-
Drug Safety Mar 2021Antidepressant use during the first trimester is reported in 4-8% of pregnancies. The use of some selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during the first trimester has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Antidepressant use during the first trimester is reported in 4-8% of pregnancies. The use of some selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during the first trimester has been identified as increasing the odds for congenital heart defects; however, little is known about the safety of non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to assess the odds of congenital heart defects associated with the use of antidepressants during the first trimester of pregnancy, and to update the literature as newer studies have been published since the latest systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
PubMed and Embase were searched till 3 June, 2020. Study quality was assessed, and study details were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4, which assessed: (1) any antidepressant usage; (2) classes of antidepressants; and (3) individual antidepressants.
RESULTS
Twenty studies were identified, encompassing 5,337,223 pregnancies. The odds ratio for maternal use of any antidepressant during the first trimester of pregnancy and the presence of congenital heart defects from the random effects meta-analysis was 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.41). Significant odds ratios of 1.69 (95% CI 1.37-2.10) and 1.25 (95% CI 1.15-1.37) were reported for serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, respectively. A non-statistically significant odds ratio of 1.02 (95% CI 0.82-1.25) was reported for the tricyclic antidepressants. Analyses of individual SSRIs produced significant odds ratios of 1.57 (95% CI 1.25-1.97), 1.36 (95% CI 1.08-1.72), and 1.29 (95% CI 1.14-1.45) for paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline, respectively. The norepinephrine-dopamine-reuptake inhibitor bupropion also produced a significant odds ratio of 1.23 (95% CI 1.01-1.49).
CONCLUSIONS
The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor classes of antidepressants pose a greater risk for causing congenital heart defects than the tricyclic antidepressants. However, this risk for individual antidepressants within each class varies, and information regarding some antidepressants is still lacking.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Female; Heart Defects, Congenital; Humans; Norepinephrine; Pregnancy; Serotonin; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
PubMed: 33354752
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-01027-x -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of pharmacotherapies for postpartum depression (PPD). We performed a computerized search of MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed),...
To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of pharmacotherapies for postpartum depression (PPD). We performed a computerized search of MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) before 31 March 2022. We calculated standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous outcomes with the random-effects model. The tolerability of antidepressants in terms of early dropouts was investigated. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used for ranking the outcomes. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. A total of 11 studies with 944 participants were included in this network meta-analysis, involving nine antidepressants. With respect to efficacy, only estradiol and brexanolone were significantly more effective than the placebo ( < 0.05), and the calculated SUCRA indicated that estradiol (94.3%) had the highest probability ranking first for reducing the PPD, followed by paroxetine (64.3%) and zuranolone (58.8%). Regarding tolerability, a greater percentage of patients treated with brexanolone experienced early dropout as compared to those treated with most other antidepressants. Only estradiol and brexanolone showed significantly higher efficacy than the placebo. According to the SUCRA ranking, estradiol, paroxetine, and zuranolone were the three best antidepressants. Concerning acceptability in terms of early dropouts, brexanolone was less well-tolerated than other antidepressants.
PubMed: 36506537
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.950004 -
Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience Apr 2020: This paper sought to identify the instruments used to measure depression in heart failure (HF) and elucidate the impact of treatment interventions on depression in HF.... (Review)
Review
: This paper sought to identify the instruments used to measure depression in heart failure (HF) and elucidate the impact of treatment interventions on depression in HF. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed. Studies published from 1988 to 2018 covering depression and HF were identified through the review of the PubMed and PsycINFO databases using the keywords: "depres*" AND "heart failure." Two authors independently conducted a focused analysis, identifying 27 studies that met the specific selection criteria and passed the study quality checks. Patient-reported questionnaires were more commonly adopted than clinician-rated questionnaires, including the Beck Depression Inventory, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Six common interventions were observed: antidepressant medications, collaborative care, psychotherapy, exercise, education, and other nonpharmacological interventions. Except for paroxetine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors failed to show a significant difference from placebo. However, the collaborative care model including the use of antidepressants showed a significant decrease in PHQ-9 score after one year. All of the psychotherapy studies included a variation of cognitive behavioral therapy and patients showed significant improvements. The evidence was mixed for exercise, education, and other nonpharmacological interventions. This study suggests which types of interventions are more effective in addressing depression in heart failure patients.
PubMed: 32802590
DOI: No ID Found -
BMC Neurology May 2023Depressive symptoms are the most common neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, despite being common, no definite consensus... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Depressive symptoms are the most common neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, despite being common, no definite consensus recommendations exist for the management of depression in AD.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on the alleviation of depressive symptoms in patients with AD.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PsychINFO were electronically searched from inception until October 2022. Response to therapy and mean depression scores between the treatment (or before) and placebo (or after) groups were the primary outcomes. For depression scores, the standard mean deviation and accompanying 95% confidence interval were determined. The risk of bias was determined using the funnel plot, trim and fill, Egger's and Begg's analyses.
RESULTS
SSRIs attenuated depressive symptoms in patients with AD (0.905 SMD, 95%CI, 0.689 to 1.121, p < 0.000). At individual SSRI level, escitalopram, paroxetine, and sertraline significantly alleviated depressive symptoms in AD patients (0.813 SMD, 95%CI, 0.207 to 1.419, p = 0.009, 1.244 SMD, 95%CI, 0.939 to 1.548, p < 0.000, and 0.818 SMD, 95%CI, 0.274 to 1.362, p < 0.000). The funnel plot, trim and fill, Begg's test (p = 0.052), and Egger's test (p = 0.148), showed no significant risk of publication bias.
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis supports the use of SSRIs for the alleviation of depression in patients with AD. However, we recommend larger randomized clinical trials that would compare the efficacy of different SSRIs in AD patients with depression.
Topics: Humans; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Depression; Alzheimer Disease; Sertraline; Escitalopram
PubMed: 37259037
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03191-w -
Clinical Psychopharmacology and... Feb 2023Paroxetine and Sertraline are the only medications approved in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, about 60% of traumatized patients fail to show an adequate... (Review)
Review
Paroxetine and Sertraline are the only medications approved in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, about 60% of traumatized patients fail to show an adequate clinical response. Second generation antipsychotics are recommended as second-line monotherapy or third-line augmentation strategies and quetiapine appears as one of the most used and promising agents. Up to date, no reviews assessed the efficacy of quetiapine in the treatment of PTSD. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and general safety of quetiapine on PTSD. A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines, selecting studies that evaluated the efficacy of quetiapine on global or specific PTSD symptomatology. Ten studies (n = 894) were considered eligible for qualitative synthesis: one case report, one case series, one prospective cohort study, 3 open-label trials, 3 retrospective studies, one randomized controlled trial. Quetiapine was effective on global PTSD symptomatology assessed in 6 studies as well as on re-experiencing (4/4 studies), avoidance (4/3 studies) and hyperarousal (4/4 studies), flashbacks (2/2 studies), depressive (4/4 studies), anxiety (1/1 studies), psychotic (3/3 studies), insomnia (4/5 studies), nightmares (3/3 studies) specific symptoms and PTSD domains. Sedation was among the most frequently observed adverse effects and the main cause of drug discontinuation. Preliminary findings support the efficacy of quetiapine in ameliorating symptoms relative to PTSD and its overall safety. However, quetiapine use in PTSD cannot be recommended yet as studies mainly rely on open-label, retrospective studies or case series.
PubMed: 36700311
DOI: 10.9758/cpn.2023.21.1.49 -
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Aug 2022This network meta-analysis compares the efficacy and acceptability of all published psychotherapeutic and pharmacological interventions for trauma-related nightmares... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This network meta-analysis compares the efficacy and acceptability of all published psychotherapeutic and pharmacological interventions for trauma-related nightmares (TRN) in adults. The analysis included data from 29 randomized clinical trials involving 14 psychotherapeutic and pharmacological interventions and involved 2214 trauma survivors. Prazosin and image rehearsal therapy (IRT) were found to be the two effective interventions for TRN. Other interventions such as risperidone, paroxetine, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), CBT-I+IRT, prolonged exposure (PE), and IRT+PE, did not show significantly greater efficacy compared with control conditions. The rates of all-cause discontinuations were comparable among majority of the interventions and did not show significant differences compared with control conditions. Prazosin and IRT should be considered as the initial choice of pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions for TRN. The efficacy of other pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions remains to be demonstrated. Future guidelines and daily clinical decision making on the choice of interventions for TRN should consider these findings.
Topics: Adult; Dreams; Humans; Implosive Therapy; Network Meta-Analysis; Prazosin; Psychotropic Drugs; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
PubMed: 35661755
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104717 -
Acta Neuropsychiatrica Aug 2020The aim of this paper was to provide a systematic review and update on the pharmacotherapy of social anxiety disorder (SAD), including the efficacy and tolerability of... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this paper was to provide a systematic review and update on the pharmacotherapy of social anxiety disorder (SAD), including the efficacy and tolerability of these agents, the ranking of interventions, and the grading of results by quality of evidence.
METHODS
The Common Mental Disorder Controlled Trial Register and two trial registries were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any pharmacological intervention or placebo in the treatment of SAD. We performed a standard pairwise meta-analysis using a random effects model and carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using the statistical package, R. Quality of evidence was also assessed.
RESULTS
We included 67 RCTs in the review and 21 to 45 interventions in the NMA. Paroxetine was most effective in the reduction of symptom severity as compared to placebo. Superior response to treatment was also observed for paroxetine, brofaromine, bromazepam, clonazepam, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, phenelzine, and sertraline. Higher dropout rates were found for fluvoxamine. Brofaromine, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, pregabalin, sertraline, and venlafaxine performed worse in comparison to placebo for the outcome of dropouts due to adverse events. Olanzapine yielded a relatively high rank for treatment efficacy and buspirone the worse rank for dropouts due to any cause.
CONCLUSION
The differences between drugs and placebo were small, apart from a significant reduction in symptom severity and response for paroxetine. We suggest paroxetine as a first-line treatment of SAD, with the consideration of future research on the drug olanzapine as well as brofaromine, bromazepam, clonazepam, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, phenelzine, and sertraline because we observed a response to treatment.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Phobia, Social; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32039743
DOI: 10.1017/neu.2020.6 -
Andrologia Sep 2022The primary goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of fluoxetine with other oral pharmaceuticals in the treatment of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The primary goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of fluoxetine with other oral pharmaceuticals in the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). We searched through databases including CNKI, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane to find research published up to 31 March 2022. PROSPERO was used to pre-register this meta-analysis (registration number CRD42022315459). Two separate writers extracted relevant details from all of the papers included in the study. To analyse the quality of literature publishing, we used the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The severity of premature ejaculation was determined using intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), and the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological interventions were determined using standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) values with matching 95% confidence level intervals (95% CIs). Our meta-analysis includes a total of ten trials to investigate into the differences in treatment efficacy and safety between fluoxetine and other medicines. The findings revealed that fluoxetine was more effective than placebo in treating PE, whereas sertraline and paroxetine were more effective than fluoxetine (p < 0.05). The side effects of the medications were not significantly different, and they were all acceptable. The results of the sensitivity analysis were unaffected by the removal of any of the articles. There was no evidence of bias in the media. This meta-analysis examined the differences in efficacy and safety between fluoxetine and other oral medications and can be used by clinicians in the treatment of PE.
Topics: Ejaculation; Fluoxetine; Humans; Male; Paroxetine; Premature Ejaculation; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Sertraline; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35760074
DOI: 10.1111/and.14500 -
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 2023Recommendations for treating panic disorder (PD) in older patients are scarce. The authors have systematically reviewed whether several recommended medications are... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Recommendations for treating panic disorder (PD) in older patients are scarce. The authors have systematically reviewed whether several recommended medications are superior to others and their optimal doses in this age group.
METHODS
A database search of studies involving patients with PD with/without agoraphobia aged ≥ 60 years was carried out using PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Clinical Trials.gov, from their inception dates to 1 March 2023. Only four (published from 2002 to 2010) of the 1292 records screened were included. A risk of bias assessment was provided. This systematic review was performed using The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
RESULTS
Two studies were randomized clinical trials, whereas two were open-label, including paroxetine, citalopram, escitalopram, and sertraline; three studies reported short-term evaluations, whereas one study included a 26-week follow-up. Medications provided benefits, with good tolerability. Preliminary results suggested greater benefits of paroxetine in reducing panic attacks vs. cognitive - behavioral therapy, and an earlier decrease in PAs with escitalopram vs. citalopram. Risk of bias was considerable.
CONCLUSIONS
The pharmacological management of PD in older patients has received no attention. Findings are scant, dated, and affected by methodological flaws; thus, they do not provide significant advances.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Panic Disorder; Paroxetine; Citalopram; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Escitalopram; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37676054
DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2254938 -
Asian Journal of Psychiatry Jun 2021This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and acceptability of the different types of antidepressants and benzodiazepines for the treatment of panic disorder... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and acceptability of the different types of antidepressants and benzodiazepines for the treatment of panic disorder (PD) in adult patients.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1995 and 2020 on the use of antidepressants and benzodiazepines for the treatment of PD. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed.
RESULTS
42 RCTs were included in the network meta-analysis, with a comparison of 11 interventions.Escitalopram (odds ratios OR 1.52, 95 % credible interval CI 1.09-2.10), venlafaxine (OR 1.33, 95 % CI 1.16-1.51) and benzodiazepines (OR 1.50, 95 % CI 1.29-1.75) had greater efficacy and acceptability than the placebo. Imipramine(OR 1.43, 95 % CI 1.15-1.79) was also demonstrated to be efficacious and tolerated but the results were restricted to small sample size. Moreover, paroxetine, sertraline, fluoxetine, citalopram and clomipramine (OR 1.37, 1.36, 1.45, 1.33 and 1.36, respectively) were more efficacious, although the acceptability of paroxetine and sertraline were significantly less tolerated than benzodiazepines. Notably, the efficacy of reboxetine and fluvoxamine were merely as equal as that of the placebo.
OUTCOMES
This is the first systematic review of antidepressants and benzodiazepines for the treatment of PD to use a network analysis. Escitalopram and venlafaxine as well as benzodiazepines may be effective choices as treatments for PD with relatively good acceptability, which still needs to be confirmed byhigh-quality RCTs.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Benzodiazepines; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Panic Disorder; Paroxetine
PubMed: 33965693
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102664