-
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Aug 2021Risk factors for the development of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) following distal pancreatectomy (DP) need clarification particularly following the 2016... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy in the era of 2016 International Study Group pancreatic fistula definition.
BACKGROUND
Risk factors for the development of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) following distal pancreatectomy (DP) need clarification particularly following the 2016 International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition.
METHODS
A systemic search of MEDLINE, Pubmed, Scopus, and EMBASE were conducted using the PRISMA framework. Studies were evaluated for risk factors for the development CR-POPF after DP using the 2016 ISGPF definition. Further subgroup analysis was undertaken on studies ≥10 patients in exposed and non-exposed subgroups.
RESULTS
Forty-three studies with 8864 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The weighted rate of CR-POPF was 20.4% (95%-CI: 17.7-23.4%). Smoking (OR 1.29, 95%-CI: 1.08-1.53, p = 0.02) and open DP (OR 1.43, 95%-CI: 1.02-2.01, p = 0.04) were found to be significant risk factors of CR-POPF. Diabetes (OR 0.81, 95%-CI: 0.68-0.95, p = 0.02) was a significant protective factor against CR-POPF. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the comparisons of pancreatic texture and body mass index. Seventeen risk factors achieved significance in a univariate or multivariate comparison as reported by individual studies in the narrative synthesis, however, they remain difficult to interpret as statistically significant comparisons were not uniform.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis found smoking and open DP to be risk factors and diabetes to be protective factor of CR-POPF in the era of 2016 ISGPF definition.
Topics: Humans; Pancreas; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors
PubMed: 33820687
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.02.015 -
Scandinavian Journal of Surgery : SJS :... Jun 2024Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) occurs in 20%-40% of patients and remains a leading cause of morbidity... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND/AIMS
Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) occurs in 20%-40% of patients and remains a leading cause of morbidity and increased healthcare cost in this patient group. Recently, several studies suggested decreased risk of CR-POPF with the use of peri-firing compression (PFC) technique. The aim of this report was to conduct a systematic review to get an overview of the current knowledge on the use of PFC in DP. In addition, our experience with PFC was presented.
METHODS
The systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Also, 19 patients undergoing DP with the use of PFC at Oslo University Hospital were studied. The primary endpoint was incidence of CR-POPF.
RESULTS
Seven articles reporting a total of 771 patients were ultimately included in the systematic review. Only two of these were case-control studies examining outcomes in patients with and without PFC, while the rest were case series. These were heterogeneous in terms of staplers used, cartridge selection policy, and PFC technique. Both case-control studies reported significantly reduced CR- POPF incidence with PFC. Eight (21%) of our patients developed CR-POPF after DP with PFC. Only one patient developed CR-POPF among those with pancreatic transection site thickness ⩽1.5 cm.
CONCLUSION
Evidence on potential benefits of PFC in DP is limited in quantity and quality. Our findings suggest that the use of PFC does not lead to reduction in the incidence of CR-POPF. Yet, there might be a benefit from PFC when dealing with a thin pancreas.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreatectomy; Postoperative Complications; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Surgical Stapling; Aged
PubMed: 37982224
DOI: 10.1177/14574969231211084 -
Annals of Surgery May 2023To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials compared laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) versus open pancreatoduodenectomy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials compared laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) in patients with periampullary tumors.
BACKGROUND
LPD has gained attention; however, its safety and efficacy versus OPD remain debatable.
METHODS
We searched PubMed and Embase. Primary outcomes were the length of hospital stay (LOS) (day), Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complications, and 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were blood loss (milliliter), blood transfusion, duration of operation (minute), readmission, reoperation, comprehensive complication index score, bile leak, gastrojejunostomy or duodenojejunostomy leak, postoperative pancreatic fistula, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, surgical site infection, intra-abdominal infection, number of harvested lymph nodes, and R0 resection. Pooled odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) of data was calculated using the random-effect model. The grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation approach was used for grading the level of evidence.
RESULTS
Four randomized controlled trials yielding 818 patients were included, of which 411 and 407 patients underwent LPD and OPD, respectively. The meta-analysis concluded that 2 approaches were similar, except in the LPD group, the LOS tended to be shorter [MD=-2.54 (-5.17, 0.09), P =0.06], LOS in ICU was shorter [MD=-1 (-1.8, -0.2), P =0.01], duration of operation was longer [MD=75.16 (23.29, 127.03), P =0.005], blood loss was lower [MD=-115.40 (-152.13, -78.68), P <0.00001], blood transfusion was lower [OR=0.66 (0.47, 0.92), P =0.01], and surgical site infection was lower [OR=0.35 (0.12, 0.96), P =0.04]. The overall certainty of the evidence was moderate.
CONCLUSIONS
Within the hands of highly skilled surgeons in high-volume centers, LPD is feasible and as safe and efficient as OPD.
Topics: Humans; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreas; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatic Fistula; Surgical Wound Infection; Laparoscopy; Postoperative Complications; Length of Stay; Retrospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36519444
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005785 -
Future Oncology (London, England) Apr 2023Extended distal pancreatectomy (EDP) is being increasingly performed for pancreatic cancers with suspected invasion into the adjacent organs. However, the perioperative... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Extended distal pancreatectomy (EDP) is being increasingly performed for pancreatic cancers with suspected invasion into the adjacent organs. However, the perioperative safety and oncological efficacy of this procedure merit further elucidation. Major databases were searched for studies evaluating EDP, and a meta-analysis was performed using fixed- or random-effects models. Fifteen studies were included in the analysis. EDP was found to be associated with significantly greater incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula overall and with major complications, re-explorations, mortality and readmissions. However, on pooled analysis of 3- and 5-year survival, EDP was found to be noninferior to standard distal pancreatectomy. EDP is feasible and may offer equivalent survival in highly selected patients but carries a higher risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatectomy; Treatment Outcome; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreas; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37170878
DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-1180 -
Surgical Endoscopy May 2022Robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) is a new technique that is rapidly gaining popularity and may help overcome the limitations of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG);... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) is a new technique that is rapidly gaining popularity and may help overcome the limitations of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG); however, its safety and therapeutic efficacy remain controversial. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RDG.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies that compared RDG and LDG and were published between the time of database inception and May 2021. We assessed the bias risk of the observational studies using ROBIN-I, and a random effect model was always applied.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included 22 studies involving 5386 patients. Compared with LDG, RDG was associated with longer operating time (Mean Difference [MD] = 43.88, 95% CI = 35.17-52.60), less intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 24.84, 95% CI = - 41.26 to - 8.43), a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes (MD = 2.41, 95% CI = 0.77-4.05), shorter time to first flatus (MD = - 0.09, 95% CI = - 0.15 to - 0.03), shorter postoperative hospital stay (MD = - 0.68, 95% CI = - 1.27 to - 0.08), and lower incidence of pancreatic fistula (OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.07-0.79). Mean proximal and distal resection margin distances, time to start liquid and soft diets, and other complications were not significantly different between RDG and LDG groups. However, in the propensity-score-matched meta-analysis, the differences in time to first flatus and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups lost significance.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the available evidence, RDG appears feasible and safe, shows better surgical and oncological outcomes than LDG and, comparable postoperative recovery and postoperative complication outcomes.
Topics: Flatulence; Gastrectomy; Humans; Laparoscopy; Postoperative Complications; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Stomach Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35020057
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08994-x -
World Journal of Surgery Jun 2024In patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), there has been some evidence favoring pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) over pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) in the occurrence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
In patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), there has been some evidence favoring pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) over pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) in the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) and considering PG as a safer anastomotic technique. However, other publications revealed comparable incidences of POPF attributed to both techniques. The current work attempts to reach a more consolidated conclusion about such an issue.
METHODS
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis that analyzed the studies comparing PG and PJ during PD in terms of the rate of POPF occurrence. Studies were obtained by searching the Scopus, PubMed Central, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases.
RESULTS
35 articles published between 1995 and 2022 presented data from 14,666 patients; 4547 underwent PG and 10,119 underwent PJ. Statistically significant lower rates of POPF (p = 0.044) and clinically relevant CR-POPF (p = 0.043) were shown in the PG group. The post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) was significantly higher in the PG group, while no significant difference was found between the two groups in the clinically significant PPH. No statistically significant differences were found regarding the amount of intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, DGE, overall morbidity rates, reoperation rates, or mortality rates. The percentage of male sex in the PG group and the percentage of soft pancreas in the PJ group seem to influence the odds ratio of CR-POPF (p = 0.076 and 0.074, respectively).
CONCLUSION
The present study emphasizes the superiority of PG over PJ regarding CR-POPF rates. Higher rates of postoperative hemorrhage were associated with PG. Yet, the clinically significant hemorrhage rate was comparable between the two groups.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticojejunostomy; Postoperative Complications; Gastrostomy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Incidence; Pancreatectomy
PubMed: 38629863
DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12173 -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Dec 2020Drains' role after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is debated by proponents of no drain, draining selected cases, and early drain removal. The aim of the study was to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical drain management after the diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: draining-tract-targeted works better than standard management.
PURPOSE
Drains' role after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is debated by proponents of no drain, draining selected cases, and early drain removal. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of "standard" and "draining-tract-targeted" management of abdominal drains still in situ after diagnosing a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).
METHODS
PubMed and Scopus were searched for "pancreaticoduodenectomy or pancreatoduodenectomy or duodenopancreatectomy," "Whipple," "proximal pancreatectomy," "pylorus-preserving pancreatectomy," and "postoperative pancreatic fistula or POPF.". Main outcomes included clinically relevant (CR) POPF, grade-C POPF, overall mortality, POPF-related mortality, and CR-POPF-related mortality. Secondary outcomes were incidence of radiological and/or endoscopic interventions, reoperations, and completion pancreatectomies.
RESULTS
Overall, 12,089 studies were retrieved by the search of the English literature (01/01/1990-31/12/2018). Three hundred and twenty-six studies (90,321 patients) reporting ≥ 100 PDs and ≥ 10 PD/year were finally included into the study. Average incidences were obtained by averaging the incidence rates reported in the single articles. Pooled incidences were calculated by combining the number of events and the total number of patients considered in the various studies. These were then meta-analyzed using DerSimonian and Laird's (1986) method. Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare pooled incidences between groups. Post hoc testing was used to see which groups differed. The meta-analyzed incidences were compared using a fixed effect for moderators. "Draining-tract-targeted" management showed a significant advantage over "standard" management in four clinically relevant outcomes out of eight according to pool analysis and in one of them according to meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
Clinically, "draining-targeted" management of POPF should be preferred to "standard" management.
Topics: Drainage; Humans; Pancreas; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 33104886
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-02005-8 -
World Journal of Surgery Feb 2021Cirrhosis has been considered a contraindication to major abdominal surgeries, due to increased risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Cirrhosis has been considered a contraindication to major abdominal surgeries, due to increased risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of pancreatectomy in cirrhotic versus non-cirrhotic patients.
METHODS
The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. All meta-analyses were performed using the random effects model.
RESULTS
Eight studies were eventually included, enrolling 1229 patients (cirrhotics: 722; and Child-Pugh A: 593; Child-Pugh B/C: 129) who underwent surgery for pancreatic cancer. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 66% (51%-80%). Infections (26%) and ascites formation/worsening (23%) were the most common postoperative complications, followed by anastomotic leak/fistula (17%). Non-cirrhotic patients were less likely to suffer from anastomotic leak/fistula (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.23-0.65) and infections (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.25-0.67). Postoperative mortality rate was statistically significantly lower in non-cirrhotic versus cirrhotic patients (OR: 0.18; 95% CI:0.18-0.39). The odds ratios of 1 year (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.30-1.30), 2 year (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.25-1.83) and 3 year all-cause mortality (OR: 0.32; 95% CI: 20.03-2.99) were not significantly different between cirrhotic versus non-cirrhotic patients.
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrated that non-cirrhotic patients were less likely to undergo any type of re-intervention and had statistically significant lower postoperative mortality rates compared to patients with cirrhosis.
Topics: Esophagectomy; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Reoperation
PubMed: 33073316
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05821-7 -
Pancreatology : Official Journal of the... Oct 2020Body composition analysis has emerged as a practical tool for predicting outcomes following pancreatic surgery. However, the impact of body composition disorders on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Body composition analysis has emerged as a practical tool for predicting outcomes following pancreatic surgery. However, the impact of body composition disorders on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) remains inconclusive. The aim of this study was to review and analyse whether radiographically assessed body composition is predictive of CR-POPF.
METHODS
PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched up to January 2020 to identify relevant studies. CR-POPF was defined according to the definition and grading system proposed by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Pooled odds ratios (OR) for CR-POPF were calculated to evaluate the predictive values of radiographically assessed body composition.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies published between 2008 and 2019 with a total of 3136 patients were included. There was a significant increase in the incidence of CR-POPF in patients with visceral obesity (OR 2.97, 95% CI 2.05-4.29, P < 0.00001) and sarcopenic obesity (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.31-6.34, P = 0.009). Conversely, the impact of sarcopenia (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.65-1.28, P = 0.59) and low muscle attenuation (MA) on CR-POPF did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSION
Preoperative visceral obesity and sarcopenic obesity are more effective at predicting CR-POPF than decreased muscle quantity and quality. This finding may lead to appropriate management and early intervention of patients at risk of CR-POPF.
Topics: Humans; Obesity, Abdominal; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Postoperative Complications; Preoperative Care; Sarcopenia; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 32972835
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.09.009 -
The Journal of Surgical Research Nov 2021Body composition can have important influence on surgical outcome. There is substantial literature examining sarcopenia, however much less in known about the impact of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Body composition can have important influence on surgical outcome. There is substantial literature examining sarcopenia, however much less in known about the impact of fat. Visceral fat area (VFA) is a reliable measures of fat distribution that can be quantified with CT scan. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of VFA to predict complications and mortality after emergent or elective surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The primary objective was to determine impact of VFA, quantified by preoperative CT scan, has on in-hospital complications and 30-day mortality after emergent or elective surgery. We included peer review English studies of adult patients who underwent elective or emergency surgery and had VFA quantified on preoperative CT scan. Obstetrical patients, case studies, and case series were excluded.
RESULTS
Our search strategy identified 3782 citations. After removal of duplicates, application of inclusion criteria and full text review, 19 studies were included. Methodological quality of all studies was fair to good as assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. There were no significant differences between patients with visceral obesity compared to normal VFA for 30-day mortality or overall postoperative complications. Our analysis did demonstrated an association between visceral obesity and increased surgical site infection, pneumonia, and postoperative pancreatic fistula.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest further studies are necessary to determine the impact of VFA on postoperative outcomes and identifies the importance of establishing standardized assessment for body composition on CT.
Topics: Adult; Body Mass Index; Humans; Intra-Abdominal Fat; Obesity, Abdominal; Pancreatic Fistula; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Period; Risk Factors
PubMed: 34130241
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.04.034