-
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aug 2023The prevalence of celiac disease (CD) is approximately 1% in the US. Studies have shown possible association between exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) and CD, with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The prevalence of celiac disease (CD) is approximately 1% in the US. Studies have shown possible association between exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) and CD, with numerous hypothesized biological mechanisms including small bowel mucosal damage causing disruption of enteric-mediated hormonal secretion such as cholecystokinin and loss of enterokinase. The overall prevalence of EPI in CD remains unknown. We performed systematic review and metanalysis and examined the prevalence of EPI in patients who were first diagnosed with CD versus those who had been on treatment with gluten-free diet (GFD). Results Six studies were included in the analysis totaling 446 CD patients (Avg age 44.1 years; 34% Males). One hundred and forty-four patients had newly diagnosed CD, and 302 patients had known CD with at least 9 months treatment with GFD. Four studies examined newly diagnosed CD patients. The individual rates of EPI in new CD patients ranged from 10.5 to 46.5%. The pooled prevalence of EPI in newly diagnosed CD patients was 26.2% (95% CI 8.43-43.92%, Q = 2.24, I = 0%). Five studies examined CD patients on GFD. The rate of EPI ranged from 1.9% to 18.2%. The prevalence of EPI in patients treated with GFD is 8% (95% CI 1.52-14.8%, Q = 4.42, I = 9.59%). Patients with newly diagnosed CD are significantly more likely to have EPI compared to those patients treated with GFD (p = 0.031). CD patients on GFD with persistent symptoms have a significantly higher rate of EPI (28.4%) compared to CD patients on GFD who are asymptomatic (3%) (p < 0.001).
Topics: Male; Humans; Adult; Female; Celiac Disease; Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency; Intestine, Small; Diet, Gluten-Free; Intestinal Mucosa
PubMed: 37294459
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-07965-7 -
European Journal of Gastroenterology &... Dec 2023The effect of gallstones and cholecystectomy on the development of pancreatic cancer has recently prompted many population-based studies. However, the results are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The effect of gallstones and cholecystectomy on the development of pancreatic cancer has recently prompted many population-based studies. However, the results are controversial. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the causality among gallstones, cholecystectomy and pancreatic cancer. Cohort studies published in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2023 were retrieved. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were analyzed using a random-effects model. We screened 1391 articles and included 16 studies. Gallstones were not associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer ( P = 0.082), with only the Asian population ( P = 0.011) showing an increased risk in the subgroup analysis. A markedly higher risk of pancreatic cancer was observed among patients with cholecystectomy (RR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.41; P = 0.004; I 2 = 74.4%). The association remained significant in the Asian population ( P = 0.004), in the subgroup analyses stratified by sex, lag period, and time interval since cholecystectomy, and when the models were adjusted for diabetes, smoking, and BMI. Interestingly, cholecystectomy due to gallstones (RR = 1.30; 95% CI, 1.14-1.48; P < 0.001; I 2 = 30.8%), rather than for unspecified reasons ( P = 0.116), markedly increased the risk of pancreatic cancer. In conclusion, cholecystectomy due to gallstones, rather than gallstone formation, conferred an increased risk for pancreatic cancer. There was a higher risk for the Asian population for both gallstones and cholecystectomy.
Topics: Humans; Gallstones; Cholecystectomy; Cohort Studies; Risk; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 37823406
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002652 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery :... Nov 2020Excess adiposity is considered causally related to pancreatic cancer. While most knowledge on the topic comes from studies on general and visceral adiposity, the role of...
BACKGROUND
Excess adiposity is considered causally related to pancreatic cancer. While most knowledge on the topic comes from studies on general and visceral adiposity, the role of intra-pancreatic fat deposition in pancreatic carcinogenesis just begins to be elucidated. The aim was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review of clinical studies on intra-pancreatic fat deposition in individuals with pancreatic cancer or pre-malignant lesions.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted independently by two reviewers using three electronic databases. Studies were included if they reported on intra-pancreatic fat deposition determined based on modern radiology or histology. Summary estimates were presented as pooled prevalence or relative risk and 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies (encompassing 2178 individuals) were included. The pooled prevalence of intra-pancreatic fat deposition in individuals with pancreatic cancer or pre-malignant lesions was 52% (95% confidence interval, 38-66%). The presence of pancreatic cancer or pre-malignant lesions was associated with a significantly increased risk of intra-pancreatic fat deposition (relative risk 2.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.56-4.94, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Individuals with pancreatic cancer or pre-malignant lesions are characterized by increased intra-pancreatic fat deposition. There are sound grounds for conceptually viewing intra-pancreatic fat deposition as a combination of fat accumulation in the pancreas (due to expansion of excess visceral fat) and fatty replacement of the pancreas (due to changes in cellular identity within the pancreas). Guidelines on reporting intra-pancreatic fat deposition need to be developed with a view to informing a comprehensive and standardized characterization of this clinical entity in future studies.
Topics: Adiposity; Carcinogenesis; Humans; Intra-Abdominal Fat; Pancreas; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 31749093
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04417-4 -
Annals of Surgical Oncology Dec 2023The association between oral microbiota and pancreatic cancer (PC) is increasingly recognized and studied. Yet, contrasting results are seen in current studies. This... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The association between oral microbiota and pancreatic cancer (PC) is increasingly recognized and studied. Yet, contrasting results are seen in current studies. This study aimed to provide systematic review and meta-analysis comparing PC and oral microbiota.
METHODS
Studies related to the association between oral microbiota and PC were identified through digital databases including PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, COCHRANE, and SCOPUS without limitations on language or publication period. The last identification date was 10 March 2023. Three case-control studies concerning the issue were included. For the meta-analyses, RevMan software version 5.4 was used. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate articles and measurement of study differences, and publication bias was shown.
RESULTS
Porphyromonas gingivalis in oral bacteria was detected at a comparatively high detection rate in PC patients compared with healthy controls (odds ratio [OR], 1.38; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.74; P = 0.007; I = 34 %). The detection rate did not differ significantly between PC patients and healthy control patients for Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (OR 0.98; 95 % CI 0.75-1.29; P = 0.90; I = 76 %); Tannerella forsythiaand (OR 1.12; 95 % CI 0.89-1.42; P = 0.33; I = 0 %), or Prevotella intermedia (OR 1.08; 95 % CI 0.84-1.39; P = 0.55; I = 0 %).
CONCLUSION
Oral microbiota were closely related to PC, whereas P. gingivalis was more commonly found in the PC patients than in the healthy controls. For patients with PC, P. gingivalis may play a role in early diagnosis.
Topics: Humans; Porphyromonas gingivalis; Prevotella intermedia; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Microbiota
PubMed: 37787951
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14366-7 -
Cancer Research Communications Oct 2022Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a 5-year survival rate below 5%. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is the most commonly used blood-based biomarker for PDAC... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
UNLABELLED
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a 5-year survival rate below 5%. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is the most commonly used blood-based biomarker for PDAC in current clinical practice, despite having been shown repeatedly to be inaccurate and have poor diagnostic performance. This review aims to assess the reported diagnostic accuracy of all blood-based biomarkers investigated to date in PDAC, by directly comparing individual biomarkers and multi-biomarker panels, both containing CA19-9 and not (novel). A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA standards in July 2020. Individualized search strategies for three academic databases identified 5,885 studies between the years 1973 and 2020. After two rounds of screening, 250 studies were included. Data were extracted and assessed for bias. A multivariate three-level meta-analysis with subgroup moderators was run in R using AUC values as effect size. On the basis of this model, the pooled AUC value for all multi-biomarker panels (AUC = 0.898; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.91) was significantly higher than all single biomarkers (AUC = 0.803; 95% CI: 0.78-0.83; < 0.0001). The pooled AUC value for CA19-9 alone was significantly lower compared with the multi-biomarker panels containing CA19-9 ( < 0.0001). For the novel biomarkers, the pooled AUC for single biomarkers was also significantly lower compared with multi-biomarker panels ( < 0.0001). Novel biomarkers that have been repeatedly examined across the literature, such as TIMP-1, CEA, and CA125, are highlighted as promising. These results suggest that CA19-9 may be best used as an addition to a panel of biomarkers rather than alone, and that multi-biomarker panels generate the most robust results in blood-based PDAC diagnosis.
SIGNIFICANCE
In a systematic review and three-level multivariate meta-analysis, it is shown for the first time that blood-based multi-biomarker panels for the diagnosis of PDAC exhibit superior performance in comparison with single biomarkers. CA19-9 is demonstrated to have limited utility alone, and to perform poorly in patient control cohorts of both healthy and benign individuals. Multi-biomarker panels containing CA19-9 produce the best diagnostic performance overall.
Topics: Humans; CA-19-9 Antigen; Biomarkers, Tumor; Case-Control Studies; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal
PubMed: 36969742
DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0190 -
European Radiology May 2021To systematically review published studies on the use of radiomics of the pancreas. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To systematically review published studies on the use of radiomics of the pancreas.
METHODS
The search was conducted in the MEDLINE database. Human studies that investigated the applications of radiomics in diseases of the pancreas were included. The radiomics quality score was calculated for each included study.
RESULTS
A total of 72 studies encompassing 8863 participants were included. Of them, 66 investigated focal pancreatic lesions (pancreatic cancer, precancerous lesions, or benign lesions); 4, pancreatitis; and 2, diabetes mellitus. The principal applications of radiomics were differential diagnosis between various types of focal pancreatic lesions (n = 19), classification of pancreatic diseases (n = 23), and prediction of prognosis or treatment response (n = 30). Second-order texture features were most useful for the purpose of differential diagnosis of diseases of the pancreas (with 100% of studies investigating them found a statistically significant feature), whereas filtered image features were most useful for the purpose of classification of diseases of the pancreas and prediction of diseases of the pancreas (with 100% of studies investigating them found a statistically significant feature). The median radiomics quality score of the included studies was 28%, with the interquartile range of 22% to 36%. The radiomics quality score was significantly correlated with the number of extracted radiomics features (r = 0.52, p < 0.001) and the study sample size (r = 0.34, p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS
Radiomics of the pancreas holds promise as a quantitative imaging biomarker of both focal pancreatic lesions and diffuse changes of the pancreas. The usefulness of radiomics features may vary depending on the purpose of their application. Standardisation of image acquisition protocols and image pre-processing is warranted prior to considering the use of radiomics of the pancreas in routine clinical practice.
KEY POINTS
• Methodologically sound studies on radiomics of the pancreas are characterised by a large sample size and a large number of extracted features. • Optimisation of the radiomics pipeline will increase the clinical utility of mineable pancreas imaging data. • Radiomics of the pancreas is a promising personalised medicine tool in diseases of the pancreas.
Topics: Diagnostic Imaging; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Pancreas; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prognosis
PubMed: 33151391
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07376-6 -
International Journal of Environmental... Nov 2021The burden of pancreatic cancer varies greatly across countries, with the number of deaths, incident cases, and disability-adjusted life years more than doubling in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The burden of pancreatic cancer varies greatly across countries, with the number of deaths, incident cases, and disability-adjusted life years more than doubling in recent years, and with high-income countries having the highest incidence and mortality rates. We conducted this systematic review with meta-analysis with the goal of summarizing the current evidence on dietary fiber intake and its role in reducing the risk of pancreatic cancer, given the importance of identifying risk factors. This systematic review followed the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. The structured literature search was conducted on PubMed/Medline and Scopus, combining free text words and medical subject headings. Our review contained 18 records at the end of the process. Our results show that dietary fiber intake reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer. When the analysis was differentiated according to the type of fiber considered, sub-grouped by gender (reduction of around 60% among women), and when case-control studies were conducted, the strength of the association increased. Clinicians and policymakers should improve interventions to raise the population's awareness regarding the consumption of high-fiber diets, both in practice and in terms of public health policy.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Dietary Fiber; Female; Humans; Incidence; Observational Studies as Topic; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Risk Factors
PubMed: 34770068
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111556 -
The American Surgeon Dec 2023Completion pancreatectomy (C.P.) is one acceptable treatment of choice in clinical scenarios such as management of post-pancreatectomy complications and recurrence in... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE (S)
Completion pancreatectomy (C.P.) is one acceptable treatment of choice in clinical scenarios such as management of post-pancreatectomy complications and recurrence in the pancreatic remnant. Studies referring to completion pancreatectomy as a distinct operation are limited, without emphasizing at the operation itself, rather reporting completion pancreatectomy as a possible option for treatment of various diseases. The identification of indications of CP in various pathologies and the clinical outcomes are therefore mandatory.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed in the Pubmed and Scopus Databases (February 2020),guided by the PRISMA protocol, for all studies reporting CP as a surgical procedure with reference at indications for performing it combined with postoperative morbidity and/or mortality.
RESULTS
Out of 1647 studies, 32 studies from 10 countries with 2775 patients in total, of whom 561 (20.2%) CPs met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Inclusion year ranged from 1964 to 2018 and were published from 1992 until 2019. 17 studies with a total number of 249 CPs were performed for post-pancreatectomy complications. Mortality rate was 44.5% (111 out of 249). Morbidity rate was (72.6%). 12 studies with 225 CPs were performed for isolated local recurrence after initial resection with a morbidity rate of 21.5% and 0% mortality rate in the early postoperative period. Two studies with a total number of 12 patients reported CP as a treatment option for recurrent neuroendocrine neoplasms. The mortality in those studies was 8% (1/12) and the mean morbidity rate was 58.3% (7/12). Finally, CP for refractory chronic pancreatitis was presented in one study with morbidity and mortality rates of 19% and 0%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Completion pancreatectomy is a distinct treatment option for various pathologies. Morbidity and mortality rates depend on the indications of performing CP, the status performance of the patients and whether the operation is performed electively or urgently
Topics: Humans; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pancreas; Pancreatitis, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 37295804
DOI: 10.1177/00031348231183121 -
The British Journal of Surgery Dec 2022Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly being used before surgery for localized pancreatic cancer. Given the importance of completing multimodal therapy, the aim of this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly being used before surgery for localized pancreatic cancer. Given the importance of completing multimodal therapy, the aim of this study was to characterize surgical resection rates after neoadjuvant therapy as well as the reasons for, and long-term prognostic impact of, not undergoing resection.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials and high-quality retrospective studies since 2010 was performed to calculate pooled resection rates using a generalized random-effects model for potentially resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Median survival times were calculated using random-effects models for patients who did and did not undergo resection.
RESULTS
In 125 studies that met the inclusion criteria, neoadjuvant therapy consisted of chemotherapy (36.8 per cent), chemoradiation (15.2 per cent), or chemotherapy and radiation (48.0 per cent). Among 11 713 patients, the pooled resection rates were 77.4 (95 per cent c.i. 71.3 to 82.5), 60.6 (54.8 to 66.1), and 22.2 (16.7 to 29.0) per cent for potentially resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer respectively. The most common reasons for not undergoing resection were distant progression for resectable and borderline resectable cancers, and local unresectability for locally advanced disease. Among 42 studies with survival data available, achieving surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival for patients with potentially resectable (median 38.5 versus 13.3 months), borderline resectable (32.3 versus 13.9 months), and locally advanced (30.0 versus 14.6 months) pancreatic cancer (P < 0.001 for all).
CONCLUSION
Although rates of surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy vary based on anatomical stage, surgery is associated with improved survival for all patients with localized pancreatic cancer. These pooled resection and survival rates may inform patient-provider decision-making and serve as important benchmarks for future prospective trials.
Topics: Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Pancreatectomy; Retrospective Studies; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 36346716
DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac354 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery :... Aug 2022Survival following oesophagectomy for cancer is improving, resulting in increased focus on quality of life and survivorship. Malabsorption syndrome is multifactorial and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Survival following oesophagectomy for cancer is improving, resulting in increased focus on quality of life and survivorship. Malabsorption syndrome is multifactorial and includes exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and bile acid malabsorption (BAM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the reported incidence and management of malabsorption syndromes post-oesophagectomy.
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library evaluating incidence, diagnosis and management of malabsorption was performed for studies published until December 2021.
RESULTS
Of 464 identified studies, eight studies (n = 7 non-randomised longitudinal studies) were included where patients were identified with malnutrition following oesophagectomy. Studies included a combined sample of 328 (range 7-63) patients. Malabsorption syndromes including EPI, SIBO and BAM occurred in 15.9-100%, 37.8-100% and 3.33-100% over 21 days-60 months, 1-24 months and 1-24 months respectively. There was no consensus definition for EPI, SIBO or BAM, and there was variation in diagnostic methods. Diagnostic criteria varied from clinical (gastrointestinal symptoms or weight loss), or biochemical (faecal elastase, hydrogen breath test and Selenium-75-labelled synthetic bile acid measurements). Treatment modalities using pancreatic enzyme replacement, rifaximin or colesevelam showed improvement in symptoms and weight in all studies, where investigated.
CONCLUSIONS
Malabsorption syndromes following oesophagectomy are under-recognised, and thus under-reported. The resultant gastrointestinal symptoms may have a negative effect on post-operative quality of life. Current literature suggests benefit with outlined therapies; however, greater understanding of these conditions, their diagnosis and management is required to further understand which patients will benefit from treatment.
Topics: Bile Acids and Salts; Esophagectomy; Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency; Humans; Incidence; Malabsorption Syndromes; Quality of Life
PubMed: 35484473
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05323-y