-
BMC Nephrology Sep 2023Rituximab (RTX) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) based treatments are both recommended as first-line therapies in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) by KDIGO 2021... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Rituximab (RTX) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) based treatments are both recommended as first-line therapies in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) by KDIGO 2021 guideline. However, the efficacy of RTX vs. CYC-based treatments in IMN is still controversial. We performed this systemic review and meta-analysis registered in PROSPERO (CRD 42,022,355,717) by pooling data from randomized controlled trials or cohort studies in IMN patients using the EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane libraries (till Orc 1, 2022). The primary outcomes were the complete remission (CR) rate + partial remission (PR) rate. CR rate, immunologic response rate, relapse rate, and the risk of serious adverse events (SAE) were secondary outcomes. Eight studies involving 600 adult patients with IMN were included with a median follow-up duration of 12 to 60 months. RTX induced a similar overall remission rate compared with CYC (RR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.09, P = 0.23). At the follow-up time of 6 months, RTX was associated with a lower CR + PR rate compared with CYC (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.88, P = 0.003). Moreover, RTX might be less effective in inducing CR + PR than CYC treatment in IMN patients with high antiPLA2R antibody levels (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.94, P = 0.02). The occurrences of CRs, relapse rates, immunologic response rates, and SAE were not significantly different between RTX and CYC, respectively. In conclusion, although the long-term efficacy and safety of CYC compared to RTX were comparable, CYC might respond faster and be more advantageous in IMN patients with high antiPLA2R antibody titers.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Glomerulonephritis, Membranous; Rituximab; Cyclophosphamide; Patients
PubMed: 37740193
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03307-x -
The Journal of Dermatological Treatment Dec 2023The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacies of different biologic therapies in treating tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα)-induced...
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacies of different biologic therapies in treating tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα)-induced paradoxical psoriasis (PXP) and controlling inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) symptoms.
METHODS
We conducted a literature search of the Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from their inception to October 3, 2021. We considered all peer-reviewed, randomized controlled trials, chart reviews, and observational studies that discussed the TNFα-induced PXP treatment outcomes in IBD patients of switching to different biologic therapies.
RESULTS
Switching to ustekinumab (UST) resulted in complete or partial resolution of TNFα-induced PXP in 83.1% of patients (74 out of 89 patients), while switching to either vedolizumab (VDZ) or secukinumab led to complete resolution in 100% of patients (eight out of eight patients). Approximately 75.4% of patients who were switched to UST remained in IBD remission, 4.6% in partial remission, and 20.0% in the flare of IBD.
CONCLUSIONS
UST has sufficient data to demonstrate the efficacy in treating TNFα-induced PXP and controlling IBD symptoms concurrently. More data is needed to validate the efficacies of VDZ and SEC in treating TNFα-induced PXP in IBD patients.
Topics: Humans; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Psoriasis; Ustekinumab; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36205507
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2133533 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2020Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a malignant, chronic disease initially affecting the skin. Several therapies are available,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a malignant, chronic disease initially affecting the skin. Several therapies are available, which may induce clinical remission for a time. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2012: we wanted to assess new trials, some of which investigated new interventions.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of interventions for MF in all stages of the disease.
SEARCH METHODS
We updated our searches of the following databases to May 2019: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS. We searched 2 trials registries for additional references. For adverse event outcomes, we undertook separate searches in MEDLINE in April, July and November 2017.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of local or systemic interventions for MF in adults with any stage of the disease compared with either another local or systemic intervention or with placebo.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were improvement in health-related quality of life as defined by participants, and common adverse effects of the treatments. Key secondary outcomes were complete response (CR), defined as complete disappearance of all clinical evidence of disease, and objective response rate (ORR), defined as proportion of patients with a partial or complete response. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence and considered comparisons of psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) light treatment as most important because this is first-line treatment for MF in most guidelines.
MAIN RESULTS
This review includes 20 RCTs (1369 participants) covering a wide range of interventions. The following were assessed as either treatments or comparators: imiquimod, peldesine, hypericin, mechlorethamine, nitrogen mustard and intralesional injections of interferon-α (IFN-α) (topical applications); PUVA, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP: photochemotherapy), and visible light (light applications); acitretin, bexarotene, lenalidomide, methotrexate and vorinostat (oral agents); brentuximab vedotin; denileukin diftitox; mogamulizumab; chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and vincristine; a combination of chemotherapy with electron beam radiation; subcutaneous injection of IFN-α; and intramuscular injections of active transfer factor (parenteral systemics). Thirteen trials used an active comparator, five were placebo-controlled, and two compared an active operator to observation only. In 14 trials, participants had MF in clinical stages IA to IIB. All participants were treated in secondary and tertiary care settings, mainly in Europe, North America or Australia. Trials recruited both men and women, with more male participants overall. Trial duration varied from four weeks to 12 months, with one longer-term study lasting more than six years. We judged 16 trials as at high risk of bias in at least one domain, most commonly performance bias (blinding of participants and investigators), attrition bias and reporting bias. None of our key comparisons measured quality of life, and the two studies that did presented no usable data. Eighteen studies reported common adverse effects of the treatments. Adverse effects ranged from mild symptoms to lethal complications depending upon the treatment type. More aggressive treatments like systemic chemotherapy generally resulted in more severe adverse effects. In the included studies, CR rates ranged from 0% to 83% (median 31%), and ORR ranged from 0% to 88% (median 47%). Five trials assessed PUVA treatment, alone or combined, summarised below. There may be little to no difference between intralesional IFN-α and PUVA compared with PUVA alone for 24 to 52 weeks in CR (risk ratio (RR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.31; 2 trials; 122 participants; low-certainty evidence). Common adverse events and ORR were not measured. One small cross-over trial found once-monthly ECP for six months may be less effective than twice-weekly PUVA for three months, reporting CR in two of eight participants and ORR in six of eight participants after PUVA, compared with no CR or ORR after ECP (very low-certainty evidence). Some participants reported mild nausea after PUVA but no numerical data were given. One participant in the ECP group withdrew due to hypotension. However, we are unsure of the results due to very low-certainty evidence. One trial comparing bexarotene plus PUVA versus PUVA alone for up to 16 weeks reported one case of photosensitivity in the bexarotene plus PUVA group compared to none in the PUVA-alone group (87 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between bexarotene plus PUVA and PUVA alone in CR (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.80) and ORR (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.44) (93 participants; low-certainty evidence). One trial comparing subcutaneous IFN-α injections combined with either acitretin or PUVA for up to 48 weeks or until CR indicated there may be little to no difference in the common IFN-α adverse effect of flu-like symptoms (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.88; 82 participants). There may be lower CR with IFN-α and acitretin compared with IFN-α and PUVA (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.84; 82 participants) (both outcomes: low-certainty evidence). This trial did not measure ORR. One trial comparing PUVA maintenance treatment to no maintenance treatment, in participants who had already had CR, did report common adverse effects. However, the distribution was not evaluable. CR and OR were not assessable. The range of treatment options meant that rare adverse effects consequently occurred in a variety of organs.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is a lack of high-certainty evidence to support decision making in the treatment of MF. Because of substantial heterogeneity in design, missing data, small sample sizes, and low methodological quality, the comparative safety and efficacy of these interventions cannot be reliably established on the basis of the included RCTs. PUVA is commonly recommended as first-line treatment for MF, and we did not find evidence to challenge this recommendation. There was an absence of evidence to support the use of intralesional IFN-α or bexarotene in people receiving PUVA and an absence of evidence to support the use of acitretin or ECP for treating MF. Future trials should compare the safety and efficacy of treatments to PUVA, as the current standard of care, and should measure quality of life and common adverse effects.
Topics: Acitretin; Antineoplastic Agents; Bexarotene; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Interferon-alpha; Mycosis Fungoides; Neoplasm Staging; PUVA Therapy; Photochemotherapy; Photopheresis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 32632956
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008946.pub3 -
Cancers Feb 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) for central nervous system lymphoma... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) for central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL).
METHODS
A systematic review was carried out to identify relevant studies from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang, CNKI, and CBM databases. The studies included patients with CNSL who received BTKis and reported the overall response (OR), complete remission (CR), and partial response (PR). An overall effect analysis was performed using STATA 15.0. A random-effects model was utilized to calculate the pooled rates, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined for all outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 21 studies involving 368 patients were included in the meta-analysis. For newly diagnosed CNSL, due to the small simple size, we conducted a quantitative description, and the ORR could reach up to 100%. For relapsed/refractory patients, the pooled ORR was 72% (95% CI: 64-80%, I = 54.89%, = 0.00), with a pooled CR and PR of 43% (95% CI: 33-54%, I = 65.40%, = 0.00) and 23% (95% CI: 13-35%, I = 78.05%, = 0.00), respectively. Most adverse events were hematology-related and generally manageable.
CONCLUSION
BTKis showed acceptable efficacy and safety in treating patients with CNSL. However, large and well-designed trials are still required to confirm BTKis as a treatment for CNSL.
PubMed: 38473226
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050860 -
European Archives of... Feb 2024Specific HPV types cause recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (R.R.P.). When administered intralesionally, cidofovir, an antiviral agent, has shown favorable outcomes in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Specific HPV types cause recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (R.R.P.). When administered intralesionally, cidofovir, an antiviral agent, has shown favorable outcomes in reducing papilloma. Bevacizumab, an angiogenesis inhibitor, has demonstrated improved R.R.P. However, both treatments lack FDA approval for R.R.P. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intralesional Cidofovir and Bevacizumab for R.R.P. and compare the two interventions.
METHODS
We searched five electronic databases to find relevant studies. After the screening, data were extracted from the included studies. Pooled ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for categorical outcomes, and mean difference (MD) was used for continuous outcomes. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using the chi-squared test for I statistics. The Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool was used to assess the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), while the National Institutes of Health's tool was used for observational studies. Analysis was done by Review Manager software.
RESULTS
In our comprehensive meta-analysis of 35 articles involving 836 patients, cidofovir demonstrated an overall remission ratio of (0.90 [95% CI: 0.83, 0.98], p = 0.01), while bevacizumab (0.92 [95% CI: 0.79, 1.07]), p = 0.3). The complete remission ratio for cidofovir was (0.66 [95% CI: 0.57, 0.75], p > 0.0001), while bevacizumab was (0.29 [95% CI: 0.12, 0.71], p = 0.07). In partial remission, Bevacizumab showed a higher ratio than Cidofovir 0.74 [0.55, 0.99] vs. 0.40 [0.30, 0.54]. Bevacizumab had a pooled ratio of 0.07 [95% CI: 0.02, 0.30] in terms of no remission, indicating better outcomes compared to Cidofovir with a ratio of 0.28 [95% CI: 0.16, 0.51]. Additionally, Cidofovir showed a favorable decrease in the Derkay Severity Score (DSS) with a mean difference (MD) of 1.98 [95% CI: 1.44, 2.52].
CONCLUSION
Cidofovir had a higher impact on complete remission compared to Bevacizumab. Both showed partial remission, with Bevacizumab having a higher ratio. Moreover, Cidofovir showed a significant decrease in DSS. Bevacizumab had lower rates of no remission and recurrence and fewer adverse events compared to Cidofovir. However, the difference between the two treatments was not significant, except for partial remission.
Topics: Humans; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Cidofovir; Injections, Intralesional; Papillomavirus Infections; Respiratory Tract Infections
PubMed: 37831132
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08279-0 -
Kidney International Reports Jan 2021Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used to treat cancers. Kidney immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) are now well recognized, with the incidence of...
INTRODUCTION
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used to treat cancers. Kidney immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) are now well recognized, with the incidence of IRAEs ranging from 2% to 5%. Most of the initial data related to kidney IRAEs have focused on acute interstitial nephritis (AIN). There are minimal data on the types and relative frequencies of glomerular diseases associated with ICIs, their treatment, and outcomes.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all biopsy-proven published cases/series of glomerular pathology associated with ICIs. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception to February 2020. We abstracted patient-level data, including demographics, cancer and ICI therapy details, and characteristics of kidney injury.
RESULTS
After screening, 27 articles with 45 cases of biopsy-confirmed ICI-associated glomerular disease were identified. Several lesion types were observed, with the most frequent being pauci-immune glomerulonephritis (GN) and renal vasculitis (27%), podocytopathies (24%), and complement 3 GN (C3GN; 11%). Concomitant AIN was reported in 41%. Most patients had ICIs discontinued (88%), and nearly all received corticosteroid treatment (98%). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) was required in 25%. Most patients had full (31%) or partial (42%) recovery from acute kidney injury (AKI), although 19% remained dialysis-dependent, and approximately one-third died. Complete or partial remission of proteinuria was achieved in 45% and 38%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Multiple forms of ICI-associated glomerular disease have been described. Pauci-immune GN, podocytopathies, and C3GN are the most frequently reported lesions. ICI-associated glomerular disease may be associated with poor kidney and mortality outcomes. Oncologists and nephrologists must be aware of glomerular pathologies associated with ICIs and consider obtaining a kidney biopsy specimen when features atypical for AIN are present.
PubMed: 33426386
DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.10.002 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety (infection events) between rituximab (RTX), tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclophosphamide (CYC)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety (infection events) between rituximab (RTX), tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclophosphamide (CYC) as induction therapies in lupus nephritis (LN).
METHODS
Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were searched from inception up to December 9, 2021. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine the direct and indirect evidence of different drugs for LN patients. The pooled relative effects were shown using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs).
RESULTS
Nineteen studies (1,566 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were selected in the present study. The network meta-analysis reported that no statistically significant differences were found in partial remission (PR) and infection among the four drugs. RTX showed a significantly higher complete remission (CR) than MMF (OR = 2.60, 95% CrI = 1.00-7.10) and seemed to be more effective than CYC (OR = 4.20, 95% CrI = 1.70-14.00). MMF had a better CR than CYC (OR = 1.60, 95% CrI = 1.00-3.20). TAC presented a better overall response than CYC (OR = 3.70, 95% CrI = 1.20-12.00). Regarding CR and overall response, the maximum surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were 96.94% for RTX and 80.15% for TAC. The maximum SUCRA value of infection reaction was 74.98% for RTX and the minimum value was 30.17% for TAC, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
RTX and TAC were the most effective drugs for induction remission in LN. Among the four drugs, TAC had the lowest probability of infection, and RTX showed the highest probability of experiencing an infection. This meta-analysis could not conclude about other adverse events.
Topics: Bayes Theorem; Cyclophosphamide; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lupus Nephritis; Male; Mycophenolic Acid; Network Meta-Analysis; Rituximab; Tacrolimus; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35444666
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.859380 -
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and...To conduct a systematic review of the available evidence regarding the clinical characteristics and treatment of Ernest syndrome.
AIMS
To conduct a systematic review of the available evidence regarding the clinical characteristics and treatment of Ernest syndrome.
METHODS
A systematic search was carried out in the EBSCOhost, Embase, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Trip databases. The free terms "stylomandibular ligament" and "Ernest syndrome" were used, and the Boolean operator "OR" was used for connection of the terms. The research protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018112914). The results of this study are presented according to the PRISMA statement, and risk of bias was assessed according to the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies of the Effective Public Health Practice Project.
RESULTS
A total of 57 articles were found, 5 of which met the selection criteria and were included in this review. The selected articles represent a population of 81 patients with primarily unilateral pain in the periauricular and mandibular areas. Diagnosis was established according to clinical history, recognition of pain on palpation of the mandibular angle, and remission following infiltration with local anesthesia. Concerning the treatments applied, infiltration with corticosteroids was highly successful, as was partial resection of the stylomandibular ligament and part of the styloid process. Furthermore, in refractory cases, the application of radiofrequency thermoneurolysis was described.
CONCLUSION
The analyzed studies allow a better understanding of Ernest syndrome and the proposal of a tendinosis model for this condition. However, the evidence is scarce, and it is therefore necessary to carry out additional studies with better methodologic designs.
Topics: Humans; Mandible; Syndrome
PubMed: 32255582
DOI: 10.11607/ofph.2551 -
Rheumatology (Oxford, England) Nov 2020To assess the efficacy of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) in achieving Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society partial remission (ASAS-PR) and/or Ankylosing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) in achieving Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society partial remission (ASAS-PR) and/or Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score inactive disease (ASDAS-ID), as remission-like surrogates, in axial SpA (axSpA).
METHODS
Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including long-term extensions, were included. A systematic literature review was performed using the MEDLINE database (first search May 2018, updated February 2020) and PICO criteria according to Patients-adults with radiographic or non-radiographic axSpA; Intervention-any bDMARD; Comparator-placebo and/or any different drug; Outcomes-ASAS-PR and/or ASDAS-ID as primary or secondary endpoints. Meta-analysis was performed after assessment of the homogeneity of study designs, populations and outcomes.
RESULTS
After screening 155 references, a total of 22 RCTs and 28 long-term extensions were retrieved. ASAS-PR was the dominant remission-like definition used. Concerning TNF inhibitors, 14/17 RCTs provided evidence of efficacy in reaching remission at different time points: 12, 16, 24 and 28 weeks (ASAS-PR in 16-62% of patients and ASDAS-ID in 24-40% of patients). With a limited number of studies available, IL-17A inhibitors exhibited remission rates of 15-21% for ASAS-PR and 11-16% for ASDAS-ID at week 16. A meta-analysis regarding ASAS-PR was performed considering RCTs with a similar duration (12, 16 or 24 weeks). The relative risk for achieving remission was 3.864 (95% CI 2.937, 5.085).
CONCLUSION
bDMARDs have a clear impact in axSpA remission evaluated by ASAS-PR. Nevertheless, these data show an unmet need for improved reporting of remission-like outcomes.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Spondylarthritis
PubMed: 32696064
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa268 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Dec 2021Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a rare inflammatory disease, typically characterized by spiking fever, skin rash, and arthralgia or arthritis. Its conventional... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a rare inflammatory disease, typically characterized by spiking fever, skin rash, and arthralgia or arthritis. Its conventional treatment includes NSAIDs and corticosteroids, and DMARDs as second-line therapy. Frequently, IL-1 inhibitors are also required, mainly in patients refractory to traditional therapy. Canakinumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds IL-1β with high affinity and specificity, making it appropriate for therapeutic purposes in AOSD.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this systematic review was to identify and compile the current data on the efficacy and safety of canakinumab in the treatment of AOSD.
METHODS
Following the guidelines established by the PRISMA statement, we searched Scopus, Web of Science, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library for relevant literature up to March 2021. The inclusion criteria comprised: randomized controlled trials, pooled analyses, observational studies, case series, and case reports.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies published from 2012 to 2021 were evaluated; 11 of these correspond to case series or case reports, four observational studies, one placebo-controlled phase II trial, and one analysis of pooled systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis data. In general, out of a total of 99 patients, 68.7% of these presented a complete remission of the systemic and arthritic manifestations at the end of the observation period, while 16.2% of the patients showed a partial improvement of the symptoms and the remaining (15.1%) did not show clinical improvement or were excluded. Moreover, 210 adverse events were reported in 69 patients during canakinumab treatment, of which the majority correspond to respiratory tract infections, arthralgia, disease flares, abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhea, whereas the most common severe adverse events included macrophage activation syndrome and serious infections. Also, a corticosteroid-sparing effect was observed in a large percentage of patients.
CONCLUSION
More studies with solid evidence are needed to support the efficacy of canakinumab in AOSD, although its use is encouraged by the increasing favorable results reported and the efficacy of other IL-1 inhibitors. It was also associated with an acceptable safety profile, similar to expected in IL-1 inhibitor therapy. However, future studies with well-defined endpoints are warranted to examine further the usefulness of canakinumab in AOSD.
Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Arthritis, Juvenile; Humans; Macrophage Activation Syndrome; Still's Disease, Adult-Onset
PubMed: 34493394
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.08.007