-
The Journal of Pediatrics Mar 2021To investigate technical success and safety of percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure in infants ≤1.5 kg. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To investigate technical success and safety of percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure in infants ≤1.5 kg.
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Data sources included Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PubMed from inception to April 2020. Publications were included if they had a clear definition of the intervention as percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure in infants ≤1.5 kg. Data extraction was independently performed by multiple observers. Primary outcome was technical success and secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs). Subgroup analysis was performed in infants ≤6.0 kg. Data were pooled by using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
We included 28 studies, including 373 infants ≤1.5 kg and 69 studies enrolling 1794 infants ≤6.0 kg. In patients ≤1.5 kg, technical success was 96% (95% CI, 93%-98%; P = .16; I = 23%). The overall incidence of AE was 27% (95% CI, 17%-38%; P < .001; I = 70%) and major AEs was 8% (95% CI, 5%-10%; P = .63; I = 0%). There were 5 deaths related to the procedure (2%; 95% CI, 1%-4%; P = .99; I = 0%); 4 of these deaths occurred in infants <0.8 kg. The probability of technical failure was inversely related to age at the time of the procedure (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.830-0.974; P = .009). Weight at intervention has decreased over time and procedural success has increased.
CONCLUSIONS
Percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure is feasible in infants ≤1.5 kg with few major AEs. The procedural success rate is high, despite performing the intervention in smaller patients.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION
CRD42020145230.
Topics: Cardiac Catheterization; Ductus Arteriosus, Patent; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Infant, Very Low Birth Weight; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33098843
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.10.035 -
Frontiers in Pediatrics 2020The optimal management strategy for patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants remains a topic of debate. Available evidence for a treatment strategy might be biased by...
The optimal management strategy for patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants remains a topic of debate. Available evidence for a treatment strategy might be biased by the delayed spontaneous closure of the ductus arteriosus in preterm infants, which appears to depend on patient characteristics. We performed a systematic review of all literature on PDA studies to collect patient characteristics and reported numbers of patients with a ductus arteriosus and spontaneous closure. Spontaneous closure rates showed a high variability but were lowest in studies that only included preterm infants with gestational ages below 28 weeks or birth weights below 1,000 g (34% on day 4; 41% on day 7) compared to studies that also included infants with higher gestational ages or higher birth weights (up to 55% on day 3 and 78% on day 7). The probability of spontaneous closure of the ductus arteriosus keeps increasing until at least 1 week after birth which favors delayed treatment of only those infants that do not show spontaneous closure. Better prediction of the spontaneous closure of the ductus arteriosus in the individual newborn is a key factor to find the optimal management strategy for PDA in preterm infants.
PubMed: 33014935
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.00541 -
Journal of Personalized Medicine Jul 2022A widely accepted concept in perinatal medicine is that boys are more susceptible than girls to complications of prematurity. However, whether this 'male disadvantage of... (Review)
Review
Sex Differences in Patent Ductus Arteriosus Incidence and Response to Pharmacological Treatment in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.
A widely accepted concept in perinatal medicine is that boys are more susceptible than girls to complications of prematurity. However, whether this 'male disadvantage of prematurity' also involves persistent patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) has been scarcely investigated. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on studies addressing sex differences in the risk of developing PDA among preterm infants. We also investigated whether the response to pharmacological treatment of PDA differs between boys and girls. PubMed/Medline and Embase databases were searched. The random-effects male/female risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. We included 146 studies (357,781 infants). Meta-analysis could not demonstrate sex differences in risk of developing any PDA (37 studies, RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.08), hemodynamically significant PDA (81 studies, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.02), or in the rate of response to pharmacological treatment (45 studies, RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.04). Subgroup analysis and meta-regression showed that the absence of sex differences was maintained over the years and in different geographic settings. In conclusion, both the incidence of PDA in preterm infants and the response rate to pharmacological treatment of PDA are not different between preterm boys and girls.
PubMed: 35887640
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071143 -
PeerJ 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore the potential impact of the route of administration on the efficacy of therapies and occurrence of adverse... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The impact of the route of administration on the efficacy and safety of the drug therapy for patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore the potential impact of the route of administration on the efficacy of therapies and occurrence of adverse events when administering medications to premature infants with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA).
METHOD
The protocol for this review has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42022324598). We searched relevant studies in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and the Web of Science databases from March 26, 1996, to January 31, 2022.
RESULTS
A total of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five observational studies were included for analysis, involving 630 premature neonates in total. Among these infants, 480 were in the ibuprofen group (oral intravenous routes), 78 in the paracetamol group (oral intravenous routes), and 72 in the ibuprofen group (rectal oral routes). Our meta-analysis revealed a significant difference in the rate of PDA closure between the the initial course of oral ibuprofen and intravenous ibuprofen groups (relative risk (RR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.13-1.44]; < 0.0001, = 0%). In contrast, the meta-analysis of paracetamol administration via oral versus intravenous routes showed no significant difference in PDA closure rates (RR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.38-1.91]; = 0.71, = 76%). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of adverse events or the need for surgical intervention among various drug administration methods after the complete course of drug therapy.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis evaluated the safety and effectiveness of different medication routes for treating PDA in premature infants. Our analysis results revealed that compared with intravenous administration, oral ibuprofen may offer certain advantages in closing PDA without increasing the risk of adverse events. Conversely, the use of paracetamol demonstrated no significant difference in PDA closure and the risk of adverse events between oral and intravenous administration.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Humans; Ductus Arteriosus, Patent; Ibuprofen; Indomethacin; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Acetaminophen; Infant, Premature
PubMed: 38304184
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16591 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Jul 2022Ibuprofen and indomethacin are the preferred drug treatment for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm neonates. The comparative safety and efficacy of paracetamol as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparative safety and efficacy of paracetamol versus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents in neonates with patent ductus arteriosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
AIM
Ibuprofen and indomethacin are the preferred drug treatment for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm neonates. The comparative safety and efficacy of paracetamol as an alternative has not yet been well established. The aim of our study was to define the comparative efficacy and safety of paracetamol versus ibuprofen and indomethacin for PDA.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases on randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and/or the safety of paracetamol versus ibuprofen and/or indomethacin and meta-analysed the available data.
RESULTS
There were 1718 neonates from 20 eligible studies. Paracetamol did not differ from ibuprofen or indomethacin regarding the primary (odds ratio [OR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-1.26, P-value: 0.650, when compared to ibuprofen, and OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.20-3.02, P-value: 0.716, when compared to indomethacin) and overall (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.82-1.66, P-value: 0.394, when compared to ibuprofen, and OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.58-2.15, P-value: 0.733, when compared to indomethacin) PDA closure rates. Paracetamol resulted in significantly reduced risk of oliguria and a tendency towards less gastrointestinal bleeding.
CONCLUSION
There was no significant difference between paracetamol and ibuprofen or indomethacin in the PDA closure rates. However, paracetamol caused fewer adverse effects.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Ductus Arteriosus, Patent; Humans; Ibuprofen; Indomethacin; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 35203104
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15291 -
Ibuprofen for the prevention of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm and/or low birth weight infants.The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2020Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) complicates the clinical course of preterm infants and increases the risk of adverse outcomes. Indomethacin has been the standard... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) complicates the clinical course of preterm infants and increases the risk of adverse outcomes. Indomethacin has been the standard treatment to close a PDA but is associated with renal, gastrointestinal, and cerebral side effects. Ibuprofen has less effect on blood flow velocity to important organs.
OBJECTIVES
Primary objectives To determine the effectiveness and safety of ibuprofen compared to placebo/no intervention, or other cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor drugs in the prevention of PDA in preterm infants.
SEARCH METHODS
We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 10), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to 17 October 2018), Embase (1980 to 17 October 2018), and CINAHL; 1982 to 17 October 2018). We searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing ibuprofen with placebo/no intervention or other cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor drugs to prevent PDA in preterm or low birth weight infants.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We extracted outcomes data including presence of PDA on day three or four of life (after 72 hours of treatment), need for surgical ligation or rescue treatment with cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors, mortality, cerebral, renal, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal complications. We performed meta-analyses and reported treatment estimates as typical mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD) and, if statistically significant, number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) or to harm (NNTH), along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed between-study heterogeneity by the I-squared test (I²). We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
In this updated analysis, we included nine trials (N = 1070 infants) comparing prophylactic ibuprofen (IV or oral) with placebo/no intervention or indomethacin. Ibuprofen (IV or oral) probably decreases the risk of PDA on day 3 or 4 (typical RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.48; typical RD -0.26, 95% CI -0.31 to -0.21; NNTB 4, 95% CI 3 to 5; 9 trials; N = 1029) (moderate-quality evidence). In the control group, the spontaneous closure rate was 58% by day 3 to 4 of age. In addition, ibuprofen probably decreases the need for rescue treatment with cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors (typical RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.26; typical RD -0.27, 95% CI -0.32 to -0.22; NNTB 4; 95% CI 3 to 5),and the need for surgical ductal ligation (typical RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.96; typical RD -0.03, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.00; NNTB 33, 95% CI 20 to infinity; 7 trials; N = 925) (moderate-quality evidence). There was a possible decrease in the risk of grade 3 or 4 intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) in infants receiving prophylactic ibuprofen (typical RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.00; I² = 34%; typical RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.08 to- 0.00; I² = 60%; 7 trials; N = 925) (moderate-quality evidence). High quality evidence showed increased risk for oliguria (typical RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.02; typical RD 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.11; NNTH 17, 95% CI 9 to 100; 4 trials; N = 747). Low quality results from four studies (N = 202) showed that administering oral ibuprofen may decrease the risk of PDA (typical RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74) and may increase risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (NNTH 7, 95% CI 4 to 25). No evidence of a difference was identified for mortality, any intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), or chronic lung disease.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review shows that prophylactic use of ibuprofen, compared to placebo or no intervention, probably decreases the incidence of patent ductus arteriosus, the need for rescue treatment with cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors, and for surgical ductal closure. Adverse effects associated with ibuprofen (IV or oral) included increased risks for oliguria, increase in serum creatinine levels, and increased risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage. There was a reduced risk for intraventricular haemorrhage (grade III - IV) but no evidence of a difference in mortality, chronic lung disease, necrotising enterocolitis, or time to reach full feeds. In the control group, the patent ductus arteriosus had closed spontaneously by day 3 or 4 in 58% of neonates. Prophylactic treatment exposes a large proportion of infants unnecessarily to a drug that has important side effects without conferring any important short-term benefits. Current evidence does not support the use of ibuprofen for prevention of patent ductus arteriosus. Until long-term follow-up results of the trials included in this review have been published, no further trials of prophylactic ibuprofen are recommended. A new approach to patent ductus arteriosus management is an early targeted treatment based on echocardiographic criteria within the first 72 hours of life, that have a high sensitivity for diagnosing a patent ductus arteriosus that is unlikely to close spontaneously. Such trials are currently ongoing in many parts of the world. Results of such trials will be included in updates of our "Ibuprofen for treatment of PDA" review.
Topics: Cerebral Hemorrhage; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Ductus Arteriosus, Patent; Enterocolitis, Necrotizing; Enzyme Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Ibuprofen; Indomethacin; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 31985838
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004213.pub5 -
Journal of the American Heart... Jul 2022Background In patients with ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow, initial palliation includes catheter-based patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) stent or surgical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Patent Ductus Arteriosus Stent Versus Surgical Aortopulmonary Shunt for Initial Palliation of Cyanotic Congenital Heart Disease with Ductal-Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background In patients with ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow, initial palliation includes catheter-based patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) stent or surgical aortopulmonary shunt (APS). This meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between PDA stent and APS. Methods and Results A comprehensive literature search yielded six retrospective observational studies. Pooled adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were included to control for covariates and assess time to event analysis. Of 757 patients, 243 (32.1%) underwent PDA stent and 514 (67.9%) underwent APS. Pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum and expected biventricular repair were more common with PDA stent compared with APS (39.6% versus 21.2%, <0.001 and 57.9% versus 46.6%, =0.007, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between PDA stent and APS (HR, 0.71; [95% CI, 0.26-1.93]; =0.50). PDA stent was associated with lower risk of postprocedural complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; [95% CI, 0.25-0.81]; =0.008), mechanical circulatory support (OR, 0.27; [95% CI, 0.09-0.79]; =0.02), and shorter intensive care unit length of stay (-4.03 days; [95% CI, -5.99 to -2.07]; <0.001), hospital length of stay (-5.54 days; [95% CI, -9.20 to -1.88]; =0.003), and duration of mechanical ventilation (-3.41 days; [95% CI, -5.29 to -1.52]; <0.001). There was no difference in pulmonary artery growth or hazard of unplanned reintereventions. Conclusions PDA stent has a similar hazard of mortality compared with APS. Benefits to PDA stent include shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, shorter hospital length of stay, and fewer complications. Differences in patient characteristics exist with more patients with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum and expected biventricular repair undergoing PDA stent.
Topics: Cardiac Catheterization; Cyanosis; Ductus Arteriosus, Patent; Heart Defects, Congenital; Humans; Hypoxia; Pulmonary Atresia; Pulmonary Circulation; Retrospective Studies; Stents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35766251
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024721 -
NeoReviews Jul 2020In view of the known complications of drug therapy and open surgical ligation, and the potential for prolonged patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) exposure to be harmful,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
In view of the known complications of drug therapy and open surgical ligation, and the potential for prolonged patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) exposure to be harmful, health care practitioners have sought new approaches to achieve definitive ductal closure. Interest in percutaneous (catheter-based) PDA closure has emerged within the neonatal community as a viable treatment option, because it has been fueled by recent procedural and device modifications, as well as mounting feasibility and safety data. Herein, we provide a contemporary review of percutaneous PDA closure among infants at the crux of the medical debate-very-low-weight infants (≤1,500 g), including: 1) characterization of traditional PDA treatments (drug therapy, open surgical ligation) and conservative (nonintervention) management options; 2) a general overview of the major procedural steps of percutaneous ductal closure, including efforts to reduce thrombotic complications and the emergence of a novel US Food and Drug Administration-approved device; 3) a systematic review and meta-analysis to better understand risk profiles of percutaneous PDA closure in this population; and 4) discussion of current gaps in our understanding of optimal PDA care, including the critical need for well-designed, randomized, controlled clinical trials.
Topics: Cardiac Catheterization; Ductus Arteriosus, Patent; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
PubMed: 32611564
DOI: 10.1542/neo.21-7-e469 -
Journal of Neonatal-perinatal Medicine 2022Several small randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies have compared high (15-20/7.5-10/7.5-10 mg/kg/dose) versus standard dose... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Several small randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies have compared high (15-20/7.5-10/7.5-10 mg/kg/dose) versus standard dose (10/5/5 mg/kg/dose) ibuprofen for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure, with limited evidence on efficacy and safety.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review and meta-analyze studies of high versus standard dose ibuprofen for the closure of PDA in preterm infants.
METHODS
Databases were searched for RCTs and observational studies assessing high compared to standard dose of ibuprofen for PDA closure for preterm infants until August 2021. The primary outcome was failure of PDA closure after the first course of ibuprofen. The secondary outcomes were the failure of PDA closure after a second course of ibuprofen, rates of PDA ligation, all-cause mortality prior to hospital discharge, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, bleeding disorders, oliguria, and serum creatinine after treatment.
RESULTS
There were 6 studies with 369 patients (3 RCT, N = 190; 3 observational studies, N = 179). Compared to standard dose, high dose ibuprofen did not significantly decrease the failure rate of PDA closure in preterm infants after the first course (Relative risk (RR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 -1.03, 6 studies, N = 369). High dose ibuprofen significantly decreased the rates of PDA ligation compared to standard dose (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16 -0.70, 5 studies, N = 309).
INTERPRETATION
Based on low-grade evidence, high dose ibuprofen may more effectively reduce rates of PDA ligation compared to standard dose with no increase in adverse effects, neonatal morbidities and mortality.
Topics: Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Ductus Arteriosus, Patent; Humans; Ibuprofen; Indomethacin; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature
PubMed: 35404294
DOI: 10.3233/NPM-210968 -
Neonatology 2023Because excessive physical stress is harmful, reducing pain and discomfort in premature neonates during mechanical ventilation is a major challenge for physicians. There... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Because excessive physical stress is harmful, reducing pain and discomfort in premature neonates during mechanical ventilation is a major challenge for physicians. There are no consensus and systematic review on the use of fentanyl, the most commonly used pain reliever in preterm neonates during mechanical ventilation. We aim to compare the benefits and harms of fentanyl versus placebo or no drug for preterm neonates receiving mechanical ventilation.
METHODS
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The systematic review was reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Scientific databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched. All preterm infants on mechanical ventilation and enrolled in an RCT of fentanyl versus control were included.
RESULTS
Of 256 reports initially retrieved, 4 reports met the eligibility criteria. Fentanyl was not associated with mortality risk compared to the control (risk ratio: 0.72, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.36-1.44). No increase in ventilation duration (mean difference [MD]: 0.04, 95% CIs: -0.63-0.71) and no effect on hospital stay length (MD: 4.00, 95% CIs: -7.12-15.12) were found. Fentanyl intervention does not affect any other morbidities, including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leukomalacia, patent ductus arteriosus, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), severe IVH, sepsis, and necrotizing enterocolitis.
CONCLUSION
The present systematic review and meta-analysis failed to demonstrate the benefit of administering fentanyl to preterm infants on mechanical ventilation in mortality and morbidities. Follow-up studies are required to investigate the long-term neurodevelopment of the children.
Topics: Infant; Child; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Respiration, Artificial; Fentanyl; Infant, Premature; Ductus Arteriosus, Patent; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Pain
PubMed: 36990067
DOI: 10.1159/000529440