-
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia Feb 2023Bone lesions and other disease- and treatment-related side effects commonly experienced by people with multiple myeloma (MM) may impede their ability to exercise. This... (Review)
Review
Bone lesions and other disease- and treatment-related side effects commonly experienced by people with multiple myeloma (MM) may impede their ability to exercise. This systematic review evaluated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of exercise program participation on the physiological and/or psychological health of people with MM. Literature searches were conducted through five electronic databases and appraised using the Delphi list of criteria. Controlled trials that assessed the safety and feasibility of an exercise intervention and its effects on disease- or treatment-related symptoms in people with MM were included. Seven studies of varying quality involving 563 participants were included. All studies concluded that exercise was safe, reporting zero serious and 4 adverse events attributable to exercise testing or training. Attendance ranged from 58% to 96%, however no study reported adherence to the exercise prescription. Compared to a control group, exercise did not appear to affect fatigue, depression, anxiety, body composition, quality of life, or sleep. Isolated studies identified between-group differences favoring exercise in lower limb strength (+8.4 kg, 95% CI 0.5, 16.3, P= .04), peak oxygen uptake (+1.2 mL/kg/min, 95% CI 0.3, 3.7, P= .02), physical activity (+6.5MET-hs/wk, P< .001), stem cell collection attempts (1.1 ± 0.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.9, P< .01), and red blood cell (1.8 ± 2.2 vs. 2.4 ± 2.6, P< .05) and platelet transfusions (2.3 ± 1.6 vs. 3.5 ± 3.4, P < .05) during transplantation. Exercise interventions appear safe and well attended by people with MM. The lack of improvements in disease- and treatment-related symptoms requires further exploration to determine whether exercise is a sufficient stimulus to elicit benefits in this unique population.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Quality of Life; Feasibility Studies; Exercise; Exercise Therapy
PubMed: 36450625
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.10.003 -
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology Apr 2022Traditional approaches for evaluating multiple myeloma (MM) treatment response have low sensitivity for residual disease. Recent studies highlight the utility of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Traditional approaches for evaluating multiple myeloma (MM) treatment response have low sensitivity for residual disease. Recent studies highlight the utility of whole-body MRI or FDG PET/CT in evaluating treatment response, with increasing emphasis on DWI. This systematic review was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI and FDG PET/CT for MM treatment response assessment. Studies in which whole-body MRI or FDG PET/CT was used to evaluate MM treatment response were identified through search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases through June 30, 2021. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting response were calculated by bivariate modeling. The diagnostic performances of whole-body MRI and FDG PET/CT were compared. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess studies comparing the modalities and studies in which whole-body MRI included DWI. Twelve studies comprising 373 patients were included: six evaluated both modalities, four evaluated whole-body MRI only, and two evaluated FDG PET/CT only. Of studies of MRI, five included DWI. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 87% (95% CI, 75-93%) and 57% (95% CI, 37-76%) for whole-body MRI versus 64% (95% CI, 45-79%) and 82% (95% CI, 75-88%) for FDG PET/CT (sensitivity, = .29; specificity, = .01). For studies directly comparing the modalities, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 90% (95% CI, 80-100%) and 56% (95% CI, 44-68%) for whole-body MRI versus 66% (95% CI, 47-85%) and 81% (95% CI, 72-90%) for FDG PET/CT (sensitivity, = .18; specificity, < .001). Sensitivity and specificity were 93% (95% CI, 75-98%) and 57% (95% CI, 21-87%) for DWI versus 74% (95% CI, 60-85%) and 56% (95% CI, 38-73%) for whole-body MRI without DWI (sensitivity, = .27; specificity, = .99). The AUC values were 0.84 for whole-body MRI, 0.83 for FDG PET/CT, and 0.92 for DWI. FDG PET/CT had significantly higher specificity, and whole-body MRI had higher sensitivity (though nonsignificant). DWI may contribute to the high sensitivity of whole-body MRI. The results of this meta-analysis suggest potential complementary roles of whole-body MRI and FDG PET/CT in assessment of MM treatment response. Future studies should explore their combination through PET/MRI.
Topics: Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Multiple Myeloma; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Positron-Emission Tomography; Radiopharmaceuticals; Sensitivity and Specificity; Whole Body Imaging
PubMed: 34704461
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.21.26381 -
Technology and Health Care : Official... 2023Currently, the frequency of coagulation dysfunction associated with chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (Car-T) therapy cannot yet be determined. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Currently, the frequency of coagulation dysfunction associated with chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (Car-T) therapy cannot yet be determined.
OBJECTIVE
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the prevalence of abnormal laboratory tests related to coagulation disorders in patients receiving Car-T therapy and provide a reference for future risk assessment mechanisms.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for relevant studies and evaluated their quality using the methodology index of non-random research (MINORS). 2672 quotations were retrieved via systematic searches. After screening of titles, abstracts and full-text, 45 trials involving 2541 patients were ultimately included. 41 studies reported the incidence of thrombocytopenia, 8 studies reported the rate of low fibrin, 4 trials reported the rate of APTT or PT abnormalities and only 3 trials reported the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We performed a quantitative meta-analysis to explore the incidence of thrombocytopenia following Car-T treatment. The incidence of hypofibrinogenemia, VTE, and abnormal APTT or PT was only qualitatively assessed, as fewer reports were included in this study.
RESULTS
The overall incidence of thrombocytopenia associated with Car-T therapy was 45.8% (95%[CI], 0.384-0.533). The highest rates of thrombocytopenia occurred in patients with multiple myeloma (60.1%, 95%[CI], 0.507-0.688) and aged between 18 to 60 (50%, 95%[CI], 0.367-0.633). There was greater prevalence of thrombocytopenia in BCMA-Car-T therapy of 58.7% (95%[CI], 0.482-0.685). Thrombocytopenia occurred most frequently in Car-T patients treated with a dosage of 1 × 105-1 × 106 cell/kg, at a rate of 66.2% (95%[CI], 0.561-0.749).
CONCLUSION
Overall, 45.8 percent of patients receiving Car-T treatment suffered from thrombocytopenia. Multiple myeloma patients, ages between 18-60, a dose of 1 × 105-1 × 106 cell/kg and BCMA-Car-T therapy are all considered high-risk factors.
Topics: Humans; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Multiple Myeloma; B-Cell Maturation Antigen; Venous Thromboembolism; Hematologic Neoplasms; Blood Coagulation Disorders; Risk Factors; Thrombocytopenia; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
PubMed: 37545264
DOI: 10.3233/THC-220537 -
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia Oct 2020Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is an IgM-producing lymphoproliferative disorder that remains incurable. Patients with high-risk disease have an overall survival... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is an IgM-producing lymphoproliferative disorder that remains incurable. Patients with high-risk disease have an overall survival (OS) of less than 3 years. Both autologous (AHCT) and allogeneic (allo-HCT) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are prescribed for treatment of WM despite a lack of randomized controlled studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We performed a comprehensive literature search using PubMed/Medline and EMBASE on September 10, 2019. Data on clinical outcomes related to benefits and harms was extracted independently by 3 authors. Fifteen studies (8 AHCT [n = 278 patients], 7 allo-HCT [n = 311 patients]) were included in this systematic review/meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Pooled OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rates post AHCT were 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65%-86%), 55% (95% CI, 42%-68%), and 4% (95% CI, 1%-7%), respectively. Pooled OS, PFS, and NRM rates post allografting were 57% (95% CI, 50%-65%), 49% (95% CI, 42%-56%), and 29% (95% CI, 23%-34%), respectively. OS and PFS rates were reported at 3 to 5 years, and NRM was reported at 1 year in most studies. Pooled ORR (at day 100) post AHCT and allo-HCT were 85% (95% CI, 72%-94%) and 81% (95% CI, 69%-91%), respectively. Pooled complete response rates post AHCT and allo-HCT were 22% (95% CI, 17%-28%) and 26% (95% CI, 7%-50%), respectively. Relapse rates post AHCT and allo-HCT were 42% (95% CI, 30%-55%) and 23% (95% CI, 18%-28%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results show that both AHCT and allo-HCT are effective in the treatment of WM. A 2-fold lower relapse rate but a 7-fold higher NRM was noted for allo-HCT compared with AHCT. The role of transplant in WM needs to be addressed in the era of novel agents.
Topics: Female; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Autologous; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome; Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia
PubMed: 32616401
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.05.021 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Jul 2021There has been long-standing controversy regarding the effectiveness and safety of lenalidomide as a maintenance treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in the treatment of multiple myeloma patients after allo-hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
There has been long-standing controversy regarding the effectiveness and safety of lenalidomide as a maintenance treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after allogeneic cell transplantation. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the effectiveness and safety of lenalidomide in the maintenance treatment of MM patients after allogeneic cell transplantation based on published data.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in English and Chinese databases, covering all available publications until 1 December 2020. Statistical analysis was performed using the software STATA 14.0, and odds ratios (ORs) combined with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to explore the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in the treatment of MM patients after allogeneic cell transplantation.
RESULTS
A total of 173 MM cases in 8 independent studies from 2007 to 2014 were included. Through a single-arm meta-analysis of the disease status of MM patients after lenalidomide treatment, 3.6% of patients were in minimal response (MR, P=0.006), 39.0% were in complete remission (CR, P=0.169), 20.2% in partial remission (PR, P<0.001), 12.8% in very good partial remission (VGPR, P=0.049), and 9.7% in SD (P=0.023); the PD was 5.6% (P=0.010). Through meta-analysis of adverse reactions after taking lenalidomide, 35.3% (P=0.628) of participants developed acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); 22.6% (P=0.049) developed chronic GVHD; 20.3% (P=0.001) developed infection; 22.5% (P=0.352) had thrombocytopenia; 32.5% (P<0.000) had neutropenia; pain occurred in 17.8% (P=0.350) of patients, and peripheral neuropathy occurred in 17.8% (P=0.995) of participants. The overall survival (OS) of ≥2 years and progression-free survival (PFS) of ≥2 years of MM patients after allo-hematopoietic-stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) taking lenalidomide were analyzed, and the results were 64.9% (P=0.049) and 58.4% (P=0.890), respectively.
DISCUSSION
Lenalidomide is effective in the treatment of MM patients after allo-HSCT, and reducing the incidence of infection and peripheral neuropathy, but it is not effective in reducing GVHD and blood system adverse reactions.
Topics: Disease-Free Survival; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Lenalidomide; Multiple Myeloma; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34353061
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-1598 -
PloS One 2022Progression-free survival (PFS) is a common primary endpoint in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Patients with NDMM typically have longer PFS and are more likely...
Progression-free survival (PFS) is a common primary endpoint in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Patients with NDMM typically have longer PFS and are more likely to achieve minimal residual disease (MRD) or complete response (CR) compared to patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Response-based surrogate endpoints may hold value given the longer follow-up time required to evaluate PFS in NDMM. In this work, systematic literature reviews of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases (2010-06/2020) and relevant congresses (2018-2020) were performed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and real-world studies in NDMM reporting median PFS and objective response. Associations between PFS and each response endpoint were evaluated using Pearson's product-moment correlation weighted by sample size in each RCT arm. Unadjusted and adjusted weighted linear regression models were applied to estimate the gain in median PFS associated with each response endpoint. Statistically significant correlations were identified for median PFS with overall response rate (ORR; Pearson r = 0.59), CR (r = 0.48), stringent CR (sCR; r = 0.68), and MRD (r = 0.69). The unadjusted models estimated 0.50 (95% CI: 0.36, 0.64; p<0.001), 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.58; p<0.001), 1.05 (95% CI: 0.58, 1.52; p<0.001), and 0.35 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.58; p = 0.006) months of median PFS gained per point of ORR, CR, sCR, and MRD, respectively. Associations for median PFS remained statistically significant in models adjusted for age and treatment type with ORR (0.35, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.49; p<0.001), and adjusted for age and International Staging System risk stage with CR (0.29, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.41; p<0.001). Due to small sample size, adjusted models could not be constructed for sCR or MRD. Nevertheless, evidence of significant survival benefit (p<0.05) associated with MRD negativity and sCR was identified across real-world studies. These findings provide support for the use of response outcomes as surrogate endpoints to estimate PFS benefit in NDMM.
Topics: Biomarkers; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm, Residual; Progression-Free Survival; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35550641
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267979 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jun 2021To compare the efficacy and safety between denosumab and zoledronic acid for advanced cancer with bone metastasis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison of denosumab and zoledronic acid for the treatment of solid tumors and multiple myeloma with bone metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy and safety between denosumab and zoledronic acid for advanced cancer with bone metastasis.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials up to December 2020 that compared denosumab and zoledronic acid in the treatment of advanced cancer with bone metastasis. The following clinical outcomes were extracted for analysis: time to first skeletal-related event, time to first-and-subsequent skeletal-related events, overall survival, and disease progression. Safety outcomes including incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, acute-phase reactions, renal toxicity, osteonecrosis of the jaw, and hypocalcemia were also extracted.
RESULTS
Four randomized controlled trials involving 7201 patients were included. The overall analysis showed that denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in delaying time to first skeletal-related event (hazard ratio = 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.93; P < 0.01) and time to first-and-subsequent skeletal-related events (risk ratio 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.81-0.93; P < 0.01). Denosumab was associated with lower incidence of renal toxicity (risk ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.87; P < 0.01) and acute phase reaction (risk ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.56; P < 0.01), but higher incidence of hypocalcemia (risk ratio 1.78; 95% confidence interval 1.33-2.38; P < 0.01) and osteonecrosis of the jaw (risk ratio 1.41; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.95; P = 0.04). No significant differences were found in overall survival, time to disease progression, or incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events between denosumab and zoledronic acid.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with zoledronic acid, denosumab is associated with delayed first-and-subsequent skeletal-related events, lower incidence of renal toxicity, and acute phase reaction, but higher incidence of hypocalcemia and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Hence, denosumab seems to be a promising choice for advanced cancer with bone metastasis. Nonetheless, more randomized controlled trials are needed for further evaluation.
Topics: Bone Density Conservation Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Denosumab; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Plasmacytoma; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Zoledronic Acid
PubMed: 34158101
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02554-8 -
BMJ Open Jan 2024Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell disorder. The most widely accepted staging system for MM is the revised International Staging System based on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell disorder. The most widely accepted staging system for MM is the revised International Staging System based on cytogenetic and clinical biomarkers. The circulating clonal plasma cells (CPCs) were reported to have potential prognostic impact on MM. Among various diagnostic approaches, multiparametric flow cytometry (FCM) offers heightened sensitivity, minimal invasiveness and reproducibility. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of quantifying CPCs via FCM in newly diagnosed symptomatic MM (NDMM) patients.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCE
PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and references of included studies.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
We included observational studies that evaluated the prognostic value of CPCs detected by FCM in NDMM.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data were screened and extracted independently by two investigators. The pooled results originated from random effects models. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). To evaluate the prognostic value of CPCs in NDMM, HRs and their 95% CI for both OS and PFS were derived using COX multivariable models. These values were then used to compute the pooled estimated effect.
RESULTS
Our meta-analysis encompassed a total of 2704 NDMM patients from 11 studies up to 27 August 2022. The pooled HR for OS and PFS in CPC-positive (CPCs+) group and CPC-negative group were 1.95 (95% CI 1.24 to 3.07) and 2.07 (95% CI 1.79 to 2.39), respectively. The autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) failed to eliminate the adverse impact on OS and PFS. The heterogeneity may stem from the use of novel agents or traditional chemotherapy as initial treatment.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis indicates CPCs+ had an adverse impact on the prognosis of NDMM patients in the total population, and the adverse impact could not be eliminated by ASCT.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42021272381.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Prognosis; Plasma Cells; Flow Cytometry; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Reproducibility of Results; Transplantation, Autologous
PubMed: 38216195
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071548 -
Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Dec 2023High-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) is associated with poor survival, despite many advances in antimyeloma strategies. Autologous followed by allogeneic stem cell... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
High-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) is associated with poor survival, despite many advances in antimyeloma strategies. Autologous followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation (auto-allo-SCT) has yielded controversial results compared to tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) in patients with HRMM. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of auto-allo-SCT and tandem-auto-SCT in patients with HRMM.
METHODS
Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases were searched until March 2023. Prospective or retrospective studies comparing the effects of auto-allo-SCT and tandem-auto-SCT were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for time-to-event outcomes, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95%CIs for dichotomous outcomes were pooled using random-effects models.
RESULTS
Three studies involving 491 patients were included. Despite auto-allo-SCT seemed to be associated with improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR [95%CI], 0.71 [0.51-1.00]) and complete response (CR) (OR [95%CI], 3.16 [1.67-5.99]), and reduced relapse/progression rates (47% vs. 55%) in comparison with tandem-auto-SCT, no marked improvement in overall survival (OS). In comparison to tandem-auto-SCT, patients assigned to auto-allo-SCT exhibited a higher risk of transplant-related mortality (TRM) (11.9% vs. 4.1%) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) (12.3% vs. 3.1%).
CONCLUSION
Auto-allo-SCT seemed to be associated with improvements in PFS and CR when compared to tandem-auto-SCT in patients with HRMM, but it did not lead to a significant improvement in OS. Furthermore, patients in the auto-allo-SCT group were at a higher risk of developing TRM and NRM. Auto-allo-SCT transplantation should not be routinely incorporated into HRMM therapy but rather should be considered investigational.
Topics: Humans; Transplantation, Autologous; Multiple Myeloma; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Transplantation, Homologous; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
PubMed: 37850613
DOI: 10.1080/16078454.2023.2269509 -
Skeletal Radiology Mar 2023To evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the initial diagnosis, staging, and assessment of treatment response in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the initial diagnosis, staging, and assessment of treatment response in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The primary endpoints were defined as the diagnostic performance of DWI for disease detection, staging of MM, and assessing response to treatment in these patients.
RESULTS
Of 5881 initially reviewed publications, 33 were included in the final qualitative and quantitative meta-analysis. The diagnostic performance of DWI in the detection of patients with MM revealed pooled sensitivity and specificity of 86% (95% CI: 84-89) and 63% (95% CI: 56-70), respectively, with a diagnostic odds ratio (OR) of 14.98 (95% CI: 4.24-52.91). The pooled risk difference of 0.19 (95% CI: - 0.04-0.42) was reported in favor of upstaging with DWI compared to conventional MRI (P value = 0.1). Treatment response evaluation and ADC value changes across different studies showed sensitivity and specificity of approximately 78% (95% CI: 72-83) and 73% (95% CI: 61-83), respectively, with a diagnostic OR of 7.21 in distinguishing responders from non-responders.
CONCLUSIONS
DWI is not only a promising tool for the diagnosis of MM, but it is also useful in the initial staging and re-staging of the disease and treatment response assessment. This can aid clinicians with earlier initiation or change in treatment strategy, which could have prognostic significance for patients.
Topics: Humans; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Multiple Myeloma; Sensitivity and Specificity; Treatment Outcome; Neoplasm Staging
PubMed: 35881152
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04119-0