-
International Journal of Molecular... Nov 2022Spinal stenosis (SS) is a multifactorial polyetiological condition characterized by the narrowing of the spinal canal. This condition is a common source of pain among... (Review)
Review
Spinal stenosis (SS) is a multifactorial polyetiological condition characterized by the narrowing of the spinal canal. This condition is a common source of pain among people over 50 years old. We perform a systematic review of molecular and genetic mechanisms that cause SS. The five main mechanisms of SS were found to be ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), hypertrophy and ossification of the ligamentum flavum (HLF/OLF), facet joint (FJ) osteoarthritis, herniation of the intervertebral disc (IVD), and achondroplasia. FJ osteoarthritis, OPLL, and HLF/OLFLF/OLF have all been associated with an over-abundance of transforming growth factor beta and genes related to this phenomenon. OPLL has also been associated with increased bone morphogenetic protein 2. FJ osteoarthritis is additionally associated with Wnt/β-catenin signaling and genes. IVD herniation is associated with collagen type I alpha 1 and 2 gene mutations and subsequent protein dysregulation. Finally, achondroplasia is associated with fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene mutations and fibroblast growth factor signaling. Although most publications lack data on a direct relationship between the mutation and SS formation, it is clear that genetics has a direct impact on the formation of any pathology, including SS. Further studies are necessary to understand the genetic and molecular changes associated with SS.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Spinal Stenosis; Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament; Ligamentum Flavum; Achondroplasia; Osteoarthritis
PubMed: 36362274
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232113479 -
The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery :... 2020Heterotopic ossification after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a known sequela and has been reported to contribute to reduced range of motion and poor functional... (Review)
Review
Heterotopic ossification after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a known sequela and has been reported to contribute to reduced range of motion and poor functional outcomes. However, conflicting results have been reported in the literature. The present study documents the incidence of heterotopic ossification for a novel fourth-generation fixed-bearing 2-component prosthesis and reports a systematic review of the literature. We reviewed the incidence and functional outcome of consecutively enrolled patients who underwent primary Infinity TAA between 2013 and 2015 in a prospective observational study. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic and functional outcome data were collected. A systematic review was also conducted investigating all published studies between 1998 and 2018 reporting the incidence of heterotopic ossification after TAA. The incidence of heterotopic ossification was 70.5% in the 61 patients who underwent primary TAA in the case series. There was no association between heterotopic ossification and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, foot function index (FFI), visual analogue scale (VAS), and ankle osteoarthritis scale (AOS). Sixteen studies on 1339 TAA implants were included. The overall incidence of heterotopic ossification after TAA was 66.0% at average 3.6 years (range 22.2% to 100%). Four studies (299 ankles) did not address functional outcomes. Eleven studies (960 ankles) reported no association between heterotopic ossification and functional outcomes. One study (80 ankles) reported a statistically significant difference in range of motion (7°) and AOFAS score (7 points). In conclusion, although the incidence of heterotopic ossification after TAA is considerable, there is insufficient literature to suggest that heterotopic ossification after TAA impacts range of motion or functional outcome.
Topics: Ankle; Ankle Joint; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Ossification, Heterotopic; Range of Motion, Articular; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31954598
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.12.003 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Sep 2021The purpose of this study was to systematically review case reports and case series about meniscal ossicle, to summarize existing evidence. Specifically, to identify the... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to systematically review case reports and case series about meniscal ossicle, to summarize existing evidence. Specifically, to identify the etiology, demographic characteristics, localization, clinical features, diagnostic procedures and treatment options of this rare entity. Although, case reports/ series are of low level of evidence, a systematic review of such studies can provide and help us to gain a better understanding and awareness of meniscal ossicle.
METHODS
Two authors searched three online databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS and GOOGLE SCHOLAR) from inception until March 2020 for the literature on meniscal ossicle. Inclusion criteria included case series, case reports and case-based reviews, available in full-text version, in English and that concern humans. Reports published in languages other than English were excluded, as well as articles with no electronic full text availability. Case reports using the term "meniscal ossicle" to describe an acute avulsion fracture of the tibial root of the meniscus, were also excluded.
RESULTS
Of 453 initial studies, 38 studies satisfied inclusion criteria. In total 169 patients were included of whom 107 (63%) were males and 62 (37%) were females. Mean age was 44 years (range 12-87). According to Magnetic resonance imaging findings, in 144 knees (86%) the ossicle was localized at the posterior root or horn of the medial meniscus. 60% of the patients had a history of trauma. The predominant symptom in 87% of patients was knee pain. In all patients was detected an intra-articular density structure in computed radiography. 76% had associated meniscal tear, 61% had intraarticular cartilage loss, 34% meniscal extrusion and 28% anterior cruciate ligament injury. Treatment modalities included conservative regimen in 40 patients, while 59 patients underwent surgical excision.
CONCLUSION
The most possible etiology of meniscal ossicle is posttraumatic heterotopic ossification and small occult bony avulsion fracture. It is commonly observed in individuals complaining about knee pain with history of antecedent trauma. The presence of a meniscal ossicle should alert the physician to the high likelihood of the patient having an associated meniscal tear, articular cartilage loss, ACL injury or meniscal extrusion. Along with the meniscal ossicle, the associated meniscal tear should be treated as well.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Child; Female; Humans; Knee Injuries; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Menisci, Tibial; Middle Aged; Osteogenesis; Retrospective Studies; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Young Adult
PubMed: 33128588
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06338-1 -
Journal of ISAKOS : Joint Disorders &... Dec 2023Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a known complication diagnosed following hip arthroscopy. (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a known complication diagnosed following hip arthroscopy.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS
This study sought to review the current literature on chemoprophylaxis for HO following hip arthroscopy and to describe what agents and doses are being utilized.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic Review.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines on the use of chemoprophylactic medications for HO prevention following hip arthroscopy. Mechanical and radiation prophylaxis were not included in the current analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 203 studies were identified, of which 15 were included with 6463 patients. There was one randomized control trial (RCT) and 4 additional comparative studies. The most commonly utilized chemoprophylactic agents were the following: naproxen (n = 8), celecoxib (n = 3), indomethacin (n = 3), aspirin (n = 1), etoricoxib (n = 1), and etodolac (n = 1), and non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (n = 1). Naproxen was either given at a dose of 500 mg once or twice daily for 2-4 weeks. RCTs and additional comparative studies showed significant HO prevention using chemoprophylactic agents following hip arthroscopy.
CONCLUSIONS
HO is a known and common complication following hip arthroscopy. The current systematic review found significant heterogeneity across the literature with respect to specific chemoprophylactic agents and their dosing regimens aimed to reduce the incidence and severity of HO following hip arthroscopy. Additionally, this review demonstrates that most studies that utilize chemoprophylaxis use NSAIDs with successful reduction in the incidence of HO.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV Evidence.
Topics: Humans; Naproxen; Arthroscopy; Postoperative Complications; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Ossification, Heterotopic; Chemoprevention
PubMed: 37619960
DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.08.005 -
Acta Ortopedica Brasileira 2021Heterotopic ossification is defined as the formation of trabecular bone in soft tissues. It is a common complication after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures.... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Heterotopic ossification is defined as the formation of trabecular bone in soft tissues. It is a common complication after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures. However, its prophylaxis and treatment are still controversial. The objective of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of actions to prevent the development of heterotopic ossification after surgical correction of acetabular fractures.
METHODS
A systematic review was carried out with research in the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and Cochrane until August 4, 2020, without restrictions on language and year of publication. Only randomized clinical studies carried out in humans without restrictions based on the dosage of treatments, use and duration of prophylaxis were included in this review.
RESULTS
Two studies compared the use of radiotherapy and indomethacin and three compared the use of indomethacin with a placebo or non-indomethacin group. The meta-analysis calculations did not indicate statistical differences between radiotherapy versus indomethacin (RR 1.45, IC 95% 0.97 to 2.17, p = 0,55) and indomethacin versus placebo or not indomethacin (RR 0.85, IC 95% 0.68 to 1.06, p = 0,59). There is insufficient evidence to affirm that the use of radiotherapy or indomethacin are effective to prevent the formation of heterotopic ossification after surgery for fractures of the acetabulum. In addition, the number of complications was higher in the indomethacin group when compared to placebo or no intervention.
PubMed: 34849100
DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220212906244689 -
European Spine Journal : Official... Apr 2023Systematic review. (Review)
Review
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
Thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (TOLF) has become the principal cause of thoracic spinal stenosis. Dural ossification (DO) was a common clinical feature accompanying with TOLF. However, on account of the rarity, we know little about the DO in TOLF so far.
PURPOSE
This study was conducted to elucidate the prevalence, diagnostic measures, and impact on the clinical outcomes of DO in TOLF by integrating the existing evidence.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database were comprehensively searched for studies relevant to the prevalence, diagnostic measures, or impact on the clinical outcomes of DO in TOLF. All retrieved studies meeting the inclusion and criterion were included into this systematic review.
RESULTS
The prevalence of DO in TOLF treated surgically was 27% (281/1046), ranging from 11 to 67%. Eight diagnostic measures have been put forward to predict the DO in TOLF using the CT or MRI modalities, including "tram track sign", "comma sign", "bridge sign", "banner cloud sign", "T2 ring sign", TOLF-DO grading system, CSAOR grading system, and CCAR grading system. DO did not affect the neurological recovery of TOLF patients treated with the laminectomy. The rate of dural tear or CSF leakage in TOLF patients with DO was approximately 83% (149/180).
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of DO in TOLF treated surgically was 27%. Eight diagnostic measures have been put forward to predict the DO in TOLF. DO did not affect the neurological recovery of TOLF treated with laminectomy but was associated with high risk of complications.
Topics: Humans; Osteogenesis; Ossification, Heterotopic; Ligamentum Flavum; Prevalence; Thoracic Vertebrae; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36877368
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07625-4 -
Cureus Oct 2023This systematic review aims to assess the contemporary literature on the incidence rate, functional scores, and clinical outcomes of heterotopic ossification (HO)... (Review)
Review
This systematic review aims to assess the contemporary literature on the incidence rate, functional scores, and clinical outcomes of heterotopic ossification (HO) following shoulder arthroplasty. We conducted a thorough literature search on EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Ortho Search to identify studies that directly compared patients with and without HO following hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). We included studies with a minimum follow-up period of one year published from January 2000 to March 2023. We excluded case reports, editorials, and reviews. We performed the systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Of the 297 studies initially identified, seven met our inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated a total of 1,134 arthroplasties (212 hemiarthroplasties, 376 aTSAs, and 546 rTSAs). The mean follow-up period was 30.52 (12-120) months and the mean age was 68.69 (20-92). The overall incidence rate of HO was 26.8% (304/1,134). Male gender was associated with a higher incidence rate of HO in three studies. No statistically significant difference was noted in symptoms at follow-up or in Constant-Murley score at two years of follow-up (HO vs. non-HO: 70 vs. 75, p = 0.081). Only one study reported a significant difference in the post-arthroplasty range of motion, specifically in forward elevation (121° vs. 133°, p = 0.0087) and external rotation (19° vs. 25°, p-value = 0.0266). We conclude that HO after shoulder arthroplasty does not display a significant impact on postoperative symptoms or functional outcomes in the majority of patients. To fully comprehend its effect, further research and consensus among experts is necessary.
PubMed: 38021631
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47374 -
Minerva Dental and Oral Science Apr 2024Ossification disorders can affect the stylohyoid ligament as well the stylomandibular ligament. The symptomathology between those syndromes and other pathologies it has... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Ossification disorders can affect the stylohyoid ligament as well the stylomandibular ligament. The symptomathology between those syndromes and other pathologies it has been a problem because there is not a guideline.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
With the aim to establish prevalence, diagnosis and etiopathogenesis of Eagle and Ernest syndromes, a scoping review was performed base on PRISMA criteria.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
To review stylohyoid ligament and Eagle Syndrome 93 articles were selected. Three articles regarding the stylomandibular ligament and Ernest Syndrome were founded and selected.
CONCLUSIONS
Both syndromes should be clinically diagnosed and corroborate with imaging (2D or 3D), although imaging in Ernest Syndrome is not clear as well in Eagle Syndrome. A decisional algorithm for diagnosis of Eagle Syndrome and Ernest Syndrome is presented.
Topics: Humans; Ossification, Heterotopic; Ligaments, Articular; Neck; Temporal Bone; Syndrome
PubMed: 36197280
DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6329.22.04724-6 -
EFORT Open Reviews Jul 2023Comminuted fractures with poor bone quality in the elderly are associated with poor outcomes. An alternative to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone,...
Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasty with limited open reduction and internal fixation vs open reduction and internal fixation for geriatric acetabular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
Comminuted fractures with poor bone quality in the elderly are associated with poor outcomes. An alternative to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone, primary or acute total hip arthroplasty (aTHA), allows early mobilization with full weight bearing. In this study, we aim to analyze whether treatment of aTHA with/withtout ORIF (limited ORIF) vs ORIF alone yields better intra-operative results, functional outcomes, and less complications.
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Random-effects model and 95% confidence intervals were used. The outcomes of interest were surgery time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, Harris hip score (HHS), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), complication rate, surgical site infection rate, heterotopic ossification rate, reoperation rate, and mortality rate.
RESULTS
Ten observational studies with a total of 642 patients (415 ORIF alone and 227 aTHA with/without ORIF) were included in the systematic review. Compared to ORIF alone, aTHA with limited ORIF provided higher HHS (P = 0.029), better physical function (P = 0.008), better physical component summary (P = 0.001), better mental component summary (P = 0.043) in postoperative 1-year SF-36, lesser complication rate (P = 0.001), and lesser reoperation rate (P = 0.000), but however greater bodily pain (P = 0.001) in acetabular fractured elderlies.
CONCLUSIONS
Acute THA with limited ORIF is favorable alternative to ORIF technique alone. It provided better HHS, physical, and mental component summary in SF-36 and yielded lower complication and reoperation rate compare to ORIF alone.
PubMed: 37395715
DOI: 10.1530/EOR-21-0099 -
Orthopedics Jan 2021Heterotopic ossification (HO), a complication after surgical repair of elbow fractures, can result in pain, decreased range of motion, or complete ankylosis of the...
Heterotopic ossification (HO), a complication after surgical repair of elbow fractures, can result in pain, decreased range of motion, or complete ankylosis of the joint. This updated systematic review focused on compiling incidence and prevalence rates of HO after surgical repair of various types of elbow fractures. The overall incidence of HO after surgical repair was calculated to be 28.7%, a result comparable with rates in the literature. Further analysis suggested that the odds of having HO may be less after distal humerus fractures than after proximal radius fractures, terrible triad injuries, and elbow fractures/dislocations. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(1):10-16.].
Topics: Elbow Joint; Fracture Dislocation; Humans; Humeral Fractures; Incidence; Ossification, Heterotopic; Prevalence; Radius Fractures; Range of Motion, Articular; Elbow Injuries
PubMed: 33238018
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20201119-03