate evidence). Spinal-reflex excitability did not change at < 6 months (moderate evidence) but increased at 24+ months (strong evidence). We also found deficits in torque variability, rate of torque development, and electromechanical delay (very limited to moderate evidence). For meniscus injury, strength deficits were evident only in the short-term. No studies reported gastrocnemius, soleus or popliteus muscle outcomes for either injury. No studies were found for other ligamentous or chondral injuries.
CONCLUSIONS
Neuromuscular deficits persist for years post-injury/surgery, though the majority of evidence is from ACL injured populations. Muscle strength deficits are accompanied by neural alterations and changes in control and timing of muscle force, but more studies are needed to fill the evidence gaps we have identified. Better characterisation and therapeutic strategies addressing these deficits could improve rehabilitation outcomes, and potentially prevent PTOA.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO CRD42019141850.
Topics: Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Humans; Knee Injuries; Knee Joint; Muscle Strength
PubMed: 33247378
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-020-01386-6 -
Advanced Science (Weinheim,... May 2022The osteochondral (OC) unit plays a pivotal role in joint lubrication and in the transmission of constraints to bones during movement. The OC unit does not spontaneously... (Review)
Review
The osteochondral (OC) unit plays a pivotal role in joint lubrication and in the transmission of constraints to bones during movement. The OC unit does not spontaneously heal; therefore, OC defects are considered to be one of the major risk factors for developing long-term degenerative joint diseases such as osteoarthritis. Yet, there is currently no curative treatment for OC defects, and OC regeneration remains an unmet medical challenge. In this context, a plethora of tissue engineering strategies have been envisioned over the last two decades, such as combining cells, biological molecules, and/or biomaterials, yet with little evidence of successful clinical transfer to date. This striking observation must be put into perspective with the difficulty in comparing studies to identify overall key elements for success. This systematic review aims to provide a deeper insight into the field of material-assisted strategies for OC regeneration, with particular considerations for the therapeutic potential of the different approaches (with or without cells or biological molecules), and current OC regeneration evaluation methods. After a brief description of the biological complexity of the OC unit, the recent literature is thoroughly analyzed, and the major pitfalls, emerging key elements, and new paths to success are identified and discussed.
Topics: Biocompatible Materials; Bone and Bones; Cartilage, Articular; Tissue Engineering; Tissue Scaffolds
PubMed: 35322596
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202200050 -
The Physician and Sportsmedicine Dec 2023Osteochondritis dissecans can result in significant limitations in activity, pain, and early osteoarthritis. There are various treatment modalities to address these... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Osteochondritis dissecans can result in significant limitations in activity, pain, and early osteoarthritis. There are various treatment modalities to address these defects. The purpose of this study was to provide a qualitative summary of the various treatment options for unstable osteochondritis dissecans in the knee.
METHODS
A literature search was performed on osteochondritis dissecans in the knee using PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases. The search was completed using a combination of the following terms: 'osteochondritis dissecans,' 'OCD,' 'osteochondral,' 'articular cartilage,' 'repair,' 'surgery,' 'treatment,' 'osteochondral allograft,' 'autologous chondrocyte implantation,' 'unstable,' 'knee,' 'clinical studies.'
RESULTS
A total of 682 studies were found, of which 24 were included in the qualitative analysis. The quality score ranged from 46 to 80, and the mean follow-up ranged from 2 to 17 years. The most common surgical procedures were internal fixation (n = 7 studies), ACI (n = 6), fragment excision (n = 3), MACI (n = 2), bone graft + ACI (n = 2), OCA (n = 2), mosaicplasty/OAT (n = 2), and scaffold (n = 2). Overall, the reported outcome measures were heterogeneous in nature. Post-operative International Knee Documentations Committee (IKDC) scores ranged from 75 to 85 and Lysholm scores ranged from 70 to 93.5. Tegner scores ranged from 4 to 5. Rates of failure, complication, and revision were highly variable across studies and surgical techniques.
CONCLUSION
There are a variety of surgical options for the treatment of unstable osteochondritis dissecans. In skeletally immature patients, internal fixation demonstrated acceptable rates of radiographic union and patient reported outcome measures. In skeletally mature patients with large lesions, MACI and OCA transplantation provided similar patient reported outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Osteochondritis Dissecans; Knee Joint; Bone Transplantation; Cartilage, Articular; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Transplantation, Autologous; Follow-Up Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35611658
DOI: 10.1080/00913847.2022.2082262 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Dec 2021The optimum management of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the capitellum is a widely debated subject.
BACKGROUND
The optimum management of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the capitellum is a widely debated subject.
PURPOSE
To better understand the efficacy of different surgical modalities and nonoperative treatment of OCD as assessed by radiological and clinical outcomes and return to sports.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
A systematic review of all treatment studies published between January 1975 and June 2020 was performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 76 clinical studies, including 1463 patients, were suitable for inclusion. Aggregate analysis and subgroup analysis of individual patient data were performed to compare the functional and radiographic outcomes between the various nonoperative and surgical treatment options for capitellar OCD. A unified grading system (UGS; grades 1-4) was developed from existing validated classification systems to allow a comparison of patients with similar-grade OCD lesions in different studies according to their treatment. Patient-level data were available for 352 patients. The primary outcome measures of interest were patient-reported functional outcome, range of motion (ROM), and return to sports after treatment. The influences of the capitellar physeal status, location of the lesion, and type of sports participation were also assessed. Each outcome measure was evaluated according to the grade of OCD and treatment method (debridement/microfracture, fragment fixation, osteochondral autograft transplantation [OATS], or nonoperative treatment).
RESULTS
No studies reported elbow scores or ROM for nonoperatively treated patients. All surgical modalities resulted in significantly increased postoperative ROM and elbow scores for stable (UGS grades 1 and 2) and unstable lesions (UGS grades 3 and 4). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of improvement or overall scores according to the type of surgery for stable or unstable lesions. Return to sports was superior with nonoperative treatment for stable lesions, whereas surgical treatment was superior for unstable lesions. Patients with an open capitellar physis had superior ROM for stable and unstable lesions, but there was no correlation with lesion location and the outcomes of OATS versus fragment fixation for high-grade lesions.
CONCLUSION
Nonoperative treatment was similar in outcomes to surgical treatment for low-grade lesions, whereas surgical treatment was superior for higher grade lesions. There is currently insufficient evidence to support complex reconstructive techniques for high-grade lesions compared with microfracture/debridement alone.
Topics: Bone Transplantation; Elbow Joint; Humans; Osteochondritis Dissecans; Range of Motion, Articular; Transplantation, Autologous; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33886390
DOI: 10.1177/03635465211000763 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine May 2022Storage procedures and parameters have a significant influence on the health of fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) cartilage. To date, there is a lack of agreement on...
BACKGROUND
Storage procedures and parameters have a significant influence on the health of fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) cartilage. To date, there is a lack of agreement on the optimal storage conditions for OCAs.
PURPOSE
To systematically review the literature on (1) experimental designs and reporting of key variables of ex vivo (laboratory) studies, (2) the effects of various storage solutions and conditions on cartilage health ex vivo, and (3) in vivo animal studies and human clinical studies evaluating the effect of fresh OCA storage on osteochondral repair and outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 5.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The inclusion criteria were laboratory studies (ex vivo) reporting cartilage health outcomes after prolonged storage (>3 days) of fresh osteochondral or chondral tissue explants and animal studies (in vivo) reporting outcomes of fresh OCA. The inclusion criteria for clinical studies were studies (>5 patients) that analyzed the relationship of storage time or chondrocyte viability at time of implantation to patient outcomes. Frozen, cryopreserved, decellularized, synthetic, or tissue-engineered grafts were excluded.
RESULTS
A total of 55 peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria. Ex vivo studies reported a spectrum of tissue sources and storage solutions and conditions, although the majority of studies lacked complete reporting of key variables, including storage solution formula and environmental conditions. The effect of various conditions (eg, temperature) and storage solutions on cartilage health were inconsistent. Although 60% of animal models suggest that storage time may influence outcomes and 80% indicate inferior outcomes with frozen OCA as compared with fresh OCA, 75% of clinical studies report no correlation between storage time and outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Given the variability in experimental designs and lack of reporting across studies, it is still not possible to determine optimal storage conditions, although animal studies suggest that storage time and chondrocyte viability influence osteochondral repair outcomes. A list of recommendations was developed to encourage reporting of key variables, such as media formulation, environmental factors, and methodologies used. High-quality clinical data are needed to investigate the effects of storage and graft health on outcomes.
Topics: Allografts; Animals; Bone Transplantation; Cartilage; Cartilage, Articular; Chondrocytes; Humans; Intra-Articular Fractures; Knee Joint; Transplantation, Homologous
PubMed: 34310184
DOI: 10.1177/03635465211016832 -
Georgian Medical News Oct 2022Epidemiological data suggest 9-15% of ankle joint osteoarthritis (AOA) in the general population. One of the methods of delaying radical intervention is ankle joint...
Epidemiological data suggest 9-15% of ankle joint osteoarthritis (AOA) in the general population. One of the methods of delaying radical intervention is ankle joint distraction arthroplasty of the ankle joint (ADA), including a combination of various techniques. The lack of publications summarizing the maximum possible clinical data on ADA for more than 50 years of the method's history justifies the need for a review. A systematic review of ankle distraction arthroplasty followed the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) protocol guidelines. The inclusion criteria were articles with clinical data in full text in English, available on the Internet for the maximum possible period, including the treatment of diseases of the ankle joint using distraction arthroplasty. At the search stage, 4640 publications from 3 sources were identified. 33 articles were selected for analysis of the full texts of the articles. Additionally, 1 article was excluded, as it contains duplicate information from an identical study. The analysis of the full texts of 32 publications was made, according to the parameters indicated earlier. A total of 927 patients underwent ADA. The mean age of the patients was 44.9 ± 12.7 years. Among the causes, post-traumatic AOA was indicated in 26 (81.3%) publications, osteochondral defects (n=2, 6.3%), consequences of poliomyelitis (n=4, 12.5%), congenital deformities (n=4, 12.5%), hemophilia (n= 2, 6.25%), idiopathic juvenile osteoarthritis (n=1, 3.1%), rheumatoid OA (n=1, 3.1%). Despite the more than 50-year history of ADA, there is still no sufficient understanding of this methodology. The goal of future research is to understand the exact indications for ADA depending on the stage, etiology, and type of AOA. ADA is a promising effective method of treatment that allows achieving an improvement in function and a reduction in pain in the medium and long term while preserving the patient's joint.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Middle Aged; Ankle; Treatment Outcome; Osteoarthritis; Ankle Joint; Arthroplasty
PubMed: 36539124
DOI: No ID Found -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Sep 2023Osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) treats symptomatic focal cartilage defects with satisfactory clinical results.
Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Treating Articular Cartilage Defects: Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-analysis of Studies From 2001 to 2020.
BACKGROUND
Osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) treats symptomatic focal cartilage defects with satisfactory clinical results.
PURPOSE
To comprehensively analyze the characteristics and clinical outcomes of OCA for treating articular cartilage defects.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
We searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science for studies published between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2020, on OCA for treating articular cartilage defects. Publication information, patient data, osteochondral allograft storage details, and clinical outcomes were extracted to conduct a comprehensive summative analysis.
RESULTS
In total, 105 studies involving 5952 patients were included. The annual reported number of patients treated with OCA increased from 69 in 2001 to 1065 in 2020, peaking at 1504 cases in 2018. Most studies (90.1%) were performed in the United States. The mean age at surgery was 34.2 years, and 60.8% of patients were male and had a mean body mass index of 26.7 kg/m. The mean lesion area was 5.05 cm, the mean follow-up duration was 54.39 months, the mean graft size was 6.85 cm, and the number of grafts per patient was 54.7. The failure rate after OCA was 18.8%, and 83.1% of patients reported satisfactory results. Allograft survival rates at 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years were 94%, 87.9%, 80%, 73%, 55%, and 59.4%, respectively. OCA was mainly performed on the knee (88.9%). The most common diagnosis in the knee was osteochondritis dissecans (37.9%), and the most common defect location was the medial femoral condyle (52%). The most common concomitant procedures were high tibial osteotomy (28.4%) and meniscal allograft transplantation (24.7%). After OCA failure, 54.7% of patients underwent revision with primary total knee arthroplasty.
CONCLUSION
The annual reported number of patients who underwent OCA showed a significant upward trend, especially from 2016 to 2020. Patients receiving OCA were predominantly young male adults with a high body mass index. OCA was more established for knee cartilage than an injury at other sites, and its best indication was osteochondritis dissecans. This analysis demonstrated satisfactory long-term postoperative outcomes.
PubMed: 37745815
DOI: 10.1177/23259671231199418 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Sep 2021The current systematic review and meta-analysis aim to pool together the incidence and risk factors of osteoarthritis following osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The current systematic review and meta-analysis aim to pool together the incidence and risk factors of osteoarthritis following osteochondritis dissecans of the knee.
METHODS
The systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A search was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Library with the keywords being "knee" and "osteochondritis dissecans" or "osteochondral lesion". All original human studies that reported the incidence or risk factors of osteoarthritis following osteochondritis dissecans of the knee were included.
RESULTS
Nine studies with 496 patients were included. The incidence of osteoarthritis following osteochondritis dissecans is 0.39 (95% CI 0.19-0.59). Patients with a body mass index greater than 25 kg/m had a significantly increased risk of osteoarthritis. Fragment excision had an increased relative risk of 1.89 (95% CI 1.19-3.01) of osteoarthritis as compared to fragment preservation. Significant heterogeneity was identified when comparing between juvenile and adult osteochondritis dissecans. The size of the lesions moderated the between-study heterogeneity with regards to the incidence of osteoarthritis, with the relative risk of osteoarthritis in lesions bigger than 4 cm being 2.29 (95% CI 1.24-4.23). No other risk factors, including gender of the patient, location of osteochondritis dissecans, stability of osteochondritis dissecans, and surgical versus non-surgical management were significant risk factors.
CONCLUSION
Significant risk factors for osteoarthritis were increased body mass index and fragment excision. Probable but inconclusive risk factors were the age of the patients and the size of the osteochondritis dissecans. The gender of the patient, location of osteochondritis dissecans, the stability of osteochondritis dissecans, and surgical versus non-surgical management of osteochondritis dissecans when appropriate were not significant risk factors.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Incidence; Knee Joint; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Osteochondritis Dissecans; Risk Factors
PubMed: 33211214
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06365-y -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Nov 2021There is a paucity of data regarding osteochondral lesions of the tibial plafond (OLTPs), in part because they are far less common than osteochondral lesions of the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There is a paucity of data regarding osteochondral lesions of the tibial plafond (OLTPs), in part because they are far less common than osteochondral lesions of the talus.
PURPOSE
To evaluate the topographical characteristics of OLTPs and outcomes after surgical intervention, while analyzing the level of evidence (LOE) and quality of evidence (QOE) of the included studies.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies reporting clinical data for OLTPs were included. The LOE and QOE of the included studies were evaluated using a 5-level grading system and the modified Coleman Methodology Score, respectively.
RESULTS
Included were 20 studies with 426 OLTPs; 4 studies were LOE 2 and 16 studies were LOE 4. Overall, 86.7% of OLTPs were associated with a traumatic history and/or previous ankle sprain. OLTPs were most commonly located in the centromedial region of the tibial plafond (30.4%), with the fewest number of OLTPs found in the anteromedial region of the tibial plafond (3.9%). In 17 of the studies, a total of 46.9% of OLTPs were associated with coexisting osteochondral lesions of the talus. The most frequently used surgical technique to treat OLTPs was microfracture, which resulted in good clinical outcomes at midterm follow-up.
CONCLUSION
The results of this systematic review indicated that OLTPs are frequently preceded by ankle trauma and are often associated with coexisting osteochondral lesions of the talus. Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic intervention appear to produce good results in the midterm, but the low LOE, poor QOE, marked heterogeneity, and underreporting of the data confound any recommendation based on this systematic review.
PubMed: 34778469
DOI: 10.1177/23259671211029208