-
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology Feb 2022Mucinous pancreatic cysts are well reported to transform into pancreatic adenocarcinoma, whereas nonmucinous cysts are mostly benign with low risk for malignant... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Mucinous pancreatic cysts are well reported to transform into pancreatic adenocarcinoma, whereas nonmucinous cysts are mostly benign with low risk for malignant transformation. Nonsurgical methods of differentiating mucinous and nonmucinous pancreatic cysts are challenging and entail a multi investigational approach. Low intracystic glucose levels have been evaluated in multiple studies for its accuracy in differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous cysts of the pancreas.
METHODS
Multiple databases were searched and studies that reported on the utility of intracystic glucose levels in diagnosing mucinous pancreatic cysts were analyzed. Meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model, heterogeneity was assessed by I2%, and pooled diagnostic test accuracy values were calculated.
RESULTS
Seven studies were included in the analysis from an initial total of 375 citations. The pooled sensitivity of low glucose in differentiating mucinous pancreatic cyst was 90.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 88.1-92.5; I2=0%] and the pooled specificity was 88% (95% CI: 80.8-92.7; I2=79%). The sensitivity at a glucose cut-off of 50 was 90.1% (95% CI: 87.2-92.5; I2=0%) and the specificity was 85.3% (95% CI: 76.8-91.1; I2=76%). The sensitivity of glucose levels in pancreatic cyst fluid taken by endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration was 90.8% (95% CI: 87.9-93.1; I2=0%) and the specificity was 90.5% (95% CI: 81.7-95.3; I2=83%). The sensitivity of point-of-care glucometers was 89.5% (95% CI: 87.9-93.1; I2=0%) and specificity was 83.9% (95% CI: 68.5-92.6; I2=43%).
CONCLUSIONS
Low glucose level at a cut-off of 50 mg/dL on fluid samples collected by endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration and analyzed by point-of-care glucometer achieves excellent diagnostic accuracy in differentiating mucinous pancreatic cysts.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Cyst Fluid; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration; Glucose; Humans; Pancreatic Cyst; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 33731599
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001507 -
European Journal of Radiology Nov 2021The main goal of this systematic review was to assess the technical and clinical success, adverse events (AEs), surgery, and overall mortality proportion after... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The main goal of this systematic review was to assess the technical and clinical success, adverse events (AEs), surgery, and overall mortality proportion after percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) of two pancreatic lesions.
METHODS
An extant search in online databases including Scopus, PubMed (Medline), Embase (Elsevier), Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar, was conducted to recognize all studies that used PCD intervention in the management of pancreatic necrosis (PN) and pancreatic pseudocysts (PP). Random effects meta-analysis was performed, and Cochrane's Q test and Istatistic were utilized to determine heterogeneity. In addition, meta-regression was used to explore the influence of categorical variables on heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Thirty-two studies (1398 patients) including PN in 26 (1256 cases, 89.8%) studies and PP in 6 (142 cases, 10.2%) studies were identified. Technical success proportion was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 100%-100%, I: 0.0%), clinical success 63% (95% CI 55%-71%, I: 92.9%), AEs 26% (95% CI 21%-31%, I: 78%), surgery after PCD intervention 33% (95% CI 25%-40%, I: 92.4%), and overall mortality was 13% (95% CI 9%-17%, I: 82.8%). The most common ADs after PCD intervention were development of fistula (106, 42.6%), hemorrhage (44, 17.7%), sepsis (40, 16.1%).
CONCLUSION
A significant clinical success proportion with low AEs, surgery, and overall mortality proportion after PCD intervention was found, although the results should be interpreted with caution due to the high heterogeneity.
Topics: Catheters; Drainage; Humans; Pancreas; Pancreatic Pseudocyst; Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34607289
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109978 -
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Mar 2023Previous studies have demonstrated that the ideal time for drainage of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections is 4 to 6 weeks after their development. However, some... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Previous studies have demonstrated that the ideal time for drainage of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections is 4 to 6 weeks after their development. However, some pancreatic collections, notably infected pancreatic fluid collections, require earlier drainage. Nevertheless, the optimal timing of the first intervention is unclear, and consensus data are sparse. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections <4 weeks after development compared with ≥4 weeks after development.
METHODS
Search strategies were developed for PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception. Outcomes of interest were technical success, defined as successful endoscopic placement of a lumen-apposing metal stent; clinical success, defined as a reduction in cystic collection size; and procedure-related adverse events. A random-effects model was used for analysis, and results are expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
Six studies (630 patients) were included in our final analysis, in which 182 patients (28.9%) were enrolled in the early drainage cohort and 448 patients (71.1%) in the standard drainage cohort. The mean fluid collection size was 143.4 ± 18.8 mm for the early cohort versus 128 ± 19.7 mm for the standard cohort. Overall, technical success was equal in both cohorts. Clinical success did not favor either standard drainage or early drainage (OR, .39; 95% CI, .13-1.22; P = .11). No statistically significant differences were found in overall adverse events (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, .63-4.45; P = .31) or mortality (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, .29-4.48; P = .85). Hospital stay was longer for patients undergoing early drainage compared with standard drainage (23.7 vs 16.0 days, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Both early (<4 weeks) and standard (≥4 weeks) drainage of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections offer similar technical and clinical outcomes. Patients requiring endoscopic drainage should not be delayed for 4 weeks.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Pseudocyst; Pancreas; Endoscopy; Stents; Treatment Outcome; Drainage; Endosonography
PubMed: 36395824
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.11.003 -
Journal of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic... Feb 2022Peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) result from acute or chronic pancreatic inflammation that suffers a rupture of its ducts. Currently, there exists three options... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Head-to-head comparison between endoscopic ultrasound guided lumen apposing metal stent and plastic stents for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND/AIMS
Peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) result from acute or chronic pancreatic inflammation that suffers a rupture of its ducts. Currently, there exists three options for drainage or debridement of pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis (WON). The traditional procedure is drainage by placing double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS); lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) has a biflanged design with a wide lumen that avoids occlusion with necrotic tissue, which is more common with DPPS and reduces the possibility of migration. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses head-to-head, including only studies that compare the two main techniques to drainage of PFCs: LAMS vs DPPS.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review in different databases, such as PubMed, OVID, Medline, and Cochrane Databases. This meta-analysis considers studies published from 2014 to 2020, including only studies that compare the two main techniques to drainage of PFCs: LAMS vs DPPS.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analyses. Only one of all studies was a randomized controlled trial. These studies comprise 1584 patients; 68.2% were male, and 31.8% were female. Six hundred sixty-three patients (41.9%) were treated with LAMS, and 921 (58.1%) were treated with DPPS. Six studies included only WON in their analysis, two included only pancreatic pseudocysts, and five studies included both pancreatic pseudocysts and WON. The technical success was similar in patients treated with LAMS and DPPS (97.6% vs 97.5%, respectively, P = .986, RR = 1.00 [95% CI 0.93-1.08]). The clinical success was similar in both groups (LAMS: 90.1% vs DPPS: 84.2%, P = .139, RR = 1.063 [95% CI 0.98-1.15]). Patients treated with LAMS had a lower complication rate than the DPPS groups, with a significant statistical difference (LAMS: 16.0% vs DPPS: 20.2%, P = .009, RR = 0.746 [95% CI 0.60-0.93]). Bleeding was the most common complication in the LAMS group (33 patients, [5.0%]), whereas infection was the most common complication in the DPPS group (56 patients, [6.1%]). The LAMS migration rate was lower than in the DPPS (0.9% vs 2.2%, respectively, P = .05). The mortality rate was similar in both groups, 0.6% in the LAMS group (four patients) and 0.4% in the DPPS group (four patients; P = .640).
CONCLUSION
The PFCs drainage is an indication when persistent symptoms or PFCs-related complications exist. EUS guided drainage with LAMS has similar technical and clinical success to DPPS drainage for the management of PFCs. The technical and clinical success rates are high in both groups. However, LAMS drainage has a lower adverse events rate than DPPS drainage. More randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the real advantage of LAMS drainage over DPPS drainage.
Topics: Drainage; Endosonography; Female; Humans; Male; Metals; Pancreatic Pseudocyst; Plastics; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional
PubMed: 34107170
DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1008 -
Endoscopic Ultrasound 2021Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are being increasingly encountered in clinical practice, and sometimes, they can represent a diagnostic challenge. Recently, a... (Review)
Review
Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are being increasingly encountered in clinical practice, and sometimes, they can represent a diagnostic challenge. Recently, a through-the-needle micro forceps biopsy (MFB) device was introduced in the endosonography practice to facilitate EUS-guided sampling of PCLs. The aim was to perform a systematic review of studies evaluating the technical aspects, safety, and efficacy of the EUS-guided MFB for PCLs. A literature search was performed in three major databases, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science in September 2019 using the search terms: "through-the-needle," "biopsy forceps," "microforceps," "endoscopic ultrasound," and "endosonography." Case reports and case series with <10 patients were excluded from the analysis. Altogether nine studies reporting on 463 patients were included in our systematic review. The mean age of the patients was 68.3 years, with a slight female predominance (60.9%). Most of the cysts were located in the body/tail of the pancreas (61.2%), with an overall mean size of 33 mm. The technical success of EUS-guided MFB was reported in 98.5%. The tissue acquisition yield reported was 88.2%, and the diagnostic accuracy was 68.6%. Adverse events were reported in 9.7%. EUS-guided MFB is technically feasible, safe, and has a high diagnostic accuracy for PCLs.
PubMed: 32611848
DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_23_20 -
Comprehensive characterisation of acinar cystic transformation of the pancreas: a systematic review.Journal of Clinical Pathology Nov 2023Acinar cystic transformation (ACT) of the pancreas is a rare pancreatic cystic lesion. Owing to its rarity, comprehensive histomolecular characterisation of this entity...
AIMS
Acinar cystic transformation (ACT) of the pancreas is a rare pancreatic cystic lesion. Owing to its rarity, comprehensive histomolecular characterisation of this entity is still lacking. We aim to perform a systematic review on this controversial entity.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, SCOPUS and Embase through May 2023 to identify all studies on ACTs. Clinicopathological, immunohistochemical (IHC) and molecular data have been extracted and analysed.
RESULTS
Overall, there were 121 cases of ACTs in the literature. ACT had a female predominance (65.3% of patients), and a mean size of 4.8 cm. ACT was more often unifocal (71.9%) and multiloculate (61.2%). Histologically, the cysts were lined by an acinar epithelium, sometimes harbouring ductal-like areas (18.2%). In five cases (4.1%), an intralesional pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) was reported. Preoperative diagnosis is challenging. After surgical resection, all patients were alive and disease free during follow-up except one patient who developed a second ACT after resection. By IHC, all lesions were positive for acinar markers; cytokeratin 7 and 8/18/19 were usually positive, and Ki-67 was invariably ≤3%. At the molecular level, three cases demonstrated genetic alterations: one showed multiple chromosomal gains, and other two harboured somatic mutations of and genes (one mutation per case).
CONCLUSIONS
Globally considered, our findings demonstrated that ACT is a benign entity, without the need of surgical resection with the exception of symptomatic lesions. The rare occurrence of intracystic PanINs and driver mutations suggest considering follow-up if a preoperative diagnosis of ACT can be made.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Pancreas; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatic Cyst; Carcinoma in Situ; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal
PubMed: 37643836
DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2023-209103 -
Journal of Gastroenterology and... Sep 2022Antibioprohylaxis (ABP) for pancreatic cystic lesion is still a debated clinical indication. Although professional societies guidelines still recommend ABP in endoscopic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Antibioprohylaxis (ABP) for pancreatic cystic lesion is still a debated clinical indication. Although professional societies guidelines still recommend ABP in endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL), this standard of care recommendation was based on old and weakly planned studies with a small number of patients. Herein, in this work, we provide a critical review with pooled data analysis of the available literature. Overall, the studies reported are weak and limited with small number of patients, the absence of exact definition of infection and the heterogenicity of the type and the duration of the ABP used. Pooled data analysis showed that the effect of ABP on the rate of cyst infection was not significant (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.17-1.2), with no significant heterogenicity between the results of the studies reviewed and reported (as assessed by Breslow Day test for homogeneity of OR's [P = 0.15]). The pooled infection rate without ABP was 0.89% and 0.36% in the ABP group. Moreover, according to the pooled data infection rate, sample size calculation demonstrated that 6954 patients are needed to show superiority of ABP, with a number needed to treat of 179 patients to prevent single infection. However, through the literature only six studies (1660 patients) reported the cyst infection rate among ABP versus control, making these results scarce and biased by a small number of patients. Therefore, we suggest the need to revise the guidelines, until performing well organized large international study to solve this controversy.
Topics: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration; Endosonography; Humans; Pancreas; Pancreatic Cyst; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 35912889
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15972 -
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Aug 2021Pancreatic cystic fluid (PCF) analysis is useful to distinguish between different cyst types and to guide management. The aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Pancreatic cystic fluid (PCF) analysis is useful to distinguish between different cyst types and to guide management. The aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of glucose level with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in PCF for mucinous cyst diagnosis.
METHODS
We identified studies with PCF obtained by EUS before surgery, with cysts classified as mucinous and nonmucinous according to surgical specimens. A random-effects model was used for quantitative meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivities, specificities, and summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted.
RESULTS
For CEA, we included 31 studies with 5268 patients, of which 2083 were referred for surgery. For glucose, we included 4 studies with 345 patients, of which 275 were referred for surgery. Glucose performed better than CEA for mucinous cysts diagnosis (premalignant and malignant) with sensitivities of .90 (95% confidence interval [CI], .85-.94) and .67 (95% CI, .65-.70), specificities of .82 (95% CI, .72-.89) and .80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83), and areas under the ROC curve of .96 and .79, respectively. Glucose had a higher sensitivity (90%), with uncommon false-negative results, making it an excellent biomarker to exclude a mucinous cyst. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the findings of the current meta-analysis are robust.
CONCLUSION
Glucose level in PCF is more accurate than CEA for preoperative diagnosis of mucinous cysts. It may become a useful first-line test, particularly in small cysts with a limited volume of PCF. Larger studies are awaited to confirm glucose as the single test for mucinous cyst diagnosis.
Topics: Carcinoembryonic Antigen; Cyst Fluid; Glucose; Humans; Pancreatic Cyst; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 33852901
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.935 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 5 (MODY5), a rare disease, is very easy to be misdiagnosed as type 2 diabetes. To get better understanding of the disease, we...
AIMS
Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 5 (MODY5), a rare disease, is very easy to be misdiagnosed as type 2 diabetes. To get better understanding of the disease, we analyzed the clinical characteristics and gene mutations of MODY5.
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang were searched with the following search terms: "MODY5" OR "HNF1B maturity-onset diabetes of the young" OR "maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 5" OR "renal cysts and diabetes syndrome". Clinical characteristics and gene mutations of MODY5 were analyzed. The demography, clinical characteristics, and blood indicators of patients were described utilizing simple summary statistics. Variables were analyzed by t-test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and Fisher exact test. Spearman's correlation analysis was used for bi-variate analysis. All tests were two-sided, and a -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26 for Windows (SPSS).
RESULTS
A total of 48 literatures were included in this study, including 61 eligible patients and 4 different mutations. Of the 39 patients with available body weight index, 15 (38.46%) were underweight, 21 (53.85%) were normal weight and 3 (7.69%) were overweight or obese. Of the 38 patients with available family history, 25 (65.79%) reported a family history of diabetes. Of the 34 patients with available age of diabetes diagnosis, the median age of diabetes diagnosis was 16.00 years old and 88.24% (30/34) of patients were under 25 years old when they were first diagnosed with diabetes. Renal cysts were presented in 72.41%, hypomagnesemia in 91.67%, and pancreatic dysplasia in 71.88% of the patients. Patients with hepatocyte nuclear factor 1B (HNF1B) deletion had lower serum magnesium, serum creatinine, and higher eGFR than patients with other gene mutations, and the difference was statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS
The young onset of diabetes with low or normal BMI, renal cysts, hypomagnesemia, and pancreatic dysplasia should be recommended to genetic testing in order to differentiate MODY5 from other types of diabetes earlier.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Central Nervous System Diseases; Dental Enamel; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-beta; Humans; Kidney Diseases, Cystic; Magnesium; Mutation
PubMed: 35846334
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.911526 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Jul 2022Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are frequently incidental findings. The prevalence of PCLs is increasing, mainly due to advancements in imaging techniques, but also... (Review)
Review
Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are frequently incidental findings. The prevalence of PCLs is increasing, mainly due to advancements in imaging techniques, but also because of the aging of the population. PCLs comprise challenging clinical problems, as their manifestations vary from benign to malignant lesions. Therefore, the recognition of PCLs is achieved through a complex diagnostic and surveillance process, which in turn is usually long-term, invasive, and expensive. Despite the progress made in the identification of novel biomarkers in the cystic fluid that also support the differentiation of PCLs, their application in clinical practice is limited. We conducted a systematic review of the literature published in two databases, Pubmed and Embase, on biochemical biomarkers in PCLs that may be applied in the diagnostic algorithms of PCLs. Eleven studies on intracystic glucose, twenty studies on intracystic carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and eighteen studies on other biomarkers were identified. Low levels of intracystic glucose had high sensitivity and specificity in the differentiation between mucinous and non-mucinous cystic neoplasms. CEA and glucose are the most widely studied fluid biochemical markers in pancreatic cystic lesions. Glucose has better diagnostic accuracy than CEA. Other biochemical biomarkers require further research.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoembryonic Antigen; Diagnosis, Differential; Glucose; Humans; Pancreatic Cyst; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 35893110
DOI: 10.3390/medicina58080994