-
Nutrients May 2020Malnutrition is associated with poor surgical outcomes, and therefore optimizing nutritional status preoperatively is very important. The purpose of this paper is to...
Malnutrition is associated with poor surgical outcomes, and therefore optimizing nutritional status preoperatively is very important. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature related to preoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) and to provide current evidence based guidance. A systemic online search of PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Databases from January 1990 to February 2020 was done. Sixteen studies were included in this narrative review, including four meta-analyses and twelve clinical trials. The majority of studies have demonstrated benefits of preoperative PN on postoperative outcomes, including reduced postoperative complications (8/10 studies) and postoperative length of stay (3/4 studies). Preoperative PN is indicated in malnourished surgical patients who cannot achieve adequate nutrient intake by oral or enteral nutrition. It can be seen that most studies showing benefits of preoperative PN often included patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease (10/12 studies), which gastrointestinal problems are commonly seen and enteral nutrition may be not feasible. When preoperative PN is indicated, adequate energy and protein should be provided, and patients should receive at least seven days of PN prior to surgery. The goal of preoperative PN is not weight regain, but rather repletion of energy, protein, micronutrients, and glycogen stores. Complications associated with preoperative PN are rarely seen in previous studies. In order to prevent and mitigate the potential complications such as refeeding syndrome, optimal monitoring and early management of micronutrient deficiencies is required.
Topics: Evidence-Based Medicine; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Insurance Benefits; Length of Stay; Malnutrition; Nutrition Assessment; Nutritional Status; Parenteral Nutrition; Postoperative Complications; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Preoperative Care; Prognosis
PubMed: 32384662
DOI: 10.3390/nu12051320 -
Cancers Apr 2022(1) Background: Pancreatic cancer (PaCa) is directly related to malnutrition, cachexia and weight loss. Nutritional interventions (NI) are used in addition to standard... (Review)
Review
(1) Background: Pancreatic cancer (PaCa) is directly related to malnutrition, cachexia and weight loss. Nutritional interventions (NI) are used in addition to standard therapy. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the types of NI and their effects. (2) Methods: We included RCTs with at least one intervention group receiving an NI and compared them with a control group with no NI, placebo or alternative treatment on cachexia, malnutrition or weight loss in patients with PaCa. Any available literature until 12 August 2021 was searched in the Pubmed and Cochrane databases. RCTs were sorted according to NI (parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition, dietary supplements and mixed or special forms). (3) Results: Finally, 26 studies with a total of 2720 patients were included. The potential for bias was mostly moderate to high. Parenteral nutrition is associated with a higher incidence of complications. Enteral nutrition is associated with shorter length of stay in hospital, lower rate and development of complications, positive effects on cytokine rates and lower weight loss. Dietary supplements enriched with omega-3 fatty acids lead to higher body weight and lean body mass. (4) Conclusions: Enteral nutrition and dietary supplements with omega-3 fatty acids should be preferred in nutritional therapy of PaCa patients.
PubMed: 35565341
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092212 -
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and... Sep 2020Low microbial diversity or altered microbiota composition is associated with many disease states. In the treatment of many conditions, enteral (EN) or parenteral (PN)...
BACKGROUND
Low microbial diversity or altered microbiota composition is associated with many disease states. In the treatment of many conditions, enteral (EN) or parenteral (PN) nutrition is frequently required.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate the evidence of the effect of EN vs PN on the gastrointestinal microbiota.
METHOD
A comprehensive systematic literature search of 5 databases was completed to review studies published until February 2020. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were utilized in completion of the review with the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics quality criteria checklist and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to evaluate the included studies. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018091328). Studies were eligible for inclusion if participants were older than 3 years, patients received either EN, PN or both, with some patients receiving each mode of nutrition support. The main outcome was any assessment of the gastrointestinal microbiota, including diversity or taxa abundance.
RESULTS
Eleven articles (n = 367 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Seven studies (n = 237) reported greater abundance of Proteobacteria with the provision of PN compared to EN; 6 studies (n = 172) reported lower Firmicutes and 5 studies (n = 155) lower Bacteroidetes. In 7 studies (n = 282), microbial diversity was lower with provision of PN than EN. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation certainty of evidence was very low.
CONCLUSIONS
Provision of PN may lead to greater abundance of Proteobacteria and reduced microbial diversity; however, there is limited literature on this topic and additional research is warranted to improve understanding of the impact of EN vs PN on the microbiota.
Topics: Bacteroidetes; Enteral Nutrition; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Parenteral Nutrition; Proteobacteria
PubMed: 32682806
DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.04.024 -
The American Journal of Hospice &... Aug 2021To assess the physiological outcomes and interpersonal influences that should be considered when making the decision to provide artificial nutrition and hydration (AN&H)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To assess the physiological outcomes and interpersonal influences that should be considered when making the decision to provide artificial nutrition and hydration (AN&H) for patients in hospice/palliative programs.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted using items from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 checklist. Distinct search strategies were employed to find primary research articles that addressed: General health outcomes of artificial nutrition and hydration interventions and nutrition therapy interventions (n = 16), nutrition-related symptoms in end-of-life care (n = 8), and the attitudes of patients and providers toward artificial nutrition and hydration (n = 21).
RESULTS
The effect of AN&H on health outcomes, quality-of-life measures and nutrition-related symptoms is limited and may vary by patient setting and diagnosis. In the absence of consistent evidence for specific health outcomes, decisions regarding AN&H should be made in context of the desires and beliefs of a patient, their family, and their medical providers. These beliefs may not be consistent with likely outcomes or may be inconsistent between individuals involved in the decision-making process, and individuals of different cultures or geographic regions may approach AN&H decisions from different perspectives. To help navigate the intersection of nutrition-related health outcomes and patient/provider beliefs, palliative care teams may employ a variety of strategies for approaching the decision-making process, and may benefit from specific involvement of a Registered Dietitian to help contribute to or lead these discussions.
Topics: Attitude; Death; Hospice Care; Humans; Palliative Care; Terminal Care
PubMed: 32945174
DOI: 10.1177/1049909120960124 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2023Routine monitoring of gastric residuals in preterm infants on tube feeds is a common practice in neonatal intensive care units used to guide initiation and advancement... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Routine monitoring of gastric residuals in preterm infants on tube feeds is a common practice in neonatal intensive care units used to guide initiation and advancement of enteral feeding. There is a paucity of consensus on whether to re-feed or discard the aspirated gastric residuals. While re-feeding gastric residuals may aid in digestion and promote gastrointestinal motility and maturation by replacing partially digested milk, gastrointestinal enzymes, hormones, and trophic substances, abnormal residuals may result in vomiting, necrotising enterocolitis, or sepsis.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and safety of re-feeding when compared to discarding gastric residuals in preterm infants. SEARCH METHODS: Searches were conducted in February 2022 in Cochrane CENTRAL via CRS, Ovid MEDLINE and Embase, and CINAHL. We also searched clinical trial databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We selected RCTs that compared re-feeding versus discarding gastric residuals in preterm infants.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Review authors assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data, in duplicate. We analysed treatment effects in individual trials and reported the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data and the mean difference (MD) for continuous data, with respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
We found one eligible trial that included 72 preterm infants. The trial was unmasked but was otherwise of good methodological quality. Re-feeding gastric residual may have little or no effect on time to regain birth weight (MD 0.40 days, 95% CI -2.89 to 3.69; 59 infants; low-certainty evidence), risk of necrotising enterocolitis stage ≥ 2 or spontaneous intestinal perforation (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.04; 72 infants; low-certainty evidence), all-cause mortality before hospital discharge (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.85; 72 infants; low-certainty evidence), time to establish enteral feeds ≥ 120 mL/kg/d (MD -1.30 days, 95% CI -2.93 to 0.33; 59 infants; low-certainty evidence), number of total parenteral nutrition days (MD -0.30 days, 95% CI -2.07 to 1.47; 59 infants; low-certainty evidence), and risk of extrauterine growth restriction at discharge (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.38 to 4.34; 59 infants; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain as to the effect of re-feeding gastric residual on number of episodes of feed interruption lasting for ≥ 12 hours (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.52; 59 infants; very low-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We found only limited data from one small unmasked trial on the efficacy and safety of re-feeding gastric residuals in preterm infants. Low-certainty evidence suggests re-feeding gastric residual may have little or no effect on important clinical outcomes such as necrotising enterocolitis, all-cause mortality before hospital discharge, time to establish enteral feeds, number of total parenteral nutrition days, and in-hospital weight gain. A large RCT is needed to assess the efficacy and safety of re-feeding of gastric residuals in preterm infants with adequate certainty of evidence to inform policy and practice.
Topics: Infant; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Enterocolitis, Necrotizing; Infant, Premature; Stomach; Birth Weight; Cognition
PubMed: 37387544
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012940.pub3 -
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Oct 2022The effect of early oral feeding (EOF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) upon perioperative complications and outcomes is unknown, therefore the aim of this systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The effect of early oral feeding (EOF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) upon perioperative complications and outcomes is unknown, therefore the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of EOF on clinical outcomes after PD, such as postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and length of stay (LOS).
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance and assimilated evidence from studies reporting outcomes for patients who received EOF after PD compared to enteral tube feeding (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN).
RESULTS
Four studies reported outcomes after EOF compared to EN/PN after PD and included 553 patients. Meta-analyses showed no difference in rates of CR-POPF (OR 0.74; 95%CI 0.44-1.24; p = 0.25) or DGE (Grade B/C) (OR 0.83; 95%CI 0.31-2.21; p = 0.70). LOS was significantly shorter in the EOF group compared to the EN/PN group (Mean Difference -3.40 days; 95% -6.11-0.70 days; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION
Current available evidence suggests that EOF after PD is not associated with increased risk of DGE, does not exacerbate POPF and appears to reduce length of stay.
Topics: Humans; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Enteral Nutrition; Length of Stay; Parenteral Nutrition; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 35606323
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.04.005 -
Nutrients Nov 2019Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease mediated by the immune system and characterized by the inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. This study is to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease mediated by the immune system and characterized by the inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. This study is to understand how the use of parenteral nutrition (PN) can affect the adult population diagnosed with IBD. We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. From the different databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, LILACS, CINAHL, WOS), we found 119 registers with an accuracy of 16% (19 registers). After a full-text review, only 15 research studies were selected for qualitative synthesis and 10 for meta-analysis and meta-regression. The variables used were Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), albumin, body weight (BW), and postoperative complications (COM). PN has shown to have efficacy for the treatment of IBD and is compatible with other medicines. The CDAI and albumin improve, although the effect of PN is greater after a while. However, the effect on the albumin could be less than the observed value in the meta-analysis due to possible publication bias. The BW does not change after intervention. COM utilizing PN has been observed, although the proportion is low. More studies specifically referring to ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are needed to develop more concrete clinical results.
Topics: Adult; Body Weight; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Malnutrition; Parenteral Nutrition; Postoperative Complications; Regression Analysis; Serum Albumin, Human
PubMed: 31766687
DOI: 10.3390/nu11122865 -
BMC Pediatrics Feb 2020The first consensus standardised neonatal parenteral nutrition formulations were implemented in many neonatal units in Australia in 2012. The current update involving...
BACKGROUND
The first consensus standardised neonatal parenteral nutrition formulations were implemented in many neonatal units in Australia in 2012. The current update involving 49 units from Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia and India was conducted between September 2015 and December 2017 with the aim to review and update the 2012 formulations and guidelines.
METHODS
A systematic review of available evidence for each parenteral nutrient was undertaken and new standardised formulations and guidelines were developed.
RESULTS
Five existing preterm Amino acid-Dextrose formulations have been modified and two new concentrated Amino acid-Dextrose formulations added to optimise amino acid and nutrient intake according to gestation. Organic phosphate has replaced inorganic phosphate allowing for an increase in calcium and phosphate content, and acetate reduced. Lipid emulsions are unchanged, with both SMOFlipid (Fresenius Kabi, Australia) and ClinOleic (Baxter Healthcare, Australia) preparations included. The physicochemical compatibility and stability of all formulations have been tested and confirmed. Guidelines to standardise the parenteral nutrition clinical practice across facilities have also been developed.
CONCLUSIONS
The 2017 PN formulations and guidelines developed by the 2017 Neonatal Parenteral Nutrition Consensus Group offer concise and practical instructions to clinicians on how to implement current and up-to-date evidence based PN to the NICU population.
Topics: Australia; Consensus; Fish Oils; Humans; India; Infant, Newborn; Malaysia; New Zealand; Olive Oil; Parenteral Nutrition; Parenteral Nutrition Solutions; Singapore; Soybean Oil; Triglycerides
PubMed: 32035481
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-020-1958-9 -
Medical Mycology Feb 2023Fungemia due to Saccharomyces species is reported in considerable numbers, and the increase is attributed to using Saccharomyces boulardii probiotics in clinical...
Fungemia due to Saccharomyces species is reported in considerable numbers, and the increase is attributed to using Saccharomyces boulardii probiotics in clinical settings. The present systematic review addresses the underlying diseases and risk factors in Saccharomyces fungemia patients, along with the treatment and outcome of the disease. The MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched systematically with appropriate keywords from June 2005 to March 2022. This review identified 117 Saccharomyces fungemia cases; 108 cases were included in the analysis. Saccharomyces fungemia is commonly seen in patients treated with S. boulardii probiotics (n = 73, 67.6%), and 35 (32.4%) patients did not receive probiotic therapy. The underlying disease and risk factors significantly associated with S. boulardii probiotic-associated fungemia were intensive care unit stay (n = 34, 31.5%), total parenteral nutrition or enteral feeding (n = 32, 29.6%), patients with gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea (n = 23, 21.3%), and diabetes mellitus (n = 14, 13.0%). In patients without probiotic therapy, immunosuppression (n = 14, 13.0%), gastrointestinal surgery (n = 5, 4.6%), and intravenous drug use (n = 5, 4.6%) were the significant risk factors for Saccharomyces fungemia. The all-cause mortality rate of the total cohort is 36.1%. No significant variation in the mortality rate is observed between S. boulardii probiotic treated patients (n = 29, 26.9%) and patients without probiotic therapy (n = 10, 9.3%). In conclusion, S. boulardii probiotic therapy in debilitated critical care patients may have contributed to increased Saccharomyces fungemia cases. Further, clinicians should be vigilant in preventing S. boulardii fungemia in patients with prophylactic probiotic therapy.
Topics: Animals; Saccharomyces; Fungemia; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Probiotics; Diarrhea; Saccharomyces boulardii
PubMed: 36806741
DOI: 10.1093/mmy/myad014 -
Cureus Jun 2023Background A central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is defined as a primary bloodstream infection (BSI) in a patient that had a central line within the... (Review)
Review
Background A central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is defined as a primary bloodstream infection (BSI) in a patient that had a central line within the 48-hour period before the development of the BSI and is not bloodstream-related to an infection at another site. CLABSI is a common healthcare-associated infection and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Methods This systematic review included studies published within the past 13 years that examined risk factors and clinical impact variables associated with CLABSI, using the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)/National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) criteria for defining catheter-associated infection, and included participants of all ages. The terms "CLABSI," "central line-associated bloodstream infection," "risk factors," "predictors," "morbidity," "mortality," "healthcare costs," and "length of hospital stay" were used to find relevant publications on PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Science Direct. The quality assessment of the included publications utilized the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for observational studies. Results After the full-text screening, we identified 15 articles that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The majority of these studies were of good quality and had a low risk of bias based on our bias assessment. The studies included a total of 32,198 participants and covered a time period from 2010 to 2023. The mean age of the male patients included in the studies ranged from 0.1 months to 69.1 years. All of the included studies were either observational cohort studies, cross sectional studies, case-control studies, or case reports. The major study parameters/outcomes extracted were risk factors, CLABSI-associated mortality, hospital cost, length of hospital stay, and catheter days. With respect to predisposing factors, multilumen access catheters were identified as risk factors in three studies, use of more than one central venous catheter per case in four studies, hematologic malignancy in three studies, catheterization duration in four studies, surgical complexity in four studies, length of ICU stays in three studies, and parenteral nutrition in two studies. Conclusion The decision to place a venous device should be carefully considered by evaluating individual risk factors for the development of CLABSI. This is important due to the potential for severe clinical consequences and significant healthcare expenses associated with this complication.
PubMed: 37503497
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40954