-
Psychiatry Research Apr 2022Patients with delusional disorder (DD) are at an increased risk for the development of depressive symptoms. We aimed to examine the literature dealing with assessment... (Review)
Review
Patients with delusional disorder (DD) are at an increased risk for the development of depressive symptoms. We aimed to examine the literature dealing with assessment tools to assess depressive symptoms in DD. A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Scopus and clinicaltrials.gov databases from inception until June 2021 (PRISMA guidelines). From 1863 initial retrieved records, 11 studies were included (N = 715 DD patients). Depressive comorbidity ranged from 20.9% to 53.5%. Seven studies used semistructured/structured interviews: OPCRIT 4.0 (n = 1), Manual for Assessment and Documentation of Psychopathology in Psychiatry (AMDP System) (n = 2), the MINI interview (n = 1), DSM-IV (n = 1), ICD-10 (n = 1); and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS-R) (n = 1). Seven studies used at least one observer-rated scale: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-depressive component (n = 2), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD, n = 3), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS, n = 1), Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI, n = 1) and the Bipolar Affective Disorder Dimension Scale (BADDS, n = 1). Assessment scales administered in depressive disorders and schizophrenia are applied to DD. This is the first systematic review exploring the use of assessment tools for depressive symptoms in DD. The use of the MADRS to assess depressive symptoms can be recommended in combination with other clinical scales, for instance, the CGI.
Topics: Bipolar Disorder; Depression; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Humans; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Schizophrenia, Paranoid
PubMed: 35150968
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114435 -
International Clinical... May 2020To collect the best available evidence and to compare the first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) vs. the second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in the treatment of...
To collect the best available evidence and to compare the first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) vs. the second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in the treatment of delusional disorder (DD). Systematic review including studies evaluating treatment response in DD using clinician-rated scales appearing in PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception till September 2019. Those studies meeting inclusion criteria were selected. Outcomes were summarized into two response categories: (1) response to treatment equal to or greater than 50% and (2) response less than 50%. Biases and quality of the studies were evaluated, and relevant data were extracted. Finally, both narrative review and quantitative synthesis were performed. The final sample included six studies (437 patients, 318 on treatment with SGAs). Antipsychotics achieved a good response in 32.3% of patients. Effectiveness differences between FGA and SGA were only marginal favouring the former. Among the most used antipsychotics, risperidone and olanzapine showed, respectively, 34.3 and 33.7% good response. Pimozide (n = 35) demonstrated a higher response rates compared with other antipsychotics. Inpatients showed the best treatment outcomes. Antipsychotics appeared to be an effective treatment in patients with DD. FGA were slightly superior to SGA. Pimozide does not seem to provide any advantage in most DD subtypes.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Schizophrenia, Paranoid; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32097136
DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000306 -
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences May 2023
Rapidly responding Geschwind syndrome comorbid with Othello syndrome in a case of post-stroke dementia and post-stroke epilepsy: A case report and a brief systematic review of classical and atypical cases.
Topics: Humans; Comorbidity; Dementia; Epilepsy; Schizophrenia, Paranoid; Stroke
PubMed: 36856332
DOI: 10.1111/pcn.13539